Robert M. MacCallum

Enhancement of protein modeling by human intervention in applying the automatic programs 3D‐JIGSAW and 3D‐PSSM

Fourteen models were constructed and analyzed for the comparative modeling section of Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP4). Sequence identity between each target and the best possible parent(s) ranged between 55 and 13%, and the root‐mean‐square deviation between model and target was from 0.8 to 17.9 Å. In the fold recognition section, 10 of the 11 remote homologues were recognized. The modeling protocols are a combination of automated computer algorithms, 3D‐JIGSAW (for comparative modeling) and 3D‐PSSM (for fold recognition), with human intervention at certain critical stages. In particular, intervention is required to check superfamily assignment, best possible parents from which to model, sequence alignments to those parents and take‐off regions for modeling variable regions. There now is a convergence of algorithms for comparative modeling and fold recognition, particularly in the region of remote homology. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:39–46.

Evolutionary dynamics of immune-related genes and pathways in disease-vector mosquitoes

Mosquitoes are vectors of parasitic and viral diseases of immense importance for public health. The acquisition of the genome sequence of the yellow fever and Dengue vector, Aedes aegypti (Aa), has enabled a comparative phylogenomic analysis of the insect immune repertoire: in Aa, the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae (Ag), and the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Dm). Analysis of immune signaling pathways and response modules reveals both conservative and rapidly evolving features associated with different functional gene categories and particular aspects of immune reactions. These dynamics reflect in part continuous readjustment between accommodation and rejection of pathogens and suggest how innate immunity may have evolved.

VectorBase: A Data Resource for Invertebrate Vector Genomics

VectorBase (http://www.vectorbase.org) is an NIAID-funded Bioinformatic Resource Center focused on invertebrate vectors of human pathogens. VectorBase annotates and curates vector genomes providing a web accessible integrated resource for the research community. Currently, VectorBase contains genome information for three mosquito species: Aedes aegypti, Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus, a body louse Pediculus humanus and a tick species Ixodes scapularis. Since our last report VectorBase has initiated a community annotation system, a microarray and gene expression repository and controlled vocabularies for anatomy and insecticide resistance. We have continued to develop both the software infrastructure and tools for interrogating the stored data.

NucPred—Predicting nuclear localization of proteins

UNLABELLED NucPred analyzes patterns in eukaryotic protein sequences and predicts if a protein spends at least some time in the nucleus or no time at all. Subcellular location of proteins represents functional information, which is important for understanding protein interactions, for the diagnosis of human diseases and for drug discovery. NucPred is a novel web tool based on regular expression matching and multiple program classifiers induced by genetic programming. A likelihood score is derived from the programs for each input sequence and each residue position. Different forms of visualization are provided to assist the detection of nuclear localization signals (NLSs). The NucPred server also provides access to additional sources of biological information (real and predicted) for a better validation and interpretation of results. AVAILABILITY The web interface to the NucPred tool is provided at http://www.sbc.su.se/~maccallr/nucpred. In addition, the Perl code is made freely available under the GNU Public Licence (GPL) for simple incorporation into other tools and web servers.

CAFASP-1: Critical Assessment of Fully Automated Structure Prediction Methods

The results of the first Critical Assessment of Fully Automated Structure Prediction (CAFASP‐1) are presented. The objective was to evaluate the success rates of fully automatic web servers for fold recognition which are available to the community. This study was based on the targets used in the third meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP‐3). However, unlike CASP‐3, the study was not a blind trial, as it was held after the structures of the targets were known. The aim was to assess the performance of methods without the user intervention that several groups used in their CASP‐3 submissions. Although it is clear that “human plus machine” predictions are superior to automated ones, this CAFASP‐1 experiment is extremely valuable for users of our methods; it provides an indication of the performance of the methods alone, and not of the “human plus machine” performance assessed in CASP. This information may aid users in choosing which programs they wish to use and in evaluating the reliability of the programs when applied to their specific prediction targets. In addition, evaluation of fully automated methods is particularly important to assess their applicability at genomic scales. For each target, groups submitted the top‐ranking folds generated from their servers. In CAFASP‐1 we concentrated on fold‐recognition web servers only and evaluated only recognition of the correct fold, and not, as in CASP‐3, alignment accuracy. Although some performance differences appeared within each of the four target categories used here, overall, no single server has proved markedly superior to the others. The results showed that current fully automated fold recognition servers can often identify remote similarities when pairwise sequence search methods fail. Nevertheless, in only a few cases outside the family‐level targets has the score of the top‐ranking fold been significant enough to allow for a confident fully automated prediction.Because the goals, rules, and procedures of CAFASP‐1 were different from those used at CASP‐3, the results reported here are not comparable with those reported in CASP‐3. Nevertheless, it is clear that current automated fold recognition methods can not yet compete with “human‐expert plus machine” predictions. Finally, CAFASP‐1 has been useful in identifying the requirements for a future blind trial of automated served‐based protein structure prediction. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:209–217.

VectorBase: improvements to a bioinformatics resource for invertebrate vector genomics

VectorBase (http://www.vectorbase.org) is a NIAID-supported bioinformatics resource for invertebrate vectors of human pathogens. It hosts data for nine genomes: mosquitoes (three Anopheles gambiae genomes, Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus), tick (Ixodes scapularis), body louse (Pediculus humanus), kissing bug (Rhodnius prolixus) and tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans). Hosted data range from genomic features and expression data to population genetics and ontologies. We describe improvements and integration of new data that expand our taxonomic coverage. Releases are bi-monthly and include the delivery of preliminary data for emerging genomes. Frequent updates of the genome browser provide VectorBase users with increasing options for visualizing their own high-throughput data. One major development is a new population biology resource for storing genomic variations, insecticide resistance data and their associated metadata. It takes advantage of improved ontologies and controlled vocabularies. Combined, these new features ensure timely release of multiple types of data in the public domain while helping overcome the bottlenecks of bioinformatics and annotation by engaging with our user community.

VectorBase: an updated bioinformatics resource for invertebrate vectors and other organisms related with human diseases

VectorBase is a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases supported Bioinformatics Resource Center (BRC) for invertebrate vectors of human pathogens. Now in its 11th year, VectorBase currently hosts the genomes of 35 organisms including a number of non-vectors for comparative analysis. Hosted data range from genome assemblies with annotated gene features, transcript and protein expression data to population genetics including variation and insecticide-resistance phenotypes. Here we describe improvements to our resource and the set of tools available for interrogating and accessing BRC data including the integration of Web Apollo to facilitate community annotation and providing Galaxy to support user-based workflows. VectorBase also actively supports our community through hands-on workshops and online tutorials. All information and data are freely available from our website at https://www.vectorbase.org/.

VectorBase: a home for invertebrate vectors of human pathogens

VectorBase () is a web-accessible data repository for information about invertebrate vectors of human pathogens. VectorBase annotates and maintains vector genomes providing an integrated resource for the research community. Currently, VectorBase contains genome information for two organisms: Anopheles gambiae, a vector for the Plasmodium protozoan agent causing malaria, and Aedes aegypti, a vector for the flaviviral agents causing Yellow fever and Dengue fever.

Progress in protein structure prediction: assessment of CASP3.

The third comparative assessment of techniques of protein structure prediction (CASP3) was held during 1998. This is a blind trial in which structures are predicted prior to having knowledge of the coordinates, which are then revealed to enable the assessment. Three sections at the meeting evaluated different methodologies - comparative modelling, fold recognition and ab initio methods. For some, but not all of the target coordinates, high quality models were submitted in each of these sections. There have been improvements in prediction techniques since CASP2 in 1996, most notably for ab initio methods.

CASP6 Assessment of Contact Prediction

Here we present the evaluation results of the Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP6) contact prediction category. Contact prediction was assessed with standard measures well known in the field and the performance of specialist groups was evaluated alongside groups that submitted models with 3D coordinates. The evaluation was mainly focused on long range contact predictions for the set of new fold targets, although we analyzed predictions for all targets. Three groups with similar levels of accuracy and coverage performed a little better than the others. Comparisons of the predictions of the three best methods with those of CASP5/CAFASP3 suggested some improvement, although there were not enough targets in the comparisons to make this statistically significant. Proteins 2005;Suppl 7:214–224.