Robert M. Rifkin

Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma.

Combinations of bortezomib (V) and dexamethasone (D) with either lenalidomide (R) or cyclophosphamide (C) have shown significant efficacy. This randomized phase 2 trial evaluated VDC, VDR, and VDCR in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM). Patients received V 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 4, 8, 11) and D 40 mg (days 1, 8, 15), with either C 500 mg/m2 (days 1, 8) and R 15 mg (days 1-14; VDCR), R 25 mg (days 1-14; VDR), C 500 mg/m2 (days 1, 8; VDC) or C 500 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15; VDC-mod) in 3-week cycles (maximum 8 cycles), followed by maintenance with V 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15, 22) for four 6-week cycles (all arms)≥very good partial response was seen in 58%, 51%, 41%, and 53% (complete response rate of 25%, 24%, 22%, and 47%) of patients (VDCR, VDR, VCD, and VCD-mod, respectively); the corresponding 1-year progression-free survival was 86%, 83%, 93%, and 100%, respectively. Common adverse events included hematologic toxicities, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, and gastrointestinal disturbances. All regimens were highly active and well tolerated in previously untreated MM, and, based on this trial, VDR and VCD-mod are preferred for clinical practice and further comparative testing. No substantial advantage was noted with VDCR over the 3-drug combinations. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00507442).

High-dose chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer: an on-site review of the Bezwoda study

BACKGROUND The efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy with progenitor-cell rescue for women with breast cancer is a controversial issue. Although historically controlled trials have suggested a survival advantage for high-dose chemotherapy, several randomised studies have yet to confirm this advantage. Two studies, however, by Bezwoda, of patients with high-risk and metastatic disease, seemed to show a significant survival advantage for high-dose compared with conventional-dose chemotherapy for metastatic and high-risk primary breast cancer. METHODS To corroborate the study results before starting a large international confirmatory study, a US team did an on-site review of records for patients in the high-risk study. Limited numbers of records were made available for review, all of which were for patients who received the high-dose-chemotherapy regimen. FINDINGS There was much disparity between the reviewed records and the data presented at two international meetings. In addition, the reviewers saw no signed informed consent, and the institutional review committee had no record of approval for the investigational therapy. After the site visit, Bezwoda admitted scientific misconduct by using a different control chemotherapy regimen from that described in presented data. INTERPRETATION The Bezwoda study should not be used as the basis for further trials to test the efficacy of the cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, etoposide regimen for high-dose chemotherapy in women with high-risk primary breast cancer. This review validates the essential nature of on-site audits, especially in single-institution studies.

Autologous Transplantation for Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Results of a Randomized Trial Evaluating Graft Source and Minimal Residual Disease

PURPOSE To determine whether the source of autologous hematopoietic stem cells altered the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) for aggressive non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Of 105 high-risk, persistent, or relapsed NHL patients slated for an autologous HSCT entered onto this trial, 93 eligible patients were randomized to receive cytokine-naive autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) (n = 46) or mobilized peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) (n = 47). All patients received carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide as the conditioning regimen. PBSCT patients also received identical mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 microg/kg/d, and both groups received G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d after the infusion of the stem-cell product until neutrophil engraftment. RESULTS PBSCT patients had significantly faster engraftment of all cell lineages: median time to absolute neutrophil count > or = 500/microL, 10 days versus 13 days on the ABMT arm; median time to platelet count greater than 20,000/microL untransfused, 11 days versus 15 days on the ABMT arm; and median time to RBC transfusion independence, 8 days versus 16 days on the ABMT arm. The complete response rate was 72% for PBSCT and 54% for ABMT. The death rate before posttransplant day 100 was 2% on the ABMT arm and 6% on PBSCT arm. Event-free survival was 37% for PBSCT and 37% for ABMT. However, overall survival for PBSCT was 61% compared with 43% for ABMT. CONCLUSION Patients with aggressive NHL receiving HSCT randomized to PBSCT demonstrated improved neutrophil engraftment and platelet and RBC transfusion independence. The complete response rate and EFS were not statistically different by randomization arm. Patients whose harvests were positive for minimal residual disease by molecular analysis had poorer EFS.

Bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide and lenalidomide combination for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: phase 1 results from the multicenter EVOLUTION study

This phase 1 study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00507442) was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cyclophosphamide in combination with bortezomib, dexamethasone and lenalidomide (VDCR) and to assess the safety and efficacy of this combination in untreated multiple myeloma patients. Cohorts of three to six patients received a cyclophosphamide dosage of 100, 200, 300, 400 or 500 mg/m2 (on days 1 and 8) plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 (on days 1, 4, 8 and 11), dexamethasone 40 mg (on days 1, 8 and 15) and lenalidomide 15 mg (on days 1–14), for eight 21-day induction cycles, followed by four 42-day maintenance cycles (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, 15 and 22). The MTD was the cyclophosphamide dose below which more than one of six patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Twenty-five patients were treated. Two DLTs were seen, of grade 4 febrile neutropenia (cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2) and grade 4 herpes zoster despite anti-viral prophylaxis (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2). No cumulative hematological toxicity or thromboembolic episodes were reported. The overall response rate was 96%, including 20% stringent complete response (CR), 40% CR/near-complete response and 68% ⩾very good partial response. VDCR is well tolerated and highly active in this population. No MTD was reached; the recommended phase 2 cyclophosphamide dose in VDCR is 500 mg/m2, which was the highest dose tested.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of Enzastaurin Versus Placebo in Patients Achieving Remission After First-Line Therapy for High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE To compare disease-free survival (DFS) after maintenance therapy with the selective protein kinase C β (PKCβ) inhibitor, enzastaurin, versus placebo in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in complete remission and with a high risk of relapse after first-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter, phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients who were at high risk of recurrence after rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Patients (N = 758) with stage II bulky or stage III to IV DLBCL, three or more International Prognostic Index risk factors at diagnosis, and a complete response or unconfirmed complete response after 6 to 8 cycles of R-CHOP were assigned 2:1 to receive oral enzastaurin 500 mg daily or placebo for 3 years or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was DFS 3 years after the last patient entered treatment. Correlative analyses of biomarkers, including cell of origin by immunohistochemistry and PKCβ expression, with efficacy outcomes were exploratory objectives. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 48 months, DFS hazard ratio for enzastaurin versus placebo was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.689 to 1.216; two-sided log-rank P = .541; 4-year DFS, 70% v 71%, respectively). Independent of treatment, no significant associations were observed between PKCβ protein expression or cell of origin and DFS or overall survival. CONCLUSION Enzastaurin did not significantly improve DFS in patients with high-risk DLBCL after achieving complete response to R-CHOP. Achievement of a complete response may have abrogated the prognostic significance of cell of origin by immunohistochemistry.

Impact of Long‐Acting Growth Factors on Practice Dynamics and Patient Satisfaction

Objective. To quantify time expended, patient satisfaction, and econometrics associated with short‐acting (sargramostim, epoetin alfa) and long‐acting (darbepoetin alfa, pegfilgrastim) growth factors.

CHAMPION-1: a phase 1/2 study of once-weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Carfilzomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is approved in the United States as a single agent, and in combination with dexamethasone or lenalidomide/dexamethasone (KRd) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Under the single-agent and KRd approvals, carfilzomib is administered as a 10-minute IV infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28-day cycles (20 mg/m(2) [cycle 1, days 1-2]; 27 mg/m(2) thereafter). This multicenter, single-arm, phase 1/2 study, Community Harmonized Assessment of Myeloma Patients via an Integrated Oncology Network-1 (CHAMPION-1), evaluated once-weekly carfilzomib with dexamethasone in relapsed, or relapsed and refractory MM (1-3 prior therapies). Patients received carfilzomib (30-minute IV infusion) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. The phase 1 portion used a 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of carfilzomib. During phase 2, patients received carfilzomib on the same schedule at the MTD. Patients received dexamethasone (40 mg) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; dexamethasone was omitted on day 22 for cycles 9+. A total of 116 patients were enrolled. The MTD was 70 mg/m(2), and 104 patients (phase 1/2) received carfilzomib 70 mg/m(2) At 70 mg/m(2), the median number of prior regimens was 1; and 52% were bortezomib-refractory. At 70 mg/m(2), the most common grade ≥3 adverse events were fatigue (11%) and hypertension (7%). Overall response rate at 70 mg/m(2) was 77%. Median progression-free survival was 12.6 months. These findings merit additional evaluation of the once-weekly dosing regimen. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01677858.

Phase 1 dose-escalation study of IV ixazomib, an investigational proteasome inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma.

Ixazomib is an investigational proteasome inhibitor that has shown preclinical activity in lymphoma models. This phase 1 study assessed the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary activity of intravenous (IV) ixazomib in relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients who had received ⩾2 prior therapies. Thirty patients with a range of histologies received ixazomib 0.125−3.11 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of 28-day cycles. Patients received a median of two cycles (range 1−36). MTD was determined to be 2.34 mg/m2. Most common drug-related adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (43%), diarrhea (33%), nausea, vomiting and thrombocytopenia (each 27%). Drug-related grade ⩾3 AEs included neutropenia (20%), thrombocytopenia (13%) and diarrhea (10%). Drug-related peripheral neuropathy occurred in four (13%) patients; no grade ⩾3 events were reported. Plasma exposure increased dose proportionally from 0.5−3.11 mg/m2; terminal half-life was 4−12 days after multiple dosing. Of 26 evaluable patients, five achieved responses: 4/11 follicular lymphoma patients (one complete and three partial responses) and 1/4 peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients (partial response). Sustained responses were observed with ⩾32 cycles of treatment in two heavily pretreated follicular lymphoma patients. Results suggest weekly IV ixazomib is generally well tolerated and may be clinically active in relapsed/refractory lymphoma.

Mitoxantrone and Fludarabine in the Treatment of Patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Failing Primary Therapy with a Doxorubicin-or Mitoxantrone-Containing Regimen

Patients with recurrent lymphoma of any grade were treated with mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2 given intravenously (IV) over 15–30 minutes on day 1) followed by fludarabine at a dose of (25 mg/m 2 given IV over 30 minutes on days 1–3) every 28 days fludarabine at a dose of(25 mg/m2 given IV over 30 minutes on days 1–3) every 28 days. All patients had failed one prior chemotherapy regimen that contained either doxorubicin or mitoxantrone, total dose not exceeding 350 mg/m2 doxorubicin or 80 mg/m2 mitoxantrone. mitoxantrone. Thirty one patients (22 with intermediate-or high-grade and 9 with low-grade NHL) were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range: 21 to 87). The objective response rate for patients with intermediate/high-grade NHL was 55% (27% with CR) and 89% (56% with CR) for patients with low-grade NHL. Median time to disease progression was 5.1 months for patients with intermediate/high-grade NHL and 10.8 months for patients with low-grade NHL. Median time to death for patients with intermediate/high-grade disease was 11.4 months. Median time to death for patients with low-grade NHL was not calculable as only one death (due to respiratory failure) occurred in this group 6.5 months after study start. The regimen was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in 80% (24 of 30) of patients and Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 19% (6 of 31) of patients. Nine hospitalizations for adverse events (primarily fever and neutropenia) occurred among eight patients, all with intermediate/high-grade NHL, during a total of 118 cycles of therapy. Further studies of this combination regimen in patients with intermediate/high-grade NHL and studies combined with monoclonal antibodies in low-grade NHL are warranted.

Photodynamic therapy using SnET2 for basal cell nevus syndrome : A case report

A 26-year-old man with basal cell nevus syndrome presented to the Rocky Mountain Cancer Center (Denver, Colorado) for treatment of several basal cell carcinomas with photodynamic therapy using tin ethyl etiopurpurin (SnET2). The patient was of northern European descent, had type I skin (always burns, never tans), and had a 10-year history of multifocal basal cell carcinomas. The patient had a family history of Gorlins syndrome (basal cell nevus syndrome); the syndrome had been diagnosed in this patient in 1985. The patient was enrolled in a Phase I/II clinical trial. He was given 1.2 mg/kg (94 mg total) of SnET2 via intravenous infusion; he returned to the clinic the following day for red light application. Thirteen lesions, in 12 treatment fields, were illuminated with light totaling 200 J/cm2 at a fluence of 150 mW/cm2. At the 3-month follow-up examination, all tumors were graded as having a complete response by modified AIDS Clinical Trial Guidelines oncologic standards. No evidence of recurrence has been noted during the 6-month follow-up period.