Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert Marsh is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert Marsh.


Journal of Medical Case Reports | 2016

Simultaneous and sequential hemorrhage of multiple cerebral cavernous malformations: a case report

Nundia Louis; Robert Marsh

BackgroundThe etiology of cerebral cavernous malformation hemorrhage is not well understood. Causative physiologic parameters preceding hemorrhagic cavernous malformation events are often not reported. We present a case of an individual with sequential simultaneous hemorrhages in multiple cerebral cavernous malformations with a new onset diagnosis of hypertension.Case presentationA 42-year-old white man was admitted to our facility with worsening headache, left facial and tongue numbness, dizziness, diplopia, and elevated blood pressure. His past medical history was significant for new onset diagnosis of hypertension and chronic seasonal allergies. Serial imaging over the ensuing 8 days revealed sequential hemorrhagic lesions. He underwent suboccipital craniotomy for resection of the lesions located in the fourth ventricle and right cerebellum. One month after surgery, he had near complete resolution of his symptoms with mild residual vertigo but symptomatic chronic hypertension.ConclusionsMany studies have focused on genetic and inflammatory mechanisms contributing to cerebral cavernous malformation rupture, but few have reported on the potential of hemodynamic changes contributing to cerebral cavernous malformation rupture. Systemic blood pressure changes clearly have an effect on angioma pressures. When considering the histopathological features of cerebral cavernous malformation architecture, changes in arterial pressure could cause meaningful alterations in hemorrhage propensity and patterns.


Translational Oncology | 2017

Analysis of Chemopredictive Assay for Targeting Cancer Stem Cells in Glioblastoma Patients.

Candace M. Howard; Jagan Valluri; Anthony Alberico; Terrence Julien; Rida S Mazagri; Robert Marsh; Hoyt Alastair; Antonio Cortese; Michael Griswold; Wanmei Wang; Krista L Denning; Linda Brown; Pier Paolo Claudio

Introduction: The prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) treated with standard-of-care maximal surgical resection and concurrent adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ)/radiotherapy remains very poor (less than 15 months). GBMs have been found to contain a small population of cancer stem cells (CSCs) that contribute to tumor propagation, maintenance, and treatment resistance. The highly invasive nature of high-grade gliomas and their inherent resistance to therapy lead to very high rates of recurrence. For these reasons, not all patients with similar diagnoses respond to the same chemotherapy, schedule, or dose. Administration of ineffective anticancer therapy is not only costly but more importantly burdens the patient with unnecessary toxicity and selects for the development of resistant cancer cell clones. We have developed a drug response assay (ChemoID) that identifies the most effective chemotherapy against CSCs and bulk of tumor cells from of a panel of potential treatments, offering great promise for individualized cancer management. Providing the treating physician with drug response information on a panel of approved drugs will aid in personalized therapy selections of the most effective chemotherapy for individual patients, thereby improving outcomes. A prospective study was conducted evaluating the use of the ChemoID drug response assay in GBM patients treated with standard of care. Methods: Forty-one GBM patients (mean age 54 years, 59% male), all eligible for a surgical biopsy, were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board–approved protocol, and fresh tissue samples were collected for drug sensitivity testing. Patients were all treated with standard-of-care TMZ plus radiation with or without maximal surgery, depending on the status of the disease. Patients were prospectively monitored for tumor response, time to recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Odds ratio (OR) associations of 12-month recurrence, PFS, and OS outcomes were estimated for CSC, bulk tumor, and combined assay responses for the standard-of-care TMZ treatment; sensitivities/specificities, areas under the curve (AUCs), and risk reclassification components were examined. Results: Median follow-up was 8 months (range 3-49 months). For every 5% increase in in vitro CSC cell kill by TMZ, 12-month patient response (nonrecurrence of cancer) increased two-fold, OR = 2.2 (P = .016). Similar but somewhat less supported associations with the bulk tumor test were seen, OR = 2.75 (P = .07) for each 5% bulk tumor cell kill by TMZ. Combining CSC and bulk tumor assay results in a single model yielded a statistically supported CSC association, OR = 2.36 (P = .036), but a much attenuated remaining bulk tumor association, OR = 1.46 (P = .472). AUCs and [sensitivity/specificity] at optimal outpoints (>40% CSC cell kill and >55% bulk tumor cell kill) were AUC = 0.989 [sensitivity = 100/specificity = 97], 0.972 [100/89], and 0.989 [100/97] for the CSC only, bulk tumor only, and combined models, respectively. Risk categorization of patients was improved by 11% when using the CSC test in conjunction with the bulk test (risk reclassification nonevent net reclassification improvement [NRI] and overall NRI = 0.111, P = .030). Median recurrence time was 20 months for patients with a positive (>40% cell kill) CSC test versus only 3 months for those with a negative CSC test, whereas median recurrence time was 13 months versus 4 months for patients with a positive (>55% cell kill) bulk test versus negative. Similar favorable results for the CSC test were observed for PFS and OS outcomes. Panel results across 14 potential other treatments indicated that 34/41 (83%) potentially more optimal alternative therapies may have been chosen using CSC results, whereas 27/41 (66%) alternative therapies may have been chosen using bulk tumor results. Conclusions: The ChemoID CSC drug response assay has the potential to increase the accuracy of bulk tumor assays to help guide individualized chemotherapy choices. GBM cancer recurrence may occur quickly if the CSC test has a low in vitro cell kill rate even if the bulk tumor test cell kill rate is high.


Clinical Case Reports | 2017

Novel case of resolution of hypsarrhythmia following tuber resection in a patient with infantile spasms and tuberous sclerosis

Robert Marsh; Courtney Nichols; Mary Payne

This article describes a case involving the resolution of hypsarrhythmia, a generalized abnormal EEG pattern, following focal resection of a cortical tuber in a patient with tuberous sclerosis.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

A UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing study of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) in previously untreated patients (pts) with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

Manish Sharma; Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci; Theodore Karrison; Kenisha Allen; Jaclyn D Peterson; Robert Marsh; Mark Kozloff; Blase N. Polite; Hedy L. Kindler


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

A phase IB/randomized phase II study of gemcitabine (G) plus placebo (P) or vismodegib (V), a hedgehog (Hh) pathway inhibitor, in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC): Interim analysis of a University of Chicago phase II consortium study.

Daniel Virgil Thomas Catenacci; Nathan Bahary; Martin J. Edelman; Sreenivasa Nattam; Robert Marsh; Andreas Kaubisch; James Wallace; Deirdre Jill Cohen; Patrick J. Stiff; Bethany G. Sleckman; Sachdev P. Thomas; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Les Henderson; Ciara Zagaya; Michael W. Vannier; Theodore Karrison; Walter M. Stadler; Hedy L. Kindler


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

ChemoID assay for glioblastoma.

Pier Paolo Claudio; Sarah E Mathis; Rounak Nande; Logan Lawrence; Anthony Alberico; Terrence Julien; Rida S Mazagri; Robert Marsh; Paul Muizelaar; Krista L Denning; Jagan Valluri


Journal of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology | 2018

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Delineating the Progression and Underlying Mechanisms Following Blast Traumatic Brain Injury

Brandon Lucke Wold; Richard Nolan; Divine Nwafor; Linda Nguyen; Cletus Cheyuo; Ryan C. Turner; Charles L. Rosen; Robert Marsh


Neuroscience Communications | 2017

Hemorrhagic progression of cavernous angiomas: a review

Nundia Louis; Robert Marsh


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

Adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival in patients with node positive esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy: A retrospective analysis using the National Cancer Database.

Gaurav S. Ajmani; Thomas A. Hensing; Ki-Wan Kim; Seth B. Krantz; Richard A. Prinz; Mark S. Talamonti; Marshall S. Baker; David J. Bentrem; Kevin K. Roggin; Robert Marsh


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

A genotype-directed study to optimize dosing of irinotecan according to the UGT1A1 genotype.

Federico Innocenti; Ravi Salgia; Jacqueline Ramírez; Linda Janisch; Samir D. Undevia; Larry House; Soma Das; Kehua Wu; Michelle Turcich; Robert Marsh; Theodore Karrison; Michael L. Maitland; Richard L. Schilsky; Mark J. Ratain

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert Marsh's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark S. Talamonti

NorthShore University HealthSystem

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marshall S. Baker

NorthShore University HealthSystem

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge