Rohit Malhotra

Impact of Mechanical Activation, Scar, and Electrical Timing on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response and Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVES Using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), we sought to evaluate the relative influences of mechanical, electrical, and scar properties at the left ventricular lead position (LVLP) on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response and clinical events. BACKGROUND CMR cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) provides high-quality strain for overall dyssynchrony (circumferential uniformity ratio estimate [CURE] 0 to 1) and timing of onset of circumferential contraction at the LVLP. CMR DENSE, late gadolinium enhancement, and electrical timing together could improve upon other imaging modalities for evaluating the optimal LVLP. METHODS Patients had complete CMR studies and echocardiography before CRT. CRT response was defined as a 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume. Electrical activation was assessed as the time from QRS onset to LVLP electrogram (QLV). Patients were then followed for clinical events. RESULTS In 75 patients, multivariable logistic modeling accurately identified the 40 patients (53%) with CRT response (area under the curve: 0.95 [p < 0.0001]) based on CURE (odds ratio [OR]: 2.59/0.1 decrease), delayed circumferential contraction onset at LVLP (OR: 6.55), absent LVLP scar (OR: 14.9), and QLV (OR: 1.31/10 ms increase). The 33% of patients with CURE <0.70, absence of LVLP scar, and delayed LVLP contraction onset had a 100% response rate, whereas those with CURE ≥0.70 had a 0% CRT response rate and a 12-fold increased risk of death; the remaining patients had a mixed response profile. CONCLUSIONS Mechanical, electrical, and scar properties at the LVLP together with CMR mechanical dyssynchrony are strongly associated with echocardiographic CRT response and clinical events after CRT. Modeling these findings holds promise for improving CRT outcomes.

Lamin A/C deficiency as a cause of familial dilated cardiomyopathy.

Purpose of review Familial dilated cardiomyopathy is an underrecognized form of dilated cardiomyopathy. Lamin A/C deficiency is probably the most common cause of familial dilated cardiomyopathy. This review will focus on the emerging knowledge of epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with lamin A/C deficiency, as well as possible disease mechanisms. Recent findings Screening of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy continues to indicate that lamin A/C deficiency is a significant cause. Multiple novel mutations have been found, suggesting that many mutations are limited to individuals or families. It is unknown how mutations cause the syndrome, although an animal model has shown that lamin A/C insufficiency causes apoptosis, particularly in the conduction system. Inheritance is predominantly autosomal dominant, but penetrance is variable. For symptomatic patients, the course is malignant, with conduction system disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. The data are contradictory, and currently, there is no clear marker for when a lamin A/C-deficient patient is at risk for sudden death. Summary Lamin A/C deficiency is an important cause of dilated cardiomyopathy, and diagnosis requires that clinicians have a high index of suspicion. Our knowledge of the mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of lamin A/C deficiency is incomplete. It is clear that patients with this condition have a malignant course and need to be followed aggressively.

Effectiveness of integrating delayed computed tomography angiography imaging for left atrial appendage thrombus exclusion into the care of patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND Computed tomography angiography (CTA) can identify and rule out left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus when delayed imaging is also performed. OBJECTIVE In patients referred for CTA to evaluate pulmonary vein anatomy before the ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) or left atrial flutter (LAFL), we sought to determine the effectiveness of a novel clinical protocol for integrating results of CTA delayed LAA imaging into preprocedure care. METHODS After making delayed imaging of the LAA part of our routine preablation CTA protocol, we integrated early reporting of preablation CTA LAA imaging results into clinical practice as part of a formal protocol in June 2013. We then analyzed the effectiveness of this protocol by evaluating 320 AF/LAFL ablation patients with CTA imaging during the time period 2012-2014. RESULTS In CTA patients with delayed LAA imaging, the sensitivity and negative predictive values for LAA thrombus using intracardiac echocardiography or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the reference standard were both 100%. Intracardiac echocardiography during ablation confirmed the absence of thrombus in patients with negative CTA or negative TEE results. No patients with either negative CTA results or equivocal CTA results combined with negative TEE results had strokes or transient ischemic attacks. Overall, the need for TEE procedures decreased from 57.5% to 24.0% during the 3-year period because of the CTA protocol. CONCLUSION Clinical integration of CTA delayed LAA imaging into the care of patients having catheter ablation of AF or LAFL is feasible, safe, and effective. Such a protocol could be used broadly to improve patient care.

Usefulness of Pharmacologic Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation During Dofetilide Loading Without the Need for Electrical Cardioversion to Predict Durable Response to Therapy

Conversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm is frequently seen during the 3-day in-hospital loading period required during dofetilide initiation, but it is not known whether pharmacologic conversion (PC) without the need for electrical cardioversion (EC) is a predictor of long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm during continued therapy with dofetilide. We sought to test the hypothesis that PC predicts durable maintenance of sinus rhythm and determine additional predictors of long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm on dofetilide. We retrospectively reviewed all elective inpatient admissions for dofetilide loading from 2003 to 2011 at the University of Virginia. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess predictors of maintenance of sinus rhythm after in-hospital dofetilide loading. In all, 101 patients with a current duration of AF lasting for a median of 1.86 months (interquartile range 0.47 to 6.03) were included in the analysis. Forty-seven patients were in the PC group, whereas 54 patients were in the EC group. Patients in the PC group remained longer in sinus rhythm compared with the patients in the EC group (log-rank p = 0.032). The seventy-fifth percentile for the current episode duration in the PC group was 5.77 months, indicating that even long-standing persistent AF frequently converted pharmacologically. Hypertension and a longer duration of the current AF episode were also predictors of recurrence in the multivariate model. In conclusion, PC during in-hospital dofetilide loading is an important predictor of durable response even in long-standing persistent patients, which has important public health implications for choice of therapy.

Cardiovascular screening and the elite athlete: advances, concepts, controversies, and a view of the future.

This article addresses programmatic cardiovascular screening and evaluation of the elite athlete at the intercollegiate, national team, professional, and Olympic levels. Although much of this content may apply to high-school and recreational sports at large, it is not specifically designed to address athletes participating in all sports activities.

SCREENING ELITE ATHLETES WITH CONGENITAL ECHO: FEASIBILITY AND FINDINGS IN OUR FIRST YEAR

There is much disagreement about the best method to perform pre-participation screening of elite intercollegiate athletes. Recent studies have demonstrated that performing history and physical, electrocardiography (ECG), and echocardiography (TTE) identify additional pathology. Previously, we have

Cost of a recall of a single-center experience managing the Riata defibrillator lead.

Riata and Riata ST defibrillator leads (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, California) were recalled in 2011 due to increased risk of insulation failure leading to externalized cables. Fluoroscopic screening can identify insulation failure, although the relation between mechanical failure and electrical failure is unclear. At the time of the recall, the University of Virginia developed a screening program, including fluoroscopic evaluation, education sessions, device interrogation, and remote monitoring for patients with this defibrillator lead. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of the screening program, including costs, which were absorbed by our institution. Costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement estimates. Forty-eight patients participated in the screening program. At initial screening, 31% were found to have evidence of insulation failure but electrical function was normal in all leads. The cost of this program was

Increasing lead burden correlates with externalized cables during systematic fluoroscopic screening of Riata leads

35,358.72. The cost per diagnosis of mechanical lead failure was

RENAL ARTERY STENOSIS CAUSING RENAL DYSFUNCTION AND HEART FAILURE, CONFOUNDED BY SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS

2,357.25. During 2 years of follow-up, 1 patient experienced Riata lead electrical failure without fluoroscopic evidence of insulation failure. Patients were more likely to have a lead revision if there was evidence of insulation failure. Lead revisions occurred at the time of generator change in 88% of patients with insulation failure but in only 14% of patients with a fluoroscopically normal lead (p = 0.04). The cost of recall-related defibrillator lead revisions was

Abstract 18650: Activation Mapping of Ventricular Ectopy: Characterization of a Threshold Value Predicting Successful Catheter Ablation

81,704.55. In conclusion, our Riata screening program added expense without clear benefit to patients. In fact, patients may have been put at more risk by undergoing defibrillator lead revisions based solely on the results of the fluoroscopic screening.