Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Roberta Capp is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Roberta Capp.


Academic Emergency Medicine | 2009

Emergency thoracic ultrasound in the differentiation of the etiology of shortness of breath (ETUDES): sonographic B-lines and N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide in diagnosing congestive heart failure.

Andrew S. Liteplo; Keith A. Marill; Tomas Villen; Robert Miller; Alice F. Murray; Peter E. Croft; Roberta Capp; Vicki E. Noble

OBJECTIVES Sonographic thoracic B-lines and N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) have been shown to help differentiate between congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The authors hypothesized that ultrasound (US) could be used to predict CHF and that it would provide additional predictive information when combined with NT-ProBNP. They also sought to determine optimal two- and eight-zone scanning protocols when different thresholds for a positive scan were used. METHODS This was a prospective, observational study of a convenience sample of adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with shortness of breath. Each patient had an eight-zone thoracic US performed by one of five sonographers, and serum NT-ProBNP levels were measured. Chart review by two physicians blinded to the US results served as the criterion standard. The operating characteristics of two- and eight-zone thoracic US alone, compared to, and combined with NT-ProBNP test results for predicting CHF were calculated using both dichotomous and interval likelihood ratios (LRs). RESULTS One-hundred patients were enrolled. Six were excluded because of incomplete data. Results of 94 patients were analyzed. A positive eight-zone US, defined as at least two positive zones on each side, had a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 3.88 (99% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55 to 9.73) and a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.5 (95% CI = 0.30 to 0.82), while the NT-ProBNP demonstrated a LR+ of 2.3 (95% CI = 1.41 to 3.76) and LR- of 0.24 (95% CI = 0.09 to 0.66). Using interval LRs for the eight-zone US test alone, the LR for a totally positive test (all eight zones positive) was infinite and for a totally negative test (no zones positive) was 0.22 (95% CI = 0.06 to 0.80). For two-zone US, interval LRs were 4.73 (95% CI = 2.10 to 10.63) when inferior lateral zones were positive bilaterally and 0.3 (95% CI = 0.13 to 0.71) when these were negative. These changed to 8.04 (95% CI = 1.76 to 37.33) and 0.11 (95% CI = 0.02 to 0.69), respectively, when congruent with NT-ProBNP. CONCLUSIONS Bedside thoracic US for B-lines can be a useful test for diagnosing CHF. Predictive accuracy is greatly improved when studies are totally positive or totally negative. A two-zone protocol performs similarly to an eight-zone protocol. Thoracic US can be used alone or can provide additional predictive power to NT-ProBNP in the immediate evaluation of dyspneic patients presenting to the ED.


Chest | 2009

Ultrasound Assessment for Extravascular Lung Water in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: Time Course for Resolution

Vicki E. Noble; Alice F. Murray; Roberta Capp; Mary H. Sylvia-Reardon; David Steele; Andrew S. Liteplo

BACKGROUND Sonographic B-lines, also known as lung comets, have been shown to correlate with the presence of extravascular lung water (EVLW). Absent in normal lungs, these sonographic findings become prominent as interstitia and alveoli fill with fluid. Characterization of the dynamics of B-lines, specifically their rate of disappearance as volume is removed, has not been previously described. In this study, we describe the dynamics of B-line resolution in patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS Patients undergoing hemodialysis underwent three chest ultrasound examinations: before, at the midpoint, and after dialysis. We followed a previously described chest ultrasound protocol that counts the number of B-lines visualized in 28 lung zones. Baseline demographics, assessment of ejection fraction, time elapsed, net volume of fluid removed, and subjective degree of shortness of breath were recorded for each patient. RESULTS Forty of 45 patients completed full dialysis runs and had all three lung scans performed; 6 of 40 patients had zero or one B-line predialysis, and none of these 6 patients gained B-lines during dialysis. Thirty-four of 40 patients had statistically significant reductions in the number of B-lines from predialysis to the midpoint scan and from predialysis to postdialysis with a p value < 0.001. There was no association between subjective dyspnea scores and number of B-lines removed. CONCLUSIONS B-line resolution appears to occur real-time as fluid is removed from the body, and this change was statistically significant. These data support thoracic ultrasound as a useful method for evaluating real-time changes in EVLW and in assessing a patients physiologic response to the removal of fluid. TRIAL REGISTRATION Massachusetts General Hospital trial registration protocol No. 2007P 002226.


Chest | 2009

Original ResearchChest UltrasonographyUltrasound Assessment for Extravascular Lung Water in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: Time Course for Resolution

Vicki E. Noble; Alice F. Murray; Roberta Capp; Mary H. Sylvia-Reardon; David Steele; Andrew S. Liteplo

BACKGROUND Sonographic B-lines, also known as lung comets, have been shown to correlate with the presence of extravascular lung water (EVLW). Absent in normal lungs, these sonographic findings become prominent as interstitia and alveoli fill with fluid. Characterization of the dynamics of B-lines, specifically their rate of disappearance as volume is removed, has not been previously described. In this study, we describe the dynamics of B-line resolution in patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS Patients undergoing hemodialysis underwent three chest ultrasound examinations: before, at the midpoint, and after dialysis. We followed a previously described chest ultrasound protocol that counts the number of B-lines visualized in 28 lung zones. Baseline demographics, assessment of ejection fraction, time elapsed, net volume of fluid removed, and subjective degree of shortness of breath were recorded for each patient. RESULTS Forty of 45 patients completed full dialysis runs and had all three lung scans performed; 6 of 40 patients had zero or one B-line predialysis, and none of these 6 patients gained B-lines during dialysis. Thirty-four of 40 patients had statistically significant reductions in the number of B-lines from predialysis to the midpoint scan and from predialysis to postdialysis with a p value < 0.001. There was no association between subjective dyspnea scores and number of B-lines removed. CONCLUSIONS B-line resolution appears to occur real-time as fluid is removed from the body, and this change was statistically significant. These data support thoracic ultrasound as a useful method for evaluating real-time changes in EVLW and in assessing a patients physiologic response to the removal of fluid. TRIAL REGISTRATION Massachusetts General Hospital trial registration protocol No. 2007P 002226.


Critical Care Medicine | 2015

Predictors of patients who present to the emergency department with sepsis and progress to septic shock between 4 and 48 hours of emergency department arrival.

Roberta Capp; Cheryl Lynn Horton; Sukhjit S. Takhar; Adit A. Ginde; David A. Peak; Richard D. Zane; Keith A. Marill

Objectives: Approximately one in every four patients who present to the emergency department with sepsis progresses to septic shock within 72 hours of arrival. In this study, we describe key patient characteristics present within 4 hours of emergency department arrival that are associated with developing septic shock between 4 and 48 hours of emergency department arrival. Design and Setting: This study was a retrospective chart review study of all patients hospitalized from the emergency department with two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria present within 4 hours of emergency department arrival from September 2010 to February 2011 at two large academic institutions. Patients were excluded if they presented with a ST-elevation myocardial infarction, acute stroke, or trauma; had a cardiac arrest prior to arrival; were pregnant; or admitted from the emergency department psychiatric unit or transferred from an outside hospital. We identified patients with within 4 hours of emergency department arrival and identified those with septic shock at 48 hours after emergency department arrival, using a standard set of guidelines. The primary objective was identifying the number of patients who present with sepsis and progress to septic shock between 4 and 48 hours of emergency department arrival. As to the second objective, we used multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify patient factors associated with the progression of sepsis to septic shock for the aforementioned population. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 18,100 patients were admitted from the emergency department, of which 3,960 patients had two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, and 1,316 patients had sepsis within 4 hours of emergency department arrival. Although 50 patients presented to the emergency department with septic shock within 4 hours of arrival, 111 patients with sepsis (8.4%) progressed to septic shock between 4 and 48 hours of emergency department arrival. Characteristics associated with the progression of septic shock between 4 and 48 hours of emergency department arrival included female gender (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.02–2.47), nonpersistent hypotension (odds ratio, 6.24; 95% CI, 3.58–10.86), bandemia at least 10% (odds ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.50–4.51), lactate at least 4.0 mmol/L (odds ratio, 5.30; 95% CI, 2.59–10.84), and past medical of coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% 1.26–3.44). Conclusion: Approximately 12% of septic emergency department patients develop shock within 48 hours of presentation, and more than half of these patients develop shock after the first 4 hours of emergency department arrival. Over a third of patients who have sepsis within 4 hours of emergency department arrival and develop septic shock between 4 and 48 hours of emergency department arrival are not admitted to an ICU.


Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2012

Impact of Physician Screening in the Emergency Department on Patient Flow

Olanrewaju A. Soremekun; Roberta Capp; Paul D. Biddinger; Benjamin A. White; Yuchiao Chang; Sarah Carignan; David F.M. Brown

BACKGROUND Physician triage is one of many front-end interventions being implemented to improve emergency department (ED) efficiency. STUDY OBJECTIVE We aim to determine the impact of this intervention on some key components of ED patient flow, including time to physician evaluation, treatment order entry, diagnostic order entry, and disposition time for admitted patients. METHODS We conducted a 2-year before-after analysis of a physician triage system at an urban tertiary academic center with 90,000 annual visits. The goal of the physician in triage was to arrange safe disposition of straightforward patients as well as to initiate work-ups. All medium-acuity patients arriving during the hours of the intervention were impacted and thus included in the analysis. Our primary outcome was the time to disposition decision. In addition to before-after analysis, comparison was made with high-acuity patients, a group not impacted by this intervention. Patient flow data were extracted from the ED information system. Outcomes were summarized with medians and interquartiles. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to investigate the intervention effect controlling for potential confounding variables. RESULTS The median time to disposition decision decreased by 6min, and the time to physician evaluation, analgesia, antiemetic, antibiotic, and radiology order decreased by 16, 70, 66, 36, and 16min, respectively. These findings were all statistically significant. Similar results were observed from the multivariable regression models after controlling for potential confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS Physician triage led to earlier evaluation, physician orders, and a decrease in the time to disposition decision.


Medical Care | 2015

Do Adult Medicaid Enrollees Prefer Going to Their Primary Care Provider's Clinic Rather Than Emergency Department (ED) for Low Acuity Conditions?

Roberta Capp; Meredith Camp-Binford; Sarah Sobolewski; Sandra Bulmer; Lauren Kelley

Background:The rates of annual visits for adult Medicaid enrollees to the emergency department (ED) are increasing. Many programs throughout the country are focused on engaging patients in the use of their primary care providers (PCP) rather than the ED for low acuity conditions. It is unclear, however, the proportion of patients who are willing to use primary care services rather than the ED if they are given the choice. Methods:Cross-sectional study of adult Medicaid enrollees (18 y and older) presenting to a large, urban, academic ED from June to August 2012 with a low acuity condition was performed. We excluded patients who did not have a PCP or active Medicaid insurance. Our primary goal was to determine the proportion of patients who prefer to use the ED, rather than their PCP clinic, if an appointment was immediately available. Our second goal was to understand why patients would prefer ED over PCP care. Results:A total of 150 patients agreed to complete the survey, and 95 (63.3%) met our inclusion criteria. Forty-three patients (45.3%) stated preferring to use their PCPs rather than the ED if an appointment was available at that time. Thirteen (48.1%) cited that the ED had more technology or specialty care services available when compared with their PCP’s clinic, 8 (15.4%) were in significant pain, and 6 (11.5%) felt the care they received in the ED was better than what they would receive in their PCP clinic. Conclusions:Our study shows that a little less than half of adult Medicaid enrollees presenting to the ED with low acuity conditions would have preferred to use their PCP rather than the ED, if an appointment had been immediately available.


Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2012

Impact of physician-assisted triage on timing of antibiotic delivery in patients admitted to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Roberta Capp; Olan A. Soremekun; Paul D. Biddinger; Benjamin A. White; Linda M. Sweeney; Yuchiao Chang; David F.M. Brown

BACKGROUND Time to antibiotic delivery in patients with diagnosis of pneumonia is a publicly reported quality measure. OBJECTIVE We aim to describe the impact of emergency department (ED) physician-assisted triage (PAT) on The Joint Commission (TJC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) pneumonia core quality measures of timing to antibiotic delivery. METHODS Retrospective case series studies of patients admitted to the hospital through the ED with diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia were identified over a period of 48 months. Patients were included in the study if they met TJC/CMS PN-5 (antibiotic timing) criteria. We compared antibiotic delivery timing before and after implementation of PAT in moderate-acuity patients using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. A linear regression analysis was done to account for age, sex, ED volume, and acuity level. RESULTS A total of 659 patients were identified: 497 patients and 162 patients enrolled pre- and post-implementation of a PAT, respectively. The median antibiotic delivery times for moderate-acuity patients during open hours of operation of PAT were 180min (pre) and 195min (post), p=0.027; this was unchanged when ED volume, age, sex, and acuity level were accounted for. A total of 43 patients (9%) and 13 patients (8%) failed to receive antibiotics within 6h of ED presentation before and after implementation of PAT, respectively. CONCLUSION In this study, implementation of PAT did not result in overall decrease in antibiotic delivery time in patients admitted to the hospital with CAP. We postulate several explanations for this delay in antibiotic delivery time.


Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2012

Accuracy of Microscopic Urine Analysis and Chest Radiography in Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

Roberta Capp; Yuchiao Chang; David F.M. Brown

BACKGROUND Diagnosis of source of infection in patients with septic shock and severe sepsis needs to be done rapidly and accurately to guide appropriate antibiotic therapy. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of two diagnostic studies used in the emergency department (ED) to guide diagnosis of source of infection in this patient population. METHODS This was a retrospective review of ED patients admitted to an intensive care unit with the diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock over a 12-month period. We evaluated accuracy of initial microscopic urine analysis testing and chest radiography in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections and pneumonia, respectively. RESULTS Of the 1400 patients admitted to intensive care units, 170 patients met criteria for severe sepsis and septic shock. There were a total of 47 patients diagnosed with urinary tract infection, and their initial microscopic urine analysis with counts>10 white blood cells were 80% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI] .66-.90) and 66% specific (95% CI .52-.77) for the positive final urine culture result. There were 85 patients with final diagnosis of pneumonia. The sensitivity and specificity of initial chest radiography were, respectively, 58% (95% CI .46-.68) and 91% (95% CI .81-.95) for the diagnosis of pneumonia. CONCLUSION In patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, the chest radiograph has low sensitivity of 58%, whereas urine analysis has a low specificity of 66%. Given the importance of appropriate antibiotic selection and optimal but not perfect test characteristics, this population may benefit from broad-spectrum antibiotics, rather than antibiotics tailored toward a particular source of infection.


Western Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2016

Undertriage of Trauma-Related Deaths in U.S. Emergency Departments

Jenelle A. Holst; Sarah M. Perman; Roberta Capp; Jason S. Haukoos; Adit A. Ginde

Introduction Accurate field triage of critically injured patients to trauma centers is vital for improving survival. We sought to estimate the national degree of undertriage of trauma patients who die in emergency departments (EDs) by evaluating the frequency and characteristics associated with triage to non-trauma centers. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of adult ED trauma deaths in the 2010 National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). The primary outcome was appropriate triage to a trauma center (Level I, II or III) or undertriage to a non-trauma center. We subsequently focused on urban areas given improved access to trauma centers. We evaluated the associations of patient demographics, hospital region and mechanism of injury with triage to a trauma versus non-trauma center using multivariable logistic regression. Results We analyzed 3,971 included visits, representing 18,464 adult ED trauma-related deaths nationally. Of all trauma deaths, nearly half (44.5%, 95% CI [43.0–46.0]) of patients were triaged to non-trauma centers. In a subgroup analysis, over a third of urban ED visits (35.6%, 95% CI [34.1–37.1]) and most rural ED visits (86.4%, 95% CI [81.5–90.1]) were triaged to non-trauma centers. In urban EDs, female patients were less likely to be triaged to trauma centers versus non-trauma centers (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.83, 95% CI [0.70–0.99]). Highest median household income zip codes (≥


BMC Medical Education | 2009

Evaluation of a thoracic ultrasound training module for the detection of pneumothorax and pulmonary edema by prehospital physician care providers

Vicki E. Noble; Lionel Lamhaut; Roberta Capp; Nichole Bosson; Andrew S. Liteplo; Jean-Sebastian Marx; Pierre Carli

67,000) were less likely to be triaged to trauma centers than lowest median income (

Collaboration


Dive into the Roberta Capp's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adit A. Ginde

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge