Roger D. Borcherdt

Continuous Borehole Strain and Pore Pressure in the Near Field of the 28 September 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield, California, Earthquake: Implications for Nucleation, Fault Response, Earthquake Prediction, and Tremor

Near-field observations of high-precision borehole strain and pore pres- sure, show no indication of coherent accelerating strain or pore pressure during the weeks to seconds before the 28 September 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield earthquake. Minor changes in strain rate did occur at a few sites during the last 24 hr before the earth- quake but these changes are neither significant nor have the form expected for strain during slip coalescence initiating fault failure. Seconds before the event, strain is stable at the 10 � 11 level. Final prerupture nucleation slip in the hypocentral region is constrained to have a moment less than 2 � 10 12 Nm( M 2.2) and a source size less than 30 m. Ground displacement data indicate similar constraints. Localized rupture nucleation and runaway precludes useful prediction of damaging earthquakes. Coseismic dynamic strains of about 10 microstrain peak-to-peak were superimposed on volumetric strain offsets of about 0.5 microstrain to the northwest of the epicenter and about 0.2 microstrain to the southeast of the epicenter, consistent with right lateral slip. Observed strain and Global Positioning System (GPS) offsets can be simply fit with 20 cm of slip between 4 and 10 km on a 20-km segment of the fault north of Gold Hill (M 0 � 7 � 10 17 N m). Variable slip inversion models using GPS data and seismic data indicate similar moments. Observed postseismic strain is 60% to 300% of the coseismic strain, indicating incomplete release of accumulated strain. No measurable change in fault zone compliance preceding or following the earthquake is indicated by stable earth tidal response. No indications of strain change accompany nonvolcanic tremor events reported prior to and following the earthquake.

Empirical Evidence for Acceleration-Dependent Amplification Factors

Incorrect versions of Figures 5 and 6 containing normalization errors were accidentally published by Borcherdt (2002). They should be replaced with the figures shown here. The text and tabulated regression values published in Borcherdt (2002) …

68 – Seismic Design Provisions and Guidelines in the United States: A Prologue

This chapter focuses on seismic design provisions and guidelines in the United States. Seismic design provisions and guidelines are the basis for reduction of potentially devastating losses of life and property from earthquakes. Improving the earthquake resistance of existing buildings is a major obstacle to the reduction of future earthquake losses worldwide. Recent efforts in the United States have also led to the development and implementation of new standards and guidelines for existing buildings based on performance-based design concepts applicable to most building types in regions with different seismic hazard levels. Ongoing implementation of these provisions together with those for concrete frame and wall construction is expected to have a significant impact on losses to existing buildings from future earthquakes in the United States. Vulnerabilities of bridges and overhead transportation structures demonstrated by recent earthquakes have stimulated the development of an extensive new set of design and retrofit criteria and guidelines.

Integrated Surface and Borehole Strong-Motion, Soil-Response Arrays in San Francisco, California

An integrated set of four borehole arrays and ten surface installations is installed in the city of San Francisco, California to measure the response of soft-soil deposits to strong earthquake ground motions. The borehole arrays extend through thick layers of soft water-saturated soils of Holocene age and older more consolidated soils of Pleistocene age into bedrock at depths up to 90 m. The surface installations are configured in pairs to provide simultaneous comparative surface measurements of soft soils and nearby rock. The rock locations also permit comparative measurements of rock as observed at the surface and in nearby boreholes. The arrays are designed to address a wide variety of scientific and engineering issues, and especially the issue of anelastic and nonlinear soil response at high strain levels as might be recorded during a large regional earthquake. Recordings of ground motions from the largest regional earthquakes which have occurred since the installation of the arrays show marked evidence of amplification as measured on the borehole and surface arrays. Implications of the results for low-strain site coefficients in present U.S. building codes are discussed.

Did mud contribute to freeway collapse

At least 41 people were killed October 17 when the upper tier of the Nimitz Freeway in Oakland, Calif., collapsed during the Ms = 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake. Seismologists studying aftershocks concluded that soil conditions and resulting ground motion amplification were important in the failure of the structure and should be considered in the reconstruction of the highway. Structural design weaknesses in the two-tiered freeway, known as the Cypress structure, had been identified before the tragedy. The seismologists, from Lamont Doherty Geological Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., and the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park, Calif., found that the collapsed section was built on fill over Bay mud. A southern section of the Cypress structure built on alluvium of Quaternary age did not collapse (see Figure 1).