Roderick R. Turner

American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Recommendations for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

PURPOSE To develop a guideline for the use of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in early stage breast cancer. METHODS An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Expert Panel conducted a systematic review of the literature available through February 2004 on the use of SNB in early-stage breast cancer. The panel developed a guideline for clinicians and patients regarding the appropriate use of a sentinel lymph node identification and sampling procedure from hereon referred to as SNB. The guideline was reviewed by selected experts in the field and the ASCO Health Services Committee and was approved by the ASCO Board of Directors. RESULTS The literature review identified one published prospective randomized controlled trial in which SNB was compared with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), four limited meta-analyses, and 69 published single-institution and multicenter trials in which the test performance of SNB was evaluated with respect to the results of ALND (completion axillary dissection). There are currently no data on the effect of SLN biopsy on long-term survival of patients with breast cancer. However, a review of the available evidence demonstrates that, when performed by experienced clinicians, SNB appears to be a safe and acceptably accurate method for identifying early-stage breast cancer without involvement of the axillary lymph nodes. CONCLUSION SNB is an appropriate initial alternative to routine staging ALND for patients with early-stage breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes. Completion ALND remains standard treatment for patients with axillary metastases identified on SNB. Appropriately identified patients with negative results of SNB, when done under the direction of an experienced surgeon, need not have completion ALND. Isolated cancer cells detected by pathologic examination of the SLN with use of specialized techniques are currently of unknown clinical significance. Although such specialized techniques are often used, they are not a required part of SLN evaluation for breast cancer at this time. Data suggest that SNB is associated with less morbidity than ALND, but the comparative effects of these two approaches on tumor recurrence or patient survival are unknown.

Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy.

ObjectiveThe authors evaluated the effect of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLND) on the axillary staging of patients with carcinoma of the breast. Summary Background DataThe accurate staging of patients with breast cancer is essential to guide management and determine prognosis. The authors previously reported the feasibility and accuracy of SLND in breast carcinoma. Sentinel lymphadenectomy identifies the first (“sentinel”) axillary lymph node draining the site of a primary tumor; because this node is the most likely site of axillary metastasis, histopathologic examination of the sentinel node correlates well with examination of the entire axillary contents. The current study compares SLND with standard axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) for the staging of breast carcinoma. MethodsThe incidence of axillary node metastasis and micrometastasis in SLND and ALND specimens from patients undergoing operative treatment of a primary breast carcinoma was compared prospectively. Multiple sections of each sentinel lymph node in SLND specimens were examined by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and by immunohistochemical techniques using antibodies to cytokeratin. One or two sections of each nonsentinel lymph node in ALND specimens were examined by routine H&E staining. ResultsOne hundred thirty-four patients underwent ALND (ALND group), and 162 underwent successful SLND followed by completion ALND (SLND group). Both groups were similar with respect to age (median, 55 and 54 years, respectively), palpable primary tumors (54.5% and 59.3%, respectively), palpable axillary nodes (5.2% and 7.4%, respectively), size of primary tumor (median, 1.5 cm in each group), and total number of axillary lymph nodes examined (median, 19 and 21, respectively). The number of patients with axillary metastasis was 39 (29.1%) in the ALND group and 68 (42.0%) in the SLND group (p < 0.03). Of these, 4 of 39 (10.3%) ALND patients (3.0% of all ALND patients) and 26 of 68 (38.2%) SLND patients (16.0% of all SLND patients) had micrometastasis (≤2 mm), a highly significant difference (p < 0.0005)

Histopathologic validation of the sentinel lymph node hypothesis for breast carcinoma.

Background and ObjectiveThe sentinel node hypothesis assumes that a primary tumor drains to a specific lymph node in the regional lymphatic basin. To determine whether the sentinel node is indeed the node most likely to harbor an axillary metastasis from breast carcinoma, the authors used cytokerati

Prospective Observational Study of Sentinel Lymphadenectomy Without Further Axillary Dissection in Patients With Sentinel Node–Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE Immediate complete axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) after sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLND) has confirmed that tumor-negative sentinel nodes accurately predict tumor-free axillary nodes in breast cancer. Therefore, we hypothesized that SLND alone in patients with tumor-negative sentinel nodes would achieve axillary control, with minimal complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between October 1995 and July 1997, 133 consecutive women who had primary invasive breast tumors clinically </= 4 cm in diameter and no axillary lymphadenopathy were prospectively entered onto a trial of SLND using vital blue dye. Sentinel nodes were examined by standard microscopy or immunohistochemistry. SLND was the only axillary surgery if sentinel nodes were tumor-free. Completion ALND was performed only if sentinel nodes contained metastases or if they were not identified. Excluded from subsequent analysis were patients with unsuspected multifocal carcinoma and those who refused completion ALND. The complication and axillary recurrence rates after SLND without ALND were determined. RESULTS Sentinel nodes were identified in 132 (99%) of 133 patients. Eight patients were excluded from further analysis. Of the 125 assessable patients, 57 had tumor-positive sentinel nodes and one had an unsuccessful mapping procedure; these patients underwent completion ALND. In the remaining 67 patients (54%), SLND was the only axillary procedure. Complications occurred in 20 patients (35%) undergoing ALND after SLND but in only two patients (3%) undergoing SLND alone (P =.001). There were no local or axillary recurrences at a median follow-up of 39 months. CONCLUSION Complication rates are negligible after SLND alone. An absence of axillary recurrences supports SLND as an accurate staging alternative for breast cancer and suggests that routine ALND can be eliminated for patients with histopathologically negative sentinel nodes.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update

PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing oncologists, surgeons, and radiation therapy clinicians to update the 2005 clinical practice guideline on the use of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for patients with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Update Committee of experts in medical oncology, pathology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, guideline implementation, and advocacy. A systematic review of the literature was conducted from February 2004 to January 2013 in Medline. Guideline recommendations were based on the review of the evidence by Update Committee. RESULTS This guideline update reflects changes in practice since the 2005 guideline. Nine randomized clinical trials (RCTs) met systematic review criteria for clinical questions 1 and 2; 13 cohort studies informed clinical question 3. RECOMMENDATIONS Women without sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases should not receive axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Women with one to two metastatic SLNs planning to undergo breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast radiotherapy should not undergo ALND (in most cases). Women with SLN metastases who will undergo mastectomy should be offered ALND. These three recommendation are based on RCTs. Women with operable breast cancer and multicentric tumors, with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who will undergo mastectomy, who previously underwent breast and/or axillary surgery, or who received preoperative/neoadjuvant systemic therapy may be offered SNB. Women who have large or locally advanced invasive breast cancer (tumor size T3/T4), inflammatory breast cancer, or DCIS (when breast-conserving surgery is planned) or are pregnant should not undergo SNB. These recommendations are based on cohort studies and/or informal consensus. In some cases, updated evidence was insufficient to update previous recommendations.

Do all patients with sentinel node metastasis from breast carcinoma need complete axillary node dissection

OBJECTIVE To determine the likelihood of nonsentinel axillary metastasis in the presence of sentinel node metastasis from a primary breast carcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Sentinel lymphadenectomy is a highly accurate technique for identifying axillary metastasis from a primary breast carcinoma. Our group has shown that nonsentinel axillary lymph nodes are unlikely to contain tumor cells if the axillary sentinel node is tumor-free, but as yet no study has examined the risk of nonsentinel nodal involvement when the sentinel node contains tumor cells. METHODS Between 1991 and 1997, axillary lymphadenectomy was performed in 157 women with a tumor-involved sentinel node. Fifty-three axillae (33.5%) had at least one tumor-involved nonsentinel node. The authors analyzed the incidence of nonsentinel node involvement according to clinical and tumor characteristics. RESULTS Only two variables had a significant impact on the likelihood of nonsentinel node metastasis: the size of the sentinel node metastasis and the size of the primary tumor. The rate of nonsentinel node involvement was 7% when the sentinel node had a micrometastasis (< or =2 mm), compared with 55% when the sentinel node had a macrometastasis (>2 mm). In addition, the rate of nonsentinel node tumor involvement increased with the size of the primary tumor. CONCLUSIONS If a primary breast tumor is small and if sentinel node involvement is micrometastatic, then tumor cells are unlikely to be found in other axillary lymph nodes. This suggests that axillary lymph node dissection may not be necessary in patients with sentinel node micrometastases from T1/T2 lesions, or in patients with sentinel node metastases from T1a lesions.

Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 Expression in Colorectal Cancer Patients Increases the Risk for Recurrence and for Poor Survival

PURPOSE Liver metastasis is the predominant cause of colorectal cancer (CRC) related mortality. Chemokines, soluble factors that orchestrate hematopoetic cell movement, have been implicated in directing cancer metastasis, although their clinical relevance in CRC has not been defined. Our hypothesis was that the chemokine receptor CXCR4 expressed by CRC is a prognostic factor for poor disease outcome. METHODS CRC cell lines (n = 6) and tumor specimens (n = 139) from patients with different American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages of CRC were assessed. Microarray screening of select specimens and cell lines identified CXCR4 as a prominent chemokine receptor. CXCR4 expression in tumor and benign specimens was assessed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and correlated with disease recurrence and overall survival. RESULTS High CXCR4 expression in tumor specimens (n = 57) from AJCC stage I/II patients was associated with increased risk for local recurrence and/or distant metastasis (risk ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.68; P = .0065). High CXCR4 expression in primary tumor specimens (n = 35) from AJCC stage IV patients correlated with worse overall median survival (9 months v 23 months; RR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.19 to 5.40; P = .016). CXCR4 expression was significantly higher in liver metastases (n = 39) compared with primary CRC tumors (n = 100; P < .0001). CONCLUSION CXCR4, a well-characterized chemokine receptor for T-cells, is differentially expressed in CRC. CXCR4 gene expression in primary CRC demonstrated significant associations with recurrence, survival, and liver metastasis. The CXCR4-CXCL12 signaling mechanism may be clinically relevant for patients with CRC and represents a potential novel target for disease-directed therapy.

Prognostic Significance of Occult Metastases Detected by Sentinel Lymphadenectomy and Reverse Transcriptase–Polymerase Chain Reaction in Early-Stage Melanoma Patients

PURPOSE Detection of micrometastases in the regional tumor-draining lymph nodes is critical for accurate staging and prognosis in melanoma patients. We hypothesized that a multiple-mRNA marker (MM) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay would improve the detection of occult metastases in the sentinel node (SN), compared with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC), and that MM expression is predictive of disease relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-two consecutive patients with clinical early-stage melanoma underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLND). Their SNs were serially sectioned and assessed for MAGE-3, MART-1, and tyrosinase mRNA expression by RT-PCR, in parallel with H&E staining and IHC, for melanoma metastases. MM expression in the SNs was correlated with H&E and IHC assay results, standard prognostic factors, and disease-free survival. RESULTS In 17 patients with H&E- and/or IHC-positive SNs, 16 (94%) expressed two or more mRNA markers. Twenty (36%) of 55 patients with histopathologically negative SNs expressed two or more mRNA markers. By multivariate analysis, patients at increased risk of metastases to the SN had thicker lesions (P =.03), were 60 years of age or younger (P <.05), and/or were MM-positive (P <.001). Patients with histopathologically melanoma-free SNs who were MM-positive, compared with those who were positive for one or fewer mRNA markers, were at increased risk of recurrence (P =.02). Patients who were MM-positive with histopathologically proven metastases in the SN were at greatest risk of disease relapse (P =. 01). CONCLUSION H&E staining and IHC underestimate the true incidence of melanoma metastases. MM expression in the SN more accurately reflects melanoma micrometastases and is also a more powerful predictor of disease relapse than are H&E staining and IHC alone.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: therapeutic utility and implications of nodal microanatomy and molecular staging for improving the accuracy of detection of nodal micrometastases.

Objective: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy (LM/SL) have been applied to virtually all solid neoplasms since our original description of LM/SL for melanoma. Our objectives were to determine the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of LM/SL, investigate carbon dye for mapping the microanatomy of lymphatic flow within the sentinel node (SN), and determine the prognostic accuracy of molecular assessment of the SN. Methods: Since 1985, 1599 patients with AJCC Stage I/II melanoma have been treated by LM/SL at our institution and 4590 have been treated by wide excision (WE) without nodal staging. We examined the incidence of clinical nodal recurrence after WE alone, the incidence of subclinical nodal metastases found by LM/SL, and the incidence of nodal recurrence in basins with histopathology-negative SNs. Results: In 1514 LM/SL patients with a primary of known Breslow thickness, the incidence of metastasis in nodes claimed to be sentinel was 7.3%, 19.7%, 33.2%, and 39.7% for primary lesions ≤1.0, 1.01–2.0, 2.01–4.0, and >4.0 mm, respectively. In 3652 WE-only patients, the corresponding rates of nodal recurrence were 12.0%, 32.0%, 34.4%, and 30.1%. Thus, LM/SL detected only 60% of expected nodal metastases from primary melanomas <2.01 mm. Forty of 1599 (3.1%) patients developed recurrence in basins with immunohistochemistry (IH)-negative SNs. To determine whether nonrandom intranodal distribution of tumor cells could explain missed SN metastases, we coinjected carbon particles and blue dye during LM/SL in 166 patients: 25 (16%) patients had nodal metastases, all of which were found only in nodal subsectors containing carbon particles. When paraffin-embedded SNs from a subset of 162 IH-negative patients were re-examined by quantitative multimarker reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT) assay, 49 (30%) gave positive signals. These patients had a significantly higher risk of disease recurrence and death than did patients whose IH and qRT results were negative (p < 0.0001). Comparison of 287 prognostically matched pairs of patients who underwent immediate (after LM/SL) versus delayed (after observation) dissection of nodal metastases revealed 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates of 73%, 69%, and 69% versus 51%, 37%, and 32%, respectively (P ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: SN assessment based on intranodal compartmentalization of lymphatic flow (carbon dye mapping) should increase the accuracy of IH and, in combination with multimarker qRT assessment, will allow confident identification of most patients for whom surgery alone is curative. Our data suggest a significant therapeutic benefit for immediate dissection based on identification of a tumor-involved SN.

Molecular Staging of Early Colon Cancer on the Basis of Sentinel Node Analysis: A Multicenter Phase II Trial

PURPOSE Approximately 30% of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I or II colorectal cancer (CRC) develop systemic disease. We hypothesized that multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) draining a primary CRC could detect micrometastases not detected by conventional histopathologic analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a multi-institutional study, 40 patients with primary CRC underwent dye-directed lymphatic mapping at the time of colon resection. Each dye-stained SN was tagged, and the tumor and regional nodes were resected en bloc. All lymph nodes were examined by conventional hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. In addition, each SN was cut into multiple sections for cytokeratin immunohistochemical (CK-IHC) staining and for RT-PCR and electrochemiluminescent detection of three markers: beta-chain human chorionic gonadotropin, hepatocyte growth factor receptor, and universal melanoma-associated antigen. Whenever possible, RT-PCR assay was also performed on primary tumor tissue. The detection sensitivity of individual markers was 10(-3) to 10(-4) microg of RNA and one to five tumor cells in 10(7) lymphocytes of healthy donors. RESULTS One to three SNs were identified in each patient. An average of 15 nodes were removed from each CRC specimen. No nonsentinel (untagged) node contained evidence of tumor if all tagged (sentinel) nodes in the same specimen were histopathology tumor-negative. HE staining of SNs identified tumor in 10 patients (25%), and CK-IHC of SNs identified occult micrometastases in four patients (10%) whose SNs were negative by HE. Of the remaining 26 patients with no evidence of SN involvement by HE or CK-IHC, 12 (46%) had positive RT-PCR results. The number of markers expressed in each SN correlated (P <.04) with the T stage of the primary tumor. There was 79% concordance in marker expression for the respective pairs (n = 38) of primary tumor and histopathologically positive SNs, and 86% (12 of 14) concordance between RT-PCR positive and histopathologically positive SNs. CONCLUSION Identification and focused examination of the SN is a novel method of staging CRC. CK-IHC and RT-PCR identified occult micrometastases in 53% of patients whose SNs were negative by conventional staging techniques. These ultrasensitive assays of the SN can identify patients who may be at high risk for recurrence of CRC and therefore are more likely to benefit from systemic adjuvant therapy.