Robert Öllinger

The faster the better: anastomosis time influences patient survival after deceased donor kidney transplantation

Despite a continuously growing knowledge of the impact of factors on kidney graft function, such as donor age, body mass index, and cold ischemia time, few data are available regarding anastomosis time (AT) and its impact on long‐term results. We investigated whether surgical AT correlates with patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation performing a retrospective analysis of 1245 consecutive deceased donor kidney transplantations between 01/2000 and 12/2010 at Innsbruck Medical University. Kaplan–Meier and log‐rank analyses were carried out for 1‐ and 5‐year patient and graft survival. AT was defined as time from anastomosis start until reperfusion. Median AT was 30 min. Five‐year survival of allografts with an AT >30 min was 76.6% compared with 80.6% in the group with AT <30 min (P = 0.027). Patient survival in the group with higher AT similarly was inferior with 85.7% after 5 years compared with 89.6% (P < 0.0001) [Correction added on February 18, 2015, after first online publication: the percentage value for patient survival was previously incorrect and have now been changed to 89.6%]. Cox regression analysis revealed AT as an independent significant factor for patient survival (HR 1.021 per minute; 95% CI 1.006–1.037; P = 0.006). As longer AT closely correlates with inferior long‐term patient survival, it has to be considered as a major risk factor for inferior long‐term results after deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Predictive Factors for Extrahepatic Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Liver Transplantation.

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients treated with liver transplantation (LT) is associated with diminished survival. Particularly, extrahepatic localization of HCC recurrence contributes to poor prognosis.

Hepatotoxicity following systemic therapy for colorectal liver metastases and the impact of chemotherapy-associated liver injury on outcomes after curative liver resection

Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) have remarkably benefited from the advances in medical multimodal treatment and surgical techniques over the last two decades leading to significant improvements in long-term survival. More patients are currently undergoing liver resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which has been increasingly established within the framework of curative-indented treatment strategies. However, the use of several cytotoxic agents has been linked to specific liver injuries that not only impair the ability of liver tissue to regenerate but also decrease long-term survival. One of the most common agents included in modern chemotherapy regimens is oxaliplatin, which is considered to induce a parenchymal damage of the liver primarily involving the sinusoids defined as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). Administration of bevacizumab, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has been reported to improve response of CLM to chemotherapy in clinical studies, concomitantly protecting the liver from the development of SOS. In this review, we aim to summarize current data on multimodal treatment concepts for CLM, give an in-depth overview of liver damage caused by cytostatic agents focusing on oxaliplatin-induced SOS, and evaluate the role of bevacizumab to improve clinical outcomes of patients with CLM and to protect the liver from the development of SOS.

Reduction of Cold Ischemia Time and Anastomosis Time Correlates with Lower Delayed Graft Function Rates Following Transplantation of Marginal Kidneys

BACKGROUND In kidney transplantation, the association of cold ischemia time (CIT), anastomosis time (AT), and delayed graft function (DGF) is particularly detrimental in grafts from marginal donors; however, actual cut-off criteria are still debated. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from patients >65 years (n=193) and patients <65 years (n=1054) transplanted between 2000 and 2010 were retrospectively analyzed regarding the age-dependent impact of ischemia times and DGF. RESULTS Overall death censored graft survival was inferior for ECD/DCD organs. Graft survival was significantly impaired by DGF in younger and older recipients. The multivariate analysis revealed an age-dependent profile of risk factors for DGF. In younger patients, multiple risk factors were identified while in patients >65 years, only CIT and AT were correlated with DGF. Marginal grafts with a CIT<769 min had a comparable outcome to any SCD organ; extended CIT >770 min worsened ECD/DCD survival significantly. Similarly, AT longer than 26 min was associated with a significantly impaired survival of ECD/DCD grafts. In a Cox regression analysis with penalized splines, this increased risk of graft loss was not linear: CIT beyond 800 min and AT beyond 20 min were cut-off values associated with worse outcomes in marginal organs. CONCLUSIONS Thus, risk factors for DGF are age-dependent; keeping ischemia times below these thresholds offers outcome of ECD/DCD organs comparable to SCD organs.

Comparison of Single-Port Versus Standard Multiport Left Lateral Liver Sectionectomy

It remains unclear if single incision laparoscopic liver surgery is superior to standard multiport resections and in what regard patients might benefit from this approach. We retrospectively analyzed the course of all patients undergoing laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy at our center between 2009 and 2017. In total, 11 single incision and 31 multiport left lateral sectionectomies were performed at our center between July 2009 and May 2017. Six patients were excluded due to multivisceral resections. Indications included adenoma (n = 7 vs n = 2), focal nodular hyperplasia (n = 4 vs n = 3), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 4 vs n = 4), colorectal liver metastasis (n = 4 vs n = 0), noncolorectal metastasis (n = 2 vs n = 1), hemangioma (n = 3 vs n = 0), abscess (n = 1 vs n = 0), and cysts (n = 1 vs n = 0). Length of operation was significantly shorter in the single incision group (206 vs 137 minutes, P = .003). One complication was observed in the single incision group (grade IIIb, n = 1) while 3 patients in the multiport group suffered from postoperative complications (grade II, n = 1; grade IIIa, n = 2), resulting in a morbidity rate of 12.5% and 11.5%, respectively. No mortality was observed in both groups. Length of hospital stay did not significantly differ in both groups (median 7 vs 7 days, P = .513). The single incision approach is safe and has become the standard approach for the left lateral sectionectomy at our center. Shorter operation times technique might well be due to the easy retrieval of the liver specimen via the umbilical incision with no need for a Pfannenstiel incision.

Intraoperative biomarkers in renal transplantation

The emerging need for biomarkers in the management of renal transplantation is highlighted by the severity of related complications such as acute renal failure and ischaemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) and by the increasing efforts to identify novel markers of these events to predict and monitor delayed graft function (DGF) and long‐term outcome. In clinical studies candidate markers such as kidney injury molecule‐1, neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin and interleukin‐18 have been demonstrated to be valid biomarkers with high predictive value for DFG in a post‐transplant setting. However, studies investigating biomarkers for early diagnosis of IRI and assumable DGF as well as identification of potential graft recipients at increased risk at the time point of transplantation lack further confirmation and translation into clinical practice. This review summarizes the current literature on the value of IRI biomarkers in outcome prediction following renal transplantation as well their capacity as surrogate end points from an intraoperative perspective.

Liver Transplantation and Liver Resection for Cirrhotic Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of Long-Term Survivals

BackgroundBoth liver transplantation (LT) and liver resection (LR) represent curative treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with liver cirrhosis. In this study, we have compared outcomes between historical and more recent patient cohorts scheduled either for LT or LR, respectively.MethodsClinicopathological data of all patients with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent LT or LR between 1989 and 2011 were evaluated. Overall survival of patients with HCC within the Milan criteria (MC) was analyzed focusing on changes between different time periods.ResultsIn total, 364 and 141 patients underwent LT and LR for HCC in cirrhosis, respectively. Among patients with HCC within MC, 214 and 59 underwent LT and LR, respectively. Postoperative morbidity (37 vs. 11%, P < .0001), but not mortality (3 vs. 1%, P = .165), was higher after LR than after LT for HCC within MC. In the period 1989–2004, overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in patients who underwent LT compared to LR for HCC within MC (5-year OS: 77 vs. 36%, P < .0001). Interestingly, in the more recent period 2005–2011, OS was comparable between LT and LR for HCC within MC (5-year OS: 73 vs. 61%, P = .07).ConclusionWe have noted an improvement of outcomes among patients selected for partial hepatectomy in recent years that were comparable to stable results after LT in cirrhotic patients with HCC. Whether those improvements are due to advances in liver surgery, optimized perioperative managament for patients with liver cirrhosis, and the development of modern multimodal treatment strategies for the recurrent lesions appears plausible.

Evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery as standard procedure for HCC in cirrhosis

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis have an increased risk for postoperative complications including liver failure. However, there is some evidence that the use of laparoscopy markedly decreases this risk. Patients Between 2010 - 2015, a total of 21 laparoscopic liver resections were performed for HCC in Child-A cirrhosis at our center. Mean MELD score was 9 (6 - 12), and the mean LiMAx was 261 µg/h/kg (101 - 489). All resections were performed by conventional laparoscopy using 4 - 6 trocars. Liver parenchyma was transected using ultrasonic shears. Hilar occlusion was used on demand. In the earlier years, laparoscopic resections were performed occasionally and mainly if tumors were easily accessible. With increasing experience, currently most HCC in cirrhosis are resected laparoscopically. Likewise, 12 out of the 21 resections were performed within the last 12 months, including 2 anatomic left hemihepatectomies. Results Conversion rate, postoperative mortality, and operative revision rate were all 0 %. Four patients (19 %) developed mild complications Clavien-Dindo grade 1 or 2 (ascites, transfusion, pneumonia, renal impairment). One patient (4.8 %) developed a grade 3 event (bile leak, percutaneous drainage). All but 1 early patient underwent R0 resection (95 %). The mean duration of hospital stay was 10.5 days (5 - 21), and the mean duration of ICU stay was 1.8 days (1 - 7). No case of decompensation of liver cirrhosis was observed. In 1 case, a prolonged production of ascites evolved. Conclusion Even in patients with severely impaired liver function, no severe complications and especially no decompensation of cirrhosis was observed. Therefore, in accordance with other single center experiences, liver resection for HCC in cirrhosis should be performed preferentially by laparoscopy.

The Role of Bariatric Surgery in Abdominal Organ Transplantation—the Next Big Challenge?

Obesity is linked to inferior transplant outcome. Bariatric surgery (BS) is an established treatment of morbid obesity. We provide an overview on BS in the field of kidney (KT) and liver transplantation (LT). In end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and KT patients, BS seems safe and feasible. Complication rates were slightly higher compared to the non-transplant population, whereas weight loss and improvement of comorbidities were comparable. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was the preferred procedure before KT and superior to gastric bypass (GB) in regard to mortality and morbidity. If conducted after KT, both procedures showed comparable results. BS before LT was associated with high complication rates, in particular after GB. Albeit distinct complications, SG conducted after LT showed the best results. Immunosuppression (IS) changes after BS were rare.

Validity of the Iwate criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive liver resection

Recently proposed by the International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection, the Iwate criteria (IC) can be used by surgeons to predict the operative difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and were validated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common indication for LLR.