Rodrigo Aguilar

Ezh1 and Ezh2 differentially regulate PSD-95 gene transcription in developing hippocampal neurons.

Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) mediates transcriptional silencing by catalyzing histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), but its role in the maturation of postmitotic mammalian neurons remains largely unknown. We report that the PRC2 paralogs Ezh1 and Ezh2 are differentially expressed during hippocampal development. We show that depletion of Ezh2 leads to increased expression of PSD-95, a critical plasticity gene, and that reduced PSD-95 gene transcription is correlated with enrichment of Ezh2 at the PSD-95 gene promoter; however, the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark is not present at the PSD-95 gene promoter, likely due to the antagonizing effects of the H3S28P and H3K27Ac marks and the activity of the H3K27 demethylases JMJD3 and UTX. In contrast, increased PSD-95 gene transcription is accompanied by the presence of Ezh1 and elongation-engaged RNA Polymerase II complexes at the PSD-95 gene promoter, while knock-down of Ezh1 reduces PSD-95 transcription. These results indicate that Ezh1 and Ezh2 have antagonistic roles in regulating PSD-95 transcription.

The Specification of Cortical Subcerebral Projection Neurons Depends on the Direct Repression of TBR1 by CTIP1/BCL11a

The acquisition of distinct neuronal fates is fundamental for the function of the cerebral cortex. We find that the development of subcerebral projections from layer 5 neurons in the mouse neocortex depends on the high levels of expression of the transcription factor CTIP1; CTIP1 is coexpressed with CTIP2 in neurons that project to subcerebral targets and with SATB2 in those that project to the contralateral cortex. CTIP1 directly represses Tbr1 in layer 5, which appears as a critical step for the acquisition of the subcerebral fate. In contrast, lower levels of CTIP1 in layer 6 are required for TBR1 expression, which directs the corticothalamic fate. CTIP1 does not appear to play a critical role in the acquisition of the callosal projection fate in layer 5. These findings unravel a key step in the acquisition of cell fate for closely related corticofugal neurons and indicate that differential dosages of transcriptions factors are critical to specify different neuronal identities.

Epigenetic control of the bone-master Runx2 gene during osteoblast-lineage commitment by the histone demethylase JARID1B/KDM5B

Background: Runx2 is the master regulator of osteoblast differentiation. Results: JARID1B/KDM5B is a key component of the epigenetic mechanisms that control Runx2 expression during osteoblast and myoblast differentiation. These mechanisms operate at the P1 promoter. Conclusion: Epigenetic mechanisms regulate Runx2 expression and osteoblast-lineage commitment. Significance: The work provides new mechanistic insights of Runx2 gene expression control during mesenchymal fate determination. Transcription factor Runx2 controls bone development and osteoblast differentiation by regulating expression of a significant number of bone-related target genes. Here, we report that transcriptional activation and repression of the Runx2 gene via its osteoblast-specific P1 promoter (encoding mRNA for the Runx2/p57 isoform) is accompanied by selective deposition and elimination of histone marks during differentiation of mesenchymal cells to the osteogenic and myoblastic lineages. These epigenetic profiles are mediated by key components of the Trithorax/COMPASS-like and Polycomb group complexes together with histone arginine methylases like PRMT5 and lysine demethylases like JARID1B/KDM5B. Importantly, knockdown of the H3K4me2/3 demethylase JARID1B, but not of the demethylases UTX and NO66, prevents repression of the Runx2 P1 promoter during myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells. The epigenetically forced expression of Runx2/p57 and osteocalcin, a classical bone-related target gene, under myoblastic-differentiation is accompanied by enrichment of the H3K4me3 and H3K27ac marks at the Runx2 P1 promoter region. Our results identify JARID1B as a key component of a potent epigenetic switch that controls mesenchymal cell fate into myogenic and osteogenic lineages.

The Ric-8B gene is highly expressed in proliferating preosteoblastic cells and downregulated during osteoblast differentiation in a SWI/SNF- and C/EBPβ-mediated manner

ABSTRACT The Ric-8 gene encodes a guanine exchange factor (GEF) that modulates G protein-mediated signaling, exhibiting a relevant role during regulation of cell division. In mammals, two Ric-8 homologues have been reported (Ric-8A and Ric-8B), and recent studies indicate equivalent roles for each protein. Here, we show that the Ric-8B gene is negatively regulated during osteoblast differentiation by the transcription factor C/EBPβ. Only the larger C/EBPβ isoform (C/EBPβ-LAP*) downregulates Ric-8B gene promoter activity in osteoblastic cells. Accordingly, knockdown of C/EBPβ expression by small intefering RNA in osteoblastic cells results in a significant increase of Ric-8B gene expression. Transient overexpression of Brg1 or Brm, the catalytic subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex, inhibits Ric-8B promoter activity. Also, the presence of inactive SWI/SNF complexes in osteoblastic cells results in increased endogenous Ric-8B transcription, indicating that SWI/SNF activity negatively regulates Ric-8B expression. During osteoblast differentiation, Ric-8B gene repression is accompanied by changes in nucleosome placement at the proximal Ric-8B gene promoter and reduced accessibility to regulatory sequences.

Epigenetic editing of the Dlg4/PSD95 gene improves cognition in aged and Alzheimer's disease mice

The Dlg4 gene encodes for post-synaptic density protein 95 (PSD95), a major synaptic protein that clusters glutamate receptors and is critical for plasticity. PSD95 levels are diminished in ageing and neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimers disease and Huntingtons disease. The epigenetic mechanisms that (dys)regulate transcription of Dlg4/PSD95, or other plasticity genes, are largely unknown, limiting the development of targeted epigenome therapy. We analysed the Dlg4/PSD95 epigenetic landscape in hippocampal tissue and designed a Dlg4/PSD95 gene-targeting strategy: a Dlg4/PSD95 zinc finger DNA-binding domain was engineered and fused to effector domains to either repress (G9a, Suvdel76, SKD) or activate (VP64) transcription, generating artificial transcription factors or epigenetic editors (methylating H3K9). These epi-editors altered critical histone marks and subsequently Dlg4/PSD95 expression, which, importantly, impacted several hippocampal neuron plasticity processes. Intriguingly, transduction of the artificial transcription factor PSD95-VP64 rescued memory deficits in aged and Alzheimers disease mice. Conclusively, this work validates PSD95 as a key player in memory and establishes epigenetic editing as a potential therapy to treat human neurological disorders.

The chromatin modifying complex CoREST/LSD1 negatively regulates notch pathway during cerebral cortex development.

The development of the cerebral cortex is a dynamic and coordinated process in which cell division, cell death, migration, and differentiation must be highly regulated to acquire the final architecture and functional competence of the mature organ. Notch pathway is an important regulator of differentiation and it is essential to maintain neural stem cell (NSC) pool. Here, we studied the role of epigenetic modulators such as lysine‐specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) and its interactor CoREST in the regulation of the Notch pathway activity during the development of the cerebral cortex. We found that CoREST and LSD1 interact in vitro with RBPJ‐κ in the repressor complex and these proteins are released upon overexpression of Notch intracellular domain (NICD). We corroborated LSD1 and RBPJ‐κ interaction in developing cerebral cortex and also found that LSD1 binds to the hes1 promoter. Knock‐down of CoREST and LSD1 by in utero electroporation increases Hes1 expression in vivo and decreases Ngn2. Interestingly, we found a functional interaction between CoREST and LSD1 with Notch pathway. This conclusion is based on the observation that both the defects in neuronal migration and the increase in the number of cells expressing Sox2 and Tbr2 were associated to the knock‐down of either CoREST or LSD1 and were reversed by the loss of Notch. These results demonstrate that CoREST and LSD1 downregulate the Notch pathway in the developing cerebral cortex, thus suggesting a role of epigenetic regulation in the fine tuning of cell differentiation.

Polycomb PRC2 complex mediates epigenetic silencing of a critical osteogenic master regulator in the hippocampus

During hippocampal neuron differentiation, the expression of critical inducers of non-neuronal cell lineages must be efficiently silenced. Runx2 transcription factor is the master regulator of mesenchymal cells responsible for intramembranous osteoblast differentiation and formation of the craniofacial bone tissue that surrounds and protects the central nervous system (CNS) in mammalian embryos. The molecular mechanisms that mediate silencing of the Runx2 gene and its downstream target osteogenic-related genes in neuronal cells have not been explored. Here, we assess the epigenetic mechanisms that mediate silencing of osteoblast-specific genes in CNS neurons. In particular, we address the contribution of histone epigenetic marks and histone modifiers on the silencing of the Runx2/p57 bone-related isoform in rat hippocampal tissues at embryonic to adult stages. Our results indicate enrichment of repressive chromatin histone marks and of the Polycomb PRC2 complex at the Runx2/p57 promoter region. Knockdown of PRC2 H3K27-methyltransferases Ezh2 and Ezh1, or forced expression of the Trithorax/COMPASS subunit Wdr5 activates Runx2/p57 mRNA expression in both immature and mature hippocampal cells. Together these results indicate that complementary epigenetic mechanisms progressively and efficiently silence critical osteoblastic genes during hippocampal neuron differentiation.

Epigenetic Signatures at the RUNX2-P1 and Sp7 Gene Promoters Control Osteogenic Lineage Commitment of Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Whartons Jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJ‐MSCs) are an attractive potential source of multipotent stem cells for bone tissue replacement therapies. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in their osteogenic conversion are poorly understood. Particularly, epigenetic control operating at the promoter regions of the two master regulators of the osteogenic program, RUNX2/P57 and SP7 has not yet been described in WJ‐MSCs. Via quantitative PCR profiling and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies, here we analyze the ability of WJ‐MSCs to engage osteoblast lineage. In undifferentiated WJ‐MSCs, RUNX2/P57 P1, and SP7 promoters are found deprived of significant levels of the histone post‐translational marks that are normally associated with transcriptionally active genes (H3ac, H3K27ac, and H3K4me3). Moreover, the RUNX2 P1 promoter lacks two relevant histone repressive marks (H3K9me3 and H3K27me3). Importantly, RUNX2 P1 promoter is found highly enriched in the H3K4me1 mark, which has been shown recently to mediate gene repression of key regulatory genes. Upon induction of WJ‐MSCs osteogenic differentiation, we found that RUNX2/P57, but not SP7 gene expression is strongly activated, in a process that is accompanied by enrichment of activating histone marks (H3K4me3, H3ac, and H3K27ac) at the P1 promoter region. Histone mark analysis showed that SP7 gene promoter is robustly enriched in epigenetic repressive marks that may explain its poor transcriptional response to osteoblast differentiating media. Together, these results point to critical regulatory steps during epigenetic control of WJ‐MSCs osteogenic lineage commitment that are relevant for future applications in regenerative medicine. J. Cell. Physiol. 232: 2519–2527, 2017.

Multiple levels of epigenetic control for bone biology and pathology

Multiple dimensions of epigenetic control contribute to regulation of gene expression that governs bone biology and pathology. Once confined to DNA methylation and a limited number of post-translational modifications of histone proteins, the definition of epigenetic mechanisms is expanding to include contributions of non-coding RNAs and mitotic bookmarking, a mechanism for retaining phenotype identity during cell proliferation. Together these different levels of epigenetic control of physiological processes and their perturbations that are associated with compromised gene expression during the onset and progression of disease, have contributed to an unprecedented understanding of the activities (operation) of the genomic landscape. Here, we address general concepts that explain the contribution of epigenetic control to the dynamic regulation of gene expression during eukaryotic transcription. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Epigenetics and Bone.

A Functional N-terminal Domain in C/EBPβ-LAP* is Required for Interacting with SWI/SNF and to Repress Ric-8B Gene Transcription in Osteoblasts

The chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF and the transcription factor C/EBPβ play critical roles in osteoblastic cells as they jointly control transcription of a number of bone‐related target genes. The largest C/EBPβ isoform, LAP*, possesses a short additional N‐terminal domain that has been proposed to mediate the interaction of this factor with SWI/SNF in myeloid cells. Here we examine the requirement of a functional N‐terminus in C/EBPβ‐LAP* for binding SWI/SNF and for recruiting this complex to the Ric‐8B gene to mediate transcriptional repression. We find that both C/EBPβ‐LAP* and SWI/SNF simultaneously bind to the Ric‐8B promoter in differentiating osteoblasts that repress Ric‐8B expression. This decreased expression of Ric‐8B is not accompanied by significant changes in histone acetylation at the Ric‐8B gene promoter sequence. A single aminoacid change at the C/EBPβ‐LAP* N‐terminus (R3L) that inhibits C/EBPβ‐LAP*‐SWI/SNF interaction, also prevents SWI/SNF recruitment to the Ric‐8B promoter as well as C/EBPβ‐LAP*‐dependent repression of the Ric‐8B gene. Inducible expression of the C/EBPβ‐LAP*R3L protein in stably transfected osteoblastic cells demonstrates that this mutant protein binds to C/EBPβ‐LAP*‐target promoters and competes with the endogenous C/EBPβ factor. Together our results indicate that a functional N‐terminus in C/EBPβ‐LAP* is required for interacting with SWI/SNF and for Ric‐8B gene repression in osteoblasts. J. Cell. Physiol. 229: 1521–1528, 2014.