Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rod Hollow is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rod Hollow.


International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology | 2016

A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system.

Anke Plasmans; Emma Rushbrooke; Michelle Moran; Claire Spence; Leen Theuwis; Andrzej Zarowski; Erwin Offeciers; Beth Atkinson; Jane McGovern; Dimity Dornan; Jaime Leigh; Arielle Kaicer; Rod Hollow; Leigh Martelli; Valerie Looi; Esti Nel; Janine Del Dot; Robert Cowan; Stefan J. Mauger

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate whether experienced paediatric cochlear implant users could show benefits to speech perception outcomes from the introduction of noise reduction and automated scene classification technologies as implemented in the Nucleus(®) 6 sound processor. Previous research with adult cochlear implant users had shown significant improvements in speech intelligibility for listening in noisy conditions and good user acceptance for upgrading to the Nucleus 6 processor. In adults, these improvements for listening in noise were primarily attributed to the use of a range of new input processing technologies including noise reduction, as well as introduction of automatic scene classification technology. METHODS Experienced paediatric cochlear implant users (n=25) were recruited from four clinics located in three countries. Research participants were evaluated on three occasions, an initial session using their Nucleus 5 sound processor; a second session in which participants used the Nucleus 6 processor programmed with the same technologies as were used in their Nucleus 5 sound processor; and a final session in which participants used the Nucleus 6 processor programmed with the default technologies including automatic scene classification (SCAN) which automatically selects the microphone directionality, noise reduction (SNR-NR), and wind noise reduction (WNR) technologies. Prior to both the second and third evaluations, research participants had approximately two weeks take-home experience with the new system. Speech perception performances on monosyllabic word tests presented in quiet and in noise, and a sentence test presented in noise, were compared across the three processor conditions. Acceptance of the Nucleus 6 default settings was assessed in a final session. RESULTS No group mean difference in performance was found for monosyllabic words in quiet. A significant improvement in speech perception was found for both monosyllabic words and sentences in noise with the default Nucleus 6 program condition as compared with the Nucleus 5 condition. No acceptance issues were noted for any of the children. CONCLUSIONS Experienced paediatric cochlear implant users showed a significant improvement in speech perception in listening in noise when upgraded to the Nucleus 6 sound processor primarily due to the introduction of a noise reduction technology, and all children accepted the default program. These findings suggest that school-aged children may benefit from upgrading to the Nucleus 6 sound processor using the default program.


Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology | 1997

Contributing Factors to Improved Speech Perception in Children Using the Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Prosthesis

Robert Cowan; Karyn L. Galvin; Sharon Klieve; E. J. Barker; Julia Z. Sarant; Shani J. Dettman; Rod Hollow; Gary Rance; Richard C. Dowell; B. C. Pyman; Graeme M. Clark

This is a publisher’s version of an article published in Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1997. This version is reproduced with permission from Karger. http://content.karger.com


Archives of Otolaryngology-head & Neck Surgery | 2004

Outcomes for Cochlear Implant Users With Significant Residual Hearing Implications for Selection Criteria in Children

Richard C. Dowell; Rod Hollow; Elizabeth Winton


Archive | 2002

Factors affecting speech perception outcomes for older children using multichannel cochlear implants

Richard C. Dowell; Shani J. Dettman; Katie Hill; Elizabeth Winton; Rod Hollow; Graeme M. Clark


Archive | 2002

The effect of language ability and residual hearing on speech perception outcomes for older children using multichannel cochlear implants [Abstract]

Richard C. Dowell; Shani J. Dettman; Katie Hill; Elizabeth Winton; Rod Hollow; Graeme M. Clark


Archive | 2002

Post-implant habilitation for children using cochlear implants: effects on long-term outcome

Richard C. Dowell; Shani J. Dettman; Sarah Williams; Alexandra Tomov; Rod Hollow; Graeme M. Clark


Archive | 2002

The effects of post-implant habilitation on long-term outcomes for children using multichannel cochlear implants [Abstract]

Richard C. Dowell; Shani J. Dettman; Sarah Williams; Alexandra Tomov; Rod Hollow; Graeme M. Clark


Archive | 2000

Latest results for adults & children using cochlear implants & future implications

Robert C. Cowan; Graeme M. Clark; Richard C. Dowell; Shani J. Dettman; E. J. Barker; Katie Latus; Rod Hollow; P. J. Blamey


Archive | 2000

Hearing levels and speech perception prior to cochlear implantation - are they predictive of outcomes for adult implant users?

Richard C. Dowell; Elizabeth Winton; Caroline Ling; Rod Hollow; Robert S. C. Cowan; Graeme M. Clark


Archive | 2000

What factors contribute to successful outcomes for children using cochlear implants

Robert C. Cowan; Graeme M. Clark; Richard C. Dowell; Shani J. Dettman; E. J. Barker; Katie Latus; Rod Hollow; P. J. Blamey

Collaboration


Dive into the Rod Hollow's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. J. Barker

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary Rance

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Cowan

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. C. Pyman

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge