Robert Moreland
Allegheny University of the Health Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robert Moreland.
Circulation Research | 1998
James Joseph Earley; Xiaoling Su; Robert Moreland
Caldesmon is a thin-filament-associated protein believed to be important in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction, although the precise mechanism is unknown. We used antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to produce intact swine carotid smooth muscle tissue deficient in h-caldesmon. Caldesmon content was decreased by 78% after 7 days in culture with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides but was unchanged in tissues in the presence of sense oligodeoxynucleotides or vehicle. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides produced a significant decrease in the caldesmon/actin ratio, but no change was measured in the calponin/actin ratio, suggesting that the effect was specific to caldesmon and not other thin-filament-associated proteins. Basal and KCl-stimulated levels of myosin light chain phosphorylation were not different among tissues from all 3 groups. In contrast, h-caldesmon-deficient tissues produced 62% less KCl-induced force than controls. Unstimulated h-caldesmon-deficient smooth muscle tissues stretched and then released, redeveloped force, demonstrating active crossbridge cycling; strips containing normal h-caldesmon content did not redevelop force on release. We suggest that in resting vascular smooth muscle, active crossbridges are inhibited by caldesmon. Therefore, regulation of smooth muscle includes a thin-filament-based disinhibition component.
Circulation Research | 2017
F. Daniel Ramirez; Pouya Motazedian; Richard G. Jung; Pietro Di Santo; Zachary MacDonald; Robert Moreland; Trevor Simard; Aisling A. Clancy; Juan J. Russo; Vivian Welch; George A. Wells; Benjamin Hibbert
Rationale: Methodological sources of bias and suboptimal reporting contribute to irreproducibility in preclinical science and may negatively affect research translation. Randomization, blinding, sample size estimation, and considering sex as a biological variable are deemed crucial study design elements to maximize the quality and predictive value of preclinical experiments. Objective: To examine the prevalence and temporal patterns of recommended study design element implementation in preclinical cardiovascular research. Methods and Results: All articles published over a 10-year period in 5 leading cardiovascular journals were reviewed. Reports of in vivo experiments in nonhuman mammals describing pathophysiology, genetics, or therapeutic interventions relevant to specific cardiovascular disorders were identified. Data on study design and animal model use were collected. Citations at 60 months were additionally examined as a surrogate measure of research impact in a prespecified subset of studies, stratified by individual and cumulative study design elements. Of 28 636 articles screened, 3396 met inclusion criteria. Randomization was reported in 21.8%, blinding in 32.7%, and sample size estimation in 2.3%. Temporal and disease-specific analyses show that the implementation of these study design elements has overall not appreciably increased over the past decade, except in preclinical stroke research, which has uniquely demonstrated significant improvements in methodological rigor. In a subset of 1681 preclinical studies, randomization, blinding, sample size estimation, and inclusion of both sexes were not associated with increased citations at 60 months. Conclusions: Methodological shortcomings are prevalent in preclinical cardiovascular research, have not substantially improved over the past 10 years, and may be overlooked when basing subsequent studies. Resultant risks of bias and threats to study validity have the potential to hinder progress in cardiovascular medicine as preclinical research often precedes and informs clinical trials. Stroke research quality has uniquely improved in recent years, warranting a closer examination for interventions to model in other cardiovascular fields.
Journal of Cellular Physiology | 1998
Anikó Rokolya; Michael P. Walsh; Harold A. Singer; Robert Moreland
Calponin, a thin filament–associated protein, inhibits actin‐activated myosin ATPase activity, and this inhibition is reversed by phosphorylation. Calponin phosphorylation by protein kinase C and Ca2+/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase II has been shown in purified protein systems but has been difficult to demonstrate in more physiological preparations. We have previously shown that calponin is phosphorylated in a cell‐free homogenate of swine carotid artery. The goal of this study was to determine whether protein kinase C and/or Ca2+/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase II catalyzes calponin phosphorylation. Ca2+‐dependent calponin phosphorylation was not inhibited by calmodulin antagonists. In contrast, both Ca2+‐ and phorbol dibutyrate/1‐oleoyl‐2‐acetyl‐sn‐glycerol–dependent calponin phosphorylation were inhibited by the pseudosubstrate inhibitor of protein kinase C and staurosporine. Our results also demonstrate that stimulation with either Ca2+, phorbol dibutyrate, or 1‐oleoyl‐2‐acetyl‐sn‐glycerol activates endogenous protein kinase C. We interpret our results as clearly demonstrating that the physiological kinase for calponin phosphorylation is protein kinase C and not Ca2+/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase II. We also present data showing that the direct measurement of 32P incorporation into calponin and the indirect measurement of calponin phosphorylation using nonequilibrium pH gradient gel electrophoresis provide similar quantitative values of calponin phosphorylation. J. Cell. Physiol. 176:545–552, 1998.
Canadian Medical Association Journal | 2018
Pietro Di Santo; David T. Harnett; Trevor Simard; F. Daniel Ramirez; Ali Pourdjabbar; Altayyeb Yousef; Robert Moreland; Jordan Bernick; George A. Wells; Alexander Dick; Michel R. Le May; Marino Labinaz; Derek So; Pouya Motazedian; Richard G. Jung; Jaya Chandrasekhar; Roxana Mehran; Aun-Yeong Chong; Benjamin Hibbert
BACKGROUND: Radial artery access is commonly performed for coronary angiography and invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Despite limitations in diagnostic accuracy, the modified Allen test (manual occlusion of radial and ulnar arteries followed by release of the latter and assessment of palmar blush) is used routinely to evaluate the collateral circulation to the hand and, therefore, to determine patient eligibility for radial artery access. We sought to evaluate whether a smartphone application may provide a superior alternative to the modified Allen test. METHODS: We compared the modified Allen test with a smartphone heart rate–monitoring application (photoplethysmography readings detected using a smartphone camera lens placed on the patient’s index finger) in patients undergoing a planned cardiac catheterization. Test order was randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion. All patients then underwent conventional plethysmography of the index finger, followed by Doppler ultrasonography of the radial and ulnar arteries (the diagnostic standard). The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of the heart rate–monitoring application. RESULTS: Among 438 patients who were included in the study, we found that the heart rate–monitoring application had a superior diagnostic accuracy compared with the modified Allen test (91.8% v. 81.7%, p = 0.002), attributable to its greater specificity (93.0% v. 82.8%, p = 0.001). We also found that this application had greater diagnostic accuracy for assessment of radial or ulnar artery patency in the ipsilateral and contralateral wrist (94.0% v. 84.0%, p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: A smartphone application used at the bedside was diagnostically superior to traditional physical examination for confirming ulnar patency before radial artery access. This study highlights the potential for smartphone-based diagnostics to aid in clinical decision-making at the patient’s bedside. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, no. NCT02519491.
Circulation Research | 2017
F. Daniel Ramirez; Pouya Motazedian; Richard G. Jung; Pietro Di Santo; Zachary MacDonald; Robert Moreland; Trevor Simard; Aisling A. Clancy; Juan J. Russo; Vivian Welch; George A. Wells; Benjamin Hibbert
Rationale: Methodological sources of bias and suboptimal reporting contribute to irreproducibility in preclinical science and may negatively affect research translation. Randomization, blinding, sample size estimation, and considering sex as a biological variable are deemed crucial study design elements to maximize the quality and predictive value of preclinical experiments. Objective: To examine the prevalence and temporal patterns of recommended study design element implementation in preclinical cardiovascular research. Methods and Results: All articles published over a 10-year period in 5 leading cardiovascular journals were reviewed. Reports of in vivo experiments in nonhuman mammals describing pathophysiology, genetics, or therapeutic interventions relevant to specific cardiovascular disorders were identified. Data on study design and animal model use were collected. Citations at 60 months were additionally examined as a surrogate measure of research impact in a prespecified subset of studies, stratified by individual and cumulative study design elements. Of 28 636 articles screened, 3396 met inclusion criteria. Randomization was reported in 21.8%, blinding in 32.7%, and sample size estimation in 2.3%. Temporal and disease-specific analyses show that the implementation of these study design elements has overall not appreciably increased over the past decade, except in preclinical stroke research, which has uniquely demonstrated significant improvements in methodological rigor. In a subset of 1681 preclinical studies, randomization, blinding, sample size estimation, and inclusion of both sexes were not associated with increased citations at 60 months. Conclusions: Methodological shortcomings are prevalent in preclinical cardiovascular research, have not substantially improved over the past 10 years, and may be overlooked when basing subsequent studies. Resultant risks of bias and threats to study validity have the potential to hinder progress in cardiovascular medicine as preclinical research often precedes and informs clinical trials. Stroke research quality has uniquely improved in recent years, warranting a closer examination for interventions to model in other cardiovascular fields.
American Journal of Physiology-gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology | 1998
Simon A. Ahtaridis; Surender S. Katoch; Robert Moreland
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2018
Trevor Simard; Richard G. Jung; Pietro Di Santo; Francisco Ramirez; Alisha Labinaz; Ian Pitcher; Pouya Motazedian; Rebecca Rochman; Robert Moreland; Jeffrey Marbach; Paul Boland; Kiran Sarathy; Saleh Alghofaili; Juan Russo; Etienne Couture; Alexander Dick; Michael Froeschl; Michel R. Le May; Benjamin Hibbert
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2018
Trevor Simard; Pietro Di Santo; Francisco Ramirez; Richard G. Jung; Alisha Labinaz; Ian Pitcher; Pouya Motazedian; Rebecca Rochman; Robert Moreland; Jeffrey Marbach; Paul Boland; Kiran Sarathy; Saleh Alghofaili; Juan Russo; Etienne Couture; Derek So; Aun-Yeong Chong; Michel R. Le May; Benjamin Hibbert
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2018
Pietro Di Santo; Alisha Labinaz; Rebecca Rochman; Richard G. Jung; Trevor Simard; Francisco Ramirez; Ian Pitcher; Pouya Motazedian; Robert Moreland; Jeffrey Marbach; Paul Boland; Kiran Sarathy; Saleh Alghofaili; Juan Russo; Etienne Couture; Michel R. Le May; Marino Labinaz; Chris N. Glover; Benjamin Hibbert
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2018
Kiran Sarathy; Richard G. Jung; Alisha Labinaz; Rebecca Rochman; Ian Pitcher; Robert Moreland; Pouya Motazedian; Francisco Ramirez; Pietro Di Santo; Jeffrey Marbach; Paul Boland; Trevor Simard; Saleh Alghofaili; Juan Russo; Etienne Couture; Marino Labinaz; Chris N. Glover; Benjamin Hibbert