Robert M. Little

Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics.

Assessment at least 10 years postretention of sixty-five cases previously treated in the permanent-dentition stage with first-premolar extractions, traditional edgewise mechanics, and retention revealed considerable variation among patients. The long-term response to mandibular anterior alignment was unpredictable; no variables, such as degree of initial crowding, age, sex, Angle classification, etc., were useful in establishing a prognosis. Typically, arch width and length decreased after retention, regardless of treatment expansion or constriction. Two thirds of the patients had unsatisfactory lower anterior alignment after retention. Cases that were minimally crowded before treatment usually became more crowded, while initially severe crowding cases usually moderated.

An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention.

Pretreatment, end of treatment, 10-year postretention, and 20-year postretention records of 31 four premolar extraction cases were assessed to evaluate stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment. Crowding continued to increase during the 10- to 20-year postretention phase but to a lesser degree than from the end of retention to 10 years postretention. Only 10% of the cases were judged to have clinically acceptable mandibular alignment at the last stage of diagnostic records. Cases responded in a diverse unpredictable manner with no apparent predictors of future success when considering pretreatment records or the treated results.

Maturation of untreated normal occlusions

The dental casts of 65 untreated normal occlusions were evaluated to determine the nature and extent of the developmental maturation process of the normal dentition. Six dental parameters were examined in the mixed dentition (9 to 10 years), early permanent dentition (12 to 13 years), and early adulthood (19 to 20 years). Results showed decreases in arch length and intercanine width; minimal overall changes in intermolar width, overjet, and overbite; and increases in incisor irregularity. Females showed more severe changes than males. The individual changes found were not correlated to changes in any of the other parameters measured. No associations or predictors of clinical value were found. The changes found in a sample of untreated normals were similar in nature but lesser in extent than postretention changes found in a sample of treated cases.

Stability and relapse of dental arch alignment.

For more than 35 years, research in the Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington has focused on a growing collection of over 600 sets of patient records to assess stability and failure of orthodontic treatment. All had completed treatment a decade or more prior to the last set of data. Evaluation of treated premolar extraction cases, treated non-extraction cases with generalized spacing, cases treated by arch enlargement strategies, and untreated normal occlusions demonstrate similar physiological changes. 1. Arch length reduces following orthodontic treatment, but also does so in untreated normal occlusions. 2. Arch width measured across the mandibular canine teeth typically reduces post-treatment whether the case was expanded during treatment or not. 3. Mandibular anterior crowding during the post-treatment phase is a continuing phenomenon well into the 20–40 age bracket and likely beyond. 4. Third molar absence or presence, impacted or fully erupted, seems to have little effect on the occurrence or degree of relapse. 5. The degree of post-retention anterior crowding is both unpredictable and variable and no pretreatment variables either from clinical findings, casts, or cephalometric radiographs before or after treatment seem to be useful predictors.

Anterior open-bite malocclusion: a longitudinal 10-year postretention evaluation of orthodontically treated patients.

Long-term response of the anterior open-bite malocclusion was evaluated in forty-one white subjects who had undergone orthodontic treatment and were out of retention a minimum of 9 years 6 months. The purpose of the study was threefold: (1) to make cephalometric comparisons between a sample of open-bite patients and a sample with normal cephalometric standards, (2) to evaluate treatment and posttreatment changes that occurred in treated open-bite patients, and (3) to search for predictors and associations of value. Changes occurring across time in the open-bite patients were analyzed by computer means using pretreatment, posttreatment, and long-term cephalometric radiographs and dental casts. An analysis of subgroups was reviewed to compare dentoalveolar and skeletal relationships of both stable and relapse groups. More than 35% of the treated open-bite patients demonstrated a postretention open bite of 3 mm or more, with the relapse subgroup demonstrating across-time, less mandibular anterior dental height, less upper anterior facial height, greater lower anterior facial height, and less posterior facial height. Neither the magnitude of pretreatment open bite, mandibular plane angle, nor any other single parameter of dentofacial form proved to be a reliable predictor of posttreatment stability.

Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse.

Increasing mandibular arch length to resolve crowding has long been debated as a treatment method. Twenty-six patients with records obtained before treatment, after treatment, and a minimum of 6 years out of retention were assessed. All the patients showed a loss of treatment arch length increase with only 6 of 26 patients showing any gain over pretreatment dimensions. Width constriction was a consistent finding, as was crowding of anterior teeth after retention. In 89% the postretention record demonstrated clinically unsatisfactory alignment. Lateral cephalometric superimposition of mandibles showed variable molar and incisor change after retention. As teeth erupted after treatment, mesial molar movement and lingual tipping of incisors were the most common cephalometric findings.

Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term stability of orthodontically induced changes in maxillary and mandibular arch form. Dental casts were evaluated before treatment, after treatment, and a minimum of 10 years after retention for 45 patients with Class I and 42 Class II, Division 1 malocclusions who received four first premolar extraction treatment. Computer generated arch forms were used to assess changes in arch shape over time. Buccal cusp tips of first molars, premolars, and canines plus mesial, distal, and central incisal aspects of incisors were marked, photocopied, and digitized in a standardized manner. An algorithm was used to fit conic sections to the digitized points. The shape of the fitted conics at each time period was described by calculating the parameter eccentricity; a small value represented a more rounded shape and a larger value represented a more tapered shape. Findings demonstrated a rounding of arch form during treatment followed by a change to more tapered. Arch form tended to return toward the pretreatment shape after retention. The greater the treatment change, the greater the tendency for postretention change. However, individual variation was considerable. The patients pretreatment arch form appeared to be the best guide to future arch form stability, but minimizing treatment change was no guarantee of postretention stability.

Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: University of Washington Studies

For more than 40 years, research in the Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington (Seattle, WA) has focused on a growing collection of more than 800 sets of patient records to assess stability and relapse of orthodontic treatment. All patients had completed treatment a decade or more before the last set of data. Evaluation of treated premolar extraction patients, treated lower incisor extraction patients, treated non-extraction cases with generalized spacing, patients treated with arch enlargement strategies, and untreated normals showed similar physiologic changes: (1) Arch length decreases after orthodontic treatment. (2) Arch width measured across the mandibular canine teeth typically reduces posttreatment, whether or not the case was expanded during treatment. (3) Mandibular anterior crowding during the posttreatment phase is a continuing phenomenon well into the 20-to-40 years age bracket and likely beyond. (4) Third molar absence or presence, impacted or fully erupted, seems to have little effect on the occurrence or degree of relapse. (5) The degree of post-retention anterior crowding is both unpredictable and variable and no pretreatment variables either from clinical findings, casts, or cephalometric radiographs before or after treatment seem to be useful predictors.

Long-term stability of mandibular incisors following successful treatment of Class II, Division 1, malocclusions

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term stability of mandibular anterior alignment in a large group of Class II, Division 1, patients who demonstrated successful occlusal results at the end of active treatment. The specific aim was to search for predictors of relapse and associations between relapse and other post-retention changes. The sample of 78 adolescents was limited to successfully treated cases as judged by subjective evaluation of intercuspation and incisor occlusion of posttreatment study models. Neither cephalometric characteristics nor post-retention occlusion were considered in sample selection. Of these patients, study models and cephalograms were available pretreatment, at the end of active treatment, and a mean of 14 years post-retention. The results demonstrated an increase of incisor irregularity and a reduction of intercanine width and arch length post-retention. At post-retention, 9.0% had irregularity index values of 6.5 mm or more and 47.4% had values equal to 3.5 mm or less. Stepwise backward multiple regression analyses revealed that narrow pretreatment intercanine width and high pretreatment incisor irregularity were significant predictors of relapse. Treatment increase of intercanine width and post-retention decrease of intercanine width and arch length were associated with relapse.

Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: A cephalometric appraisal of first-premolar-extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics☆

Assessment at least 10 years postretention of fifty-four cases previously treated in the permanent-dentition stage with first-premolar extractions, traditional edgewise mechanotherapy, and retention revealed considerable variation among patients. The long-term response to mandibular anterior alignment was unpredictable; no cephalometric parameters, such as maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination, horizontal and vertical growth amounts, mandibular plane angle, etc., were useful in establishing a prognosis. Few associations of value were found between cephalometric parameters and dental-cast measurements, such as overbite, arch length, intercanine width, and overjet. Only a slight tendency was found for incisor inclination to return toward the pretreatment value during the postretention period. It was possible to predict, on the basis of an analysis of pre- and posttreatment cephalometric records, those cases which had greater than 4 mm deepening of overbite postretention as well as those cases which had decreases of 3 mm or more in arch-length postretention. The practical use of these predictions were of limited clinical value, however.