Roger B. Lee

Phase II Study of Gefitinib in Patients with Relapsed or Persistent Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma and Evaluation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations and Immunohistochemical Expression: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

Purpose: This phase II trial assessed the activity and tolerability of a daily oral dose of 500 mg gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa) in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma, and explored the clinical value of determining the status of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Experimental Design: Primary measure of efficacy was progression-free survival at 6 months. Mutations in exons 18 to 21 of EGFR and/or immunohistochemical expression of EGFR were evaluated in tumor specimens from patients enrolled in this trial as well as from patients not treated with gefitinib. Results: Twenty-seven of 30 (90%) patients were eligible and evaluable for analysis of gefitinib efficacy and toxicity. Of these, four survived progression-free >6 months with one objective response (4%). The most commonly observed grade 3 toxicities were dermatologic (15%, 4 of 27) and diarrhea (30%, 8 of 27). Specimens from 26 of 26 or 25 of 26 patients were evaluable for immunohistochemical or mutation analysis, respectively. The response rate for patients with EGFR-positive tumors was 9% (1 of 11). EGFR expression was associated with longer progression-free survival (P = 0.008) and possibly longer survival (P = 0.082). The patient with the only objective response had a mutation in the catalytic domain of the tumors EGFR (P = 0.04). Among 32 invasive tumors from patients not treated with gefitinib, one exhibited a catalytic domain mutation. Conclusions: Gefitinib was well tolerated but had minimal activity in unscreened patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Prescreening patients for activating mutations in EGFR may improve response rate to gefitinib. This report is the first to document activating mutations in catalytic domain of EGFR in 3.5% (2 of 57) of ovarian cancers.

A randomized phase III trial in advanced endometrial carcinoma of surgery and volume directed radiation followed by cisplatin and doxorubicin with or without paclitaxel: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study☆ , ☆☆

OBJECTIVES After surgical debulking and volume-directed irradiation of the pelvis/para-aortic lymph nodes, treatment was randomized to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and toxicity between two chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of women with advanced stage endometrial carcinoma. METHODS Treatment was randomized between 6 cycles of cisplatin [C] (50 mg/m(2)) and doxorubicin [D] (45 mg/m(2)) with or without paclitaxel [P] (160 mg/m(2)). Initially in paclitaxel treated patients and, after May 2002, all patients received granulocyte growth factor with each cycle. RESULTS Of 659 patients enrolled following surgery, 552 eligible patients were randomized to chemotherapy after irradiation. Accrual closed to Stage IV patients in June, 2003. Approximately 80% completed six cycles of chemotherapy. Three deaths resulted from bowel complications and one death was due to renal failure. Hematologic adverse events, sensory neuropathy and myalgia, were more frequent and severe in the paclitaxel arm (p<0.01) which was confirmed by Quality of Life assessments. Percentage of patients alive and recurrence-free at 36 months was 62% for CD vs. 64% for CDP. The hazard of recurrence or death relative to the CD arm stratified by stage is 0.90 (95% CI is 0.69 to 1.17, p=0.21, one-tail). However, in subgroup analysis, CDP was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of recurrence or death among patients with gross residual disease (95% CI: 0.26 to 0.92). Stage, residual disease, histology/grade, positive para-aortic node and cytology, pelvic metastases and age were significantly associated with RFS. CONCLUSION The addition of paclitaxel to cisplatin and doxorubicin following surgery and radiation was not associated with a significant improvement in RFS but was associated with increased toxicity.

Phase II Evaluation of Imatinib Mesylate in the Treatment of Recurrent or Persistent Epithelial Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE This phase II trial assessed the activity and tolerability of an oral dose of imatinib mesylate 400 mg twice daily in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. The association between the expression of certain markers and clinical outcome was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary measure of clinical efficacy was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Mutational analysis of KIT, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for markers (KIT, platelet-derived growth factor [PDGF] receptor [-R], AKT2, phosphorylated AKT [p-AKT], stem cell factor [SCF], and PDGF) were performed. RESULTS Fifty-six eligible patients were evaluated. Nine patients were progression free for at least 6 months including one complete responder. The median PFS and survival were 2 and 16 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia, GI, dermatologic effects, pain, and electrolyte disturbances. At least one target of imatinib (KIT, PDGFR-alpha, or PDGFR-beta) was expressed in all tumors, and most tumors expressed all three receptors. Higher expression of p-AKT and PDGFR-beta were associated with shorter PFS, and higher IHC scores (% immunopositive cells x staining intensity) of SCF and p-AKT were associated with decreased overall survival. No sequence mutations were detected in the KIT gene. Higher pretreatment plasma concentrations of PDGF-AB, PDGF-BB, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were individually associated with shorter PFS and survival. CONCLUSION Imatinib mesylate was well tolerated but had minimal single-agent activity in patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. No marker was identified that would predict activity of imatinib; however, tumor p-AKT and plasma VEGF levels were associated with poor outcome.

Surgical complications of obese patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Sixty-seven patients had exploratory laparotomy for stage I and II (occult) adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Acute surgical complications were analyzed in obese and in normal-weight patients. Compared to normal-weight patients, obese patients had significantly higher rates of wound infection and wound dehiscence, longer operating time, greater blood loss, and longer hospital stay. Wound infection and wound dehiscence were significantly related to postoperative anemia.

Goserelin acetate as treatment for recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

This Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study was designed to estimate the activity of goserelin acetate as treatment for advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Forty evaluable patients received monthly treatment with goserelin acetate at a dose of 3.6 mg, given subcutaneously. Standard GOG response and adverse effects criteria were used. The median age of patients was 71 years. Seventy-one percent of patients had received prior radiation therapy; 18% of patients were reported to have received prior progestational therapy for endometrial cancer. One patient had received prior chemotherapy. There were two complete responses (5%) and three partial responses (7%). One response occurred in a patient who previously did not respond to progestin therapy after having achieved a response. The overall response rate was 11% (95% CI: 4–27%). Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months and median overall survival was 7.3 months. No severe or life-threatening toxicities occurred because of goserelin. Deep venous thrombosis developed in two patients. This study confirmed the limited activity of goserelin acetate in endometrial carcinoma, with only one response in a patient previously treated with hormonal therapy. The activity is insufficient to warrant further study of the single agent at this time. Elucidation of the mechanism of action of this drug may allow more effective use in conjunction with other agents in the future.

Phase III Randomized Trial of Intravenous Cisplatin Plus a 24- or 96-Hour Infusion of Paclitaxel in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE This study was undertaken to assess if prolonged paclitaxel administration in combination with cisplatin improves overall survival (OS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with suboptimal stage III or IV EOC, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer were randomly allocated to receive six cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and either paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 during 24 hours (arm 1) or paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 during 96 hours (arm 2). RESULTS Planned accrual was 324 patients; 293 were enrolled before the study was closed as a result of a scheduled interim futility analysis. There were 13 ineligible patients; thus, 140 patients in each arm were assessable. In arm 1, 80% of patients completed all six cycles compared with 83% of patients in arm 2. Grade 4 granulocytopenia was more common in arm 1 (79% v 54%; P < .001) whereas grade 3 or worse anemia was more severe in arm 2 (6% v 18%; P < .003). The median progression-free survival was 1.03 years for arm 1 versus 1.05 years for arm 2. The median OS was 2.49 and 2.54 years for arms 1 and 2, respectively. There have been 237 reported deaths. The relative death rate was approximately 12% greater in arm 2 (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.860 to 1.45). CONCLUSION Patients with advanced EOC have a relatively poor prognosis. The results of treatment with cisplatin and paclitaxel are not significantly improved by prolonging the paclitaxel infusion from 24 to 96 hours.

A randomized phase III trial of IV carboplatin and paclitaxel × 3 courses followed by observation versus weekly maintenance low-dose paclitaxel in patients with early-stage ovarian carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study ☆

OBJECTIVE To compare the recurrence-free interval (RFI) and safety profile in patients with completely resected high-risk early-stage ovarian cancer treated with intravenous (IV) carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without maintenance low-dose paclitaxel for 24 weeks. METHODS Eligibility was limited to patients with stage IA/B (grade 3 or clear cell), all IC or II epithelial ovarian cancer. All patients were to receive carboplatin AUC 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m² q3 weeks × 3 courses with random assignment to either observation or maintenance paclitaxel 40 mg/m²/week × 24 weeks. Recurrence required clinical or radiological evidence of new tumor. RESULTS There were 571 patients enrolled onto this study, of whom 29 were deemed ineligible due to inappropriate stage or pathology, leaving 542 patients. At least 3 cycles of treatment were administered to 524/542 (97%) of patients, and among those assigned to maintenance paclitaxel, 80% completed the regimen. The incidence of grade 2 or worse peripheral neuropathy (15.5% vs. 6%), infection/fever (19.9% vs. 8.7%), and dermatologic events (70.8% vs. 52.1%) was higher on the maintenance regimen (p<0.001). The cumulative probability of recurring within 5 years for the maintenance paclitaxel regimen is 20% vs. 23% for surveillance (hazard ratio 0.807; 95% CI: 0.565-1.15). The probability of surviving 5 years was 85.4% and 86.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION Maintenance paclitaxel at 40 mg/m²/week × 24 weeks added to standard dose AUC6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m² × 3 doses provides no significant increase in RFI.

Intraperitoneal P-32 is not an effective consolidation therapy after a negative second-look laparotomy for epithelial carcinoma of the ovary

Thirty-four patients with epithelial carcinoma of the ovary were entered into a trial of adjuvant intraperitoneal P-32 following induction chemotherapy and a negative second-look laparotomy. The breakdown by initial Stage was Stage IC, 5; Stage II, 3; Stage III optimal, 22; and Stage III suboptimal, 4. Previous treatment consisted of 4-12 cycles (median 6) of cisplatin or carboplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Fifteen millicuries of P-32 were instilled via a Tenckhoff catheter placed at the time of second-look laparotomy. Because of a 22% incidence of bowel injury in the first 23 patients, the P-32 dose was reduced to 12 mCi in the last 11 patients. To date, there have been no bowel injuries at the lower dose. Eighteen of the 34 (53%) patients have relapsed with a median time to relapse of 20 months and a median follow-up for all patients of 31 months. There has been no difference in the relapse rate between a dose of 12 and 15 mCi. Intraperitoneal P-32 does not appear to reduce the relapse rate following a negative second-look laparotomy. The incidence of bowel injury is dose dependent and is higher than that seen in patients treated as an adjuvant following initial surgery without subsequent chemotherapy or second-look laparotomy.

Predictive modeling for determination of microscopic residual disease at primary cytoreduction: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 182 Study

OBJECTIVE Microscopic residual disease following complete cytoreduction (R0) is associated with a significant survival benefit for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Our objective was to develop a prediction model for R0 to support surgeons in their clinical care decisions. METHODS Demographic, pathologic, surgical, and CA125 data were collected from GOG 182 records. Patients enrolled prior to September 1, 2003 were used for the training model while those enrolled after constituted the validation data set. Univariate analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of R0 and these variables were subsequently analyzed using multivariable regression. The regression model was reduced using backward selection and predictive accuracy was quantified using area under the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) in both the training and the validation data sets. RESULTS Of the 3882 patients enrolled in GOG 182, 1480 had complete clinical data available for the analysis. The training data set consisted of 1007 patients (234 with R0) while the validation set was comprised of 473 patients (122 with R0). The reduced multivariable regression model demonstrated several variables predictive of R0 at cytoreduction: Disease Score (DS) (p<0.001), stage (p=0.009), CA125 (p<0.001), ascites (p<0.001), and stage-age interaction (p=0.01). Applying the prediction model to the validation data resulted in an AUC of 0.73 (0.67 to 0.78, 95% CI). Inclusion of DS enhanced the model performance to an AUC of 0.83 (0.79 to 0.88, 95% CI). CONCLUSIONS We developed and validated a prediction model for R0 that offers improved performance over previously reported models for prediction of residual disease. The performance of the prediction model suggests additional factors (i.e. imaging, molecular profiling, etc.) should be explored in the future for a more clinically actionable tool.

Does adjuvant chemotherapy dose modification have an impact on the outcome of patients diagnosed with advanced stage ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE To determine the relationship between chemotherapy dose modification (dose adjustment or treatment delay), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) who receive carboplatin and paclitaxel. METHODS Women with stages III and IV EOC and PPC treated on the Gynecologic Oncology Group phase III trial, protocol 182, who completed eight cycles of carboplatin with paclitaxel were evaluated in this study. The patients were grouped per dose modification and use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). The primary end point was OS; Hazard ratios (HR) for PFS and OS were calculated for patients who completed eight cycles of chemotherapy. Patients without dose modification were the referent group. All statistical analyses were performed using the R programming language and environment. RESULTS A total of 738 patients were included in this study; 229 (31%) required dose modification, 509 did not. The two groups were well-balanced for demographic and prognostic factors. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for disease progression and death among dose-modified patients were: 1.43 (95% CI, 1.19-1.72, P < 0.001) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.04-1.54, P = 0.021), respectively. Use of G-CSF was more frequent in dose-modified patients with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.63 (95% CI: 2.51-5.26, P < 0.001) compared to dose-unmodified patients. CONCLUSION Dose-modified patients were at a higher risk of disease progression and death. The need for chemotherapy dose modification may identify patients at greater risk for adverse outcomes in advanced stage EOC and PPC.