Rodney J. Landreneau

Postoperative pain-related morbidity: Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy☆

One hundred thirty-eight consecutive, nonrandomized patients, with equivalent demographic and preoperative physiologic parameters, underwent either a video-assisted thoracic surgical (VATS) approach (n = 81) or a limited lateral thoracotomy (LLT) approach (n = 57) to accomplish pulmonary resection for peripheral lung lesions (< or = 3 cm in diameter). Wedge resection was done in 74 VATS patients and 19 LLT patients. Seven patients underwent VATS lobectomy and 38 patients had lobectomy performed through an LLT. Pain was quantitated by postoperative narcotic requirements, the need for intercostal/epidural analgesia, and patient perception of pain index scoring. Shoulder and pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) were measured preoperatively, 3 days postoperatively, and at 3 weeks of follow-up. Patients undergoing VATS experienced significantly less postoperative pain. No patients undergoing VATS required intercostal block/epidural analgesia; 31 LLT patients (54%) required this treatment for breakthrough pain (p = 0.001). Narcotic requirements were less (p = 0.05) among VATS patients, which correlated with lower perception of pain index after operation for VATS patients. Shoulder girdle strength was equally impaired at day 3, but function was more improved in VATS patients at 3 weeks (p = 0.01). Patients undergoing wedge resection alone by LLT had greater impairment in early (day 3) pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) (p = 0.002); this difference from VATS was not sustained at 3 weeks. Video-assisted thoracic surgery is associated with reduced pain, shoulder dysfunction, and early pulmonary impairment compared with LLT for select patients requiring pulmonary resection.

Improvement in pulmonary function and elastic recoil after Lung reduction surgery for diffuse emphysema

BACKGROUND Pulmonary function may improve after surgical resection of the most severely affected lung tissue (lung-reduction surgery) in patients with diffuse emphysema. The basic mechanisms responsible for the improvement, however, are not known. METHODS We studied 20 patients with diffuse emphysema before and at least three months after either a unilateral or a bilateral lung-reduction procedure. Clinical benefit was assessed by measurement of the six-minute walking distance and the transitional-dyspnea index, which is a subjective rating of the change from base line in functional impairment and the threshold for effort- and task- dependent dyspnea. Pressure-volume relations in the lungs were measured with static expiratory esophageal-balloon techniques, and right ventricular systolic function was assessed by echocardiography. RESULTS The patients had significant improvement in the transitional-dyspnea index after surgery (P<0.001). The mean (+/-SD) coefficient of retraction, an indicator of elastic recoil of the lung, improved (from 1.3+/-0.6 cm of water per liter before surgery to 1.8+/-0.8 after, P<0.001). Sixteen patients with increased elastic recoil had a greater increase in the distance walked in six minutes than the other four patients, in whom recoil did not increase (P=0.02). The improved lung recoil led to disproportionate decreases in residual volume as compared with total lung capacity (16 percent vs. 6 percent), but the decreases in both values were significant (P<0.001). Forced expiratory volume in one second increased (from 0.87+/-0.36 to 1.11+/-0.45 liters, P<0.001). End-expiratory esophageal pressure also decreased (P=0.002). These improvements in lung mechanics led to a decrease in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide form 42+/-6 to 38+/-5 mm Hg (P=0.006). Furthermore, the fractional change in right ventricular area, an indicator of systolic function, increased from 0.33+/-0.11 to 0.38+/-0.010 (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Lung-reduction surgery can produce increases in the elastic recoil of the lung in patients with diffuse emphysema, leading to short-term improvement in dyspnea and exercise tolerance.

Lobectomy—video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy: A randomized trial

Video-assisted thoracic surgery has been adopted by some thoracic surgeons as the preferred approach over thoracotomy for many benign and malignant diseases of the chest. However, little concrete evidence exists to support this technique as the superior approach. This randomized study was carried out to define the advantages of video-assisted lobectomy over muscle-sparing thoracotomy and lobectomy. Sixty-one patients with presumed clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer were entered into the study. Each patient was randomized to muscle-sparing thoracotomy and lobectomy or video-assisted lobectomy. Six patients were excluded from the study either because final pathologic results revealed nonmalignant disease (3 patients) or because an attempted video-assisted lobectomy was converted to a thoracotomy. This left 30 patients in the thoracotomy group and 25 patients in the video-assisted group. No significant differences existed between the two groups in operating time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of chest tube drainage, or length of hospital stay. Significantly more postoperative complications occurred in the thoracotomy group (p < 0.5), the majority of which were prolonged air leaks. Return to work time was not an issue because the majority of the patients were either retired or not working at the time of the operation. Only three patients had persistent postthoracotomy pain (thoracotomy, n = 2; video-assisted lobectomy, n = 1). We conclude that video-assisted lobectomy was not associated with a significant decrease in duration of chest tube drainage, length of hospital stay, postthoracotomy pain, or, in this group of patients, a faster recovery time and return to work. Video-assisted lobectomy continues to expose the patient to the risk of a major pulmonary resection being done in an essentially closed chest. These results illustrate the need for critical evaluation of video-assisted thoracic surgery before the procedure is accepted as a superior approach based on presumed and thus far unproved advantages.

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND Standard options for the invasive management of proximal disease of the left anterior descending coronary artery include coronary artery bypass grafting with a left internal mammary artery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. METHODS We describe a surgical technique for bypass of the left anterior descending coronary artery with a left internal mammary artery without median sternotomy and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Thoracoscopy is used to harvest the internal mammary artery, whereas the mammary-coronary artery anastomosis is performed under direct vision through a limited anterior thoracotomy. RESULTS We have performed this procedure successfully in 3 patients with minimal morbidity and shortened hospital stay. Average operative time was 3 hours and postoperative hospital stay averaged less than 48 hours. CONCLUSION Although experience is limited and follow-up is very short, with further experience, this less invasive surgical technique may become a viable option for the management of proximal left anterior descending disease.

Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Review of Over 1000 Patients

Background: Esophagectomy is a complex operation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In an attempt to lower morbidity, we have adopted a minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy. Objectives: Our primary objective was to evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in a large group of patients. Our secondary objective was to compare the modified McKeown minimally invasive approach (videothoracoscopic surgery, laparoscopy, neck anastomosis [MIE-neck]) with our current approach, a modified Ivor Lewis approach (laparoscopy, videothoracoscopic surgery, chest anastomosis [MIE-chest]). Methods: We reviewed 1033 consecutive patients undergoing MIE. Elective operation was performed on 1011 patients; 22 patients with nonelective operations were excluded. Patients were stratified by surgical approach and perioperative outcomes analyzed. The primary endpoint studied was 30-day mortality. Results: The MIE-neck was performed in 481 (48%) and MIE-Ivor Lewis in 530 (52%). Patients undergoing MIE-Ivor Lewis were operated in the current era. The median number of lymph nodes resected was 21. The operative mortality was 1.68%. Median length of stay (8 days) and ICU stay (2 days) were similar between the 2 approaches. Mortality rate was 0.9%, and recurrent nerve injury was less frequent in the Ivor Lewis MIE group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: MIE in our center resulted in acceptable lymph node resection, postoperative outcomes, and low mortality using either an MIE-neck or an MIE-chest approach. The MIE Ivor Lewis approach was associated with reduced recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and mortality of 0.9% and is now our preferred approach. Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be performed safely, with good results in an experienced center.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery: Basic technical concepts and intercostal approach strategies

Video-assisted thoracic surgery is emerging as a viable approach to a number of intrathoracic disorders. Technical difficulties related to improper instrument selection and suboptimal intercostal operative access can reduce the utility of, and the enthusiasm for, the video-assisted thoracic surgical approach. This report describes the intercostal access strategy and the instrument positioning that we now prescribe for many video-assisted thoracic surgical procedures. These approaches have become refined during the course of our experience with 467 patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic operations over the last 18 months.

MicroRNA expression profiles of esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE Expression of microRNAs by array analysis provides unique profiles for classifying tissues and tumors. The purpose of our study was to examine microRNA expression in Barrett esophagus and esophageal cancer to identify potential markers for disease progression. METHODS MicroRNA was isolated from 35 frozen specimens (10 adenocarcinoma, 10 squamous cell carcinoma, 9 normal epithelium, 5 Barrett esophagus, and 1 high-grade dysplasia). MicroRNA expression was analyzed with Ambion bioarrays (Ambion, Austin, Tex) containing 328 human microRNA probes. RESULTS Unsupervised hierarchic clustering resulted in four major branches corresponding with four histologic groups. One branch consisted of 7 normal epithelium samples and 1 squamous cell carcinoma sample. The second branch consisted of 7 squamous cell carcinoma samples and 1 normal epithelium sample. The third branch contained 4 Barrett esophagus samples and 1 squamous cell carcinoma sample. The fourth contained all the adenocarcinoma samples and 1 sample each of Barrett esophagus, normal epithelium, squamous cell carcinoma, and high-grade dysplasia. Supervised classification with principal component analysis determined that the normal epithelium samples were more similar to the squamous cell carcinoma tumors, whereas the Barrett esophagus samples were more similar to adenocarcinoma. Pairwise comparisons between sample types revealed microRNAs that may be markers of tumor progression. Both mir_203 and mir_205 were expressed 2- to 10-fold lower in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinomas than in normal epithelium. The mir_21 expression was 3- to 5-fold higher in both tumors than in normal epithelium. Prediction analysis of microarray classified 3 Barrett esophagus samples as Barrett esophagus, 1 as adenocarcinoma, and 1 as normal epithelium. CONCLUSION Expression profiles of miRNA distinguish esophageal tumor histology and can discriminate normal tissue from tumor. MicroRNA expression may prove useful for identifying patients with Barrett esophagus at high risk for progression to adenocarcinoma.

Randomized trial of mediastinal lymph node sampling versus complete lymphadenectomy during pulmonary resection in the patient with N0 or N1 (less than hilar) non-small cell carcinoma: Results of the American College of Surgery Oncology Group Z0030 Trial

OBJECTIVE To determine whether mediastinal lymph node dissection improves survival compared with mediastinal lymph node sampling in patients undergoing resection for N0 or nonhilar N1, T1, or T2 non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS Patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent sampling of 2R, 4R, 7, and 10R for right-sided tumors and 5, 6, 7, and 10L for left-sided tumors. If all tumors were negative for malignancy, patients were randomized to no further lymph node sampling (mediastinal lymph node sampling) or complete mediastinal lymph node dissection. RESULTS Of 1111 patients randomized, 1023 (mediastinal lymph node sampling in 498, mediastinal lymph node dissection in 525) were eligible and evaluable. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, histology, cancer location, type or extent of resection, and pathologic stage. Occult N2 disease was found in 21 patients in the mediastinal lymph node dissection group. At a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 435 patients (43%) have died: mediastinal lymph node sampling in 217 (44%) and mediastinal lymph node dissection in 218 (42%). The median survival is 8.1 years for mediastinal lymph node sampling and 8.5 years for mediastinal lymph node dissection (P = .25). The 5-year disease-free survival was 69% (95% confidence interval, 64-74) in the mediastinal lymph node sampling group and 68% (95% confidence interval, 64-73) years in the mediastinal lymph node dissection group (P = .92). There was no difference in local (P = .52), regional (P = .10), or distant (P = .76) recurrence between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS If systematic and thorough presection sampling of the mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes is negative, mediastinal lymph node dissection does not improve survival in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer, but these results are not generalizable to patients staged radiographically or those with higher stage tumors.

Egr-1 Regulates Autophagy in Cigarette Smoke-Induced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive lung disease characterized by abnormal cellular responses to cigarette smoke, resulting in tissue destruction and airflow limitation. Autophagy is a degradative process involving lysosomal turnover of cellular components, though its role in human diseases remains unclear. Methodology and Principal Findings Increased autophagy was observed in lung tissue from COPD patients, as indicated by electron microscopic analysis, as well as by increased activation of autophagic proteins (microtubule-associated protein-1 light chain-3B, LC3B, Atg4, Atg5/12, Atg7). Cigarette smoke extract (CSE) is an established model for studying the effects of cigarette smoke exposure in vitro. In human pulmonary epithelial cells, exposure to CSE or histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor rapidly induced autophagy. CSE decreased HDAC activity, resulting in increased binding of early growth response-1 (Egr-1) and E2F factors to the autophagy gene LC3B promoter, and increased LC3B expression. Knockdown of E2F-4 or Egr-1 inhibited CSE-induced LC3B expression. Knockdown of Egr-1 also inhibited the expression of Atg4B, a critical factor for LC3B conversion. Inhibition of autophagy by LC3B-knockdown protected epithelial cells from CSE-induced apoptosis. Egr-1 −/− mice, which displayed basal airspace enlargement, resisted cigarette-smoke induced autophagy, apoptosis, and emphysema. Conclusions We demonstrate a critical role for Egr-1 in promoting autophagy and apoptosis in response to cigarette smoke exposure in vitro and in vivo. The induction of autophagy at early stages of COPD progression suggests novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of cigarette smoke induced lung injury.

Thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of the indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule

Traditional nonoperative diagnostic approaches to the indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule include bronchoscopy and percutaneous needle biopsy. Although both methods are minimally invasive, the diagnosis of the small, peripheral nodule may remain elusive. Open thoracotomy is often required when these methods fail to obtain a diagnosis. Between January 1991 and June 1992, 242 patients with indeterminate solitary lung nodules underwent thoracoscopic excisional biopsy as the primary diagnostic method. Wedge excisions of the nodules were all performed by thoracoscopic techniques using an endoscopic stapler alone (72%), neodymium:yttrium-aluminum garnet laser (18%), or both (10%). A definite diagnosis was obtained in all patients. Two patients required conversion to thoracotomy to locate the nodule (both malignant). A benign diagnosis was obtained in 127 patients (52%) and a malignant diagnosis in 115 (48%). Of the malignant nodules, 51 (44%) were primary lung cancer and 64 (56%) were metastases. All patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer having adequate pulmonary reserve (n = 29) underwent formal open lung resection during the same procedure. There was no mortality, and significant morbidity was limited to atelectasis in 3 patients (1.2%), pneumonia in 2 patients (0.8%), and prolonged air leak more than 7 days in 4 patients (1.6%). Average hospital stay for patients having thoracoscopy only (n = 213) was 2.4 days (range, 1 to 12 days). Thoracoscopy offers a minimally invasive approach for the diagnosis of the indeterminate solitary nodule. It has advantages over traditional diagnostic methods of being virtually 100% sensitive and 100% specific with no mortality and minimal morbidity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)