Roger S. Rittmaster

Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND We conducted a study to determine whether dutasteride reduces the risk of incident prostate cancer, as detected on biopsy, among men who are at increased risk for the disease. METHODS In this 4-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, we compared dutasteride, at a dose of 0.5 mg daily, with placebo. Men were eligible for inclusion in the study if they were 50 to 75 years of age, had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 2.5 to 10.0 ng per milliliter, and had had one negative prostate biopsy (6 to 12 cores) within 6 months before enrollment. Subjects underwent a 10-core transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy at 2 and 4 years. RESULTS Among 6729 men who underwent a biopsy or prostate surgery, cancer was detected in 659 of the 3305 men in the dutasteride group, as compared with 858 of the 3424 men in the placebo group, representing a relative risk reduction with dutasteride of 22.8% (95% confidence interval, 15.2 to 29.8) over the 4-year study period (P<0.001). Overall, in years 1 through 4, among the 6706 men who underwent a needle biopsy, there were 220 tumors with a Gleason score of 7 to 10 among 3299 men in the dutasteride group and 233 among 3407 men in the placebo group (P=0.81). During years 3 and 4, there were 12 tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10 in the dutasteride group, as compared with only 1 in the placebo group (P=0.003). Dutasteride therapy, as compared with placebo, resulted in a reduction in the rate of acute urinary retention (1.6% vs. 6.7%, a 77.3% relative reduction). The incidence of adverse events was similar to that in studies of dutasteride therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, except that in our study, as compared with previous studies, the relative incidence of the composite category of cardiac failure was higher in the dutasteride group than in the placebo group (0.7% [30 men] vs. 0.4% [16 men], P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Over the course of the 4-year study period, dutasteride reduced the risk of incident prostate cancer detected on biopsy and improved the outcomes related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00056407.)

Abnormal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function in anorexia nervosa: pathophysiologic mechanisms in underweight and weight-corrected patients

To study the pathophysiology of hypercortisolism in patients with anorexia nervosa, we examined plasma ACTH and cortisol responses to ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone before and after correction of weight loss. We also studied patients with bulimia whose weight was normal, since this disorder has been suspected to be a variant of anorexia nervosa. Before their weight loss was corrected, the anorexic patients had marked hypercortisolism but normal basal plasma ACTH. The hypercortisolism was associated with a marked reduction in the plasma ACTH response to corticotropin-releasing hormone. When these patients were studied three to four weeks after their body weight had been restored to normal, the hypercortisolism had resolved but the abnormal response to corticotropin-releasing hormone remained unchanged. On the other hand, at least six months after correction of weight loss their responses were normal. The bulimic patients whose weight was normal also had a normal response to corticotropin-releasing hormone. We conclude that in underweight anorexics, the pituitary responds appropriately to corticotropin-releasing hormone, being restrained in its response by the elevated levels of cortisol. This suggests that hypercortisolism in anorexics reflects a defect at or above the hypothalamus. The return to eucortisolism soon after correction of the weight loss indicates resolution of this central defect despite persistence of abnormalities in adrenal function.

The role of dihydrotestosterone in benign prostatic hyperplasia

This article examines the role of the androgen dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in the healthy and diseased prostate and considers the implications of the data on DHT for therapeutic approaches to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Development and maintenance of the normal prostate, as well as development of BPH, depend on a functional androgen-signaling axis, components of which include: (1) testosterone synthesis in the testes and adrenal glands; (2) conversion of testosterone to DHT; (3) transport of DHT to target tissues; and (4) binding of DHT to the androgen receptor with consequent modulation of genes. DHT plays a beneficial role in the developing prostate but it can be detrimental in the adult prostate in that it causes pathologic prostate growth. The role of DHT in other adult tissues is uncertain. DHT has not been shown to perform beneficial functions unique from testosterone in the adult male, and it is believed that its fundamental effect is to amplify testosterones weaker hormonal signal. Increased understanding of the cellular mechanisms by which the androgen-signaling axis functions has led to advances in treatment for prostate disease. In BPH, the 5alpha-reductase inhibitors--the only class of therapy to act at the pathophysiologic substrate of the disease--arrest the disease process, reduce prostate volume, improve symptoms, and reduce the risk of acute urinary retention and BPH-related surgery. The availability of dutasteride, the first dual (Type 1/Type 2) 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, offers the opportunity for rapid and consistent inhibition of DHT.

Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: the REDEEM randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of dutasteride, a 5α-reductase inhibitor, on prostate cancer progression in men with low-risk disease who chose to be followed up with active surveillance. METHODS In our 3 year, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, undertaken at 65 academic medical centres or outpatient clinics in North America, we enrolled men aged 48-82 years who had low-volume, Gleason score 5-6 prostate cancer and had chosen to be followed up with active surveillance. We randomly allocated participants in a one-to-one ratio, stratified by site and in block sizes of four, to receive once-daily dutasteride 0·5 mg or matching placebo. Participants were followed up for 3 years, with 12-core prostate biopsy samples obtained after 18 months and 3 years. The primary endpoint was time to prostate cancer progression, defined as the number of days between the start of study treatment and the earlier of either pathological progression (in patients with ≥1 biopsy assessment after baseline) or therapeutic progression (start of medical therapy). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00363311. FINDINGS Between Aug 10, 2006, and March 26, 2007, we randomly allocated 302 participants, of whom 289 (96%) had at least one biopsy procedure after baseline and were included in the primary analysis. By 3 years, 54 (38%) of 144 men in the dutasteride group and 70 (48%) of 145 controls had prostate cancer progression (pathological or therapeutic; hazard ratio 0·62, 95% CI 0·43-0·89; p=0·009). Incidence of adverse events was much the same between treatment groups. 35 (24%) men in the dutasteride group and 23 (15%) controls had sexual adverse events or breast enlargement or tenderness. Eight (5%) men in the dutasteride group and seven (5%) controls had cardiovascular adverse events, but there were no prostate cancer-related deaths or instances of metastatic disease. INTERPRETATION Dutasteride could provide a beneficial adjunct to active surveillance for men with low-risk prostate cancer. FUNDING GlaxoSmithKline.

Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS)

Study Type – Therapy (RCT)

PCA3 Molecular Urine Test for Predicting Repeat Prostate Biopsy Outcome in Populations at Risk: Validation in the Placebo Arm of the Dutasteride REDUCE Trial

PURPOSE We determined the performance of PCA3 alone and in the presence of other covariates as an indicator of contemporaneous and future prostate biopsy results in a population with previous negative biopsy and increased serum prostate specific antigen. MATERIALS AND METHODS Urine PCA3 scores were determined before year 2 and year 4 biopsies from patients in the placebo arm of the REDUCE trial, a prostate cancer risk reduction study evaluating men with moderately increased serum prostate specific antigen results and negative biopsy at baseline. PCA3, serum prostate specific antigen and percent free prostate specific antigen results were correlated with biopsy outcome via univariate logistic regression and ROC analyses. Multivariate logistic regression was also performed including these biomarkers together with prostate volume, age and family history. RESULTS PCA3 scores were measurable from 1,072 of 1,140 subjects (94% informative rate). PCA3 scores were associated with positive biopsy rate (p <0.0001) and correlated with biopsy Gleason score (p = 0.0017). PCA3 AUC of 0.693 was greater than serum prostate specific antigen (0.612, p = 0.0077 vs PCA3). The multivariate logistic regression model yielded an AUC of 0.753 and exclusion of PCA3 from the model decreased AUC to 0.717 (p = 0.0009). PCA3 at year 2 was a significant predictor of year 4 biopsy outcome (AUC 0.634, p = 0.0002), whereas serum prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen were not predictive (p = 0.3281 and 0.6782, respectively). CONCLUSIONS PCA3 clinical performance was validated in the largest repeat biopsy study to date. Increased PCA3 scores indicated increased risk of contemporaneous cancers and predicted future biopsy outcomes. Use of PCA3 in combination with serum prostate specific antigen and other risk factors significantly increased diagnostic accuracy.

Androgen-Induced Regrowth in the Castrated Rat Ventral Prostate: Role of 5α-Reductase1

Testosterone (T), the major circulating androgen, must be converted to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) by the enzyme 5α-reductase (5α-R) to be maximally active in the prostate. The present study was designed to determine the relative potency of T and DHT on regrowth of the involuted prostate and to elucidate the role of 5α-R in the growing prostate. To create dose-response curves for intraprostatic T or DHT, rats were castrated for 2 weeks to allow their prostates to fully regress and then given T implants of various sizes in the presence or absence of the 5α-R inhibitor, finasteride. Markers for androgen effects on regrowth of the prostate were prostate weight, duct mass (a measure of secretory activity) and DNA content (a measure of cell number). To assess the relative uptake of T and DHT by the prostate, a comparison was made of intraprostatic DHT levels resulting from T and DHT implants. In the prostate, 1.6–1.9 times more T than DHT was required to achieve a half-maximal response for each of the three mark...

The Rationale for Inhibiting 5α-Reductase Isoenzymes in the Prevention and Treatment of Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE Androgens are essential for prostatic growth and development but they also have a significant role in prostate disease pathogenesis. Dihydrotestosterone, the primary prostatic androgen, is transformed from testosterone by types 1 and 2 5alpha-reductase and, thus, a potential therapeutic benefit could be achieved through the inhibition of 5alpha-reductase. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature review was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE and congress abstracts to examine evidence supporting the potential of 5alpha-reductase inhibitors in the primary prevention of prostate cancer and in limiting the progression of diagnosed disease. RESULTS Prostate disease development is associated with increased expression of each 5alpha-reductase isoenzyme with over expression of type 1 of particular importance in prostate cancer development and progression. The 2 5alpha-reductase inhibitors currently clinically available are finasteride, a type 2 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, and dutasteride, a dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor. Dual inhibition by dutasteride has been shown to translate into a greater degree and consistency of dihydrotestosterone suppression compared with finasteride. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial showed that finasteride significantly decreased the 7-year risk of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen 3.0 ng/ml or less, while the ongoing Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events study is assessing whether dutasteride decreases the risk of biopsy detectable prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen 2.5 to 10 ng/ml and a previous negative biopsy. Small-scale studies have demonstrated potential effects of 5alpha-reductase inhibition in prostate cancer treatment that warrant further investigation, while dutasteride use in men undergoing expectant treatment is also being examined. CONCLUSIONS The inhibition of 5alpha-reductase represents a valid target for prostate cancer risk reduction and treatment strategies. The greater suppression of dihydrotestosterone observed with agents that inhibit each 5alpha-reductase isoenzyme may translate into enhanced outcomes and studies are under way to test this hypothesis.

Dihydrotestosterone and the concept of 5α-reductase inhibition in human benign prostatic hyperplasia

Abstract. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) clearly requires a combination of testicular androgens and the ageing process. Although the role of androgens as the causative factor for human benign prostatic hyperplasia is debated, they undoubtedly play, at least, a permissive role. The principal prostatic androgen is dihydrotestosterone. Although not elevated in human benign prostatic hyperplasia, dihydrotestosterone levels in the prostate remain at a normal level with ageing, despite a decrease in the plasma testosterone. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is generated by a reduction in testosterone. Two isoenzymes of 5α-reductase have been discovered. Type 1 is present in most tissues in the body where 5α-reductase is expressed, and is the dominant form in sebaceous glands. Type 2 5α-reductase is the dominant isoenzyme in genital tissues, including the prostate. Finasteride is a 5α-reductase inhibitor that has been used to treat BPH and male-pattern baldness. At doses used clinically, its major effect is to suppress type 2 5α-reductase, because it has a much lower affinity for the type 1 isoenzyme. Finasteride suppresses DHT by about 70% in serum and by as much as 85%–90% in the prostate. The remaining DHT in the prostate is likely to be the result of type 1 5α-reductase. The suppression of both 5α-reductase isoenzymes with GI198745 results in greater and more consistent containment of serum dihydrotestosterone than that observed with a selective inhibitor of type 2 5α-reductase. Physiological and clinical studies comparing dual 5α-reductase inhibitors, such as GI198745, with selective type 2, such as finasteride, will be needed to determine the clinical relevance of type 1 5α-reductase within the prostate. There have been two large, international multicentre, phase III trials published documenting the safety and efficacy of finasteride in treating human benign prostatic hyperplasia. Combining these two studies, randomised, controlled data are available for 12 months. Non-controlled extension of these data from a subset of patients, who elected to continue on the drug for 3, 4 and 5 years, are also available. Long-term medical therapy with finasteride can reduce clinically significant endpoints, such as acute urinary retention or surgery. According to the meta-analysis of six randomised, clinical trials with finasteride, finasteride is most effective in men with large prostates. A more effective dual inhibitor of type 1 and 2 human 5α-reductase may lower circulating dihydrotestosterone to a greater extent than finasteride and show advantages in treating human benign prostatic hyperplasia and other disease states that depend on dihydrotestosterone. A clinical evaluation of potent dual 5α-reductase inhibitors may help to define the relative roles of human type 1 and 2 5α-reductase in the pathophysiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia and other androgen-dependent diseases.

Phase II Study of Androgen Synthesis Inhibition with Ketoconazole, Hydrocortisone, and Dutasteride in Asymptomatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Purpose: Increasing evidence indicates that enhanced intratumoral androgen synthesis contributes to prostate cancer progression after androgen deprivation therapy. This phase II study was designed to assess responses to blocking multiple steps in androgen synthesis with inhibitors of CYP17A1 (ketoconazole) and type I and II 5-reductases (dutasteride) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Experimental Design: Fifty-seven men with CRPC were continued on gonadal suppression and treated with ketoconazole (400 mg thrice daily), hydrocortisone (30 mg/AM, 10 mg/PM), and dutasteride (0.5 mg/d). Results: Prostate-specific antigen response rate (50 decline) was 56 (32 of 57; 95 confidence interval, 42.4-69.3); the median duration of response was 20 months. In patients with measurable disease, 6 of 20 (30) responded by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Median duration of treatment was 8 months; 9 patients remained on therapy with treatment durations censored at 18 to 32 months. Median time to progression was 14.5 months. Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 32 with only one reported grade 4 (thrombosis) toxicity. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate declined by 89, androstenedione by 56, and testosterone by 66, and dihydrotestosterone declined to below detectable levels compared with baseline levels with testicular suppression alone. Median baseline levels and declines in dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, androstenedione, testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone were not statistically different in the responders versus nonresponders, and hormone levels were not significantly increased from nadir levels at relapse. Conclusion: The response proportion to ketoconazole, hydrocortisone, and dutasteride was at least comparable with previous studies of ketoconazole alone, whereas time to progression was substantially longer. Combination therapies targeting multiple steps in androgen synthesis warrant further investigation. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(22):7099105)