Rogério Ferreira

The role of angiotensin II in the early stages of bovine ovulation

There is evidence that the renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in ovulation in cattle. Using an in vivo model, we investigated the role of angiotensin (Ang) II in bovine ovulation by injecting Ang II receptor antagonists into ovulatory follicles. Animals (n = 102) were pre-synchronized and, when the follicles reached 12 mm, they were given the respective treatment and the cows received GnRH agonist (i.m.) to induce ovulation. The ovulation rate was significantly lower when 100 mu M saralasin (Ang II receptor antagonist) was intrafollicularly injected (14.3%) in comparison with saline solution (83.3%). Based on these results, a second experiment was carried out to determine the timing of Ang IIs critical role in ovulation. Saralasin inhibited ovulation only when applied at 0 and 6 h (16.7 and 42.9% ovulation rate in the 0- and 6-h groups respectively), but not at 12 h (100%) following GnRH agonist treatment. To investigate the subtypes of Ang II receptors implicated in the LH-induced ovulation, losartan (LO; AT(1)-Ang II receptor antagonist), PD123 319 (AT(2)-Ang II receptor antagonist), LO+PD123 319, or saline were intrafollicularly injected when the cows were challenged with GnRH agonist. Ovulation was inhibited by PD123 319 and LO+PD123 319 (50.0 and 33.3% on ovulation rate respectively), but not by LO or saline solution (100% ovulation in both groups). From these results, we suggest that Ang II plays a pivotal role in the early mechanism of bovine ovulation via the AT(2) receptor subtype.

Evidence that the effect of angiotensin II on bovine oocyte nuclear maturation is mediated by prostaglandins E2 and F2α

Angiotensin II (AngII) prevents the inhibitory effect of follicular cells on oocyte maturation, but its involvement in LH-induced meiotic resumption remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the involvement of AngII in LH-induced meiotic resumption and of prostaglandins (PGs) in the action of AngII. In the experiment I, seven cows were superovulated, intrafollicularly injected with 10 muM saralasin (a competitive AngII antagonist) or saline when the follicles reached a diameter larger than 12 mm, and challenged with a GnRH agonist to induce an LH surge. Fifteen hours after GnRH, the animals were ovariectomized and the oocytes were recovered to determine the stage of meiosis. The oocytes from follicles that received saline were in germinal vesicle (GV) breakdown (30.8%) or metaphase I (MI; 69.2%) stage while those that received saralasin were in the GV stage (100%; P<0.001) 15 h after GnRH agonist. In another experiment, oocytes were co-cultured with follicular hemisections for 15 h to determine whether PGs mediate the effect of AngII on meiotic resumption. Indomethacin (10 microM) inhibited AngII-induced meiotic resumption (13.4 vs 77.5% MI without indomethacin; P<0.001). Furthermore, the GV oocytes progressed to MI at a similar rate when PGE(2), PGF(2alpha) or AngII was present in the co-culture system with follicular cells (PGE(2) 77.4%, PGF(2alpha) 70.0%, and AngII 75.0% MI). In conclusion, our results provide strong evidence that AngII mediates the resumption of meiosis induced by an LH surge in bovine oocytes and that this event is dependent on PGE(2) or PGF(2alpha) produced by follicular cells.

Molecular characterization and regulation of the angiotensin-converting enzyme type 2/Angiotensin-(1-7)/MAS receptor axis during the ovulation process in cattle:

The objective of this study was to characterize the profiles of Ang-(1-7), MAS receptor, ACE2, NEP and PEP during the ovulatory process in cattle. For this study, 40 synchronized cows with follicular diameter ≥ 12 mm were ovariectomized at different time-points (0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h) after i.m. application of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) to induce a luteinizing hormone surge. Follicular fluid was collected for measuring Ang-(1-7) by radioimmunoassay. Theca and granulosa cells were isolated from the preovulatory follicles to evaluate the gene expression of MAS receptor, ACE2, NEP and PEP by qRT-PCR assay. Cross-contamination between theca and granulosa cells was tested by RT-PCR to detect cytochrome P450 aromatase (CYP19A1) and 17α-hydroxylase (CYP17A1) mRNA. Ang-(1-7) levels were constant until 12 h and then increased (p < 0.05) at 24 h after GnRH. Messenger RNA expression of MAS, ACE2, NEP and PEP was detected in theca and granulosa cells at all time-points after GnRH. In granulosa cells, ACE2, NEP and PEP were differentially expressed after GnRH treatment (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the Ang-(1-7), MAS receptor, ACE2, NEP and PEP profiles in preovulatory follicles indicate that Ang-(1-7) plays a role in the regulation of the ovulatory process in cattle.

Role of angiotensin in ovarian follicular development and ovulation in mammals: a review of recent advances

Angiotensin (Ang) II is widely known for its role in the control of systemic blood vessels. Moreover, Ang II acts on the vascular control of ovarian function, corpus luteum formation, and luteolysis. Over the past 10 years, our research group has been studying the new concept of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) as an autocrine/paracrine factor regulating steroidogenesis and promoting different cellular responses in the ovary, beyond vascular function. We have developed and used different in vivo and in vitro experimental models to study the role of RAS in the ovary and a brief overview of our findings is presented here. It is widely accepted that there are marked species differences in RAS function in follicle development. Examples of species-specific functions of the RAS in the ovary include the involvement of Ang II in the regulation of follicle atresia in rats vs the requirement of this peptide for the dominant follicle development and ovulation in rabbits and cattle. More recently, Ang-(1-7), its receptor, and enzymes for its synthesis (ACE2, NEP, and PEP) were identified in bovine follicles, implying that Ang-(1-7) has an ovarian function. Other novel RAS components (e.g. (pro)renin receptor and renin-binding protein) recently identified in the bovine ovary show that ovarian RAS is poorly understood and more complex than previously thought. In the present review, we have highlighted the progress toward understanding the paracrine and autocrine control of ovarian antral follicle development and ovulation by ovarian tissue RAS, focusing on in vivo studies using cattle as a model.

Angiotensin II profile and mRNA encoding RAS proteins during bovine follicular wave

Angiotensin II (AngII) has a role in ovarian follicle development, ovulation, and oocyte meiotic resumption. The objective of the present study was to characterise the AngII profile and the mRNA encoding RAS proteins in a bovine follicular wave. Cows were ovariectomised when the size between the largest (F1) and the second largest follicle (F2) was not statistically different (day 2), slightly different (day 3), or markedly different (day 4). AngII was measured in the follicular fluid and the mRNA abundance of genes encoding angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), (pro)renin receptor, and renin-binding protein (RnBP) was evaluated in the follicular cells from F1 and F2. The AngII levels increased at the expected time of the follicular deviation in F1 but did not change in F2. However, the expression of the genes encoding ACE, (pro)renin receptor, and RnBP was not regulated in F1 but was upregulated during or after the follicular deviation in F2. Moreover, RnBP gene expression increased when the F1 was treated with the oestrogen receptor-antagonist in vivo. In conclusion, the AngII concentration increased in the follicular fluid of the dominant follicle during and after deviation and further supports our finding that RAS is present in the ovary regulating follicular dominance.

Evidence that the effect of angiotensin II on bovine oocyte nuclear maturation is mediated by PGE2 and PGF2 1

Angiotensin II (AngII) prevents the inhibitory effect of follicular cells on oocyte maturation, but its involvement in LH-induced meiotic resumption remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the involvement of AngII in LH-induced meiotic resumption and of prostaglandins (PGs) in the action of AngII. In the experiment I, seven cows were superovulated, intrafollicularly injected with 10 muM saralasin (a competitive AngII antagonist) or saline when the follicles reached a diameter larger than 12 mm, and challenged with a GnRH agonist to induce an LH surge. Fifteen hours after GnRH, the animals were ovariectomized and the oocytes were recovered to determine the stage of meiosis. The oocytes from follicles that received saline were in germinal vesicle (GV) breakdown (30.8%) or metaphase I (MI; 69.2%) stage while those that received saralasin were in the GV stage (100%; P<0.001) 15 h after GnRH agonist. In another experiment, oocytes were co-cultured with follicular hemisections for 15 h to determine whether PGs mediate the effect of AngII on meiotic resumption. Indomethacin (10 microM) inhibited AngII-induced meiotic resumption (13.4 vs 77.5% MI without indomethacin; P<0.001). Furthermore, the GV oocytes progressed to MI at a similar rate when PGE(2), PGF(2alpha) or AngII was present in the co-culture system with follicular cells (PGE(2) 77.4%, PGF(2alpha) 70.0%, and AngII 75.0% MI). In conclusion, our results provide strong evidence that AngII mediates the resumption of meiosis induced by an LH surge in bovine oocytes and that this event is dependent on PGE(2) or PGF(2alpha) produced by follicular cells.

FGF10 inhibits dominant follicle growth and estradiol secretion in vivo in cattle.

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are involved in paracrine control of follicle development. It was previously demonstrated that FGF10 decreases estradiol (E(2)) secretion in granulosa cell culture and that theca cell FGF10 mRNA expression is decreased in healthy follicles from abattoir ovaries. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate FGF10 and FGFR2b mRNA expression during follicular development in vivo, to evaluate the effect of FGF10 on follicle growth using Bos taurus taurus cows as a model, and to gain more insight into the mechanisms through which FGF10 inhibits steroidogenesis. Messenger RNA encoding both FGF10 and FGFR2b (main FGF10 receptor) was significantly more expressed in subordinate follicles (SFs) than in dominant follicles (DFs). The intrafollicular injection of FGF10 into the largest growing follicle at 7-8 mm in diameter interrupted the DF growth in a dose-dependent manner (11±0.4, 8.3±1 and 5.9±0.3 mm for 0, 0.1, and 1 μg/ml FGF10, respectively, at 72 h after treatment; P<0.05). In a third experiment, follicles were obtained 24 h after FGF10 (1 μg/ml) or PBS treatment through ovariectomy. In theca cells, FGF10 treatment did not affect mRNA encoding steroidogenic enzymes, LHCGR and IGFBPs, but significantly upregulated FGF10 mRNA expression. The expression of CYP19A1 mRNA in granulosa cells was downregulated by FGF10 treatment, which was accompanied by a 50-fold decrease in E(2) production, and decreased cyclin D2 mRNA. These results have shown that FGF10 and its receptor FGFR2b are more expressed in SFs and provide solid in vivo evidence that FGF10 acts as an important regulator of follicular growth in cattle.

Expression of receptors for BMP15 is differentially regulated in dominant and subordinate follicles during follicle deviation in cattle

Bone morphogenetic proteins are known to be involved in determining ovulation rate in mammals. The mechanisms through which these proteins determine follicle fate are incompletely understood. In the present study, we used cattle as a model to evaluate the regulation of BMP15 and GDF9 receptors in granulosa cells during dominant follicle (DF) selection. Before follicular deviation (day 2 of the follicular wave), BMPR2 mRNA abundance tended to be higher in the second largest follicles (F2; P<0.1) compared to the future dominant follicle (F1). At the expected time of follicular deviation (day 3), BMPR2 and BMPR1B mRNA levels were higher in subordinate follicles (SFs; P<0.05) compared to dominant follicles (DFs). After deviation (on day 4), BMPR1B mRNA and protein were significantly more abundant in atretic SFs (as assessed by cleaved caspase 3) than in DFs. The fact that BMPR1B is more expressed in atretic follicles was further confirmed by using intrafollicular treatment with two agents known to induce atresia, namely an estradiol receptor antagonist (fulvestrant) and FGF10. In conclusion, the fact that BMPR-1B and -2 are more expressed in the second largest follicles before and at the expected time of follicular deviation is indicative of their inhibitory role in follicle differentiation and steroidogenesis. BMPR1B also seems to have a pivotal role during follicle regression since it is upregulated in advanced atretic follicles.

Preovulatory changes in the angiotensin II system in bovine follicles.

The present study evaluated whether the gonadotrophin surge modulates components of the renin-angiotensin system and whether angiotensin II (Ang II) plays a role in the production of hormones by follicular cells during the ovulatory process. In Experiment 1, cows were ovariectomised at various times (0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h) after GnRH injection to obtain preovulatory follicles. The concentration of Ang II in follicular fluid increased after GnRH and reached a peak at 24 h, concomitant with the peak of angiotensinogen (AGT) mRNA expression in granulosa cells. AGT mRNA was not expressed in theca cells. Ang II receptor type 2 and angiotensin-converting enzyme mRNA levels were transiently upregulated in theca cells. In Experiment 2, an in vitro culture was used to determine whether Ang II could modulate hormone production by healthy dominant follicles. In the absence of LH, Ang II did not alter hormonal production by either theca or granulosa cells. Ang II plus LH increased progesterone and prostaglandin secretion by granulosa cells. In summary, the renin-angiotensin system is actively controlled during the preovulatory period and Ang II amplifies the stimulatory effects of LH on the secretion of progesterone and prostaglandins by granulosa cells.

Expression and molecular consequences of inhibition of estrogen receptors in granulosa cells of bovine follicles

BackgroundEstradiol (E2) receptors mediate E2 effects on cell proliferation and apoptosis under normal and pathological conditions. However, the mechanisms involved in E2 signaling are not completely understood. The objectives in this study were to evaluate the expression of estrogen receptors (ESRs) during follicular selection in cattle, and the effect of intrafollicular injection of fulvestrant (an antagonist of ESRs) on follicular development and transcript abundance in granulosa cells.MethodsGranulosa cells were obtained from the two largest follicles around follicular deviation, after FSH treatment and after intrafollicular injection of fulvestrant. Ovarian follicular dynamics monitored by ultrasonography and quantitative real time PCR were used to validate the in vivo model and investigate the effects of FSH supplementation or ESR blockade on mRNA expression of estradiol-related genes.ResultsESR1 and ESR2 were expressed in granulosa cells of both dominant (F1) and subordinate (F2) follicles, but their transcripts levels were higher in F1 than F2 after follicular deviation. FSH treatment maintained mRNA levels of both ESR1 and ESR2 in F2 follicles at similar levels observed in F1 follicles. Intrafollicular injection of 100 μM fulvestrant inhibited follicular growth and decreased CYP19A1 mRNA levels. Transcript levels for both ESR1 and ESR2 were not affected by fulvestrant injection. Analyses of FSH-regulated genes revealed that ESRs inhibition in the dominant follicle decreased the transcript levels of the GJA1 but not those of PRKAR2B, MRO or LRP11 genes.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that: both ESR1 and ESR2 are regulated during follicular deviation and dominance in cattle and in response to FSH treatment, and ESRs are required for normal gene expression and development of the dominant follicle. Furthermore, we have validated an in vivo model to study estrogen signaling during follicular development that allows paracrine signaling between different follicular cells in a physiological endocrine environment.