Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rodney L. Huffman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rodney L. Huffman.


Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-asce | 2013

Water Application Efficiency and Adequacy of ET-Based and Soil Moisture-Based Irrigation Controllers for Turfgrass Irrigation

Garry L. Grabow; I. E. Ghali; Rodney L. Huffman; Grady L. Miller; Daniel C. Bowman; A. Vasanth

Abstract Increasing competition for water and the desire for high-quality turfgrass require sound irrigation water management. The main objective of this study was to evaluate two types of commercially available irrigation control technologies: one based on evapotranspiration (ET) estimates and the other based on feedback from a soil-moisture sensor (SMS). Irrigation treatments were combinations of controller technology: a timer-based standard controller system (TIM), an add-on (1 set point) SMS system (SMS1), and an evapotranspiration (ET)-based system (ETB), and watering frequency: weekly, twice per week, and daily (1, 2, and 7xa0days per week, respectively) plus a 10th treatment of an on-demand (2 set point) SMS system (SMS2). Both irrigation efficiency and adequacy were best for the SMS2 treatment when averaged over all three years. The SMS1 treatment provided good irrigation efficiency, but irrigation adequacy suffered, most noticeably with the twice per week treatment. The ET treatment provided good i...


Transactions of the ASABE | 2006

Water Distribution from a Subsurface Drip Irrigation System and Dripline Spacing Effect on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency in a Coastal Plain Soil

Garry L. Grabow; Rodney L. Huffman; Robert O. Evans; David L. Jordan; R. C. Nuti

A subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) system was installed in 2001 in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina. Initially, four zones were installed, each with 0.91 m dripline spacing. In 2002, a fifth zone with 1.82 m dripline spacing was added. This system irrigated a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) rotation on a Norfolk sandy loam soil. Seed cotton yield data was collected from 2001 to 2004. In addition to SDI, overhead sprinkler irrigation was applied to cotton plots from 2001 to 2003. This study was concurrent with another study that evaluated the effect of irrigation system type, cotton growth regulator (mepiquat chloride), herbicide (glyphosate) treatment, and planting date on lint yield and quality. Although the soil is classified as a sandy loam, water moved laterally to the midpoint of the 1.82 m spaced dripline; this was likely due to the pan layer found at about 0.3 m just below the dripline depth of 0.23 m. There was no difference in lateral water movement between the two dripline spacings. Seed cotton yield and irrigation water use efficiency was not statistically different between irrigation system type or dripline spacing over all years in the study. Seed cotton yield averaged 3.44 Mg ha-1 for the 0.91 m dripline spacing and 3.22 Mg ha-1 for the 1.82 m spacing for the three-year period 2002-2004 compared to an unirrigated average of 2.58 Mg ha-1 for the same period. Average irrigation water use efficiency was greater for the 0.91 m dripline spacing but not statistically different from the 1.82 m spacing. For 2001-2003, when sprinkler-irrigated plots existed, seed cotton yield averaged 3.55 Mg ha-1 for the 0.91 m dripline spacing, 3.35 Mg ha-1 for the sprinkler-irrigated plots, and 2.56 Mg ha-1 for the unirrigated plots. Drought conditions existed in 2002, when 258 mm of rain occurred between planting and final irrigation. The other growing seasons received relatively high amounts of rainfall: 524, 555, and 643 mm in 2001, 2003, and 2004, respectively.


Transactions of the ASABE | 2011

Linking Plant Ecology and Long-Term Hydrology to Improve Wetland Restoration Success

P. V. Caldwell; Michael J. Vepraskas; James D. Gregory; R. W. Skaggs; Rodney L. Huffman

Although millions of dollars are spent restoring wetlands, failures are common, in part because the planted vegetation cannot survive in the restored hydrology. Wetland restoration would be more successful if the hydrologic requirements of wetland plant communities were known so that the most appropriate plants could be selected for the range of projected hydrology at the site. Here we describe how hydrologic models can be used to characterize the long-term hydrology of wetland plant communities, and we show how these results can be used to define wetland design criteria. In our study, we quantified differences in long-term (40-year) hydrologic characteristics of the pond pine woodland (PPW), nonriverine swamp forest (NRSF), high pocosin (HP), and bay forest (BF) plant communities native to the North Carolina Coastal Plain. We found that the median water level was 8 cm below the land surface in PPW and 9, 2, and 8 cm above the land surface for NRSF, HP, and BF, respectively. When the land surface was inundated, the median duration of inundation was 91 d year-1 for PPW and 317, 243, and 307 d year-1 for NRSF, HP, and BF, respectively. Our models suggested that the PPW received an average of 15% of its water input from groundwater inflow, whereas the other communities we modeled did not appear to receive groundwater inflow. Using these results and soil organic layer thickness, we developed and propose design criteria linking soil, vegetation, and hydrology parameters that should contribute to improved restoration success.


World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008 | 2008

EVALUATION OF EVAPOTRANSPIRATION-BASED AND SOIL-MOISTURE- BASED IRRIGATION CONTROL IN TURF

Garry L. Grabow; Arjun Vasanth; Daniel C. Bowman; Rodney L. Huffman; Grady L. Miller

A study was initiated in Fall 2006 in Raleigh, North Carolina to compare two types of commercially available irrigation control technologies, one based on estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) and the other based on feedback from soil moisture sensors. Water applied and turf quality from one ET-based system and two sensor-based systems were compared to a system using a standard time-based irrigation schedule. The effect of irrigation frequency was also a part of the study. Estimates of turf ET were obtained from the Penman-Monteith equation using on-site weather data, and also from an atmometer. Results from the twenty week evaluation in 2007 showed that on average the “add-on” soil-moisture-based system evaluated applied the least amount of water while the ETbased system evaluated applied the most water. Weekly irrigation frequencies used the least amount of water, followed by bi-weekly and daily frequencies in increasing amounts when averaged across all technologies. Minimally acceptable turf quality was maintained by all technologies and frequencies through most of the study, but turf quality declined substantially the last month of the study for the add-on system and standard timer-based system. The “on-demand” sensor-based system resulted in the best combination of water efficiency and turf quality.


Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-asce | 2011

SDI Dripline Spacing Effect on Corn and Soybean Yield in a Piedmont Clay Soil

Garry L. Grabow; Rodney L. Huffman; Robert O. Evans

A subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) system was installed in the Piedmont of North Carolina in a clay soil in the fall of 2001 to test the effect of dripline spacing on corn and soybean yield. The system was zoned into three sections; each section was cropped to either corn (Zea mays L.), full-season soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], or winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) double cropped to soybean representing any year of a typical crop rotation in the region. Each section had four plots; two SDI plots with dripline spacing at either 1.52 or 2.28 m, an overhead sprinkler irrigated plot, and an unirrigated plot. There was no difference in average corn grain yield for 2002–2005 between dripline spacings or between either dripline spacing and sprinkler. Irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) was greater for sprinkler irrigated corn than for either SDI treatment and there was no difference in IWUE in soybean. Water typically moved laterally from the driplines 0.38 to 0.50 m. SDI yield and IWUE increased relative t...


2010 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 20 - June 23, 2010 | 2010

Evaluation of Two Smart Irrigation Technologies in Cary, North Carolina

Mayank Nautiyal; Garry L. Grabow; Grady L. Miller; Rodney L. Huffman

Decreasing the amount of water applied by residential irrigation systems without causing negative effects on turfgrass quality is a challenge. A variety of technologies are available in the market that seeks to reduce irrigation water use. These technologies include rain sensors, and soil moisture sensor (SMS) based and evapotranspiration (ET) based controllers. A study was conducted in Cary, North Carolina with the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of two smart systems, based on the amount of irrigation applied and turf quality in residential settings. The study included 24 residential sites that were divided into six geographical regions, each group within a region receiving four different treatments. The treatments were: SMS) an irrigation controller with a soil moisture sensor, ET) an evapotranspiration based controller, ED) a standard irrigation controller using seasonal runtimes based on historical climate data and Control) irrigation controller with no intervention. Data was collected from May 2009 through September 2009. Maximum water savings were achieved by the SMS treatment followed by ET, ED and Control treatments. According to visual turfgrass rating, only the Control group was found to have turf quality below an acceptable level.


Journal of Environmental Quality | 2009

Leaching of Nutrients and Trace Elements from Stockpiled Turkey Litter into Soil

Sanjay B. Shah; Kimberly J. Hutchison; Dean Hesterberg; Garry L. Grabow; Rodney L. Huffman; David H. Hardy; James T. Parsons

In addition to nutrients, poultry are fed trace elements (e.g., As) for therapeutic purposes. Although a large proportion of the nutrients are assimilated by the birds, nearly all of the As is excreted. Hence, turkey litter constituents can leach into the soil and contaminate shallow ground water when it is stockpiled uncovered on bare soil. This study quantified the leaching of turkey litter constituents from uncovered stockpiles into the underlying soil. Four stockpiles were placed on Orangeburg loamy sand in summer 2004 for 162 d; 14 d after their removal, four stockpiles were created over the same footprints and left over winter for 162 d. Soil samples at depths of 7.6 to 30.5 cm and 30.5 to 61 cm adjacent to and beneath the stockpiles were compared for pH, electrical conductivity, total C, dissolved organic C, N species, P, water-extractable (WE)-P, As, WE-As, Cu, Mn, and Zn. All WE constituents affected the 7.6- to 30.5-cm layer, and some leached deeper; for example, NH(4)(+)-N concentrations were 184 and 62 times higher in the shallow and deep layers, respectively. During winter stockpiling, WE-As concentrations beneath the stockpiles tripled and doubled in the 7.6- to 30.5-cm and 30.5- to 61-cm layers, respectively, with WE-As being primarily as As(V). Heavy dissolved organic C and WE-P leaching likely increased solubilization of soil As, although WE-As concentrations were low due to the Al-rich soil and low-As litter. When used as drinking water, shallow ground water should be monitored on farms with a history of litter stockpiling on bare soil; high litter As; and high soil As, Fe, and Mn concentrations.


Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-asce | 2015

Residential Irrigation Water Use in the Central Piedmont of North Carolina. II: Evaluation of Smart Irrigation Technologies

M. Nautiyal; Garry L. Grabow; Rodney L. Huffman; Grady L. Miller; Daniel C. Bowman

AbstractA study was conducted in Cary, North Carolina, in the spring and summer of 2009 with the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of two “smart irrigation” controllers based on the amount of irrigation applied and resulting turf quality in residential settings. Twenty-four residential sites were selected, in clusters of four, representing six geographical areas within the town. Each geographical cluster included one site of each treatment. The treatments were standard irrigation controller with an add-on soil moisture sensor system (SMS); standard irrigation controller with an add-on evapotranspiration-based adjustment system (ET); standard irrigation controller using seasonal runtimes based on historical climate data (ED); and a control group which used a standard irrigation controller with no intervention (CON). Weekly water usage was obtained from irrigation meter readings and turf quality was characterized using a visual rating and a normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) meter. Maximum ...


2002 Chicago, IL July 28-31, 2002 | 2002

Subsurface Drip Irrigation Research on Commodity Crops in North Carolina

Garry L. Grabow; Rodney L. Huffman; Robert O. Evans; Keith Edmisten; David L. Jordan

Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) is relatively new to North Carolina. Subsurface drip, for npurposes of this paper, means drip line installed at a depth below normal tillage operations, and used nmultiple years. There has been interest of the use of this technology on commodity crops (corn, nwheat, soybeans, cotton, and peanuts) upon which much of the North Carolina agricultural economy nis based. nResearch-scale SDI systems have been installed in the Piedmont of North Carolina, in clay loam nsoils, and in the Coastal Plain in fine sandy loam soils. One year of data has been collected for corn, nwinter wheat, and soybeans in the Piedmont, and for cotton and peanuts at the Coastal Plain site. nThe Piedmont site tested for impact of drip line spacing on corn, winter wheat and soybean yield, nwhile the initial phase of the coastal plain site tested the effect of irrigation method (SDI, sprinkler, nand rainfed) and pest strategies on cotton and peanut yield. nData from the Piedmont site indicated that a 5-foot drip line spacing (every-other-row between-rows) non corn was just as effective as a 2.5-foot spacing (every-row under-row). No increase in winter nwheat yield was realized for any of the drip line spacings, however the wheat was replanted due to ncold, dry weather, and was poorly established, complicating the comparison. SDI irrigated soybean nyield was also not statistically different than rainfed yield for any of the drip line spacings. This may nhave been due to the combination of an early frost and indeterminate soybeans that negated npotential irrigation benefits late in the pod filling stage. nData from the Coastal Plain site showed that SDI improved cotton yield as compared to sprinkler nacross Roundup. and Pix. treatments. Peanuts receiving various disease control strategies had nsimilar results. Continued research is planned for both sites.


Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-asce | 2015

Residential Irrigation Water Use in the Central Piedmont of North Carolina. I: Measured Use and Water Requirements

M. Nautiyal; Garry L. Grabow; Rodney L. Huffman; Grady L. Miller; Daniel C. Bowman

AbstractIrrigation is the most common and standard practice for maintaining turfgrass and landscape plants in residential settings. The main objective of this study was to quantify the residential irrigation water use in Cary, North Carolina. A subobjective was to develop distributions of monthly reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and gross irrigation requirements (GIRs) for the area using long-term weather data. As part of the subobjective, an investigation was performed to compare daily measured solar radiation with two empirical methods of estimating solar radiation (Rs). The goal of this investigation was to determine the relative accuracy of these methods and to evaluate the impact of using Rs estimates in the computation of ETo and GIR for the Raleigh-Durham area, where Cary is located. Irrigation water use data from 2005 to 2007 for 120 randomly sampled residences were evaluated. The average lawn area of the sampled residences was 713u2009u2009m2. None of the sampled households used drip irrigation. A nega...

Collaboration


Dive into the Rodney L. Huffman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Garry L. Grabow

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Grady L. Miller

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel C. Bowman

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert O. Evans

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sanjay B. Shah

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David L. Jordan

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dean Hesterberg

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. Vepraskas

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Casson Stallings

Alion Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G.S. Kreiser

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge