Robert Reyes

Effects of Laropiprant on Nicotinic Acid-Induced Flushing in Patients With Dyslipidemia

Niacin (nicotinic acid) is not optimally used mainly because of flushing, a process mediated primarily by prostaglandin D(2), which leads to poor patient compliance and suboptimal dosing. This phase II dose-ranging study was designed to assess whether the prostaglandin D(2) receptor 1 antagonist laropiprant (LRPT; MK-0524) would (1) reduce extended-release niacin (ERN)-induced flushing in dyslipidemic patients and (2) support a novel accelerated ERN dosing paradigm: initiating ERN at 1 g and advancing rapidly to 2 g. In part A of the study, 154 dyslipidemic patients were randomized to LRPT 150 mg/day or placebo in a 9-week, 2-period crossover study. Patients who completed part A (n = 122) entered part B (after a 2-week washout), together with additional patients who entered part B directly (n = 290). Part B patients were randomized to placebo, ERN 1 g (Niaspan, no previous titration), or ERN 1 g coadministered with LRPT 18.75, 37.5, 75, or 150 mg for 4 weeks, with doubling of the respective doses for the remaining 4 weeks. Patients treated with LRPT plus ERN experienced significantly less ERN-induced flushing than those treated with ERN alone during the initiation of treatment (ERN 1 g, week 1) and the maintenance treatment (ERN 1 to 2 g, weeks 2 to 8). All doses of LRPT were maximally effective in inhibiting niacin-induced flushing. LRPT did not alter the beneficial lipid effects of ERN. LRPT plus ERN was well tolerated. In conclusion, the significant reduction in ERN-induced flushing provided by LRPT plus ERN supports an accelerated ERN dose-advancement paradigm to achieve rapidly a 2-g dose in dyslipidemic patients.

Effects of alendronate on gastric and duodenal mucosa.

Objectives:This single-center, double-blind, randomized study assessed the effect of alendronate 5 and 10 mg on the gastroduodenal mucosa.Methods:Overall, 95 postmenopausal women without a recent history of major upper gastrointestinal (GI) disease and not taking gastric-irritant drugs, were screened with an upper GI endoscopy. Fourteen women (15% of the total) were found to have baseline endoscopic gastric and/or duodenal abnormalities, including mucosal hemorrhages (n = 4), erosions (n = 11), and ulcers (n = 3). Two additional women had baseline esophageal abnormalities. Thus, 79 postmenopausal women (mean age 51 yr, range 41–64 yr), free of esophageal, gastric and/or duodenal erosions or ulcer, were enrolled. Subjects received placebo, alendronate 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day, or aspirin 650 mg q.i.d. for 14 days. Endoscopy was repeated on Day 8 and on Day 15. Gastric and duodenal mucosae were graded separately using a 5-point scale for erosive mucosal injury.Results:The proportions of subjects with a gastric or duodenal erosion score ≥ 2 (presence of at least one mucosal erosion) on either Day 8 or 15 were four of 22 (18.2%) in the placebo group; four of 22 (18.2%) in the alendronate 5 mg group; five of 21 (23.8%) in the alendronate 10 mg group; and 14 of 14 (100.0%) in the aspirin group. Thirty-five of 76 (46%) subjects were H. pylori-positive (Pyloritek test), and were equally distributed across treatment groups.Conclusions:Alendronate 5 and 10 mg/day for 2 wk was associated with a lower incidence of gastric erosions than aspirin. The incidence of gastric erosions in the alendronate groups did not differ significantly from the placebo group. In this study, unlike aspirin, alendronate did not induce gastric erosions.

An endoscopic comparison of the effects of alendronate and risedronate on upper gastrointestinal mucosae

Abstract OBJECTIVES: The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate have been reported to have upper gastrointestinal (GI) safety and tolerability profiles comparable to those of placebo. Nevertheless, both agents have demonstrated similar potential for irritation of gastric mucosa at high doses in preclinical studies. The present study compared the potential for alendronate and risedronate to produce endoscopic upper GI mucosal irritation using the highest approved dosage regimens for the two agents. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which a total of 235 patients (men or postmenopausal women, aged 45–80 yr) with normal upper GI endoscopy at baseline received 28-day treatments with the following: alendronate 40 mg/day (N = 90), risedronate 30 mg/day (N = 89), placebo (N = 36), or placebo with aspirin 650 mg q.i.d. for the last 7 days (N = 20). Endoscopy was repeated on day 29 using standardized scoring scales. RESULTS: After 28 days of treatment, the alendronate and risedronate groups had comparable mean gastric and duodenal erosion scores that were significantly lower than those of the aspirin group. Esophageal scores were comparable in all groups. Gastric ulcers and/or large numbers of gastric erosions occurred in approximately 3% of alendronate and risedronate patients versus 60% with aspirin. Both bisphosphonates were clinically well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for gastroduodenal irritation is similar for alendronate and risedronate and is markedly less than for aspirin. The findings of this study, together with the large placebo-controlled clinical trial experience with both agents and extensive epidemiological data for alendronate, suggest that the risk for clinically important gastric irritation with these bisphosphonates is very low, even at the highest available doses.

The upper GI safety and tolerability of oral alendronate at a dose of 70 milligrams once weekly: a placebo-controlled endoscopy study

OBJECTIVE:Alendronate (10 mg daily) has been shown in long term clinical trials to be an effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. A weekly dosing regimen of alendronate is preferred by both patients and physicians, as it has the potential to provide greater convenience and enhance compliance. In a 1-yr clinical trial, alendronate (70 mg once weekly) was equally efficacious and at least as well tolerated as the 10-mg daily dose in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, despite the higher unit dosage required. We conducted a randomized, double blind, placebo- and active-controlled endoscopy study to confirm the results of this clinical trial. We hypothesized that mean endoscopic gastric erosion scores would be similar in subjects receiving alendronate (70 mg once weekly) and those receiving a placebo.METHODS:Two hundred seventy-seven subjects (90 men and 187 women) were randomized to one of three treatment groups: 1) alendronate (70 mg once weekly) for 10 wk (N = 126), 2) placebo (once weekly) for 10 wk (N = 126), or 3) placebo (once weekly) for 10 wk followed by aspirin (650 mg q.i.d.) for the last week as the positive control (N = 25). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed 5 to 7 days after the last dose of alendronate or matching placebo.RESULTS:The mean gastric erosion scores (Lanza scale) were similar in subjects given alendronate (70 mg once weekly) and those given a placebo (0.32 vs 0.35, respectively; 95% CI for difference =− 0.22–0.16, p = 0.75), whereas scores in both groups were significantly lower than in those given aspirin (3.09; p < 0.001). Endoscopic gastroduodenal ulcers occurred in no alendronate (0%), two placebo (1.7%), and five aspirin (23.8%) subjects. The mean erosion scores in the esophagus and duodenum of alendronate and placebo subjects were also similar. The incidences of upper GI symptoms were similar in the alendronate and placebo subjects and did not suggest a relationship with endoscopic lesions.CONCLUSIONS:Alendronate (70 mg once weekly) was not associated with any increase in endoscopic lesions in the upper GI tract relative to a placebo.

Measuring flushing symptoms with extended‐release niacin using the flushing symptom questionnaire©: results from a randomised placebo‐controlled clinical trial

Introduction:  Niacin is underutilised because of flushing. Lack of a quantitative tool to assess niacin‐induced flushing has precluded the objective evaluation of flushing associated with extended‐release (ER) niacin formulations. We developed the Flushing Symptom Questionnaire© (FSQ), a quantitative tool to assess patient‐reported flushing, and assessed its ability to characterise ER niacin‐induced flushing.

Original ContributionsEffects of alendronate on gastric and duodenal mucosa

Abstract Objectives: This single-center, double-blind, randomized study assessed the effect of alendronate 5 and 10 mg on the gastroduodenal mucosa. Methods: Overall, 95 postmenopausal women without a recent history of major upper gastrointestinal (GI) disease and not taking gastric-irritant drugs, were screened with an upper GI endoscopy. Fourteen women (15% of the total) were found to have baseline endoscopic gastric and/or duodenal abnormalities, including mucosal hemorrhages (n = 4), erosions (n = 11), and ulcers (n = 3). Two additional women had baseline esophageal abnormalities. Thus, 79 postmenopausal women (mean age 51 yr, range 41–64 yr), free of esophageal, gastric and/or duodenal erosions or ulcer, were enrolled. Subjects received placebo, alendronate 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day, or aspirin 650 mg q.i.d. for 14 days. Endoscopy was repeated on Day 8 and on Day 15. Gastric and duodenal mucosae were graded separately using a 5-point scale for erosive mucosal injury. Results: The proportions of subjects with a gastric or duodenal erosion score ≥ 2 (presence of at least one mucosal erosion) on either Day 8 or 15 were four of 22 (18.2%) in the placebo group; four of 22 (18.2%) in the alendronate 5 mg group; five of 21 (23.8%) in the alendronate 10 mg group; and 14 of 14 (100.0%) in the aspirin group. Thirty-five of 76 (46%) subjects were H. pylori -positive (Pyloritek test), and were equally distributed across treatment groups. Conclusions: Alendronate 5 and 10 mg/day for 2 wk was associated with a lower incidence of gastric erosions than aspirin. The incidence of gastric erosions in the alendronate groups did not differ significantly from the placebo group. In this study, unlike aspirin, alendronate did not induce gastric erosions.

A multi-centre, randomised, double-blind 14-week extension study examining the long-term safety and efficacy profile of the ezetimibe/simvastatin combination tablet.

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of ezetimibe/simvastatin (EZE/SIMVA) tablet and SIMVA monotherapy. This was an extension study of a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Protocol‐compliant patients who completed the 12‐week base study were eligible to enter a randomised, double‐blind, 14‐week extension study and were administered 1 of 8 daily treatments: EZE/SIMVA 10/10‐, 10/20‐, 10/40‐ or 10/80‐mg, or SIMVA 10‐, 20‐, 40‐ or 80‐mg. Patients receiving these treatments during the base study remained on the same treatment in the extension. Patients administered placebo or EZE 10‐mg monotherapy during the base study were re‐randomised to EZE/SIMVA 10/10 mg or SIMVA 80 mg. The primary analysis was mean per cent change in low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) from baseline to extension study end‐point. Mean changes from baseline in LDL‐C of −38.8% and −53.7% were observed for pooled SIMVA and pooled EZE/SIMVA respectively. The between treatment difference of −14.9% (95% confidence interval: −16.4, −13.3) was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The incremental LDL‐C lowering effect of EZE/SIMVA compared with the corresponding dose of SIMVA alone was consistent across the dose range (p < 0.001 for each between‐group comparison). More patients receiving EZE/SIMVA than SIMVA achieved LDL‐C concentrations < 100 mg/dl and < 70 mg/dl (p < 0.001 for both goals). EZE/SIMVA was generally well tolerated with a safety profile similar to SIMVA monotherapy. There were no significant between‐group differences in the incidences of clinically significant elevations in liver transaminase or creatine kinase levels. In conclusion, EZE/SIMVA had a comparable safety and tolerability profile and was more efficacious than SIMVA monotherapy for up to 6 months.

Oral alendronate 70 mg once weekly is not associated with endoscopic upper GI mucosal lesions compared to placebo

Purpose: Animal studies suggest that gastrointestinal safety and tolerability of weekly oral dosing of bisphosphonates will be as well as, if not better tolerated than daily dosing, despite the higher unit dosage required with weekly dosing. In a clinical trial, ALN 70 mg once weekly was equally efficacious and as well tolerated as the 10-mg daily dose in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (T Schnitzer, Aging Clin Exp Res 2000). We therefore hypothesized that, in humans, mean endoscopic gastric erosion scores would be similar in subjects receiving ALN 70 mg once weekly and those receiving placebo.