Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert M. Norman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert M. Norman.


The International Journal of Aviation Psychology | 2009

Synthetic Vision Enhanced Surface Operations With Head-Worn Display for Commercial Aircraft

Jarvis J. Arthur; Lawrence J. Prinzel; Kevin J. Shelton; Lynda J. Kramer; Steven P. Williams; Randall E. Bailey; Robert M. Norman

Efficiency and safety of airport surface operations can be enhanced by using synthetic vision and associated technologies, employed on a head-up display (HUD) combined with a head-down display electronic moving map. Past research has noted that 2 major limitations of HUDs during ground operations were its monochrome form and its limited, fixed field of regard. These limitations can be overcome with the use of a head-worn display (HWD). This article describes the results of a simulation experiment that showed that a fully integrated HWD concept provided significantly improved path performance compared to using paper charts alone. When comparing the HWD and HUD concepts, there were no differences found for path performance or subjective ratings of workload and marginally significant differences found for reported situation awareness and pilot comments of perceived system safety. Implications and directions for future research are described.


ieee/aiaa digital avionics systems conference | 2011

Flight deck interval management and delegated separation for equivalent visual operations

Lawrence J. Prinzel; Kevin J. Shelton; Lynda J. Kramer; Jarvis J. Arthur; Randall E. Bailey; Robert M. Norman; Kyle K. E. Ellis; Bryan E. Barmore

An emerging Next Generation Air Transportation System concept — Equivalent Visual Operations (EVO) — can be achieved using an electronic means to provide sufficient visibility of the external world and other required flight references on flight deck displays that enable the safety, operational tempos, and visual flight rules (VFR)-like procedures for all weather conditions. Synthetic and enhanced flight vision system technologies are critical enabling technologies to EVO. Current research evaluated concepts for flight deck-based interval management (FIM) operations, integrated with Synthetic Vision and Enhanced Vision flight-deck displays and technologies. One concept involves delegated flight deck-based separation, in which the flight crews were paired with another aircraft and responsible for spacing and maintaining separation from the paired aircraft, termed, “equivalent visual separation.” The operation required the flight crews to acquire and maintain an “equivalent visual contact” as well as to conduct manual landings in low-visibility conditions. The paper describes results that evaluated the concept of EVO delegated separation, including an off-nominal scenario in which the lead aircraft was not able to conform to the assigned spacing resulting in a loss of separation.


10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference | 2010

Use of Data Comm by Flight Crew in High-Density Terminal Areas

Brian T. Baxley; Robert M. Norman; Kyle K. E. Ellis; Kara A. Latorella; James R. Comstock; Cathy A. Adams

This paper describes a collaborative FAA and NASA experiment using 22 commercial airline pilots to determine the effect of using Datalink Communication (Data Comm) to issue messages in busy, terminal area operations. Four conditions were defined that span current day to future flight deck equipage levels (voice communication only, Data Comm only, Data Comm with Moving Map Display, Data Comm with Moving Map displaying taxi route), and each condition was used to create an arrival and a departure scenario at the Boston Logan Airport. These eight scenarios were repeated twice for a total of 16 scenarios for each of the eleven crews. Quantitative data was collected on subject reaction time and eye tracking information. Questionnaires collected subjective feedback on workload and acceptability to the flight crew for using Data Comm in a busy terminal area. 95% of the Data Comm messages were responded to by the flight crew within one minute; however, post experiment debrief comments revealed almost unanimous consensus that two minutes was a reasonable expectation for crew response. Eye tracking data indicated an insignificant decrease in head-up time for the Pilot Flying when Data Comm was introduced; however, the Pilot Monitoring had significantly less head-up time. Data Comm workload was rated as operationally acceptable by both crew members in all conditions in flight at any altitude above the Final Approach Fix in terms of response time and workload. Results also indicate the use of Data Comm during surface operations was acceptable, the exception being the simultaneous use of voice, Data Comm, and audio chime required for an aircraft to cross an active runway. Many crews reported they believed Data Comm messages would be acceptable after the Final Approach Fix or to cross a runway if the message was not accompanied by a chime and there was not a requirement to immediately respond to the uplink message.


International Journal of Human-computer Interaction | 2012

Flight Deck Interval Management Delegated Separation Using Equivalent Visual Operations

Lawrence J. Prinzel; Lynda J. Kramer; Kevin J. Shelton; Jarvis J. Arthur; Randall E. Bailey; Robert M. Norman; Kyle L. Ellis; Bryan E. Barmore

The Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) concept termed, “Equivalent Visual Operations” (EVO) represents a fundamentally different operational approach to current issues confronting commercial aviation. Synthetic and enhanced flight vision system (S/EVS) technologies are critical enabling technologies to EVO. Research was conducted that evaluated concepts for flight-deck-based interval management operations, integrated with S/EVS. One of the concepts tested involves delegated flight-deck-based separation, in which the flight crews were paired with another aircraft and responsible for spacing and maintaining separation from the paired aircraft termed “equivalent visual separation.” The operation required the flight crews to acquire and maintain an “equivalent visual contact” as well as to conduct manual landings in low-visibility conditions utilizing S/EVS and other flight deck technologies. The article describes results that evaluated the concept of EVO delegated separation, including an off-nominal scenario in which the lead aircraft was not able to conform to the assigned spacing resulting in a loss of separation. The results demonstrated that delegated separation improved flight deck situation awareness without an increase in mental workload. Implications for NextGen and future research directions are described.


Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingHuman Factors and Ergonomics Society | 2010

The Impact of Data Communications Messages in the Terminal Area on Flight Crew Workload and Eye Scanning

James R. Comstock; Brian T. Baxley; Robert M. Norman; Kyle K. E. Ellis; Cathy A. Adams; Kara A. Latorella; William A. Lynn

This paper, to accompany a discussion panel, describes a collaborative FAA and NASA research study to determine the effect Data Communications (Data Comm) messages have on flight crew workload and eye scanning behavior in busy terminal area operations. In the Next Generation Air Transportation System Concept of Operations, for the period 2017–2022, the FAA envisions Data Comm between controllers and the flight crew to become the primary means of communicating non-time critical information. Four research conditions were defined that span current day to future equipage levels (Voice with Paper map, Data Comm with Paper map, Data Comm with Moving Map Display with ownship position displayed, Data Comm with Moving Map, ownship and taxi route displayed), and were used to create arrival and departure scenarios at Boston Logan Airport. Preliminary results for workload, situation awareness, and pilot head-up time are presented here. Questionnaire data indicated that pilot acceptability, workload, and situation awareness ratings were favorable for all of the conditions tested. Pilots did indicate that there were times during final approach and landing when they would prefer not to hear the message chime, and would not be able to make a quick response due to high priority tasks in the cockpit.


Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting | 2008

Synthetic Vision Displays for Planetary and Lunar Lander Vehicles

Jarvis J. Arthur; Lawrence J. Prinzel; Steven P. Williams; Kevin J. Shelton; Lynda J. Kramer; Randall E. Bailey; Robert M. Norman

Aviation research has demonstrated that Synthetic Vision (SV) technology can substantially enhance situation awareness, reduce pilot workload, improve aviation safety, and promote flight path control precision. SV, and related flight deck technologies are currently being extended for application in planetary exploration vehicles. SV, in particular, holds significant potential for many planetary missions since the SV presentation provides a computer-generated view for the flight crew of the terrain and other significant environmental characteristics independent of the outside visibility conditions, window locations, or vehicle attributes. SV allows unconstrained control of the computer-generated scene lighting, terrain coloring, and virtual camera angles which may provide invaluable visual cues to pilots/astronauts, not available from other vision technologies. In addition, important vehicle state information may be conformally displayed on the view such as forward and down velocities, altitude, and fuel remaining to enhance trajectory control and vehicle system status. The paper accompanies a conference demonstration that introduced a prototype NASA Synthetic Vision system for lunar lander spacecraft. The paper will describe technical challenges and potential solutions to SV applications for the lunar landing mission, including the requirements for high-resolution lunar terrain maps, accurate positioning and orientation, and lunar cockpit display concepts to support projected mission challenges.


Archive | 2009

Synthetic and Enhanced Vision System for Altair Lunar Lander

Lawrence J. Prinzell; Lynda J. Kramer; Robert M. Norman; Jarvis J. Arthur; Steven P. Williams; Kevin J. Shelton; Randall E. Bailey


Archive | 2011

Flight Deck-Based Delegated Separation: Evaluation of an On-Board Interval Management System with Synthetic and Enhanced Vision Technology

Lawrence J. Prinzel; Kevin J. Shelton; Lynda J. Kramer; Jarvis J. Arthur; Randall E. Bailey; Robert M. Norman; Kyle K. E. Ellis; Bryan E. Barmore


Archive | 2012

Quantifying Pilot Visual Attention in Low Visibility Terminal Operations

Kyle K. E. Ellis; Jarvis J. Arthur; Kara A. Latorella; Lynda J. Kramer; Kevin J. Shelton; Robert M. Norman; Lawrence J. Prinzel


17th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology | 2013

Flight Deck Technologies to Enable NextGen Low Visibility Surface Operations

Lawrence J. Prinzel; Jarvis J. Arthur; Lynda J. Kramer; Robert M. Norman; Randall E. Bailey; Denise R. Jones; Jerry R. Karwac; Kevin J. Shelton; Kyle K. E. Ellis

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert M. Norman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge