Robert M. Bersin
Carolinas Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robert M. Bersin.
Circulation | 2010
Loren F. Hiratzka; George L. Bakris; Joshua A. Beckman; Robert M. Bersin; Vincent F. Carr; Donald E. Casey; Kim A. Eagle; Luke K. Hermann; Eric M. Isselbacher; Ella A. Kazerooni; Nicholas T. Kouchoukos; Bruce W. Lytle; Dianna M. Milewicz; David L. Reich; Souvik Sen; Julie A. Shinn; Lars G. Svensson; David M. Williams; Alice K. Jacobs; Sidney C. Smith; Jeffery L. Anderson; Cynthia D. Adams; Christopher E. Buller; Mark A. Creager; Steven M. Ettinger; Robert A. Guyton; Jonathan L. Halperin; Sharon A. Hunt; Harlan M. Krumholz; Frederick G. Kushner
2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2010
Loren F. Hiratzka; George L. Bakris; Joshua A. Beckman; Robert M. Bersin; Vincent F. Carr; Donald E. Casey; Kim A. Eagle; Luke K. Hermann; Eric M. Isselbacher; Ella A. Kazerooni; Nicholas T. Kouchoukos; Bruce W. Lytle; Dianna M. Milewicz; David L. Reich; Souvik Sen; Julie A. Shinn; Lars G. Svensson; David M. Williams
It is essential that the medical profession play a central role in critically evaluating the evidence related to drugs, devices, and procedures for the detection, management, or prevention of disease. Properly applied, rigorous, expert analysis of the available data documenting absolute and relative
The New England Journal of Medicine | 1992
Peter W. Stacpoole; Elizabeth C. Wright; Thomas G. Baumgartner; Robert M. Bersin; Scott E. Buchalter; Stephen H. Curry; Charles A. Duncan; Eloise Harman; George N. Henderson; Steven Jenkinson; John M. Lachin; Anthea Lorenz; Stephen H. Schneider; John H. Siegel; Warren R. Summer; Douglas Thompson; Christopher L. Wolfe; Barbara Zorovich
Abstract Background. Mortality is very high in lactic acidosis, and there is no satisfactory treatment other than treatment of the underlying cause. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that dichloroacetate, which stimulates the oxidation of lactate to acetyl-coenzyme A and carbon dioxide, might reduce morbidity and improve survival among patients with this condition. Methods. We conducted a placebo-controlled, randomized trial of intravenous sodium dichloroacetate therapy in 252 patients with lactic acidosis; 126 were assigned to receive dichloroacetate and 126 to receive placebo. The entry criteria included an arterial-blood lactate concentration of ≥5.0 mmol per liter and either an arterial-blood pH of ≤7.35 or a base deficit of ≥6 mmol per liter. The mean (±SD) arterial-blood lactate concentrations before treatment were 11.6±7.0 mmol per liter in the dichloroacetate-treated patients and 10.4±5.5 mmol per liter in the placebo group, and the mean initial arterial-blood pH values were 7.24±0.12 and 7.24±0...
American Heart Journal | 1997
Robert M. Bersin; Peter W. Stacpoole
This article critically reviews the pharmacologic effects of the investigational drug dichloroacetate (DCA), which activates the mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase enzyme complex in cardiac tissue and thus preferentially facilitates aerobic oxidation of carbohydrate over fatty acids. The pharmacologic effects of DCA are compared with other interventions, such as glucose plus insulin, inhibitors of long chain fatty acid oxidation and adenosine, that are also thought to exert their therapeutic effects by altering myocardial energy metabolism. Short-term clinical and laboratory experiments demonstrate that intravenous DCA rapidly stimulates pyruvate dehydrogenase enzyme complex activity and, therefore, aerobic glucose oxidation in myocardial cells. Typically these effects are associated with suppression of myocardial long chain fatty acid metabolism and increased left ventricular stroke work and cardiac output without changes in coronary blood flow or myocardial oxygen consumption. Although long-term studies are lacking, short-term parenteral administration of DCA appears to be safe and capable of significantly improving myocardial function in conditions of limited oxygen availability by increasing the efficient conversion of myocardial substrate fuels into energy.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2008
L. Nelson Hopkins; Subbarao Myla; Eberhard Grube; J. Christopher Wehman; Elad I. Levy; Robert M. Bersin; James Joye; Dominic J. Allocco; Lynne Kelley; Donald S. Baim
The multicenter, single‐arm CABERNET trial evaluated outcomes in high‐surgical‐risk patients with carotid artery stenosis treated with the NexStent® plus FilterWire EX®/EZ™ Emboli Protection System.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2012
Robert M. Bersin; Eugenio Stabile; Gary M. Ansel; Daniel G. Clair; Alberto Cremonesi; L. Nelson Hopkins; Dimitrios Nikas; Bernhard Reimers; Horst Sievert; Paolo Rubino
The clinical risk predictors for adverse events in carotid stenting using distal embolic protection devices are well established and include patient age and symptomatic status. The risk predictors for adverse events with proximal occlusion devices are not as well established. This study is a meta‐analysis of available data on proximal occlusion devices to determine the risk predictors of adverse events in carotid stenting.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 1998
Alexandra J. Lansky; Gary S. Mintz; Jeffrey J. Popma; Augusto D. Pichard; Kenneth M. Kent; Lowell F. Satler; Donald S. Baim; Kuntz Re; Charles A. Simonton; Robert M. Bersin; Tomaki Hinohara; Peter J. Fitzgerald; Martin B. Leon
OBJECTIVES The intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy of OARS (Optimal Atherectomy Restenosis Study) was designed to assess the mechanisms of restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA). BACKGROUND Recent serial IVUS studies have indicated that late lumen loss after interventional procedures was determined primarily by the direction and magnitude of arterial remodeling, not by cellular proliferation. METHODS Complete quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS were obtained in 104 patients before and after intervention and during follow-up. All studies were performed after administration of 200 microg of intracoronary nitroglycerin. Angiographic measurements included minimum lumen diameter (MLD), interpolated reference diameter and diameter stenosis (DS). Intravascular ultrasound measurements included lesion and reference external elastic membrane (EEM), lumen and plaque+media cross-sectional area (CSA). The axial location of the lesion site was at the smallest follow-up lumen CSA; the reference segment was the most normal-looking cross section within 10 mm proximal to the lesion but distal to any major side branch. Results are reported as mean +/- one standard deviation. RESULTS The QCA reference decreased from 3.51 +/- 0.46 mm to 3.22 +/- 0.44 mm; the MLD decreased from 3.22 +/- 0.47 mm to 2.03 +/- 0.72 mm; and the DS increased from 8 +/- 10% to 38 +/- 20%. On IVUS, the decrease in lumen CSA (from 8.8 +/- 2.5 mm2 to 5.5 +/- 4.0 mm2) was associated with a significant decrease in EEM (from 19.7 +/- 5.6 mm2 to 16.9 +/- 6.2 mm2); there was no significant increase in P+M (from 10.9 +/- 4.2 mm2 to 11.3 +/- 3.9 mm2). A change in lumen correlated with a change in EEM (r = 0.790, p < 0.0001), not with a change in P+M (r = 0.133, p = 0.2258). A decrease in reference EEM (from 19.1 +/- 7.7 mm2 to 17.6 +/- 8.0 mm2) also correlated with a decrease in lesion EEM (r = 0.665, p < 0.0001). Results in restenotic lesions were similar. CONCLUSION Restenosis after optimal DCA is caused primarily by a decrease in EEM CSA that extends into contiguous reference segments.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2013
Robert M. Bersin; Gary M. Ansel; Anthony Rizzo; H. Bob Smouse; Shantanu Sinha; Ravish Sachar; Rajesh M. Dave; Barry S. Weinstock; Robert L. Feldman; Gary S. Roubin
To evaluate the 9‐month safety and effectiveness outcomes of the Formula™ balloon‐expandable renal stent (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) for the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) following suboptimal angioplasty.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2014
Andrew J. Klein; Dmitriy N. Feldman; Herbert D. Aronow; Bruce H. Gray; Kamal Gupta; Osvaldo Gigliotti; Michael R. Jaff; Robert M. Bersin; Christopher J. White
Aorto‐iliac arterial occlusive disease is common and may cause a spectrum of chronic symptoms from intermittent claudication to critical limb ischemia. Treatment is indicated for symptoms that have failed lifestyle and medical therapies or occasionally to facilitate other interventional procedures such as TAVR and/or placement of hemodynamic assist devices. It is widely accepted that TASC A, B, and C lesions are best managed with endovascular intervention. In experienced hands, most TASC D lesions may be treated by endovascular methods, and with the development of chronic total occlusion devices, many aorto‐iliac occlusions may be recanalized safely by endovascular means. Interventional cardiologists should be well versed in the anatomy, as well as the treatment of aorto‐iliac disease, given their need to traverse these vessels during transfemoral procedures. Overall, aorto‐iliac occlusive disease is more commonly being treated with an endovascular‐first approach, using open surgery as a secondary option. This document was developed to guide physicians in the clinical decision‐making related to the contemporary application of endovascular intervention among patients with aorto‐iliac arterial disease.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 1999
Robert M. Bersin; John C. Cedarholm; Glen J. Kowalchuk; Peter J. Fitzgerald
The acute angiographic and long‐term clinical outcomes of a consecutive series of patients treated with the coronary rotablator at a single center are described. The patient population was a high‐risk population, with significant instances of unstable angina or acute myocardial infarctions (MI) on presentation (75.5%), three‐vessel coronary artery disease (27.5%), congestive heart failure (23.8%), and diabetes (39%). The coronary anatomy was also complex, with 79.3% of lesions treated being National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) class B or C. The maximum burr:artery ratio averaged 0.79 ± 0.11. The maximum balloon:artery ratio averaged 1.19 ± 0.17. Acute procedural success was 90%. The reference vessel diameter was 2.72 mm ± 0.54 mm. The average minimum luminal diameter (MLD) preprocedure was 0.87 ± 0.31 mm. The average MLD postprocedure was 2.01 ± 0.54 mm. The acute gain averaged 1.14 ± 0.51 mm. Urgent coronary artery bypass grafting was required in 1% of patients. Subendocardial infarctions occurred in 8.5% of patients, and abrupt closure postprocedure while in hospital occurred in 1% of patients. Reinterventions or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in hospital occurred in only 3.5% of patients; 96% of patients were available for a long‐term clinical follow‐up. Repeat coronary interventions for target lesion revascularizations were required in 17.4% of patients, coronary artery bypass grafting for target lesion revascularization was necessary in 9.5% of patients, and the combined target lesion revascularization rate was 25.3% at 1 year. Subsequent Q‐wave myocardial infarctions or cardiac death occurred in 5.7% of patients at 1 year. Event‐free survival was 75.1% at 6 months and 69.9% at 1 year. The strongest predictor of subsequent target lesion revascularization was lesion length (P = 0.034) and not the postprocedure MLD (P = 0.41). Most major adverse clinical events occurred within the first 4 months and greater than 90% of all major adverse clinical events occurred within the first 6 months. The coronary rotablator was able to achieve a high degree of clinical success in a high‐risk patient population with complex anatomy. Most major adverse clinical events occurred early (<6 months) and were comprised principally of target lesion revascularizations. The overall target lesion revascularization rates and combined major adverse clinical event rates are favorable, given the complex anatomy and the high proportion of diabetics, females, and multivessel disease patients treated in this series. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 46:399–405, 1999.