Roberto Di Pietra
University of Siena
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Roberto Di Pietra.
Accounting in Europe | 2005
Lisa Evans; Guenther Gebhardt; Martin Hoogendoorn; Jan Marton; Roberto Di Pietra; Araceli Mora; Frank Thinggård; Petri Vehmanen; Alfred Wagenhofer
Abstract In June 2004 the IASB issued the Discussion Paper ‘Preliminary Views on Accounting Standards for Small and Medium-Sized Entities’. This invited comments on the central question of whether the IASB should develop separate standards for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and on further issues and questions arising from this. This paper briefly introduces the background to the publication of the Discussion Paper. This is followed by a review of prior literature on SME financial reporting implications, prepared by the European Accounting Associations Financial Reporting Standards Committee as the basis of its response to the Discussion Paper. The paper concludes with a brief summary of events and issues arising since the end of the consultation period.
Accounting in Europe | 2008
Roberto Di Pietra; Lisa Evans; Jérôme Chevy; Maurizio Cisi; Brigitte Eierle; Robin Jarvis
Abstract In February 2007 the IASB invited comments on its Exposure Draft of a proposed IFRS for Small and Medium-Sized Entities. The deadline for comments was 30 November 2007. Below we reproduce3 the comment letter prepared by the European Accounting Associations Financial Reporting Standards Committee (EAA FRSC). This is a follow up of the EAA FRSCs comment letter prepared in response to the IASBs Discussion Paper on ‘Preliminary Views on Accounting Standards for Small and Medium-Sized Entities’, published in 2005. Our comment is structured as follows: we initially sketch the background to the development of the Exposure Draft. We then revisit the key issues arising from our previous comment letter. This is followed by a survey of relevant literature published since the Discussion Paper. We then briefly address the questions raised by the IASB in the context of the Exposure Draft, before summarising the key issues arising from the literature which we consider relevant to the IASBs project.
Accounting in Europe | 2006
Frank Thinggaard; Alfred Wagenhofer; Lisa Evans; GüNther Gebhardt; Martin Hoogendoorn; Jan Marton; Roberto Di Pietra; Araceli Mora; Ken V. Peasnell
ABSTRACT This paper is a response to the exposure draft of proposed amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements published by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in March 2006. The objective is to bring to the standard setters attention research that is relevant to the issues raised in the exposure draft. We review analytic, empirical and experimental research that addresses the presentation of income and the format of the income statement. Overall, there is some support for a single statement of (total) recognised income and expense. However, net income is on average more relevant than comprehensive income, which may favour a two-statement approach. While this result is in line with the IASBs option of the two formats, it does not support the IASBs preference for a single statement.
Archive | 2001
Roberto Di Pietra; Stuart McLeay; Angelo Riccaboni
This chapter provides an analysis of the process of accounting regulation in Italy, where corporate governance is greatly influenced by a legislature operating in its traditional interventionist form. The rules governing accounting in Italy are the product of the wider political system, rather than of a specialized institution charged with the task of overseeing accounting developments.
Accounting in Europe | 2017
Roberto Di Pietra
We examine the recent changes that have affected the Italian accounting scenario after the adoption of the IFRS and the enactment of the European accounting system. In particular, we have focused our attention on the decision of the legislature to enlarge the mandatory adoption of IFRS to non-listed companies and to individual financial statements (FS). At the same time, we have observed the changes determined by the EU Directive 2013/34 on the Italian Civil Code and the FS legislation. Both set of changes are describing a process under which the Italian accounting rules are moving towards the international accounting standards and their framework, contents and methods. Therefore, the main differences among national rules and IFRS are grounded on the measurement rules and the role played by the historical cost principles and the strict and detailed regulation of the Balance sheet and Income statement formats.Abstract We examine the recent changes that have affected the Italian accounting scenario after the adoption of the IFRS and the enactment of the European accounting system. In particular, we have focused our attention on the decision of the legislature to enlarge the mandatory adoption of IFRS to non-listed companies and to individual financial statements (FS). At the same time, we have observed the changes determined by the EU Directive 2013/34 on the Italian Civil Code and the FS legislation. Both set of changes are describing a process under which the Italian accounting rules are moving towards the international accounting standards and their framework, contents and methods. Therefore, the main differences among national rules and IFRS are grounded on the measurement rules and the role played by the historical cost principles and the strict and detailed regulation of the Balance sheet and Income statement formats.
Archive | 2014
Daniela Argento; Roberto Di Pietra
This chapter aims to investigate how regulatory change affects corporate disclosure. The explanations are based on institutional theory which provides an understanding of how organizations may react to a change in the regulatory framework. By conducting a content analysis, the chapter focuses on the information disclosed in the Management’s Reports prepared by the major Italian listed companies after the enactment of the 2007 law. This law extended companies’ disclosure obligations since management has to disclose information pertaining to risks and uncertainties, performance indicators, environment, and personnel. The new requirements not only lead to an increase in the information to be disclosed, but also to a change in the nature of the disclosed information. In addition to the more traditional financial information, also social, environmental, and strategic information should be provided. The main results of the content analysis allow to formulate some tentative reflections on companies’ receptivity to the 2007 regulatory change.
Journal of Management & Governance | 2008
Roberto Di Pietra; Christos A. Grambovas; Ivana Raonic; Angelo Riccaboni
Archive | 2014
Roberto Di Pietra; Stuart McLeay; Joshua Ronen
Journal of Management & Governance | 2017
Lucie Courteau; Roberto Di Pietra; Paolo Giudici; Andrea Melis
Archive | 2014
Roberto Di Pietra; Stuart McLeay; Joshua Ronen