Roberto Bellusci

Surgical resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhotic liver

Objective:We sought to compare the experience of 2 different surgical units in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on cirrhosis with resection or percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA), respectively. Summary Background Data:When allowed by the hepatic functional reserve, surgery is the therapy for HCC on cirrhosis; alternative treatments are proposed because of the high tumor recurrence rate after resection. RFA is being widely adopted to treat HCC. Methods:Over a 4-year period, 79 cirrhotics with HCC underwent resection in 1 surgical unit (group A) and another 79 had RFA at a different unit (group B). Patient selection, operative mortality, hospital stay, and 1- and 3-year overall and disease-free survival were analyzed. Results:Group A (surgery): mean follow-up was 28.9 ± 17.9 months; operative mortality was 3.8%, mean hospital stay 9 days; 1- and 3-year survival were, respectively, 83 and 65%. One- and 3-year disease-free survival were 79 and 50%. Group B (RFA): mean follow-up was 15.6 ± 11.7 months. Mean hospital stay was 1 day (range 1–8). One- and 3-year survival were 78 and 33%; 1- and 3-year disease-free survival were 60 and 20%. Overall and disease-free survival were significantly higher in group A (P = 0.002 and 0.001). The advantage of surgery was more evident for Child-Pugh class A patients and for single tumors of more than 3 cm in diameter. Results were similar in 2 groups for Child-Pugh class B patients Conclusions:RFA has still to be confirmed as an alternative to surgery for potentially-resectable HCCs.

Abstension from treatment of low-level pp65 cytomegalovirus antigenemia after liver transplantation: a prospective study.

Background. Ganciclovir is a highly effective and relatively safe drug to treat cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in liver transplant patients; CMV resistance to ganciclovir is progressively emerging due to the extensive use of the drug in transplant and AIDS patients; CMV pp65 antigenemia allows early diagnosis of CMV infection and quantitation of the viral load; preemptive antigenemia-guided therapy of CMV infection can prevent CMV disease but the threshold of antigenemia value above which treatment has to be instituted is unclear. Methods. To demonstrate the safety of abstention from preemptive treatment in the presence of low levels of antigenemia 77 consecutive liver transplant recipients were prospectively evaluated. Antigenemia was tested twice a week from transplantation until discharge, then once a week until the third postoperative month. In absence of risk factors for CMV disease, namely donor positive/recipient negative CMV serology, treatment with antibodies to lymphocytes and retransplantation, only patients with antigenemia of more than 50 or symptoms possibly related to CMV infection had preemptive treatment. Results. A total of 32 patients had at least one positive antigenemia test with a value less than 50; 22 (68.7%) spontaneously cleared the virus, 3 were treated with i.v. ganciclovir for the presence of fever, and the other 7 (21,8%) progressed to values of antigenemia of more than 50 and were treated even if asymptomatic. No CMV disease was observed in these patients. Conclusion. CMV antigenemia less than 50 in liver transplant recipients with low and intermediate risk for CMV disease does not mandate preemptive ganciclovir treatment. Close surveillance with repeated determination of antigenemia until its negativization and careful clinical and laboratory monitoring is advisable.

Fatal necrotizing pancreatitis caused by hepatitis B virus infection in a liver transplant recipient

A 32-year-old man who had undergone liver transplantation for fulminant hepatitis due to HBV infection developed fatal acute necrotizing pancreatitis on the 60th post-transplant day, while showing signs of intense viral replication. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization of the pancreas following autopsy showed the presence of HBsAG and HBV-DNA in the cytoplasm of acinar cells, together with the picture of necrotizing pancreatitis. Clinical and histological features seem to indicate that pancreatitis was directly caused by HBV infection.

De Novo Hepatitis B and C Viral Infection after Liver Transplantation

Abstract. Hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) viral infections often recur after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), but viral infections acquired with OLT have not been widely investigated. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence, evolution, and diagnostic problems of de novo HBV and HCV infections in liver transplant recipients with long-term follow-up. Altogether 121 transplant recipients entered the study. HBV, HDV, and HCV infections were diagnosed by means of serology and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Three patients became hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive after OLT, all of whom showed signs of persistent viral replication. Twelve patients became anti-HCV-positive after OLT: After clearance of passive antibodies, active anti-HCV seroconversion was usually delayed. The viral genome was detected in 9 of 12 patients, with fluctuations of viremia during their follow-up. The other three patients, who were HBsAg-positive before and after OLT, were repeatedly HCV-RNA-negative despite persistent anti-HCV reactivity. Four pre-OLT HBsAg-positive patients had evidence of HBV-related liver transplant disease. The remaining 8 of 12 patients experienced repeated alanine aminotransferase increases more than two times normal after transplant. De novo infections due to primary hepatotropic viruses were frequent after OLT in our experience. Early diagnosis of infection, especially when the HCV is involved, may be problematic and should be taken into account in patients showing persistent aminotransferase abnormalities. Monitoring viral markers and accurate evaluation of biopsy specimens are mandatory. The interference between HBV and HCV might play a role in the replicative cycle of one or both viruses in co-infected patients.

Simultaneous presence of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular carcinoma : Case report and review of the literature

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is an infrequent benign tumor of the liver that is generally believed to have no potential for malignant transformation; the coexistence of FNH and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has seldom been reported. Here we describe an exceptional case of simultaneous FNH and HCC in the same patient and discuss the clinical and therapeutic management of FNH on the basis of a review of the literature.

Bleeding esophageal varices: today's role of portosystemic shunts.

Emergency portosystemic shunting has once again become a significant option in the management of bleeding esophageal varices and portal hypertension. The decision to perform such a shunt and the choice of shunt procedure requires a rational assessment of the pathophysiology and hepatoportal hemodynamics of the patients disease and the manner in which it is anticipated that the selected procedure may alter portal flow. Since shunt surgery may interfere with hepatic transplantation, the patients suitability as a future transplant recipient must also be considered in choosing a shunt procedure. Furthermore, if a shunt is to be performed on an emergency basis to control acute bleeding, this procedure must be done before the patients condition deteriorates sufficiently to represent a prohibitive surgical risk.