Roberto Riva

Pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic drugs : Clinical considerations

SummaryAntiepileptic drug interactions represent a common clinical problem which has been compounded by the introduction of many new compounds in recent years. Most pharmacokinetic interactions involve the modification of drug metabolism; the propensity of antiepileptic drugs to interact depends on their metabolic characteristics and action on drug metabolic enzymes.Phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone and carbamazepine are potent inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP), epoxide hydrolase and uridine diphosphate glucurono-syltransferase (UDPGT) enzyme systems; oxcarbazepine is a weak inducer of CYP enzymes, probably acting on a few specific isoforms only. All stimulate the rate of metabolism and the clearance of the drugs which are catabolised by the induced enzymes.Valproic acid (valproate sodium) inhibits to different extents many hepatic enzyme system activities involved in drug metabolism and is able to significantly displace drugs from plasma albumin. Felbamate is an inhibitor of some specific CYP isoforms and mitochondrial β-oxidation, whereas it is a weak inducer of other enzyme systems.Topiramate is an inducer of specific CYP isoforms and an inhibitor of other isoforms. Ethosuximide, vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin and possibly zonisamide and tiagabine have no significant effect on hepatic drug metabolism.Apart from vigabatrin and gabapentin, which are mainly eliminated unchanged by the renal route, all other antiepileptic drugs are metabolised wholly or in part by hepatic enzymes and their disposition may be altered by metabolic changes.Some interactions are clinically unremarkable and some need only careful clinical monitoring, but others require prompt dosage adjustment. From a practical point of view, if valproic acid is added to lamotrigine or phenobarbital therapy, or if felbamate is added to phenobarbital, phenytoin or valproic acid therapy, a significant rise in plasma concentrations of the first drug is expected with a corresponding increase in clinical effects. In these cases a concomitant reduction of the dosage of the first drug is recommended to avoid toxicity. Conversely, if a strong inducer is added to carbamazepine, lamotrigine, valproic acid or ethosuximide monotherapy, a significant decrease in their plasma concentrations is expected within days or weeks, with a possible reduction in efficacy. In these cases a dosage increase of the first drug may be required.

Oxcarbazepine: Pharmacokinetic Interactions and Their Clinical Relevance

Summary: Antiepileptic drug (AED) interactions are a common problem during epilepsy treatment. Oxcarbazepine (OCBZ) is a keto homologue of carbamazepine (CBZ) with a completely different metabolic profile. In humans, the keto group is rapidly and quantitatively reduced to form a mono‐hydroxy derivative (MHD), which is the main active agent during OCBZ therapy. MHD is eliminated by renal excretion, glucuronidation and, marginally, by hydroxylation to a diol derivative. This metabolic profile, and in particular the limited involvement of oxidative microsomal enzymes, suggests that OCBZ may have fewer drug interactions compared with traditional AEDs. This possibility has been investigated in experimental studies and, retrospectively, in data obtained from clinical trials. The capacity of OCBZ to induce microsomal enzymes of the P‐450 family has mostly been examined by use of antipyrine and CBZ kinetics as markers. The results suggest that OCBZ has little enzyme inducing capacity. In clinical trials in which OCBZ was substituted for CBZ, plasma concentrations of concomitant AEDs were increased, possibly as a consequence of total or partial de‐induction. OCBZ interference with other drugs has been evaluated for warfarin, felodipine, and oral contraceptives, three medications strongly influenced by enzyme‐inducing AEDs. OCBZ does not modify the anticoagulant effect of warfarin, whereas some reduction in felodipine concentration and a clinically significant reduction of contraceptive drug levels and efficacy were observed. Polytherapy with established AEDs does not significantly modify OCBZ disposition (MHD kinetics); however, available information is not extensive. Finally, the action on OCBZ kinetics of a group of drugs (verapamil, cimetidine, erythromycin, dextropropoxyphene, and viloxazine) known to inhibit the metabolism of some AEDs has been studied. None of the drugs caused kinetic modification^ likely to be of clinical relevance. OCBZ has a favorable metabolic profile and fewer drug interactions compared with established AEDs. These findings should be confirmed by more clinical trials and use.

Levetiracetam therapeutic monitoring in patients with epilepsy: effect of concomitant antiepileptic drugs.

Background: Lacosamide (LCM) is one of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) licensed as add-on treatment for partial epilepsy. Data on LCM pharmacokinetics and interactions are limited and partly contradictory. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of concomitant AED therapy on steady state plasma concentrations of LCM in a population of patients with epilepsy. Methods: Steady state plasma concentrations of LCM were assessed in a cohort of 75 consecutive patients with epilepsy referred to the Laboratory of Clinical Neuropharmacology for AED therapeutic monitoring over 16 months. Plasma LCM concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with spectrophotometric detection. Results: Median morning trough plasma concentration-to-weight-adjusted dose ratio of LCM [(mg/L)/(mg/kg/d)] was significantly reduced (0.94 versus 1.35, P < 0.001) in patients treated with LCM plus AED strong inducers of cytochrome P450 metabolism, namely, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin (group A, n = 33), compared with a pool of patients not comedicated with AED strong inducers, predominantly including oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, and valproic acid (group B, n = 42). The 2 groups were comparable for age, gender, weight, LCM daily dose, and dosing frequency. LCM plasma concentrations were linearly related to daily drug doses, regardless of concomitant AED therapy, over a dose range from 75 to 600 mg/d, although, at a given drug dose, a large interpatient variability was observed in matched, plasma drug concentration. Conclusions: Our findings confirm, in a real-patient clinical setting, preliminary evidence from randomized, clinical trials showing that carbamazepine, phenobarbital, or phenytoin significantly reduces the overall systemic exposure to LCM. From a practical point of view, patients on concomitant AED strong inducers may require a 30% higher dose of LCM compared with patients not receiving strongly inducing AED cotherapy, to achieve the same plasma drug concentration.

Diurnal Fluctuations in Free and Total Steady‐State Plasma Levels of Carbamazepine and Correlation with Intermittent Side Effects

Summary: The relationship between diurnal fluctuations in free (unbound) and total plasma carbamazepine levels and the appearance of intermittent side effects was investigated in nine epileptic patients receiving chronic therapy with carbamazepine, alone or in combination with phenobarbital. On a three‐times‐daily or four‐times‐daily dosing schedule, both total and free carbamazepine levels fluctuated considerably (on an average, 41 and 45%, respectively, around the mean). Side effects (particularly diplopia and nystagmus) were observed in five patients and showed an intermittent pattern in four. Side effects were never found at total carbamazepine levels<34 μmol/L but invariably appeared at levels >38 μmol/L. At levels between 34 and 38 (μmol/L adverse effects were inconsistently observed. The correlation between plasma carbamazepine levels and manifestations of toxicity was slightly stronger when free rather than total levels were considered. Side effects were always apparent at free levels >7.2 μmol/L. These data underline the limitations of relying on a single drug level determination during the monitoring of carbamazepine therapy and emphasize the necessity of carefully adjusting the dosing schedule, to minimize the appearance of intermittent adverse effects.

Pharmacodynamic modeling of oral levodopa : clinical application in Parkinson's disease

We investigated the relationship between levodopa plasma concentration and the tapping effect, after a standard oral levodopa test, by kinetic-dynamic modeling in 40 parkinsonian patients with stable or fluctuating response to levodopa, and found no difference in levodopa plasma pharmacokinetics between stable and fluctuating patients. Conversely, levodopa equilibration half-life between plasma and effect-site concentration was fivefold shorter on average in fluctuating patients. Overall, levodopa equilibration half-life highly correlated with the duration of tapping response and provided a reliable quantitative index of central mechanisms that affect the length of clinical effect. Individual fitting of tapping measures to modeled drug effect-site concentrations by sigmoid Emax model revealed that fluctuating patients required almost two-fold higher levodopa concentrations (EC50) to elicit almost the same motor response (Emax). These findings suggest that shortening of levodopa clinical effect may be accompanied by a reduced drug affinity for the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system (EC50), with no change in its intrinsic activity (Emax).

Abnormal platelet mitochondrial function in patients affected by migraine with and without aura

To investigate energy metabolism in migraine, we determined platelet mitochondrial enzyme activities in 40 patients with migraine with aura and in 40 patients with migraine without aura during attack-free intervals and in 24 healthy control subjects. NADH-dehydrogenase, citrate synthase and cytochrome-c-oxidase activities in both patient groups were significantly lower than in controls (p < 0.01), while NADH-cytochrome-c-reductase activity was reduced only in migraine with aura (p < 0.01). No alteration in succinate-dehydrogenase was observed. Monoamine-oxidase activity differed between sexes (p < 0.05) but within each sex group no difference was observed between patients and controls. We hypothesize that the defect in mitochondrial enzymes observed indicates a systemic impairment of mitochondrial function in migraine patients.

Longitudinal monitoring of the levodopa concentration‐effect relationship in Parkinson's disease

We prospectively evaluated over 4 years the intrasubject relationship between levodopa plasma concentration and the tapping effect after a standard oral levodopa test in 28 patients with mild-to-moderate idiopathic Parkinsons disease. The onset and duration of the tapping effect significantly shortened over years; response amplitude did not vary. Levodopa plasma kinetics remained unchanged. Pharmacodynamic modeling indicated a progressive decrease in the equilibration half-life between plasma drug concentration and effect, which correlated with the shorter motor response. No clear-cut change in maximum response (Emax) emerged, but levodopa concentration needed to yield 50% of maximum effect (EC50) significantly increased. These data indicate that the duration of motor response becomes a major determinant of drug efficacy over years. The modifications in levodopa effect-compartment equilibration half-life and EC50 further support the suggestion that alterations in cerebral levodopa kinetics have an important role in the development of response fluctuations.

Free Fraction of Valproic Acid: In Vitro Time‐Dependent Increase and Correlation with Free Fatty Acid Concentration in Human Plasma and Serum

Summary: The effect of sample incubation and storage on the protein binding of the antiepileptic drug valproic acid (VPA) and on the concentration of free fatty acids (FFA) was investigated in serum and plasma collected from four normal volunteers. Both the free fraction of VPA and the concentration of FFA increased progressively with time when samples were incubated at 4 to 37oC. These effects occurred to the same extent in both serum and heparinized plasma. At 4oC and at room temperature, the increase in free drug fraction was relatively small (18 and 25% respectively at 24 h), whereas at 37oC it was quite considerable (24% at 8 h and 40% at 24 h). At room temperature, FFA rose on average by 22% at 4 h, 34% at 8 h, and 86% at 24 h, whereas at 37oC the increases at the same incubation times were 59, 90, and 160%, respectively. There was a strong positive relationship between changes in free VPA fraction and FFA content of the samples. The time‐dependent changes in VPA binding capacity described in this study may lead to overestimation of the actual free concentration in vivo, especially when this is estimated by equilibrium dialysis or ultracentrifugation techniques requiring long incubation (centrifugation) times at 37oC.

Response to a Standard Oral Levodopa Test in Parkinsonian Patients with and without Motor Fluctuations

The acute dose-response profile of a standard oral levodopa dose was followed, over a maximum 8-h period, in 13 patients with and 10 patients without motor fluctuations using a battery of motor quantitative tests (tapping and walking speed, and multiple choice reaction and movement times). Thirteen age-matched normal controls performed tapping and psychomotor tests, at the same time intervals, over a 4-h period. Tapping test and movement times proved significantly impaired in all patients and were the best indicator of levodopa effect, while walking speed and reaction times were apparently of less value, except in severely affected patients. The duration of the levodopa antiparkinsonian effect differed markedly between the two groups, since fluctuating patients returned to prelevodopa dose values within 4 h (mean +/- SEM: 203 +/- 16 min), while in the stable group motor scores remained significantly higher than baseline values up to at least 7 h postdose. The magnitude of the effect was similar in the two groups, but response was complicated by mild to severe dyskinesias in 9 of 13 fluctuating subjects. The pharmacokinetic parameters of levodopa were almost identical in the two groups. Our data add further weight to the hypothesis that cerebral pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic factors are responsible for motor fluctuations. Oral levodopa doses coupled with objective tests of motor performance may prove a practical clinical tool to assess and optimize the relationship between drug dose and therapeutic effect.

Pharmacokinetic optimisation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

SummaryThe current symptomatic treatment of Parkinson’s disease mainly relies on agents which are able to restore dopaminergic transmission in the nigrostriatal pathway, such as the dopamine precursor levodopa or direct agonists of dopamine receptors. Ancillary strategies include the use of anticholinergic and antiglutamatergic agents or inhibitors of cerebral dopamine catabolism, such as monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors.Levodopa is the most widely used and effective drug. Its peculiar pharmacokinetics are characterised by an extensive presystemic metabolism, overcome by the combined use of extracerebral inhibitors of the enzyme aromatic-aminoacid decarboxylase and rapid absorption in the proximal small bowel by a saturable facilitated transport system shared with other large neutral amino acids. Drug transport from plasma to the brain is mediated by the same carriers operating in the intestinal mucosa. The main strategies to assure reproducibility of both drug intestinal absorption and delivery to the brain and clinical effect include standardisation of levodopa administration with respect to meal times and a controlled dietary protein intake.The levodopa plasma half-life is very short, resulting in marked plasma drug concentration fluctuations which are matched, as the disease progresses, with swings in the therapeutic response (‘wearing-off’ phenomena). ‘Wearing-off’ phenomena can be also associated, at the more advanced disease stages with a ‘negative’, both parkinsonism-exacerbating and dyskinetic effect of levodopa at subtherapeutic plasma concentrations. Dyskinesias may be also related to high-levodopa, excessive plasma concentrations. Recognition of the different levodopa toxic response patterns can be difficult on a clinical basis alone, and simultaneous monitoring of levodopa concentration-effect relationships may prove useful to disclose the underlying mechanism and in planning the correct pharmacokinetic management.Controlled-release levodopa formulations have been developed in an attempt to smooth out fluctuations in plasma profiles and matched therapeutic responses. The delayed levodopa absorption and lower plasma concentrations which characterise controlled-release formulations compared with standard forms must be taken into account when prescribing dosage regimens and can be complicating factors in the management of the advanced disease stages.The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterisation of the other anti-parkinsonian agents is hampered by the lack of sensitive and specific analytical methods to measure their very low plasma drug concentrations and by the difficulty in quantitatively assessing overall moderate drug clinical effects. In clinical practice an optimal dosage schedule is still generally found for each patient on an empirical basis.Future strategies should focus on the search for pharmacological agents with a better kinetic profile, particularly a higher and reproducible bioavailability and a predictable relationship between plasma drug concentration and clinical response. Treatments aimed not only at controlling the symptoms, but also at slowing the neurodegenerative process, are currently under intensive investigation.