Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rodrigo Pinochet is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rodrigo Pinochet.


European Urology | 2010

Comprehensive Standardized Report of Complications of Retropubic and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Farhang Rabbani; Luis Herran Yunis; Rodrigo Pinochet; Lucas Nogueira; Kinjal Vora; James A. Eastham; Bertrand Guillonneau; Vincent P. Laudone; Peter T. Scardino; Karim Touijer

BACKGROUND The lack of standardized reporting of the complications of radical prostatectomy in the literature has made it difficult to compare incidences across institutions and across different surgical approaches. OBJECTIVE To define comprehensively the incidence, severity, and timing of onset of medical and surgical complications of open retropubic prostatectomy (RP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LP) using a standardized reporting methodology to facilitate comparison. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Between January 1999 and June 2007, 4592 consecutive patients underwent RP or LP without prior radiation or hormonal therapy. Median follow-up was 36.9 mo (interquartile range: 20.3-60.6). INTERVENTION Open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MEASUREMENTS All medical and surgical complications of radical prostatectomy were captured and graded according to the modified Clavien classification and classified by timing of onset. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS There were 612 medical complications in 467 patients (10.2%) and 1426 surgical complications in 925 patients (20.1%). The overall incidences of early minor and major medical and surgical complications for RP were 8.5% and 1.5% for medical and 11.4% and 4.9% for surgical complications, respectively. The overall incidences of early minor and major medical and surgical complications for LP were 14.2% and 2.3% for medical and 23.1% and 6.6% for surgical complications, respectively. On multivariate analysis, LP approach was associated with a higher incidence of any grade medical and surgical complications but a lower incidence of major surgical complications than RP. Six hundred fifty-two men (14.2%) visited the emergency department, and 240 men (5.2%) required readmission. The main limitation is the retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS With standardized reporting, the incidence of some complications is higher than recognized in the literature. Although most complications are minor in severity, medical and surgical complications are observed in approximately 10% and 20% of patients, respectively. Accurate reporting of complications through a standardized methodology is essential for counseling patients regarding risk of complications, for identifying modifiable risk factors, and for facilitating comparison across institutions and approaches.


Urology | 2010

Focal treatment or observation of prostate cancer: pretreatment accuracy of transrectal ultrasound biopsy and T2-weighted MRI.

Lucas Nogueira; Liang Wang; Samson W. Fine; Rodrigo Pinochet; Jordan M. Kurta; Darren Katz; Caroline Savage; Angel M. Cronin; Hedvig Hricak; Peter T. Scardino; Oguz Akin; Jonathan A. Coleman

OBJECTIVES To test the hypothesis that men with prostate cancer (PCA) and preoperative disease features considered favorable for focal treatment would be accurately characterized with transrectal biopsy and prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by performing a retrospective analysis of a selected cohort of such patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS A total of 202 patients with PCA who had preoperative MRI and low-risk biopsy criteria (no Gleason grade 4/5, 1 involved core, < 2 mm, PSA density < or = 0.10, clinical stage < or = T2a) were included in the study. Indolent RP pathology was defined as no Gleason 4/5, organ confined, tumor volume < 0.5 mL, and negative surgical margins. MRI ability to locate and determine the tumor extent was assessed. RESULTS After RP, 101 men (50%) had nonindolent cancer. Multifocal and bilateral tumors were present in 81% and 68% of patients, respectively. MRI indicated extensive disease in 16 (8%). MRI sensitivity to locate PCA ranged from 2% to 20%, and specificity from 91% to 95%. On univariate analysis, MRI evidence of extracapsular extension (P = .027) and extensive disease (P = .001) were associated with nonindolent cancer. On multivariate analysis, only the latter remained as significant predictor (P = .0018). CONCLUSIONS Transrectal biopsy identified men with indolent tumors favorable for focal treatment in 50% of cases. MRI findings of extracapsular extension and extensive tumor involving more than half of the gland are associated with unfavorable features, and may be useful in excluding patients from focal treatment. According to these data, endorectal MRI is not sufficient to localize small tumors for focal treatment.


Journal of Endourology | 2012

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Patients with Elevated Risk of Lymph Node Invasion During Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Procedures

Jonathan L. Silberstein; Andrew J. Vickers; Nicholas Power; Raul O. Parra; Jonathan A. Coleman; Rodrigo Pinochet; Karim Touijer; Peter T. Scardino; James A. Eastham; Vincent P. Laudone

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Published outcomes of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) demonstrate significant variability. The purpose of the study was to compare PLND outcomes in patients at risk for lymph node involvement (LNI) who were undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) by different surgeons and surgical approaches. PATIENTS AND METHODS Institutional policy initiated on January 1, 2010, mandated that all patients undergoing RP receive a standardized PLND with inclusion of the hypogastric region when predicted risk of LNI was ≥ 2%. We analyzed the outcomes of consecutive patients meeting these criteria from January 1 to September 1, 2010 by surgeons and surgical approach. All patients underwent RP; surgical approach (open radical retropubic [ORP], laparoscopic [LRP], RALP) was selected by the consulting surgeon. Differences in lymph node yield (LNY) between surgeons and surgical approaches were compared using multivariable linear regression with adjustment for clinical stage, biopsy Gleason grade, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and age. RESULTS Of 330 patients (126 ORP, 78 LRP, 126 RALP), 323 (98%) underwent PLND. There were no significant differences in characteristics between approaches, but the nomogram probability of LNI was slightly greater for ORP than RALP (P=0.04). LNY was high (18 nodes) by all approaches; more nodes were removed by ORP and LRP (median 20, 19, respectively) than RALP (16) after adjusting for stage, grade, PSA level, and age (P=0.015). Rates of LNI were high (14%) with no difference between approaches when adjusted for nomogram probability of LNI (P=0.15). Variation in median LNY among individual surgeons was considerable for all three approaches (11-28) (P=0.005) and was much greater than the variability by approach. CONCLUSIONS PLND, including hypogastric nodal packet, can be performed by any surgical approach, with slightly different yields but similar pathologic outcomes. Individual surgeon commitment to PLND may be more important than approach.


Urology | 2010

Critical Evaluation of Perioperative Complications in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Lucas Nogueira; Darren Katz; Rodrigo Pinochet; Guilherme Godoy; Jordan M. Kurta; Caroline Savage; Angel M. Cronin; Bertrand Guillonneau; Karim Touijer; Jonathan A. Coleman

OBJECTIVES To analyze our experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) to detail postoperative adverse events and identify factors that may contribute to adverse surgical outcomes. Complications from LPN result from a variety of factors, both technical and inherent. METHODS Single-center review of 144 consecutive LPN (4 surgeons) performed between November 2002 and January 2008 was conducted. Identified complications were graded using standard reporting criteria. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis of variables and their association with complication event and blood loss was performed. RESULTS A total of 39 complications occurred in 29 (20%) cases. Of these, 20 (51%) were urologic and 19 (49%) were nonurologic. Individual adverse events by grade were as follows: grade I, 6 (15.4%); grade II, 19 (48.7%), grade III, 11 (28.2%), and grade IV, 3 (7.7%). No grade V complications occurred. The median tumor size and ischemia time were 2.7 cm and 35 minutes, respectively. Univariate analysis identified increased American Society of Anesthesiologists risk score (odds ratio 2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28, 6.94) and ischemia time (odds ratio 1.31; 95% CI 1.00, 1.71) as associated with complication risk. On multivariate analysis, longer ischemia time was associated with increased estimated blood loss (95% CI 3, 57; P = .03). Hospital readmission and reintervention was required in 15 (10.4%) and 9 (6.2%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Complications from LPN occur in a meaningful proportion of procedures although the majority does not require reintervention and half are not urologic. Increasing ischemia time and American Society of Anesthesiologists score are associated with risk for unfavorable surgical outcomes.


BJUI | 2008

Comparison of gelatine matrix-thrombin sealants used during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Lucas Nogueira; Darren Katz; Rodrigo Pinochet; Jordan M. Kurta; Jonathan A. Coleman

To compare haemostasis and other outcomes after the use of bovine‐derived or porcine‐derived gelatine matrix‐thrombin sealants (GMTS) in a continuous series of patients during and for 6 months after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).


Urologia Internationalis | 2010

Role of Short-Term Antibiotic Therapy at the Moment of Catheter Removal after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Rodrigo Pinochet; Lucas Nogueira; Angel M. Cronin; Darren Katz; Farhang Rabbani; Bertrand Guillonneau; Karim Touijer

Objective: To assess the role of short-term antibiotic therapy (ABT) in preventing urinary tract infection (UTI) after catheter removal following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Methods: 729 consecutive patients underwent LRP by one of two surgeons. One surgeon systematically prescribed a 3-day course of ABT (ciprofloxacin) starting the day before catheter removal; the other surgeon did not. The groups were compared for the incidence of symptomatic UTI occurring within 6 weeks after catheter removal. Results: ABT was given to 261 of 713 patients (37%), while the remaining 452 patients (63%) did not receive ABT. After catheter removal, UTI was observed less frequently among patients receiving ABT: 3.1 vs. 7.3% in those not receiving ABT (p = 0.019). A number needed to treat to prevent 1 UTI is 24. Hospital readmission for febrile UTI was observed only in patients who did not receive ABT (n = 5, 1.1 vs. 0%, p = 0.16). One would need to prescribe ABT for 91 LRP patients to prevent 1 case of febrile UTI. Conclusions: ABT at the time of catheter removal reduced the risk of postoperative UTI after LRP. One would need to prescribe ABT to 24 patients to prevent 1 case of UTI.


Prostate Cancer | 2014

Comparison of Transperineal Mapping Biopsy Results with Whole-Mount Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer

Darren Katz; Rodrigo Pinochet; Kyle A. Richards; Guilherme Godoy; Kazuma Udo; Lucas Nogueira; Angel M. Cronin; Samson W. Fine; Peter T. Scardino; Jonathon A. Coleman

Objective. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of transperineal mapping biopsy (TMB) by comparing it to the pathology specimen of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer. Methods. From March 2007 to September 2009, 78 men at a single center underwent TMB; 17 of 78 subsequently underwent RP. TMB cores were grouped into four quadrants and matched to data from RP whole-mount slides. Gleason score, tumor location and volume, cross-sectional area, and maximal diameter were measured; sensitivity and specificity were assessed. Results. For the 17 patients who underwent RP, TMB revealed 12 (71%) had biopsy Gleason grades ≥ 3 + 4 and 13 (76%) had bilateral disease. RP specimens showed 14 (82%) had Gleason scores ≥ 3 + 4 and 13 (76%) had bilateral disease. Sensitivity and specificity of TMB for prostate cancer detection were 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72%–94%) and 83% (95% CI 62%–95%), respectively. Four quadrants negative for cancer on TMB were positive on prostatectomy, and six positive on TMB were negative on prostatectomy. Conclusion. TMB is a highly invasive procedure that can accurately detect and localize prostate cancer. These findings help establish baseline performance characteristics for TMB and its utility for organ-sparing strategies.


The Journal of Urology | 2010

125 IMPACT OF STATIN USE ON PATHOLOGIC FEATURES IN MEN TREATED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

Jorge Rioja; Rodrigo Pinochet; Caroline Savage; Bertrand Guillonneau; Peter T. Scardino; James A. Eastham; Raul O. Parra


The Journal of Urology | 2010

140 ROLE OF 3D TRANSPERINEAL MAPPING BIOPSY IN CANDIDATES FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE

Winston E. Barzell; Rodrigo Pinochet; Angel M. Cronin; Myron R. Melamed; Jonathan A. Coleman


The Journal of Urology | 2010

139 THE RATE OF UPGRADING AND UPSTAGING ON IMMEDIATE REPEAT BIOPSY IN PATIENTS ELIGIBLE FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IS NOT RELATED TO EXTENT OF FIRST BIOPSY

David S. Yee; Ari Adamy; Rodrigo Pinochet; Alexandra C. Maschino; Angel M. Cronin; Bertrand Guillonneau; Peter T. Scardino; James A. Eastham

Collaboration


Dive into the Rodrigo Pinochet's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lucas Nogueira

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bertrand Guillonneau

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan A. Coleman

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karim Touijer

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter T. Scardino

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Darren Katz

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Caroline Savage

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James A. Eastham

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jordan M. Kurta

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge