Robert M. McNamara

Management of sickle cell pain crisis in the emergency department at teaching hospitals.

The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency and variety of strategies being used in the Emergency Department (ED) management of sickle cell pain crisis (SCPC). One thousand randomly selected academic emergency physicians received a multiple-choice survey; 549 (55%) completed the survey. Forty-five percent of respondents treat patients with SCPC every week or almost every shift. Twenty percent use protocols for management of SCPC. Respondents consider pain refractory to outpatient treatment if it is persistent after two (23%) or three (53%) doses of parenteral analgesic. Meperidine or morphine is the most common initial analgesic. In the routine management of uncomplicated SCPC, i.v. analgesics, i.v. hydration, oxygen therapy, and complete blood counts are often or always used by 67, 71, 66, and 82% of respondents, respectively. Some patterns in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with SCPC in the ED are identified, but overall practice is highly variable. Some popular elements of care are divergent from those suggested by the scientific literature.

Anaphylaxis after low dose intravenous vitamin K.

Over-anticoagulation from warfarin is a common occurrence, and these patients are often referred to the Emergency Department for further treatment. Unfortunately, there is little guidance in the Emergency Medicine literature for the management of such patients. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) issued guidelines in 1998 that address the use of vitamin K for patients with over-anticoagulation. However, there is still debate as to the optimal dose and route of vitamin K administration. This case report describes a patient who was treated with intravenous vitamin K within the scope of these guidelines at a very low dose (1 mg) and had a fatal anaphylactic reaction. This article will further discuss this patient, the 1998 ACCP guidelines, and the data supporting the alternative of subcutaneously administered vitamin K for patients with over-anticoagulation with no active bleeding.

Impact of an Opioid Prescribing Guideline in the Acute Care Setting.

BACKGROUNDnDeath from opioid abuse is a major public health issue. The death rate associated with opioid overdose nearly quadrupled from 1999 to 2008. Acute care settings are a major source of opioid prescriptions, often for minor conditions and chronic noncancer pain.nnnOBJECTIVEnOur aim was to determine whether a voluntary opioid prescribing guideline reduces the proportion of patients prescribed opioids for minor and chronic conditions.nnnMETHODSnA retrospective chart review was performed on records ofxa0adult emergency department visits from January 2012 to July 2014 for dental, neck, back, or unspecified chronic pain, and the proportion of patients receiving opioid prescriptions at discharge was compared before and after the guideline. Attending emergency physicians were surveyed on their perceptions regarding the impact of the guideline on prescribing patterns, patient satisfaction, and physician-patient interactions.nnnRESULTSnIn our sample of 13,187 patient visits, there was a significant (p < 0.001) and sustained decrease in rates of opioid prescriptions for dental, neck, back, or unspecified chronic pain. The rate of opioid prescribing decreased from 52.7% before the guideline to 29.8% immediately after its introduction, and to 33.8% at an interval of 12 to 18 months later. The decrease in opioid prescriptions was observed in all of these diagnosis groups and in all age groups. All 31 eligible prescribing physicians completed a survey. The opioid prescribing guideline was supported by 100% of survey respondents.nnnCONCLUSIONSnAn opioid prescribing guideline significantly decreased the rates at which opioids were prescribed for minor and chronic complaints in an acute care setting.

Approach to Acute Abdominal Pain

Evaluation of the emergency department patient with acute abdominal pain may be challenging. Many factors can obscure the clinical findings leading to incorrect diagnosis and subsequent adverse outcomes. Clinicians must consider multiple diagnoses with limited time and information, giving priority to life-threatening conditions that require expeditious management to avoid morbidity and mortality. This article seeks to provide the clinician with the clinical tools to achieve these goals by reviewing the anatomic and physiological basis of abdominal pain and key components of the history and the physical examination. In addition, this article discusses the approach to unstable patients with abdominal pain.

Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction: Rapid Correction with Neostigmine in the Emergency Department

Ogilvies syndrome, now known as acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, is characterized by massive dilatation of large bowel in the absence of mechanical obstruction. It is found in a variety of patients, although elderly and immobile patients make up a large portion of the afflicted population. This article discusses the case of a 64-year-old bedridden, paraplegic, male nursing home resident who presented to the Emergency Department with a chronic history of abdominal distention that acutely worsened on the day of his arrival. A diagnosis of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction was made and 2 mg of intravenous neostigmine was administered, with resolution of the patients condition allowing for subsequent Emergency Department discharge. This report discusses the utilization of neostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, for patients with colonic pseudo-obstruction. We also briefly review the literature on this condition and other therapeutic options.

Modafinil and Zolpidem Use by Emergency Medicine Residents

OBJECTIVESnThe objective was to assess the prevalence and patterns of modafinil and zolpidem use among emergency medicine (EM) residents and describe side effects resulting from use.nnnMETHODSnA voluntary, anonymous survey was distributed in February 2006 to EM residents nationally in the context of the national American Board of Emergency Medicine in-training examination. Data regarding frequency and timing of modafinil and zolpidem use were collected, as well as demographic information, reasons for use, side effects, and perceived dependence.nnnRESULTSnA total of 133 of 134 residency programs distributed the surveys (99%). The response rate was 56% of the total number of EM residents who took the in-training examination (2,397/4,281). Past modafinil use was reported by 2.4% (57/2,372) of EM residents, with 66.7% (38/57) of those using modafinil having initiated their use during residency. Past zolpidem use was reported by 21.8% (516/2,367) of EM residents, with 15.3% (362/2,367) reporting use in the past year and 9.3% (221/2,367) in the past month. A total of 324 of 516 (62.8%) of zolpidem users initiated use during residency. Side effects were commonly reported by modafinil users (31.0%)-most frequent were palpitations, insomnia, agitation, and restlessness. Zolpidem users reported side effects (22.6%) including drowsiness, dizziness, headache, hallucinations, depression/mood lability, and amnesia.nnnCONCLUSIONSnZolpidem use is common among EM residents, with most users initiating use during residency. Modafinil use is relatively uncommon, although most residents using have also initiated use during residency. Side effects are commonly reported for both of these agents, and long-term safety remains unclear.

A Screening Tool to Medically Clear Psychiatric Patients in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUNDnEmergency physicians are frequently called on to medically clear patients presenting with a psychiatric complaint. There is limited guidance on how to conduct this clearance.nnnOBJECTIVEnThis study evaluated the usefulness of a screening tool in ruling out serious organic disease in emergency department (ED) patients with psychiatric complaints.nnnMETHODSnA retrospective chart review was performed on 500 consecutive adult ED patients with primarily psychiatric complaints who were evaluated using the tool, and then subsequently transferred to a psychiatric crisis center. The screening tool consists of a series of historical and physical examination criteria derived from the literature intended to identify patients who have a psychiatric manifestation of an organic disease. The physician filled out the screening form and if the proper conditions were met, the patient was transferred to Psychiatry without further laboratory or imaging studies. We reviewed the charts of both the ED visit and the psychiatric crisis center visit to determine if any of the patients required further medical treatment or a medical admission rather than a psychiatric admission.nnnRESULTSnFive hundred consecutive ED patient charts were reviewed. Fifteen of the corresponding charts from the psychiatric center could not be found. Of the remaining 485 patients, 6 patients were sent back to the ED for further evaluation. After laboratory work and imaging, none of these 6 patients required more than an outpatient prescription.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe screening tool proved useful in determining if a psychiatric patient needed further medical evaluation beyond a history and physical examination before transfer for a psychiatric evaluation.

Emergency department crowding and loss of medical licensure: a new risk of patient care in hallways.

We report the case of a 32-year-old male recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes treated at an urban university emergency department (ED) crowded to 250% over capacity. His initial symptoms of shortness of breath and feeling ill for several days were evaluated with chest radiograph, electrocardiogram (EKG), and laboratory studies, which suggested mild diabetic ketoacidosis. His medical care in the ED was conducted in a crowded hallway. After correction of his metabolic abnormalities he felt improved and was discharged with arrangements made for outpatient follow-up. Two days later he returned in cardiac arrest, and resuscitation efforts failed. The autopsy was significant for multiple acute and chronic pulmonary emboli but no coronary artery disease. The hospital settled the case for

Substance Use in Emergency Medicine Training Programs

1 million and allocated major responsibility to the treating emergency physician (EP). As a result the state medical board named the EP in a disciplinary action, claiming negligence because the EKG had not been personally interpreted by that physician. A formal hearing was conducted with the EP’s medical license placed in jeopardy. This case illustrates the risk to EPs who treat patients in crowded hallways, where it is difficult to provide the highest level of care. This case also demonstrates the failure of hospital administration to accept responsibility and provide resources to the ED to ensure patient safety.

One-Year Experience with the Institution of a Critical Airway Team at an Academic Medical Center

OBJECTIVESnTo explore the prevalence of substance use among emergency medicine (EM) residents and compare to a prior study conducted in 1992.nnnMETHODSnA voluntary, anonymous survey was distributed in February 2006 to EM residents nationally in the context of the national in-service examination. Data regarding 13 substances, demographics, and perceptions of personal patterns of substance use were collected.nnnRESULTSnA total of 133 of 134 residencies distributed the surveys (99%). The response rate was 56% of the total EM residents who took the in-service examination (2,397/4,281). The reported prevalence of most illicit drug use, including cocaine, heroin, amphetamines, and other opioids, among EM residents are low. Although residents reporting past marijuana use has declined (52.3% in 1992 to 45.0% in 2006; p < 0.001), past-year use (8.8%-11.8%; p < 0.001) and past-month use (2.5%-4.0%; p < 0.001) have increased. Alcohol use appears to be increasing, including an increase in reported daily drinkers from 3.3% to 4.9% (p < 0.001) and an increase in number of residents who indicate that their consumption of alcohol has increased during residency (from 4% to 12.6%; p < 0.001).nnnCONCLUSIONSnSelf-reported use of most street drugs remains uncommon among EM residents. Marijuana and alcohol use, however, do appear to be increasing. Educators should be aware of these trends, and this may allow them to target resources for impaired and at-risk residents.