Rohan Puri
University of Tasmania
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rohan Puri.
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience | 2015
Rohan Puri; Mark R. Hinder; Hakuei Fujiyama; Rapson Gomez; Richard G. Carson; Jeffery J. Summers
The brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism and stimulation duration are thought to play an important role in modulating motor cortex plasticity induced by non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS). In the present study we sought to determine whether these factors interact or exert independent effects in older adults. Fifty-four healthy older adults (mean age = 66.85 years) underwent two counterbalanced sessions of 1.5 mA anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS), applied over left M1 for either 10 or 20 min. Single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to assess corticospinal excitability (CSE) before and every 5 min for 30 min following atDCS. On a group level, there was an interaction between stimulation duration and BDNF genotype, with Met carriers (n = 13) showing greater post-intervention potentiation of CSE compared to Val66Val homozygotes homozygotes (n = 37) following 20 min (p = 0.002) but not 10 min (p = 0.219) of stimulation. Moreover, Met carriers, but not Val/Val homozygotes, exhibited larger responses to TMS (p = 0.046) after 20 min atDCS, than following 10 min atDCS. On an individual level, two-step cluster analysis revealed a considerable degree of inter-individual variability, with under half of the total sample (42%) showing the expected potentiation of CSE in response to atDCS across both sessions. Intra-individual variability in response to different durations of atDCS was also apparent, with one-third of the total sample (34%) exhibiting LTP-like effects in one session but LTD-like effects in the other session. Both the inter-individual (p = 0.027) and intra-individual (p = 0.04) variability was associated with BDNF genotype. In older adults, the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism along with stimulation duration appears to play a role in modulating tDCS-induced motor cortex plasticity. The results may have implications for the design of NBS protocols for healthy and diseased aged populations.
PLOS ONE | 2015
Paola Reissig; Rohan Puri; Michael I. Garry; Jeffery J. Summers; Mark R. Hinder
The well-documented observation of bilateral performance gains following unilateral motor training, a phenomenon known as cross-limb transfer, has important implications for rehabilitation. It has recently been shown that provision of a mirror image of the active hand during unilateral motor training has the capacity to enhance the efficacy of this phenomenon when compared to training without augmented visual feedback (i.e., watching the passive hand), possibly via action observation effects [1]. The current experiment was designed to confirm whether mirror-visual feedback (MVF) during motor training can indeed elicit greater performance gains in the untrained hand compared to more standard visual feedback (i.e., watching the active hand). Furthermore, discussing the mechanisms underlying any such MVF-induced behavioural effects, we suggest that action observation and the cross-activation hypothesis may both play important roles in eliciting cross-limb transfer. Eighty participants practiced a fast-as-possible two-ball rotation task with their dominant hand. During training, three different groups were provided with concurrent visual feedback of the active hand, inactive hand or a mirror image of the active hand with a fourth control group receiving no training. Pre- and post-training performance was measured in both hands. MVF did not increase the extent of training-induced performance changes in the untrained hand following unilateral training above and beyond those observed for other types of feedback. The data are consistent with the notion that cross-limb transfer, when combined with MVF, is mediated by cross-activation with action observation playing a less unique role than previously suggested. Further research is needed to replicate the current and previous studies to determine the clinical relevance and potential benefits of MVF for cases that, due to the severity of impairment, rely on unilateral training programmes of the unaffected limb to drive changes in the contralateral affected limb.
Frontiers in Psychology | 2017
Melanie Krüger; Mark R. Hinder; Rohan Puri; Jeffery J. Summers
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate how age-related performance differences in a visuospatial sequence learning task relate to age-related declines in cognitive functioning. Method: Cognitive functioning of 18 younger and 18 older participants was assessed using a standardized test battery. Participants then undertook a perceptual visuospatial sequence learning task. Various relationships between sequence learning and participants’ cognitive functioning were examined through correlation and factor analysis. Results: Older participants exhibited significantly lower performance than their younger counterparts in the sequence learning task as well as in multiple cognitive functions. Factor analysis revealed two independent subsets of cognitive functions associated with performance in the sequence learning task, related to either the processing and storage of sequence information (first subset) or problem solving (second subset). Age-related declines were only found for the first subset of cognitive functions, which also explained a significant degree of the performance differences in the sequence learning task between age-groups. Discussion: The results suggest that age-related performance differences in perceptual visuospatial sequence learning can be explained by declines in the ability to process and store sequence information in older adults, while a set of cognitive functions related to problem solving mediates performance differences independent of age.
Scientific Reports | 2018
Alexander Tang; William R. Bennett; Claire Hadrill; Jessica M. Collins; Barbora Fulopova; Karen Wills; Aidan Bindoff; Rohan Puri; Michael I. Garry; Mark R. Hinder; Jeffery J. Summers; Jennifer Rodger; Allan J. Canty
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is commonly used to modulate cortical plasticity in clinical and non-clinical populations. Clinically, rTMS is delivered to targeted regions of the cortex at high intensities (>1 T). We have previously shown that even at low intensities, rTMS induces structural and molecular plasticity in the rodent cortex. To determine whether low intensity rTMS (LI-rTMS) alters behavioural performance, daily intermittent theta burst LI-rTMS (120 mT) or sham was delivered as a priming or consolidating stimulus to mice completing 10 consecutive days of skilled reaching training. Relative to sham, priming LI-rTMS (before each training session), increased skill accuracy (~9%) but did not alter the rate of learning over time. In contrast, consolidating LI-rTMS (after each training session), resulted in a small increase in the rate of learning (an additional ~1.6% each day) but did not alter the daily skill accuracy. Changes in behaviour with LI-rTMS were not accompanied with long lasting changes in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression or in the expression of plasticity markers at excitatory and inhibitory synapses for either priming or consolidation groups. These results suggest that LI-rTMS can alter specific aspects of skilled motor learning in a manner dependent on the timing of intervention.
Journal of Neurophysiology | 2018
Rohan Puri; Tess Nikitenko; Sarah Kemp
Many everyday actions require inhibitory control. The success of these actions depends on the availability of prior information regarding stopping demands. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), Cirillo and colleagues (Cirillo J, Cowie MJ, MacDonald HJ, Byblow WD. J Neurophysiol 119: 877-886, 2018) provide novel neurophysiological evidence for distinct roles of intracortical inhibitory mechanisms underlying inhibitory control. Other, nonexclusive mechanisms such as disfacilitation of excitatory pathways and interhemispheric inhibition may also contribute to inhibitory control. Accordingly, diverse TMS protocols are a valuable assessment tool to investigate these mechanisms.
Brain Stimulation | 2015
Alexander Tang; Bill Bennett; Rohan Puri; Michael I. Garry; Mark R. Hinder; Jeffery J. Summers; Jennifer Rodger; Allan J. Canty
Modulation of cortical plasticity by the means of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has generated significant interest as it can induce plasticity in clinical and non-clinical populations. In particular, complex pattern rTMS such as intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has been shown to induce long lasting effects in both humans and rodents. However, the biological mechanisms underpinning rTMS induced plasticity remains poorly understood. Rodent models offer the potential to investigate not only the behavioural, but the structural and molecular mechanisms post stimulation. This study examined changes in skilled motor learning and the extent of reorganisation at the dendritic and synaptic level following iTBS to the motor cortex. We use a rodent specific TMS circular coil to deliver iTBS (600 pulses) over the motor cortex of awake adult male mice. For motor learning paradigms, C57Bl6/J mice receive daily iTBS prior to undergoing a skilled pellet reaching task for 10 days. In a separate group; Thy1-GFPM mice undergo cranial window insertion overlying the right motor cortex to enable visualisation of excitatory cortical neurons in the upper layers of the motor cortex. Images of synaptic structures are collected at regular intervals before and after iTBS and analysed for alterations in connectivity resulting from stimulation. Preliminary analysis suggests daily iTBS significantly increases accuracy (15% over 10 days) but not speed of reaching, relative to sham stimulation (handling control). These results help address the biological mechanisms underlying rTMS, which will undoubtedly pave the way forward in the therapeutic applications of non-invasive brain stimulation in health and disease.
Experimental Brain Research | 2016
Rohan Puri; Mark R. Hinder; Allan J. Canty; Jeffery J. Summers
Cortex | 2018
Mark R. Hinder; Rohan Puri; Sarah Kemp; Sara Waitzer; Paola Reissig; Tino Stöckel; Hakuei Fujiyama
Clinical Neurophysiology | 2017
Alexander Tang; William R. Bennett; Claire Hadrill; Jessica M. Collins; Karen Wills; Rohan Puri; Michael I. Garry; Mark R. Hinder; Jeffery J. Summers; Jennifer Rodger; A. Canty
Brain Stimulation | 2015
Rohan Puri; Mark R. Hinder; Jeffery J. Summers