Robin Kothari
University of Waterloo
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robin Kothari.
Physical Review Letters | 2015
Dominic W. Berry; Andrew M. Childs; Richard Cleve; Robin Kothari; Rolando D. Somma
We describe a simple, efficient method for simulating Hamiltonian dynamics on a quantum computer by approximating the truncated Taylor series of the evolution operator. Our method can simulate the time evolution of a wide variety of physical systems. As in another recent algorithm, the cost of our method depends only logarithmically on the inverse of the desired precision, which is optimal. However, we simplify the algorithm and its analysis by using a method for implementing linear combinations of unitary operations together with a robust form of oblivious amplitude amplification.
conference on theory of quantum computation communication and cryptography | 2010
Andrew M. Childs; Robin Kothari
We present an efficient algorithm for simulating the time evolution due to a sparse Hamiltonian. In terms of the maximum degree d and dimension N of the space on which the Hamiltonian H acts for time t, this algorithm uses (d2(d+log* N) ∥Ht∥)1+o(1) queries. This improves the complexity of the sparse Hamiltonian simulation algorithm of Berry, Ahokas, Cleve, and Sanders, which scales like (d4(d+log* N) ∥Ht∥)1+o(1) To achieve this, we decompose a general sparse Hamiltonian into a small sum of Hamiltonians whose graphs of non-zero entries have the property that every connected component is a star, and efficiently simulate each of these pieces.
foundations of computer science | 2015
Dominic W. Berry; Andrew M. Childs; Robin Kothari
We present an algorithm for sparse Hamiltonian simulation whose complexity is optimal (up to log factors) as a function of all parameters of interest. Previous algorithms had optimal or near-optimal scaling in some parameters at the cost of poor scaling in others. Hamiltonian simulation via a quantum walk has optimal dependence on the sparsity at the expense of poor scaling in the allowed error. In contrast, an approach based on fractional-query simulation provides optimal scaling in the error at the expense of poor scaling in the sparsity. Here we combine the two approaches, achieving the best features of both. By implementing a linear combination of quantum walk steps with coefficients given by Bessel functions, our algorithms complexity (as measured by the number of queries and 2-qubit gates) is logarithmic in the inverse error, and nearly linear in the product tau of the evolution time, the sparsity, and the magnitude of the largest entry of the Hamiltonian. Our dependence on the error is optimal, and we prove a new lower bound showing that no algorithm can have sub linear dependence on tau.
symposium on the theory of computing | 2016
Scott Aaronson; Shalev Ben-David; Robin Kothari
We show a power 2.5 separation between bounded-error randomized and quantum query complexity for a total Boolean function, refuting the widely believed conjecture that the best such separation could only be quadratic (from Grovers algorithm). We also present a total function with a power 4 separation between quantum query complexity and approximate polynomial degree, showing severe limitations on the power of the polynomial method. Finally, we exhibit a total function with a quadratic gap between quantum query complexity and certificate complexity, which is optimal (up to log factors). These separations are shown using a new, general technique that we call the cheat sheet technique, which builds upon the techniques of Ambainis et al. [STOC 2016]. The technique is based on a generic transformation that converts any (possibly partial) function into a new total function with desirable properties for showing separations. The framework also allows many known separations, including some recent breakthrough results of Ambainis et al. [STOC 2016], to be shown in a unified manner.
SIAM Journal on Computing | 2017
Andrew M. Childs; Robin Kothari; Rolando D. Somma
Harrow, Hassidim, and Lloyd [Phys. Rev. Lett., 103 (2009), 150502] showed that for a suitably specified
symposium on discrete algorithms | 2013
Stacey Jeffery; Robin Kothari; Frédéric Magniez
N \times N
international colloquium on automata languages and programming | 2012
Stacey Jeffery; Robin Kothari; Frédéric Magniez
matrix
international colloquium on automata languages and programming | 2013
Aleksandrs Belovs; Andrew M. Childs; Stacey Jeffery; Robin Kothari; Frédéric Magniez
A
symposium on theoretical aspects of computer science | 2011
Andrew M. Childs; Robin Kothari
and an
symposium on theoretical aspects of computer science | 2014
Robin Kothari
N