Robert T. Burks

Fifteen-year follow-up of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy

From an original pool of 283 patients, 146 patients who had undergone arthroscopic partial meniscectomy an average of 14.7 years before were followed-up. Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, satisfaction index on a scale of 1 to 10, and standing anteroposterior and flexion weight-bearing radiographs of both knees, were obtained. A physical examination was performed on each knee emphasizing motion, swelling, and ligament evaluation. Radiographs were graded for degenerative changes for each knee. Each knee joint space was also measured in millimeters and compared, operative knee with unoperated knee. The unoperated knee had no injuries or surgeries and was used as a control. Patients were 83% male and 17% female; 78% had undergone medial meniscectomies, 19% lateral, and 3% both. There were 88% good and excellent results in anterior cruciate ligament-stable knees. The radiographic grade side-to-side difference showed the operative knee to be only a 0.23 grade worse than the nonoperative knee. Age at the time of meniscectomy was not found to be a factor. Male patients had better radiographic results than female patients, but not better functional scores. Medial meniscus and lateral meniscus results were not significantly different. Knees with a femoral-tibial anatomic alignment of > 0 degree valgus compared with < or = 0 degree and that had undergone medial meniscectomy had significantly better radiographic results. Patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears and meniscectomy did significantly poorer than stable knees with meniscectomy in regards to radiographic grade change, Lysholm, satisfaction index, Tegner level, and medial joint space narrowing.

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) introduces several diagnostic and technical challenges in comparison with primary ACL reconstruction. With the increasing numbers of original reconstructions combined with the continued expectation of high-level athletic participation, revision ACL reconstruction is likely to become more frequent. The purpose of this article was to summarize the causes of failure and the evaluation of the patient with recurrent instability. A review of the literature regarding results after revision ACL reconstruction was performed to assist in the decision-making process and patient counseling. Good results can be obtained in terms of functional stability after revision reconstruction, but chondral and meniscal injury as well as unrecognized associated pathologic instability may play a role in diminished outcomes. In addition, a wide variety of surgical techniques are reviewed to address problems associated with tunnel malposition, widening, and pre-existing hardware.

Meniscal Injury: I. Basic Science and Evaluation

The patient with meniscal injury may present with pain, swelling, or mechanical symptoms and often requires surgical intervention for symptom resolution. Treatment of such injuries relies on understanding the gross and microanatomic features of the meniscus that are important in maintaining meniscal function. The ability of the meniscus to participate in load bearing, shock absorption, joint lubrication, and joint stability depends on the maintenance of its structural integrity. The diagnosis of meniscal injury often can be made by clinical evaluation utilizing the history, physical examination, and plain radiographs. Magnetic resonance imaging can be useful in confirming the diagnosis when clinical findings are inconclusive. Treatment depends on tear pattern, vascularity, and an assessment of tissue quality. Surgical decision making for the treatment of meniscal injury is based on patient factors and understanding of the meniscal structure, function, and pathology.

Subtle injuries of the Lisfranc Joint

In fifteen patients, a subtle injury of the Lisfranc joint (tarsometatarsal articulation) was found. The lesion was defined as a diastasis of two to five millimeters between the bases of the first and second metatarsals, as seen on anteroposterior radiographs. There often was a long delay between injury and diagnosis. Eight patients were treated with a below-the-knee cast only, three had treatment with a cast and then tarsometatarsal arthrodesis, two had no initial treatment but later had arthrodesis, and two had open reduction and internal fixation. The duration of follow-up ranged from two to thirteen years after the diagnosis. There was no correlation between the severity of the diastasis and the patients functional result. Marked disability and pain persisted in seven patients, and six of them had flattening of the longitudinal arch. Maintenance of the longitudinal arch usually was associated with a better functional outcome. When a patient has a subtle injury of the Lisfranc joint, weight-bearing lateral radiographs of both feet are needed to identify flattening of the longitudinal arch. Such radiographs should be made routinely in the evaluation of all injuries of the foot that may involve the Lisfranc joint.

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Single- and Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Early Clinical Evaluation

Background Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has become more popular, and some studies have shown better footprint coverage and improved biomechanics of the repair. Hypothesis Double-row rotator cuff repair leads to superior cuff integrity and early clinical results compared with single-row repair. Study Design Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods Forty patients were randomized to either single-row or double-row rotator cuff repair at the time of surgical intervention. Patients were followed with clinical measures (UCLA, Constant, WORC, SANE, ASES, as well as range of motion, internal rotation strength, and external rotation strength). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were performed on each shoulder preoperatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after repair. Results Mean anteroposterior tear size by MRI was 1.8 cm. A mean of 2.25 anchors for single row (SR) and 3.2 for double row (DR) were used. There were 2 retears at 1 year in each group. There were 2 additional cases that had severe thinning in the DR repair group at 1 year. The MRI measurements of footprint coverage, tendon thickness, and tendon signal showed no significant differences between the 2 repair groups. At 1 year, there were no differences in any of the postoperative measures of motion or strength. At 1 year, mean WORC (SR, 84.8; DR, 87.9), Constant (SR, 77.8; DR, 74.4), ASES (SR, 85.9; DR, 85.5), UCLA (SR, 28.6; DR, 29.5), and SANE (SR, 90.9; DR, 89.9) scores showed no significant differences between groups. Conclusions No clinical or MRI differences were seen between patients repaired with a SR or DR technique.

Anatomy of the lateral ankle ligaments

The anatomy of the lateral ankle ligaments that is fre quently described in articles and book chapters often lacks the precision of orientation and attachment points. We believe a knowledge of this precise anatomy is im portant to better reconstruct or repair lateral ligaments. We dissected cadaveric ankles free of skin and soft tis sue and made the following measurements: areas of attachments of the anterior talofibular ligament, length and width of the anterior talofibular ligament, and loca tions of the attachments on the fibula and talus. The same measurements were made of the calcaneofibular and posterior talofibular ligaments. The distance of the calcaneofibular calcaneal attachments from the subta lar joint as well as the angle in the sagittal plane with the fibula was determined. We then used these anatomic attachments of the ligaments to make comparisons with the Watson-Jones and modified Elmslie reconstruc tions. Our results enable us to suggest a more anatomic placement for ligaments in a reconstruction.

Principles and decision making in meniscal surgery

This article provides a review of the basic science and clinical information available to the orthopedist on which a systematic approach to meniscal surgery can be based. Attitudes toward the meniscus have changed dramatically in the last 50 years. Laboratory investigations show that the menisci participate in many important functions, including tibiofemoral load transmission, shock absorption, lubrication, and passive stabilization of the knee joint. Histologic/structural analyses reveal the menisci to be annular structures, with the ability to transmit and properly distribute load over the tibial plateau, primarily facilitated by the circumferential collagen fibers in the peripheral third of the meniscus, in conjunction with their strong bony attachments at the anterior and posterior horns. Biologic studies demonstrate that meniscal healing can occur through two pathways: an intrinsic ability of the meniscal fibrochondrocyte to migrate, proliferate, and synthesize matrix (provided they are given the proper environment), and extrinsic stimulation through neovascularization (when the meniscal injury occurs in the vascular periphery). This review makes it clear that the menisci are essential components of the normal knee, and that techniques intended to preserve the menisci are both possible and mandatory. As evidence has accumulated from both animal and clinical studies of the frequent development of degenerative changes following meniscectomy, surgeons have become increasingly aggressive in their efforts to conserve as much meniscal tissue as possible. Current approaches to treatment of meniscal tears are based on a thorough understanding of meniscal structure, biology, and function, as well as familiarity with the basic principles of meniscal repair and resection. To synthesize these principles, the article concludes with an algorithm intended to guide surgeons in decision making when faced with a variety of meniscal lesions in different clinical situations.

Outpatient management of continuous peripheral nerve catheters placed using ultrasound guidance: an experience in 620 patients.

BACKGROUND:Continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) is an optimal choice for analgesia after orthopedic procedures, but is not commonly used in outpatients because of concern regarding the possibility of catheter-related complications. In addition, it may be difficult to provide adequate patient access to physicians in this setting. We present 620 outpatients who were treated with CPNB using an established protocol. METHODS:All catheters were placed using direct ultrasound visualization. These patients received extensive oral and written preoperative instruction and were provided continuous telephone access to the anesthesiologist during the postoperative period. All patients were also contacted at home by telephone on the first postoperative day. In addition, each patient was seen and examined by the surgeon within 2 wk of hospital discharge. RESULTS:Of the 620 patients, there were 190 interscalene (brachial plexus), 206 fascia iliaca (femoral nerve), and 224 popliteal fossa (sciatic nerve) catheters. Two patients (0.3%) had complications related to the nerve block. In both of these patients, the symptoms resolved within 6 wk of surgery. Twenty-six patients (4.2%) required postoperative interventions by the anesthesiologist. One patient returned to the hospital for catheter removal. CONCLUSIONS:In this large series of outpatients treated with CPNB, there were surprisingly few interventions requiring an anesthesiologist. Likewise, patients were able to manage and remove their catheters at home without additional follow-up. This suggests that with adequate instruction and telephone access to health care providers, patients are comfortable with managing and removing CPNB catheters at home.

Biomechanical and histological observations of the dog patellar tendon after removal of its central one-third

The use of a central one-third patellar tendon as an autograft for surgical reconstruction of a damaged cru ciate ligament is common. Few complications of its use have been reported. However, recent clinical studies indicate that decreased quadriceps strength, de creased range of motion, decreased thigh circumfer ence, and patellofemoral problems can be associated with this procedure. Some of these complications may result from alterations in the biomechanical properties of the remaining patellar tendon. The objective of this study was to examine biomechanically and histologi cally the fate of the remaining patellar tendon after removal of its central one-third. Three groups of dogs were used for this study. On one knee the central third of the patellar tendon was removed, while the contralateral side was used as a control. One group was immediately euthanized, while the other two groups were euthanized at 3 and 6 months. Control and operated patella-patellar tendon- tibia preparations were harvested and stretched to failure at 100% strain per second. The 3 and 6 month groups had a 10% decrease in length of the operated patellar tendon versus the con tralateral control. There was a very significant increase in cross-sectional area of the patellar tendon at 3 months, and a further increase at 6 months. The failure load was 70% of the controls at 3 months and 60% of the controls at 6 months. The stiffness and modulus of the operated tendon within the physiologic range were dramatically reduced to 70% and 33% of controls at 6 months, respectively. These overall results were observed with the central one-third defect closed or left open in surgery. This study indicated that the canine patellar tendon had not fully recovered 6 months after removal of its central third. The biomechanical changes observed in the remaining tendon may help explain the loss of quadriceps strength that has been documented in re cent clinical studies after using patellar tendon grafts.

Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using patellar tendon autograft or allograft

Seventy-eight of 113 consecutive patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (autograft, 47 of 66; allograft, 31 of 47) were evaluated at an average of 34 months. Reconstructions were compared with Lysholm and Tegner knee-rating scales, physical examination findings, instrumented laxity values, single-leg hop distances, and isokinetic strength results. Lysholm scores > or = 90 were achieved by 69% of autograft patients versus 67% of allograft patients. Desired Tegner activity scores were achieved by 80% of autograft patients versus 74% of allograft patients. Patellofemoral signs and symptoms were absent in 40% of autograft patients versus 44% of allograft patients. Side-to-side laxity differences < or = 3 mm were achieved in 80% of autograft patients versus 70% of allograft patients. Single-leg hop scores > or = 90% of the nonoperated leg were obtained in 76% of autograft patients versus 81% of allograft patients. Isokinetic results between groups were also similar. Traumatic ruptures were sustained by four allograft patients at an average of 11 months postoperatively compared with no traumatic ruptures in the autograft group (P = .011). This was the only difference of statistical significance.