Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert P. Sutcliffe is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert P. Sutcliffe.


Hpb | 2011

Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis

Reza Mirnezami; Alex H. Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Neil W. Pearce; John Primrose; Robert P. Sutcliffe

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now considered a feasible alternative to open liver resection (OLR) in selected patients. Nevertheless studies comparing LLR and OLR are few and concerns remain about long-term oncological equivalence. The present study compares outcomes with LLR vs. OLR using meta-analytical methods. METHODS Electronic literature searches were conducted to identify studies comparing LLR and OLR. Short-term outcomes evaluated included operating time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, peri-operative morbidity and resection margin status. Longer-term outcomes included local and distant recurrence, and overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Meta-analyses were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method and Cohens d method, with results expressed as odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD), respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria with a population of 1678 patients. LLR resulted in longer operating time, but reduced blood loss, portal clamp time, overall and liver-specific complications, ileus and length of stay. No difference was found between LLR and OLR for oncological outcomes. DISCUSSION LLR has short-term advantages and seemingly equivalent long-term outcomes and can be considered a feasible alternative to open surgery in experienced hands.


Transplantation | 2003

Liver transplantation for Wilson's disease: long-term results and quality-of-life assessment.

Robert P. Sutcliffe; Donal Maguire; Paolo Muiesan; Anil Dhawan; Giorgina Mieli-Vergani; John O'Grady; Mohammed Rela; Nigel Heaton

Background. Wilson’s disease associated with severe liver disease is effectively cured by orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, there are also anecdotal reports of improved or resolved neurologic symptoms after OLT in patients with stable or normal liver function. Side effects with conventional chelating agents are common, and it has been suggested that OLT should be considered in patients with severe progressive neurologic symptoms. However, the decision to apply this therapeutic modality to a subgroup of patients without significant liver disease is a quality-of-life issue. Methods. Long-term follow-up and quality-of-life data were obtained prospectively for 24 patients who underwent OLT between 1988 and 2000 for Wilson’s disease associated with severe liver disease. In long-term survivors, quality of life was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire. Results. One patient who had multiorgan failure before OLT died within 24 hr of surgery and two patients died within 1 year because of immunosuppressant-related complications. There have been no deaths or graft loss in patients who have undergone transplantation since 1994, and after a median follow-up of 92 months, all survivors have satisfactory graft function (5-year patient and graft survival, 87.5%), with quality-of-life scores (assessed in 86% of survivors) comparable to age- and sex-matched controls from the general population. Conclusions. The authors’ results suggest that liver transplantation can be safely performed in patients with Wilson’s disease, with excellent long-term results and quality of life. Further study of the utility of liver transplantation in the management of patients with severe neurologic symptoms is justified.


Hpb | 2014

A preoperative predictive score of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy

Keith Roberts; James Hodson; Homoyoon Mehrzad; Ravi Marudanayagam; Robert P. Sutcliffe; Paolo Muiesan; John Isaac; Simon R. Bramhall; Darius F. Mirza

BACKGROUND Various factors are related to the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Some of the strongest are identified intra- or postoperatively, which limits their utility in predicting this complication. The preoperative prediction of POPF permits an individualized approach to patient consent and selection, and may influence postoperative management. This study sought to develop and test a score to predict POPF. METHODS A post hoc analysis of a prospectively maintained database was conducted. Consecutive patients were randomly selected to modelling and validation sets at a ratio of 2 :1, respectively. Patient data, preoperative blood tests and physical characteristics of the gland (assessed from preoperative computed tomography images) were subjected to univariate and multivariate analysis in the modelling set of patients. A score predictive of POPF was designed and tested in the validation set. RESULTS Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 77 of 325 (23.7%) patients. The occurrence of POPF was associated with 12 factors. On multivariate analysis, body mass index and pancreatic duct width were independently associated with POPF. A risk score to predict POPF was designed (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.832, 95% confidence interval 0.768-0.897; P < 0.001) and successfully tested upon the validation set. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative assessment of a patients risk for POPF is possible using simple measurements. The present risk score is a valid tool with which to predict POPF in patients undergoing PD.


Annals of Surgery | 2015

Scoring System to Predict Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A UK Multicenter Study

Keith Roberts; Robert P. Sutcliffe; Ravi Marudanayagam; James Hodson; John Isaac; Paolo Muiesan; Alex Navarro; Krashna Patel; Asif Jah; Sara Napetti; Anya Adair; Stefanos Lazaridis; Andreas Prachalias; Guy Shingler; Bilal Al-Sarireh; Roland Storey; Andrew M. Smith; Nehal Shah; Guiseppe Fusai; Jamil Ahmed; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Darius F. Mirza

OBJECTIVE To validate a preoperative predictive score of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Other risk factors for POPF were sought in an attempt to improve the score. BACKGROUND POPF is the major contributor to morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). A preoperative score [using body mass index (BMI) and pancreatic duct width] to predict POPF was tested upon a multicenter patient cohort to assess its performance. METHODS Patients undergoing PD at 8 UK centers were identified. The association between the score and other pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables with POPF was assessed. RESULTS A total of 630 patients underwent PD with 141 occurrences of POPF (22.4%). BMI, perirenal fat thickness, pancreatic duct width on computed tomography and at operation, bilirubin, pancreatojejunostomy technique, underlying pathology, T stage, N stage, R status, and gland firmness were all significantly associated with POPF. The score predicted POPF (P < 0.001) with a higher predictive score associated with increasing severity of POPF (P < 0.001). Stepwise multivariate analysis of pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables demonstrated that only the score was consistently associated with POPF. A table correlating the risk score to actual risk of POPF was created. CONCLUSIONS The predictive score performed well and could not be improved. This provides opportunities for individualizing patient consent and selection, and treatment and research applications.


Diseases of The Esophagus | 2008

Anastomotic strictures and delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy: incidence, risk factors and management

Robert P. Sutcliffe; M. J. Forshaw; R. Tandon; Ashish Rohatgi; Dirk C Strauss; Abrie Botha; Robert C. Mason

The aim of this study was to report the incidence, risk factors, and management of gastric conduit dysfunction after esophagectomy in 177 patients over a 3-year period in a single center. Patients with anastomotic strictures or delayed gastric emptying (DGE) were identified from a prospective database. Anastomotic strictures occurred in 48 patients (27%). Eighty-three percent of early anastomotic strictures (<1 year) were benign, and all late strictures (>1 year) were malignant. Dilatation was effective in 98% of benign and 64% of malignant strictures. DGE occurred in 21 patients (12%), and was associated with both anastomotic leak (P = 0.001) and anastomotic stricture (P = 0.001). 4/8 patients with late DGE (>3 months postesophagectomy) were tumor-related. Pyloric dilatation was effective in 92% of early and 63% of late DGE. Pyloric stents were inserted in 3 patients with tumor-related DGE. After esophagectomy, early anastomotic strictures (within 1 year) and early delayed gastric emptying (within 3 months) are usually benign and respond to dilatation. However, patients presenting later with tumor-related obstruction are unlikely to respond to anastomotic or pyloric dilatation and should be stented.


British Journal of Surgery | 2006

Selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation

Robert P. Sutcliffe; Donal Maguire; Bernard C. Portmann; M. Rela; Nigel Heaton

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) plays a pivotal role in the management of selected patients with initial hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). After disappointing early results and a shortage of cadaveric grafts, patients are currently selected for OLT on the basis of tumour size and number. Limitations of these criteria and the advent of living donation have prompted their re‐evaluation. The principal aims of this review were to define the limitations of current transplant criteria for HCC, and to identify potential areas for improvement.


Liver Transplantation | 2004

Bile duct strictures after adult liver transplantation: A role for biliary reconstructive surgery?

Robert P. Sutcliffe; Donal Maguire; Andrej Mróz; Bernard Portmann; John O'Grady; Matthew Bowles; Paolo Muiesan; Mohamed Rela; Nigel Heaton

There is no accurate method to determine the functional significance of bile duct strictures after liver transplantation, and although biliary reconstructive surgery (Roux‐en‐Y hepaticojejunostomy, HJ) is the second‐line treatment in patients with persistent allograft dysfunction following failed endoscopic therapy, there is no evidence to support this approach. Liver transplant recipients with allograft dysfunction and demonstrable bile duct strictures who had undergone hepaticojejunostomy were identified from a prospective database. Preoperative and follow‐up clinical, biochemical, and radiological data were collected. Perioperative liver biopsies were evaluated prospectively by two histopathologists blinded to clinical information. The biopsies were scored according to presence and severity of biliary features, fibrosis, and coexisting diseases. The effects of preoperative factors on postoperative allograft function were analyzed using SPSS statistical software. After hepatico‐jejunostomy, graft function returned to normal in 8/44 patients (18%), improved in 16/44 (36%), but remained abnormal in 20/44 (45%), including 4 patients who subsequently underwent retransplantation. Hepaticojejunostomy was more likely to yield a favorable outcome (improved or normal graft function) when performed within 2 years of transplantation. Prolonged duration of biliary obstruction was associated with development of advanced graft fibrosis at the time of surgery, but neither factor significantly influenced postoperative graft function. In conclusion, biliary reconstruction successfully restores graft function in the majority of patients who present with anastomotic strictures within the first 2 years after liver transplantation. In patients presenting with bile duct strictures late after transplantation, surgery should be reserved for selected patients without histological evidence of graft fibrosis (moderate–severe) or significant nonbiliary pathology. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:928–.934)


International Journal of Surgery | 2010

Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological factors influencing survival following esophagectomy for cancer

Reza Mirnezami; Ashish Rohatgi; Robert P. Sutcliffe; Ahmed Hamouda; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Abrie Botha; Robert C. Mason

BACKGROUND A number of clinicopathological characteristics can influence survival following esophagectomy for cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the factors affecting survival in a consecutive series of patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer at a single tertiary centre over a 7 year period. MATERIALS & METHODS We analyzed a prospective database of 314 consecutive patients (247 males and 67 females), with a mean age of 62.8 +/- 9.1 years, who underwent esophagectomy for cancer at a single, high-volume centre between January 2000 and June 2007. The impact of 11 variables on survival following esophagectomy was determined by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS On univariate analysis, gender, ASA grade, blood transfusion, type of cancer, tumor stage, lymph node status, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), longitudinal resection margin (LRM) involvement and circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement were significant (p<0.05) negative factors for survival. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated that the only independent factors negatively impacting on survival were ASA grade (p=0.012), tumor stage (p=0.009), LVI (p=0.009) and LRM involvement (p=0.031). CONCLUSIONS In the current study we demonstrated that independent variables effecting survival after esophagectomy for cancer were ASA grade, tumor stage, lymphovascular invasion and longitudinal resection margin involvement. Contrary to other studies we did not find CRM involvement to be an independent predictor for survival.


Hpb | 2012

Aetio-pathogenesis and the management of spontaneous liver bleeding in the West: a 16-year single-centre experience

Narendra Battula; Dimitrios Tsapralis; Arjun Takhar; C. Coldham; David Mayer; John Isaac; Paolo Muiesan; Robert P. Sutcliffe; Ravi Marudanayagam; Darius F. Mirza; Simon R. Bramhall

BACKGROUND Spontaneous liver bleeding (SLB) is a rare but potentially fatal complication. In contrast to the East, various benign pathologies are the source of SLB in the West. An accurate diagnosis and a timely implementation of appropriate treatment are crucial in the management of these patients. The present study presents a large Western experience of SLB from a specialist liver centre. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients presented with SLB between January 1995 and January 2011. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients had SLB, 44 (66%) were female and the median age at presentation was 47 years. Abrupt onset upper abdominal pain was the presenting symptom in 65 (97%) patients. The aetiology for SLB was hepatic adenoma in 27 (40%), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 17 (25%) and various other liver pathologies in the rest. Emergency treatment included a conservative approach in 42 (64%), DSA and embolization in 6 (9%), a laparotomy and packing in 6 (9%) and a liver resection in 11 (16%) patients. Eleven (16%) patients had further planned treatments. Seven (10%) died during the same admission but the mortality was highest in patients with HELLP syndrome. At a median follow-up of 54 months all patients with benign disease are alive. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival of patients with HCC was 59%, 35% and 17%, respectively. CONCLUSION SLB is a life-threatening complication of various underlying conditions and may represent their first manifestation. The management should include initial haemostasis followed by appropriate staging investigations to provide a definitive treatment for each individual patient.


Annals of Surgery | 2017

The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation

Mohammad Abu Hilal; Luca Aldrighetti; Ibrahim Dagher; Bjørn Edwin; Roberto Troisi; R. Alikhanov; Somaiah Aroori; Giulio Belli; Marc G. Besselink; Javier Briceño; Brice Gayet; Mathieu D'Hondt; Mickael Lesurtel; K. Menon; P. Lodge; Fernando Rotellar; Julio Santoyo; Olivier Scatton; Olivier Soubrane; Robert P. Sutcliffe; Ronald M. van Dam; Steve White; Mark Halls; Federica Cipriani; Marcel J. van der Poel; Rubén Ciria; Leonid Barkhatov; Yrene Gomez-Luque; Sira Ocana-Garcia; Andrew Cook

Objective: The European Guidelines Meeting on Laparoscopic Liver Surgery was held in Southampton on February 10 and 11, 2017 with the aim of presenting and validating clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery. Background: The exponential growth of laparoscopic liver surgery in recent years mandates the development of clinical practice guidelines to direct the specialitys continued safe progression and dissemination. Methods: A unique approach to the development of clinical guidelines was adopted. Three well-validated methods were integrated: the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology for the assessment of evidence and development of guideline statements; the Delphi method of establishing expert consensus, and the AGREE II-GRS Instrument for the assessment of the methodological quality and external validation of the final statements. Results: Along with the committee chairman, 22 European experts; 7 junior experts and an independent validation committee of 11 international surgeons produced 67 guideline statements for the safe progression and dissemination of laparoscopic liver surgery. Each of the statements reached at least a 95% consensus among the experts and were endorsed by the independent validation committee. Conclusion: The European Guidelines Meeting for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery has produced a set of clinical practice guidelines that have been independently validated for the safe development and progression of laparoscopic liver surgery. The Southampton Guidelines have amalgamated the available evidence and a wealth of experts’ knowledge taking in consideration the relevant stakeholders’ opinions and complying with the international methodology standards.

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert P. Sutcliffe's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paolo Muiesan

Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ravi Marudanayagam

Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Darius F. Mirza

Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Isaac

Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nigel Heaton

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James Hodson

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Keith Roberts

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge