Roberto Gattobigio

Prognostic Significance of Serial Changes in Left Ventricular Mass in Essential Hypertension

BACKGROUND Increased left ventricular (LV) mass predicts an adverse outcome in patients with essential hypertension. The purpose of this study was to determine the relation between changes in LV mass during antihypertensive treatment and subsequent prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS Procedures including echocardiography and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring were performed in 430 patients with essential hypertension before therapy and after 1217 patient-years. Months or years after the follow-up visit, 31 patients suffered a first cardiovascular morbid event. The patients with a decrease in LV mass from the baseline to follow-up visit were compared with those with an increase in LV mass. There were 15 events (1.78 per 100 person-years) in the group with a decrease in LV mass and 16 events (3.03 per 100 person-years) in the group with an increase in LV mass (P=.029). In a Cox model, the lesser cardiovascular risk in the group with a decrease in LV mass (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.99) remained significant (P=.04) after adjustment for age (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.10; P=.0008) and baseline LVH at ECG (HR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.52 to 9.78; P=.012). In that model, baseline LV mass bordered on statistical significance (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.03; P=.06). In the subset with LV mass > 125 g/m2 at the baseline visit (26% of subjects), the event rate was lower among the subjects who achieved regression of LVH than in those who did not (1.58 versus 6.27 events per 100 person-years; P=.002). This difference held in the multivariate analysis (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.68). CONCLUSIONS In essential hypertension, a reduction in LV mass during treatment is a favorable prognostic marker that predicts a lesser risk for subsequent cardiovascular morbid events. Such an association is independent of baseline LV mass, baseline clinic and ambulatory BP, and degree of BP reduction.

Adverse Prognostic Significance of New Diabetes in Treated Hypertensive Subjects

Abstract—Diabetes may develop in nondiabetic hypertensive subjects during treatment, but the long-term cardiovascular implications of this phenomenon are not clear. We determined the prognostic value of new diabetes in hypertensive subjects. In a long-term cohort study, 795 initially untreated hypertensive subjects, 6.5% of whom with type 2 diabetes, underwent diagnostic procedures including 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and electrocardiography (ECG). Procedures were repeated after a median of 3.1 years in the absence of cardiovascular events. Follow-up duration was 1 to 16 years (median 6.0). New diabetes occurred in 5.8% of subjects initially without diabetes. Antihypertensive treatment included a diuretic in 53.5% of these subjects, versus 30.4% of those in whom diabetes did not develop (P =0.002). Plasma glucose at entry (P =0.0001) and diuretic treatment on follow-up (P =0.004) were independent predictors of new diabetes. Subsequent to the follow-up visit, a first cardiovascular event occurred in 63 subjects. Event rate in nondiabetic subjects at both visits, new diabetes, and diabetes at entry were 0.97, 3.90, and 4.70×100 person-years, respectively (P =0.0001). After adjustment for several confounders, including 24-hour ambulatory BP, the relative risk of events was 2.92 (95% CI: 1.33 to 6.41; P =0.007) in the group with new diabetes and 3.57 (95% CI: 1.65 to 7.73; P =0.001) in the group with previous diabetes, when compared with the group persistently free of diabetes. In treated hypertensive subjects, occurrence of new diabetes portends a risk for subsequent cardiovascular disease that is not dissimilar from that of previously known diabetes.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention

We investigated whether protection from coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke conferred by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in hypertensive or high-risk patients may be explained by the specific drug regimen. We extracted summary statistics regarding CHD and stroke from 28 outcome trials that compared either ACEIs or CCBs with diuretics, β-blockers, or placebo for a total of 179 122 patients, 9509 incident cases of CHD, and 5971 cases of stroke. CHD included myocardial infarction and coronary death. In placebo-controlled trials, ACEIs decreased the risk of CHD (P<0.001), and CCBs reduced stroke incidence (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in CHD risk between regimens based on diuretics/β-blockers and regimens based on ACEIs (P=0.46) or CCBs (P=0.52). The risk of stroke was reduced by CCBs (P=0.041) but not by ACEIs (P=0.15) compared with diuretics/β-blockers. Because heterogeneity between trials was significant, we investigated potential sources of heterogeneity by metaregression. Examined covariates were the reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP), drug treatment (ACEIs versus CCBs), their interaction term, sex, age at randomization, year of publication, and duration of treatment. Prevention of CHD was explained by systolic BP reduction (P<0.001) and use of ACEIs (P=0.028), whereas prevention of stroke was explained by systolic BP reduction (P=0.001) and use of CCBs (P=0.042). These findings confirm that BP lowering is fundamental for prevention of CHD and stroke. However, over and beyond BP reduction, ACEIs appear superior to CCBs for prevention of CHD, whereas CCBs appear superior to ACEIs for prevention of stroke.

Changes in cardiovascular risk by reduction of left ventricular mass in hypertension: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND Some studies have suggested that serial changes in left ventricular (LV) mass in hypertensive subjects predict the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic impact of LV hypertrophy regression in hypertension. METHODS We undertook a meta-analysis of studies that reported echocardiographic LV mass before and during antihypertensive therapy, with subsequent assessment of cardiovascular events. The aims of this meta-analysis were: 1) to compare subjects with LV hypertrophy (LVH) during treatment (persistence or new development of LVH) with those with LVH at baseline, but not during treatment (regression of LVH); and 2) to compare subjects with LVH at baseline, but not during treatment with those without LVH both before and during treatment (regression of LVH versus persistently normal LV mass). RESULTS The four eligible studies included 1064 hypertensive subjects (41% women) aged 45 to 51 years who repeated the echocardiographic study 3 to 10 years after the initial examination. The definition of LVH was based on a LV mass corrected by body surface area >125 g/m(2) in two studies and >110 g/m(2) (for women) and 124 g/m(2) (for men) in two studies. Compared with subjects with lack of regression or new development of LVH, those with LVH regression showed a reduced risk of subsequent cardiovascular disease (odds ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.78, P =.007). Compared with subjects with regression of LVH, those with persistently normal LV mass showed a similar risk of subsequent events (odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI = 0.31 to 1.30, P =.21). CONCLUSION Compared with persistence or new development of LV hypertrophy, regression of LV hypertrophy during antihypertensive treatment is associated with a marked reduction in risk for subsequent cardiovascular disease.

Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertension: Predictors and Outcome

Abstract—Incidence, determinants, and outcome of atrial fibrillation in hypertensive subjects are incompletely known. We followed for up to 16 years 2482 initially untreated subjects with essential hypertension. At entry, all subjects were in sinus rhythm. Subjects with valvular heart disease, coronary artery disease, preexcitation syndrome, thyroid disorders, or lung disease were excluded. During follow-up, a first episode of atrial fibrillation occurred in 61 subjects at a rate of 0.46 per 100 person-years. At entry, subjects with future atrial fibrillation differed (all P <0.05) from those without by age (59 versus 51 years), office, and 24-hour systolic blood pressure (165 and 144 versus 157 and 137 mm Hg, respectively), left ventricular mass (58 versus 49 g/height[m]2.7), and left atrial diameter (3.89 versus 3.56 cm). Age and left ventricular mass (both P <0.001) were the sole independent predictors of atrial fibrillation. For every 1 standard deviation increase in left ventricular mass, the risk of atrial fibrillation was increased 1.20 times (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.34). Atrial fibrillation became chronic in 33% of subjects. Age, left ventricular mass, and left atrial diameter (all P <0.01) were independent predictors of chronic atrial fibrillation. Ischemic stroke occurred at a rate of 2.7% and 4.6% per year, respectively, among subjects with paroxysmal and chronic atrial fibrillation. These data indicate that in hypertensive subjects with sinus rhythm and no other major predisposing conditions, risk of atrial fibrillation increases with age and left ventricular mass. Increased left atrial size predisposes to chronicization of atrial fibrillation.

Prognostic value of a new electrocardiographic method for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension

OBJECTIVES We tested the prognostic value of a new electrocardiographic (ECG) method (Perugia score) for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in essential hypertension and compared it with five standard methods (Cornell voltage, Framingham criterion, Romhilt-Estes point score, left ventricular strain, Sokolow-Lyon voltage). BACKGROUND Several standard ECG methods for assessment of LVH are used in the clinical setting, but a comparative prognostic assessment is lacking. METHODS A total of 1,717 white hypertensive subjects (mean age 52 years; 51% men) were prospectively followed up for up to 10 years (mean 3.3). RESULTS At entry, the prevalence of LVH was 17.8% (Perugia score), 9.1% (Cornell), 3.9% (Framingham), 5.2% (Romhilt-Estes), 6.4% (strain) and 13.1% (Sokolow-Lyon). During follow-up there were 159 major cardiovascular morbid events (33 fatal). The event rate was higher in the subjects with than in those without LVH (all p < 0.001) according to all methods except the Sokolow-Lyon method. By multivariate analysis, an independent association between LVH and cardiovascular disease risk was maintained by the Perugia score (hazard ratio [HR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 2.8) and the Framingham (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.2), Romhilt-Estes (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.7 to 4.1) and strain methods (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.2). The Perugia score showed the highest population-attributable risk for cardiovascular events, accounting for 15.6% of all cases, whereas the Framingham, Romhilt-Estes and strain methods accounted for 3.0%, 7.4% and 6.8% of all events, respectively. LVH diagnosed by the Perugia score was also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 4.21, 95% CI 2.1 to 8.7), with a population-attributable risk of 37.0%. CONCLUSIONS The Perugia score carried the highest population-attributable risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared with classic methods for detection of LVH. Traditional interpretation of standard electrocardiography maintains an important role for cardiovascular risk stratification in essential hypertension.

Prognostic value of left ventricular mass and geometry in systemic hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy

To determine the independent prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) mass and geometry (concentric vs eccentric pattern) in hypertensive subjects with LV hypertrophy at echocardiography, 274 subjects were followed for up to 8.7 years (mean 3.2). All patients had systemic hypertension and LV mass > or = 125 g/body surface area (BSA) and underwent ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and echocardiography before treatment. Eccentric and concentric hypertrophy were defined by the ratio between LV posterior wall thickness and LV radius at telediastole <0.45 and > or = 0.45, respectively. Age, sex ratio, body mass index, office BP and serum glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides did not differ between the groups with eccentric (n=145) and concentric (n=129) hypertrophy. Average 24-hour daytime, and nighttime systolic ambulatory BPs were higher in concentric than in eccentric hypertrophy (all p <0.01). LV mass was slightly greater in concentric than in eccentric hypertrophy (157 vs 149 g/BSA, p <0.05). Endocardial and midwall shortening fraction were lower in concentric than in eccentric hypertrophy (96.5% vs 106.0% of predicted and 71.4% vs 89.7% of predicted, respectively; both p <0.01). The rate of major cardiovascular morbid events was 2.20 and 3.34 per 100 patient-years in eccentric and concentric hypertrophy, respectively (log rank test, p=NS). Age >60 and LV mass above median (145 g/BSA) were significant adverse prognostic predictors, while LV geometry (eccentric vs concentric hypertrophy) and ambulatory BP were not. The event rates per 100 patient-years were 1.38 and 3.98, respectively, in the patients with LV mass below and above median (age-adjusted relative risk 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 6.63; p=0.015). In hypertensive subjects with established LV hypertrophy, LV mass, but not its geometric pattern, provides important prognostic information independent of conventional risk markers including office and ambulatory BP.

White coat hypertension and white coat effect similarities and differences

The rise in blood pressure (BP) associated with clinical visit (white coat effect) may be one basic mechanism of white coat hypertension (persistently raised clinic BP together with a normal BP outside the clinic), but the relations between white coat hypertension, white coat effect, and target organ damage have not yet been assessed on large populations. Thus, we performed 24-h noninvasive ambulatory BP monitoring and 2D-guided M-mode echocardiography in 1,333 untreated subjects with essential hypertension and 178 control normotensive subjects. White coat hypertension was defined by an average daytime ambulatory BP < 131/86 mm Hg in women and < 136/87 mm Hg in men and its prevalence was 18.9% (n = 252). The white coat effect was calculated for systolic and diastolic BP as the difference between clinic BP and average daytime ambulatory BP. Echocardiographic left ventricular mass was slightly but not significantly greater in the group with white coat hypertension than in the normotensive group (93 v 87 g/m2, P = NS), and increased in the group with ambulatory hypertension (112 g/m2, P < .01). The prevalence of white coat hypertension markedly decreased from the first to the fourth Joint National Committee V (JNC V) stage of severity of hypertension (186/559 subjects (33%) in I; 59/501 (11%) in II; 7/230 (3%) in III; 0/43 (0%) in IV; P < .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cigarette smoking, ambulatory blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy in essential hypertension.

Objective: To assess the role of blood pressure in the association between cigarette smoking and left ventricular mass in male and female subjects with essential hypertension. Design: A case-control study with matching ratio of 1 :4. Patients and methods: We studied 115 heavy smokers (>20 cigarettes/day; 91 men) and 460 non-smokers (364 men) with essential hypertension. Subjects were matched by sex, age (within 5 years) and clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressures (within 5 mmHg). All the subjects underwent 24 h off-therapy non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography. Results: By matching, clinic blood pressure was nearly identical in smokers and non-smokers (158/99 versus 158/98 mmHg). Daytime ambulatory blood pressure was significantly higher in the smokers than in the non-smokers (150/97 versus 143/93 mmHg), whereas night-time blood pressure did not differ between the two groups (129/79 versus 126/78 mmHg). Smokers had a higher 24 h but not clinic heart rate. Variability of systolic and diastolic blood pressure was slightly greater in smokers when expressed in terms of the standard deviation of the 24 h average (15.9/13.0 versus 14.6/12.2 mmHg), but not after correction for average blood pressure. Left ventricular mass was greater in the smokers than in the non-smokers (119 versus 110g/m2), and this difference remained after adjustment for clinic blood pressure and other related covariates. However, when clinic blood pressure was replaced by daytime ambulatory blood pressure in the equation, adjusted values of left ventricular mass did not differ between the smokers and the non-smokers (113 versus 112g/m2). Conclusion: In patients with essential hypertension, heavy cigarette smoking (>20 cigarettes/day) is associated with a definite increase in left ventricular mass through a rise in whole-day blood pressure. A pressor mechanism of that type may not be detected by the standard measurement of blood pressure in the clinic, which would make ambulatory blood pressure monitoring a valuable diagnostic tool in this setting.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Outcome in Relation to Perceived Sleep Deprivation

Sleep deprivation induced by cuff inflations during overnight blood pressure (BP) monitoring might interfere with the prognostic significance of nighttime BP. In 2934 initially untreated hypertensive subjects, we assessed the perceived quantity of sleep during overnight BP monitoring. Overall, 58.7%, 27.7%, 9.7%, and 4.0% of subjects reported a sleep duration perceived as usual (group A), <2 hours less than usual (group B), 2 to 4 hours less than usual (group C), and >4 hours less than usual (group D). Daytime BP did not differ across the groups (all Ps not significant). Nighttime BP increased from group A to D (124/75, 126/76, 128/77, and 129/79 mm Hg, respectively; all Ps for trend <0.01). Over a median follow-up period of 7 years there were 356 major cardiovascular events and 176 all-cause deaths. Incidence of total cardiovascular events and deaths was higher in the subjects with a night/day ratio in systolic BP >10% compared with those with a greater day–night BP drop in the group with perceived sleep duration as usual or <2 hours less than usual (both P<0.01), not in the group with duration of sleep ≥2 hours less than usual (all Ps not significant). In a Cox model, the independent prognostic value of nighttime BP for total cardiovascular end points and all-cause mortality disappeared in the subjects with perceived sleep deprivation ≥2 hours. In conclusion, nighttime BP rises and loses its prognostic significance in the hypertensive subjects who perceive a sleep deprivation by ≥2 hours during overnight monitoring.