Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert M. Berman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert M. Berman.


Biological Psychiatry | 2000

Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients

Robert M. Berman; Angela Cappiello; Amit Anand; Dan A. Oren; George R. Heninger; Dennis S. Charney; John H. Krystal

BACKGROUND A growing body of preclinical research suggests that brain glutamate systems may be involved in the pathophysiology of major depression and the mechanism of action of antidepressants. This is the first placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial to assess the treatment effects of a single dose of an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist in patients with depression. METHODS Seven subjects with major depression completed 2 test days that involved intravenous treatment with ketamine hydrochloride (.5 mg/kg) or saline solutions under randomized, double-blind conditions. RESULTS Subjects with depression evidenced significant improvement in depressive symptoms within 72 hours after ketamine but not placebo infusion (i.e., mean 25-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores decreased by 14 +/- SD 10 points vs. 0 +/- 12 points, respectively during active and sham treatment). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest a potential role for NMDA receptor-modulating drugs in the treatment of depression.


The Lancet | 2000

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia

Ralph E. Hoffman; Nashaat N. Boutros; Sylvia Hu; Robert M. Berman; John H. Krystal; Dennis S. Charney

12 patients with schizophrenia and auditory hallucinations received 1 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation of left temporoparietial cortex. In a double-blind crossover trial, active stimulation significantly reduced hallucinations relative to sham stimulation.


Brain Stimulation | 2008

Effects of Pulse Width and Electrode Placement on the Efficacy and Cognitive Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy

Harold A. Sackeim; Joan Prudic; Mitchell S. Nobler; Linda Fitzsimons; Sarah H. Lisanby; Nancy Payne; Robert M. Berman; Eva-Lotta Brakemeier; Tarique D. Perera; D.P. Devanand

BACKGROUND While electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in major depression is effective, cognitive effects limit its use. Reducing the width of the electrical pulse and using the right unilateral electrode placement may decrease adverse cognitive effects, while preserving efficacy. METHODS In a double-masked study, we randomly assigned 90 depressed patients to right unilateral ECT at 6 times seizure threshold or bilateral ECT at 2.5 times seizure threshold, using either a traditional brief pulse (1.5 ms) or an ultrabrief pulse (0.3 ms). Depressive symptoms and cognition were assessed before, during, and immediately, two, and six months after therapy. Patients who responded were followed for a one-year period. RESULTS The final remission rate for ultrabrief bilateral ECT was 35 percent, compared with 73 percent for ultrabrief unilateral ECT, 65 percent for standard pulse width bilateral ECT, and 59 percent for standard pulse width unilateral ECT (all Ps<0.05 after covariate adjustment). The ultrabrief right unilateral group had less severe cognitive side effects than the other 3 groups in virtually all primary outcome measures assessed in the acute postictal period, and during and immediately following therapy. Both the ultrabrief stimulus and right unilateral electrode placement produced less short- and long-term retrograde amnesia. Patients rated their memory deficits as less severe following ultrabrief right unilateral ECT compared to each of the other three conditions (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The use of an ultrabrief stimulus markedly reduces adverse cognitive effects, and when coupled with markedly suprathreshold right unilateral ECT, also preserves efficacy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00487500.).


Biological Psychiatry | 2000

A randomized clinical trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depression

Robert M. Berman; Meera Narasimhan; Gerard Sanacora; Alexander P. Miano; Ralph E. Hoffman; X.Sylvia Hu; Dennis S. Charney; Nashaat N. Boutros

BACKGROUND Multiple groups have reported on the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treatment-resistant major depression. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of rTMS in unmedicated, treatment-resistant patients who meet criteria for major depression. METHODS Depressed subjects, who had failed to respond to a median of four treatment trials, were assigned in a randomized double-blind manner to receive either active (n = 10; 20 2-sec trains of 20 Hz stimulation with 58-sec intervals; delivered at 80% motor threshold with the figure-of-eight coil positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) or sham (n = 10; similar conditions with the coil elevated and angled 45 degrees tangentially to the scalp) rTMS. These sequences were applied during 10 consecutive weekdays. Continuous electroencephalogram sampling and daily motor threshold determinations were also obtained. RESULTS The group mean 25-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score was 37.2 (+/- 2.0 SEM) points. Adjusted mean decreases in HDRS scores were 14.0 (+/- 3.7) and 0.2 (+/- 4.1) points for the active and control groups, respectively (p <.05). One of 10 subjects receiving active treatment demonstrated a robust response (i.e., HDRS decreased from 47 to 7 points); three other patients demonstrated 40-45% decreases in HDRS scores. No patients receiving sham treatment demonstrated partial or full responses. CONCLUSIONS A 2-week course of active rTMS resulted in statistically significant but clinically modest reductions of depressive symptoms, as compared to sham rTMS in a population characterized by treatment resistance.


Cns Spectrums | 2009

Aripiprazole Augmentation in Major Depressive Disorder: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Patients with Inadequate Response to Antidepressants

Robert M. Berman; Maurizio Fava; Michael E. Thase; Madhukar H. Trivedi; Rene Swanink; Robert D. McQuade; William H. Carson; David E. Adson; Leslie V. Taylor; James Hazel; Ronald N. Marcus

INTRODUCTION Effective management of major depressive disorder (MDD) continues to be a challenging task for psychiatrists and primary care physicians. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive aripiprazole versus antidepressant monotherapy in patients with MDD and independently replicated the positive findings of two similar trials. METHODS Patients (N=1,147) with MDD experiencing a major depressive episode and a history of inadequate response to antidepressant monotherapy were enrolled (week 0); 827 received single-blind adjunctive placebo plus open-label antidepressant (escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine controlled release, sertraline, or venlafaxine extended release) for 8 weeks to confirm inadequate response to antidepressants; 349 patients with inadequate response were randomized (1:1) to double-blind, adjunctive placebo (n=172) or adjunctive aripiprazole (n=177; 2-20 mg/day). Primary outcome was the mean change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total score from baseline (week 8) to endpoint (week 14). RESULTS Clinically significant improvements in depressive symptoms as assessed by decreases in the MADRS Total score were greater with adjunctive aripiprazole (-10.1) than placebo (-6.4; P<.001). Remission rates were greater for adjunctive aripiprazole than for adjunctive placebo (week 14, 36.8% vs 18.9%; P<.001). Completion rates with adjunctive aripiprazole and placebo were high (83% vs. 87%) and discontinuations due to adverse events were low (6.2% vs 1.7%). CONCLUSION For some patients with MDD who do not obtain adequate symptom relief with antidepressant monotherapy, adjunctive therapies can significantly improve depressive symptoms. As reported, adjunctive aripiprazole was associated with a two-fold higher remission rate than adjunctive placebo. This, and previous studies, have shown that discontinuations due to adverse events were low and completion rates were high, and has indicated that both antidepressant and aripiprazole in combination were relatively well-tolerated and safe. This is the third consecutive clinical trial, in the absence of a failed trial, to demonstrate that aripiprazole augmentation to antidepressants is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for patients with MDD who do not respond adequately to standard antidepressant monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00105196).


Movement Disorders | 2006

Open-label flexible-dose pilot study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of aripiprazole in patients with psychosis associated with Parkinson's disease

Joseph H. Friedman; Robert M. Berman; Christopher G. Goetz; Stewart A. Factor; William G. Ondo; Joanne Wojcieszek; William H. Carson; Ronald N. Marcus

Psychosis affects at least 5% to 8% of medication‐treated patients with idiopathic Parkinsons disease (PD). Treatment options include reducing medications used for the treatment of PD‐related motor symptoms or introducing an atypical antipsychotic drug. Only clozapine has been demonstrated to be efficacious and tolerated in double‐blind controlled trials. This study evaluated the effect of aripiprazole, an atypical antipsychotic, on psychosis in PD in an open‐label pilot study. Fourteen patients meeting entry criteria were started on aripiprazole 1 mg/day and titrated up to a maximum dose of 5 mg as needed. Subjects were evaluated on the Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III for motor function, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) for psychiatric response. Statistically significant improvement in mean BPRS and positive BPRS subscales occurred with open‐label aripiprazole, but eight subjects discontinued the study due to worsened Parkinsonism (three), worsened psychosis (two), worsening of both (two), and lack of efficacy (one). While some patients had a favorable response, aripiprazole was associated with an exacerbation of motor symptoms. In this small study on psychosis in PD, aripiprazole did not appear promising.


Biological Psychiatry | 2006

Sex Differences in Diencephalon Serotonin Transporter Availability in Major Depression

Julie K. Staley; Gerard Sanacora; Gilles Tamagnan; Paul K. Maciejewski; Robert T. Malison; Robert M. Berman; Meena Vythilingam; Akira Kugaya; Ronald M. Baldwin; John Seibyl; Dennis S. Charney; Robert B. Innis

BACKGROUND Major depression is more prevalent in women than men. The present study evaluated if previous findings that demonstrated decreased 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) transporter availability in depressed patients would be confirmed in a larger sample and also evaluated sex differences. METHODS Depressed (n = 32) and healthy subjects (n = 32), including 16 pairs of women and men, participated in an iodine-123-2 beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-(4-iodophenyltropane) ([(123)I]beta-CIT) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Participants were administered [(123)I]beta-CIT (225.7 +/- 3.7 MBq) and imaged 23.0 +/- 1.6 hours later. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance and a regression analysis of the main and interactive effects of age, sex, and depression. RESULTS Overall, depressed patients demonstrated 12% lower diencephalon and no change in striatal or brainstem [(123)I]beta-CIT uptake. Significant age by sex, sex by depression, and age by sex by depression interactions were noted due to 22% lower diencephalon [(123)I]beta-CIT uptake in depressed women compared with less than a 1% decrease in depressed men. CONCLUSIONS As observed previously, diencephalon 5-HT transporter availability is decreased in depressed patients. However, the decrease appears to be sex-specific and age-dependent. These findings suggest that serotonergic mechanisms mediating depressed mood differ between men and women in an age-dependent manner and may explain why young women respond better to treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants.


Biological Psychiatry | 1999

The use of pindolol with fluoxetine in the treatment of major depression: final results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Robert M. Berman; Amit Anand; Angela Cappiello; Helen L. Miller; X.Sylvia Hu; Dan A. Oren; Dennis S. Charney

BACKGROUND Preliminary reports have suggested that concomitant institution of pindolol and serotonin reuptake inhibitors robustly hastens clinical response; however, contradictory evidence from a randomized double-blind, controlled trial was recently reported by this group in a population of depressed patients who were prescribed fluoxetine and pindolol. Herein, we report final results from an extended sample size. METHODS Drug-free outpatients with a major depressive episode were randomized in a double-blind manner to one of two treatment conditions: fluoxetine (20 mg daily) with pindolol (7.5 to 10 mg daily) or fluoxetine (20 mg daily) with placebo. After 6 weeks, patients were followed for 3 more weeks in a single-blind manner, on fluoxetine and placebo pindolol. RESULTS Eighty-six patients completed at least 1 or more weeks on protocol, with 45 and 41 patients randomized to the pindolol and placebo groups respectively. After 2 weeks on protocol, partial remission (i.e., at least 50% decrease in depression rating scores from baseline) rates for pindolol (16%) and placebo (19%) groups were comparable. By the studys end, a partial remission was achieved, at least transiently, for 67% of the pindolol group and 80% of the placebo group. Pindolol treatment was associated with statistically significant reduction in blood pressure and pulse as compared to the control group. The two groups did not have overall differences in rates of attrition, time to response, and side effects. CONCLUSIONS In accord with our previously published findings, these extended results do not support the efficacy of pindolol in hastening clinical response to fluoxetine in a patient population with predominantly chronic and recurrent depression.


Neuropsychopharmacology | 2004

Addition of the α2-Antagonist Yohimbine to Fluoxetine: Effects on Rate of Antidepressant Response

Gerard Sanacora; Robert M. Berman; Angela Cappiello; Dan A. Oren; Akira Kugaya; Nianjun Liu; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Donna Fasula; Dennis S. Charney

Electrophysiological studies suggest that α2-adrenoceptors profoundly affect monoaminergic neurotransmission by enhancing noradrenergic tone and serotonergic firing rates. Recent reports suggest that α2-antagonism may hasten and improve the response to antidepressant medications. To test this hypothesis, a randomized double-blind controlled trial was undertaken to determine if the combination of an α2-antagonist (yohimbine) with a selective serotonin reuptake agent (SSRI) (fluoxetine) results in more rapid onset of antidepressant action than an SSRI agent alone. In all, 50 subjects with a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder confirmed by SCID interview were randomly assigned to receive either fluoxetine 20 mg plus placebo (F/P) or fluxetine 20 mg plus a titrated dose of yohimbine (F/Y). The yohimbine dose was titrated based on blood pressure changes over the treatment period, in a blind-preserving manner. Hamilton depression scale ratings (HDRS) and clinical global impression (CGI) ratings were obtained weekly over a period of 6 weeks. The rate of achieving categorical positive responses was significantly more rapid in the F/Y group compared to the F/P group using both the HDRS and the CGI scales as outcome measures in a survival analysis using a log-rank test (χ2(1)=5.86, p=0.016 and χ2(1)=5.29, p=0.021, respectively). At the last observed visit, 18 (69%) of the 26 F/Y subjects met the response criteria for CGI compared to 10 (42%) of 24 F/P subjects. Using the HDRS criteria, 17 (65%) of 26 F/Y subject vs 10 (42%) of 24 F/P subjects were responders. The addition of the α2-antagonist yohimbine to fluoxetine appears to hasten the antidepressant response. There is also a trend suggesting an increased percentage of responders to the combined treatment at the end of the 6-week trial.


Neurology | 2013

Screening for predementia AD: Time-dependent operating characteristics of episodic memory tests

Carol A. Derby; Leah Burns; Cuiling Wang; Mindy J. Katz; Molly E. Zimmerman; Gilbert J. L'Italien; Zhenchao Guo; Robert M. Berman; Richard B. Lipton

Objective: Data from the Einstein Aging Study (EAS) were used to prospectively evaluate the free recall score from the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT-FR) and Logical Memory I immediate recall (LM-IR) subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised for prediction of incident Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia among individuals from a community-based cohort with memory complaints. Methods: Analyses included 854 participants, age ≥70 years, who initially had no dementia, and had memory complaints. Clinic evaluations were completed annually and AD dementia was diagnosed using standard criteria (n = 86 cases; average follow-up 4.1 years). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic ability of FCSRT-FR and LM-IR for incident AD over various durations of follow-up. Results: For identifying those with memory complaints who will develop incident AD dementia over 2–4 years, the FCSRT-FR had better operating characteristics than LM-IR. APOE ε4 status, age, and education did not affect cut points; however, positive predictive values were higher among APOE ε4-positive individuals. Conclusions: For follow-up intervals of 2–4 years, the FCSRT-FR is more predictive than the LM-IR for identifying individuals with memory complaints who will develop incident AD. APOE ε4 status improves positive predictive value, but does not affect the choice of optimal cuts.

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert M. Berman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dennis S. Charney

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Howard Feldman

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge