Roel S. Driessen

Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve

Importance At present, the choice of noninvasive testing for a diagnosis of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) is ambiguous, but nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging with single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is predominantly used for this purpose. However, to date, prospective head-to-head studies are lacking regarding the diagnostic accuracy of these imaging modalities. Furthermore, the combination of anatomical and functional assessments configuring a hybrid approach may yield improved accuracy. Objectives To establish the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA, SPECT, and PET and explore the incremental value of hybrid imaging compared with fractional flow reserve. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective clinical study involving 208 patients with suspected CAD who underwent CCTA, technetium 99m/tetrofosmin–labeled SPECT, and [15O]H2O PET with examination of all coronary arteries by fractional flow reserve was performed from January 23, 2012, to October 25, 2014. Scans were interpreted by core laboratories on an intention-to-diagnose basis. Hybrid images were generated in case of abnormal noninvasive anatomical or functional test results. Main Outcomes and Measures Hemodynamically significant stenosis in at least 1 coronary artery as indicated by a fractional flow reserve of 0.80 or less and relative diagnostic accuracy of SPECT, PET, and CCTA in detecting hemodynamically significant CAD. Results Of the 208 patients in the study (76 women and 132 men; mean [SD] age, 58 [9] years), 92 (44.2%) had significant CAD (fractional flow reserve ⩽0.80). Sensitivity was 90% (95% CI, 82%-95%) for CCTA, 57% (95% CI, 46%-67%) for SPECT, and 87% (95% CI, 78%-93%) for PET, whereas specificity was 60% (95% CI, 51%-69%) for CCTA, 94% (95% CI, 88%-98%) for SPECT, and 84% (95% CI, 75%-89%) for PET. Single-photon emission tomography was found to be noninferior to PET in terms of specificity (P < .001) but not in terms of sensitivity (P > .99) using the predefined absolute margin of 10%. Diagnostic accuracy was highest for PET (85%; 95% CI, 80%-90%) compared with that of CCTA (74%; 95% CI, 67%-79%; P = .003) and SPECT (77%; 95% CI, 71%-83%; P = .02). Diagnostic accuracy was not enhanced by either hybrid SPECT and CCTA (76%; 95% CI, 70%-82%; P = .75) or by PET and CCTA (84%; 95% CI, 79%-89%; P = .82), but resulted in an increase in specificity (P = .004) at the cost of a decrease in sensitivity (P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance This controlled clinical head-to-head comparative study revealed PET to exhibit the highest accuracy for diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. Furthermore, a combined anatomical and functional assessment does not add incremental diagnostic value but guides clinical decision-making in an unsalutary fashion.

Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET

Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease remains a challenging task, with a large armamentarium of diagnostic modalities. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is widely used for this purpose whereby cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) is considered the gold standard. Next to relative radiotracer distribution, PET allows for measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow. This quantification of perfusion improves diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value. Cardiac hybrid imaging relies on the fusion of anatomical and functional imaging using coronary computed tomography angiography and MPI, respectively, and provides incremental value as compared with either stand-alone modality.

Prevalence of ischaemia in patients with a chronic total occlusion and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Aims Previous studies on invasive assessment of collateral function in patients with a chronic total occlusion (CTO) have displayed only a limited increase in collateral flow and high occurrence of coronary steal during pharmacological stress. This could question the necessity for ischaemia testing prior to revascularization of CTOs in the presence of myocardial viability. The purpose of the present study was to determine the prevalence of perfusion impairments in patients with a CTO as assessed by [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET). Methods and results Seventy-six consecutive patients (60 men, 62 ± 10 years) with a documented CTO and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were included. All patients underwent PET to assess (hyperaemic) myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR). Collateral connection score was 0 in 7 (9%), 1 in 13 (17%), and 2 in 56 (74%) of the cases, with predominantly a high Rentrop grade (96% ≥2). MBF of the target area during hyperaemia was significantly lower when compared with the remote area (1.37 ± 0.37 vs. 2.63 ± 0.71 mL min-1 g-1, P < 0.001). Target to remote ratio during hyperaemia was on average 0.54 ± 0.13, and 73 (96%) patients demonstrated a significantly impaired target to remote ratio (≤0.75). Only 7 (9%) patients displayed a preserved CFR of ≥2.50, whereas coronary steal (CFR <1.0) was observed in 10 (13%) patients. Conclusions Even in the presence of angiographically well-developed collateral arteries, the vast majority of CTO patients with a preserved LVEF showed significantly impaired perfusion. These results suggest that collateral function during increased blood flow demand in viable myocardium is predominantly insufficient.

Value of Hybrid Imaging with PET/CT to Guide Percutaneous Revascularization of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion

Chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) are documented in approximately one fifth of diagnostic invasive coronary angiographies (ICA). Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of CTO are challenging and are accompanied by higher complication and lower success rates in comparison with non-CTO PCI. Scrutinous evaluation of ischemia and viability to justify percutaneous revascularization is therefore of importance to select eligible patients for such a procedure. Furthermore, knowledge of the anatomical features of the occlusion may predict the chances of success of PCI CTO and could even guide the procedural strategy to augment the likelihood of recanalization. Positron emission tomography (PET) is unequivocally accepted as the reference standard for ischemia and viability testing, whereas coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) currently allows for non-invasive detailed three-dimensional imaging of the coronary anatomy that adds morphological information over two-dimensional ICA. Hybrid PET/CT could therefore be useful for optimal patient selection as well as procedural planning. This review discusses the potential value of PET/CT to guide PCI in CTOs.

Effects of successful percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions on myocardial perfusion and left ventricular function

AIMS The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of successful PCI CTO on absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) and functional recovery. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with a documented CTO were prospectively examined for ischaemia and viability with [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) and late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR). Sixty-nine consecutive patients, in whom PCI was successful, underwent follow-up PET and CMR after approximately 12 weeks to evaluate potential improvement of MBF as well as systolic function. After PCI, stress MBF in the CTO area increased from 1.22±0.36 to 2.40±0.90 mL·min-1·g-1 (p<0.001), whilst stress MBF in the remote area also increased significantly between baseline and follow-up PET (2.58±0.68 to 2.77±0.77 mL·min-1·g-1, p=0.01). The ratio of stress MBF between CTO and remote area was 0.49±0.13 at baseline and increased to 0.87±0.24 at follow-up (p<0.001). The MBF defect size of the CTO area decreased from 5.12±1.69 to 1.91±1.75 myocardial segments after PCI (p<0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased significantly (46.4±11.0 vs. 47.5±11.4%, p=0.01) at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The vast majority of CTO patients with documented ischaemia and viability showed significant improvement in stress MBF and a reduction of ischaemic burden after successful percutaneous revascularisation with only minimal effect on LVEF.

Measurement of LV Volumes and Function Using Oxygen-15 Water-Gated PET and Comparison With CMR Imaging

Myocardial perfusion imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. And although PET using [15O]H2O has a high diagnostic accuracy for predicting coronary artery disease in routine clinical practices [(1)][1], left ventricular (LV)

Incremental Value of Hybrid PET/CT in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

The noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) is a challenging task. Traditionally, myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has been widely used for this purpose whereby cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) is considered the gold standard. Alternatively, noninvasive anatomical imaging of coronary atherosclerosis with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has recently been successfully implemented in clinical practice. Cardiac hybrid imaging consists of the fusion of these modalities and provides detailed information on the presence and extent of CAD including its functional consequences on myocardial perfusion. This type of comprehensive imaging, obtained within a single session using a PET/CT scanner, appears to have superior diagnostic and prognostic value as compared with either stand-alone test. This review discusses the literature on the incremental value of hybrid cardiac PET/CT imaging for patients suspected of CAD.

Diagnostic value of longitudinal flow gradient for the presence of haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease

Aims The longitudinal myocardial blood flow (MBF) gradient derived from positron emission tomography (PET) has been proposed as an emerging non-invasive index of haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of longitudinal MBF gradient for the presence of haemodynamically significant CAD. Methods and results A total of 204 patients (603 vessels) with suspected CAD underwent [15O]H2O PET followed by invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) of all major coronary arteries. Longitudinal base-to-apex MBF gradients were assessed by two methods, using MBF in apical and mid (Method 1) or in apical and basal (Method 2) myocardial segments to calculate the gradient. The hyperaemic longitudinal MBF gradient was only weakly correlated with FFR (Method 1: r = 0.12, P = 0.02; Method 2: r = 0.22, P < 0.001). The hyperaemic longitudinal MBF gradient (by both methods), had lower diagnostic value when compared with hyperaemic MBF for the presence of haemodynamically significant CAD, defined as an FFR ≤ 0.80. No significant correlations between longitudinal MBF gradients and FFR were noted in proximal lesions, whereas longitudinal MBF gradients and FFR were significantly correlated in non-proximal lesions (r = 0.57, P < 0.001). Conclusion PET measured longitudinal flow parameters had lower diagnostic value when compared with hyperaemic MBF for the presence of haemodynamically significant CAD. Since lesion location was found to affect the correlation of PET measured longitudinal flow parameters and FFR, presence of a longitudinal flow gradient may be partly caused by normalization to a relatively normal perfused areas.

Impact of Revascularization on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow as Assessed by Serial [15O]H2O Positron Emission Tomography Imaging: A Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve

Background: The main goal of coronary revascularization is to restore myocardial perfusion in case of ischemia, causing coronary artery disease. Yet, little is known on the effect of revascularization on absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF). Therefore, the present prospective study assesses the impact of coronary revascularization on absolute MBF as measured by [15O]H2O positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Methods and Results: Fifty-three patients (87% men, mean age 58.7±9.0 years) with suspected coronary artery disease were included prospectively. All patients underwent serial [15O]H2O positron emission tomography perfusion imaging at baseline and after revascularization by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. FFR was routinely measured at baseline and directly post-PCI. After revascularization, regional rest and stress MBF improved from 0.77±0.16 to 0.86±0.25 mL/min/g and from 1.57±0.59 to 2.48±0.91 mL/min/g, respectively, yielding an increase in coronary flow reserve from 2.02±0.69 to 2.94±0.94 (P<0.01 for all). Mean FFR at baseline improved post-PCI from 0.61±0.17 to 0.89±0.08 (P<0.01). After PCI, an increase in FFR paralleled improvement in absolute myocardial perfusion as reflected by stress MBF and coronary flow reserve (r = 0.74 and r = 0.71, respectively, P<0.01 for both). PCI demonstrated a greater improvement of regional stress MBF as compared with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (1.14±1.11 versus 0.66±0.69 mL/min/g, respectively, P=0.02). However, patients undergoing bypass grafting had a more advanced stage of coronary artery disease and more incomplete revascularizations. Conclusion: Successful coronary revascularization has a significant and positive impact on absolute myocardial perfusion as assessed by serial quantitative [15O]H2O positron emission tomography. Notably, improvement of FFR after PCI was directly related to the increase in hyperemic MBF.

AUTOMATIC SPECT ANALYSIS COMPARED TO EXPERT VISUAL SCORING FOR THE DETECTION OF CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

Background: Traditionally, the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging is based on visual analysis. A computer-based automated analysis might be a simple alternative obviating the need for extensive reading experience. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to compare the diagnostic