Roger Faroux

Gemcitabine in Combination With Oxaliplatin Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Results of a GERCOR and GISCAD Phase III Trial

PURPOSE Gemcitabine (Gem) is the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Given the promising phase II results obtained with the Gem-oxaliplatin (GemOx) combination, we conducted a phase III study comparing GemOx with Gem alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were stratified according to center, performance status, and type of disease (locally advanced v metastatic) and randomly assigned to either GemOx (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a 100-minute infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks) or Gem (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a weekly 30-minute infusion). RESULTS Three hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled; 313 were eligible, and 157 and 156 were allocated to the GemOx and Gem arms, respectively. GemOx was superior to Gem in terms of response rate (26.8% v 17.3%, respectively; P = .04), progression-free survival (5.8 v 3.7 months, respectively; P = .04), and clinical benefit (38.2% v 26.9%, respectively; P = .03). Median overall survival (OS) for GemOx and Gem was 9.0 and 7.1 months, respectively (P = .13). GemOx was well tolerated overall, although a higher incidence of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 toxicity per patient was observed for platelets (14.0% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), vomiting (8.9% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), and neurosensory symptoms (19.1% for GemOx v 0% for Gem). CONCLUSION These results confirm the efficacy and safety of GemOx, but this study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in terms of OS compared with Gem. Because GemOx is the first combined treatment to be superior to Gem alone in terms of clinical benefit, this promising regimen deserves further development.

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX‐6) as first‐line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

A regimen consisting of 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX‐6) is widely used in France in the first‐line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The aim of our study was to demonstrate the non‐inferiority of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus FOLFOX‐6 for this indication. Patients were randomly assigned to receive XELOX or FOLFOX‐6 for 6 months. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in the per‐protocol (PP) population; however, progression‐free and overall survival (OS), time to response and response duration were also assessed. A total of 306 patients were enrolled (XELOX n = 156; FOLFOX‐6 n = 150). ORR was 42 and 46% with XELOX and FOLFOX‐6, respectively, in the PP population. The difference between groups was 4.7%; the upper limit of the unilateral 95% confidence interval (14.4%) was below the non‐inferiority margin of 15%. In the intent‐to‐treat population, median progression‐free survival was 8.8 months with XELOX and 9.3 months with FOLFOX‐6, and median OS was 19.9 and 20.5 months, respectively. XELOX patients had significantly more grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (12% vs. 5%) and diarrhoea (14% vs. 7%), but significantly less grade 3/4 neutropenia (5% vs. 47%), febrile neutropenia (0% vs. 6%) and neuropathy (11% vs. 26%) than FOLFOX‐6 patients. We conclude that XELOX is non‐inferior in terms of efficacy to FOLFOX‐6 in the first‐line treatment of MCRC, but has a different toxicity profile.

Combinations of cytochrome P450 gene polymorphisms enhancing the risk for sporadic colorectal cancer related to red meat consumption.

Susceptibility to sporadic colorectal cancers (CRC) is generally thought to be the sum of complex interactions between environmental and genetic factors, all of which contribute independently, producing only a modest effect on the whole phenomenon. However, to date, most research has concealed the notion of interaction and merely focused on dissociate analyses of risk factors to highlight associations with CRC. By contrast, we have chosen a combinative approach here to explore the joint effects of several factors at a time. Through an association study based on 1,023 cases and 1,121 controls, we examined the influence on CRC risk of environmental factors coanalyzed with combinations of six single nucleotide polymorphisms located in cytochrome P450 genes (c.−163A>C and c.1548T>C in CYP1A2, g.−1293G>C and g.−1053C>T in CYP2E1, c.1294C>G in CYP1B1, and c.430C>T in CYP2C9). Whereas separate analyses of the SNPs showed no effect on CRC risk, three allelic variant combinations were found to be associated with a significant increase in CRC risk in interaction with an excessive red meat consumption, thereby exacerbating the intrinsic procarcinogenic effect of this dietary factor. One of these three predisposing combinations was also shown to interact positively with obesity. Provided that they are validated, our results suggest the need to develop robust combinative methods to improve genetic investigations into the susceptibility to CRC. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(7):1460–7)

Treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with long-acting octreotide: a phase III multicentre, randomised, double blind placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND A previous study reported a significant survival benefit for octreotide compared with no treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This was investigated further in this multicentre study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred and seventy two patients with HCC who were ineligible for curative treatments or had relapsed following potentially curative therapies were randomised to receive long-acting octreotide, 30 mg as an intramuscular injection once every 4 weeks for up to 2 years, or placebo. RESULTS At the time of the final analysis, median overall survival (OS) was 6.53 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-8.3) for octreotide versus 7.03 months (95% CI, 5.43-8.53) for placebo (p=0.34). Progression-free survival (p=0.26) also did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. No objective responses were achieved in the octreotide group but 33% of patients achieved disease stabilisation for a mean time of 5.5 months (95% CI, 1.1-9.9). The median time until definitive global health score deterioration (according to QLQ-C30) was 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.7) in the octreotide and 4 months (95% CI, 2.2-5.7) in the placebo group (p=0.09). There were four objective responses in the placebo group. Octreotide was well tolerated; seven patients reported severe adverse events possibly related to octreotide and there were no cases of haematoma or cholecystitis. CONCLUSIONS In patients with advanced HCC, octreotide has a favourable safety profile but does not improve OS and could have a negative impact on quality of life.

Microscopic Colitis or Functional Bowel Disease With Diarrhea: A French Prospective Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVES:To describe the characteristics of a cohort of patients with microscopic colitis (MC; lymphocytic (LC) or collagenous (CC) colitis) and to compare them with patients with functional bowel disorder with diarrhea (FBD-D).METHODS:Between September 2010 and June 2012, patients fulfilling the following inclusion criteria were prospectively included in 26 centers in France: (i) having at least three bowel movements daily with change in stool consistency; (ii) duration of abnormal bowel habit >4 weeks; and (iii) normal or near-normal colonoscopy. Each patient underwent a colonoscopy and colonic biopsies. We compared the demographic, clinical, biological, and etiological characteristic of patients with MC (CC and LC) with those of control patients with FBD-D.RESULTS:A total of 433 patients were included: 129 with MC (87 LC and 42 CC), 23 with another organic disease, and 278 with FDB-D, including patients with diarrhea and abdominal pain who met the criteria of Rome III (irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea) and patients with functional diarrhea without abdominal pain. Logistic regression analysis identified the following independent predictors of MC: age >50 years (odds ratio (OR)=3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.6–5.9), presence of nocturnal stools (OR=2, 95% CI=1.1–3.9), weight loss (OR=2.5, 95% CI=1.3–4.7), duration of diarrhea <12 months (OR=2.0, 95% CI=1.1–3.5), recent introduction of new drugs (OR=3.7, 95% CI=2.1–6.6; P<0.0001), and the presence of a known autoimmune disorder (OR=5.5, 95% CI=2.5–12).CONCLUSIONS:Age >50 years, the presence of nocturnal stools, weight loss, the introduction of a new drug, and the presence of a known autoimmune disease increase the probability of MC and thus the indication for colonoscopy with biopsies.

Epidemiological and prognostic factors involved in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: results of a French prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS The mortality rate from upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains high, at 5 % - 10 %. The aim of the current study was to describe the epidemiological characteristics, prognostic factors, and actual practice in a cohort of patients with UGIB admitted to French general hospitals. METHODS From March 2005 to February 2006, a prospective multicenter study was conducted at 53 French hospitals. A total of 3298 patients admitted for UGIB were enrolled consecutively. Patient data were collected up to the date of discharge from hospital. RESULTS Data were available for 2130 men and 1073 women (mean age 63 ± 18 years), one-third of whom were taking drugs that would increase the risk of UGIB. The two main causes of bleeding were peptic ulcers (38 %) and esophagogastric varices (EGV) or portal hypertensive gastropathy (24.5 %). Mean Rockall score was 5.0 ± 2.3. Endoscopy was performed on 96 % of patients (within 24 hours in 79 %), and 66 % of those with ulcers and 62.5 % of the EGV patients underwent hemostatic therapy when indicated. Rebleeding occurred in 9.9 % of the patients, and 8.3 % died. Independent predictors of rebleeding were: need for transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 19.1; 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 10.1 - 35.9); hemoglobin < 10 g/dL (OR: 1.7; 95 %CI 1.1 - 3.3); Rockall score (OR: 1.4 for each 1 point score increase; 95 %CI 1.0 - 1.9), systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg (OR: 1.9; 95 %CI 1.4 - 2.5), and signs of recent bleeding (OR: 2.4; 95 %CI 1.7 - 3.5). Independent predictors of mortality were: Rockall score (OR: 2.8; 95 %CI 2.0 - 4.0), co-morbidities (OR: 3.6 for each additional co-morbidity; 95 %CI 2.0 - 6.3), and systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg (OR: 2.1; 95 %CI 1.8 - 2.8). Rockall score, blood pressure and co-morbidities were taken as continuous variables meaning that the OR was 1.4 for every point increase, it was the same for blood pressure. CONCLUSION UGIB still occurs mainly as a result of peptic ulcers and portal hypertension in France, and causes significant rates of mortality. There is scope for improvement via better prevention (better use of UGIB-facilitating drugs), endoscopic therapy, and management of co-morbidities.

Bevacizumab Combined With Chemotherapy in the Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results from the Phase II BEVACOLOR Study

BACKGROUND This prospective phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy regimens commonly used in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS Patients with mCRC who progressed or relapsed after first-line oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based treatment received bevacizumab 2.5 mg/kg/week plus chemotherapy until disease progression. The primary endpoint was disease-control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. RESULTS Fifty-three patients (66% men; median age, 62 years old) received second-line bevacizumab plus folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; 57%), folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 26%), irinotecan (15%), or capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI; 2%). The DCR was 87% (95% CI, 77%-97%); ORR was 32% (95% CI, 19%-46%). Median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.8 months) and median OS 19.3 months, (95% CI, 14.2-25.1 months).The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (21%), diarrhea (15%), asthenia, and vomiting (9% each). Five patients (9%) had grade 3/4 targeted toxicities: grade 3 hypertension (n = 2), grade 3 venous thromboembolism (n = 2), and grade 4 arterial thromboembolism (n = 1). None of these events led to death during the study. CONCLUSION Bevacizumab plus standard second-line chemotherapy is highly active in patients with mCRC and has an acceptable safety profile.

Development and validation of a new prognostic score of death for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in palliative setting.

BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a palliative setting have a poor prognosis despite recent therapeutic progress. Several prognostic scores, such as the BCLC and the CLIP, have been shown to be useful in helping select treatment options ranging from transplantation to palliative care. However, the discriminatory ability of these scores is inadequate in palliative settings, which concern about 70% of HCC patients. In this paper, we propose and validate a new prognostic score for patients in the palliative setting. METHODS The prognostic score was developed on a set of 416 patients from a negative randomized clinical trial conducted by the Fédération Francophone de Cancers Digestifs. It was then subsequently validated on a second set of 271 patients from another negative trial. Backward selection was used to identify independent baseline characteristics. Measures of discrimination and predictive values were computed to assess the quality of the developed score. Comparisons with the BCLC and the CLIP - with and without the WHO performance status (PS) score - were performed. RESULTS Tumour morphology, portal vein obstruction, metastasis, ascites, jaundice, alpha-foetoprotein, and serum alkaline phosphatase were included in the final score. From the training dataset, three groups of increasing risk were defined, and these were associated with hazard ratios (HR) of 2.13 and HR = 5.72. Similar results were obtained on the validation dataset. This score provides a better discriminatory ability than BCLC and CLIP in this setting. Unfortunately, absolute performances for these scores remain poor. CONCLUSIONS The new prognostic score and CLIP + PS are recommended in palliative settings. However, new prognostic variables are necessary.

Cost-minimisation analysis in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in France: XELOX versus FOLFOX-6.

Objective: In a recent randomized study, we demonstrated that XELOX (oxaliplatin + oral capecitabine) was well tolerated and not inferior in terms of efficacy to the infusional FOLFOX-6 regimen in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The objective of this additional analysis was to compare the cost of XELOX and FOLFOX-6. Methods: This cost-minimisation study took into account costs related to drug acquisition, hospital care for chemotherapy administration and for serious adverse event management. Hospital care costs were based on French ‘diagnosis-related group’ tariffs. Drug acquisition costs were drawn from French official sources. Analysis was performed from the French health insurance perspective. Results: Baseline characteristics of the 282 patients included (143 XELOX, 139 FOLFOX-6) were well balanced. Patients reported less and shorter hospitalisations (day and overnight hospital care) with XELOX: 6.4 ± 2.2 hospitalisations versus 9.7 ± 3.1 (p < 0.001); 11.4 ± 10.6 days versus 17.7 ± 11.8 (p < 0.001). Mean disease management cost per patient was significantly lower with XELOX (EUR 12,918 ± 5,075 vs. EUR 17,229 ± 8,665, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In the perspective of our analysis, taking into account hospitalisation and drug acquisition costs, the treatment of mCRC patients with XELOX in comparison to FOLFOX-6 significantly decreased the costs, as well as the mean overall hospitalisation length of stay.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in treatment-naive patients in 'true life': a plea in favor of independent postmarketing evaluations.

Background Results of treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus are only estimated and disclosed from pivotal trials. Aim To report the ‘true life’ results of pegylated interferon and ribavirin in treatment-naive patients. Methods A prospective, multicenter observatory in 22 general hospitals. Results Five-hundred and one patients were included, with 309 men (62%), aged 46±11 years, weighting 70±13 kg, infected with the following hepatitis C virus genotypes: 1 (50%), 2 (12%), 3 (28%), 4 (7.5%), 5 (0.6%). Liver biopsy, available in 436 patients showed stage F3 fibrosis in 24% and F4 in 13%. Two-hundred and seven patients had a comorbid condition. Treatment consisted of interferon &agr;2b in 340 patients and interferon &agr;2a in 161 patients. Dose reductions were necessary in 145 patients (29%). Treatment was prematurely interrupted in 145 patients (29%) owing to lack of efficacy (n=72) or side-effects (n=73). Sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 50% for all patients, and 37.1, 70.5, and 71% for patients with genotype 1, 2 and 3, respectively. At multivariate analysis, age, genotype, and fibrosis severity were the only independent factors of SVR. Conclusion In true life, patients are older and more severe, and SVR is about 10% lower than in pivotal trials.