Roland Bugat

Multicenter Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Compared With Surgery Alone After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 Trial

PURPOSEnComplete resection of liver metastases of colorectal origin is the only potentially curative treatment. In order to decrease recurrences, the use of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy after liver resection is controversial because no randomized study demonstrated its benefit.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnIn a multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 173 patients with completely resected (R0) hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer to surgery alone and observation (87 patients) or to surgery followed by 6 months of systemic adjuvant chemotherapy with a fluorouracil and folinic acid monthly regimen (86 patients). The main outcome criterion was disease-free survival. Secondary outcome measures were overall survival and treatment-related toxicity.nnnRESULTSnThe intention-to-treat analysis was based on 171 patients, after a median follow-up of 87 months (SE = 5.8). The 5-year disease-free survival rate, after adjustment for major prognostic factors, was 33.5% for patients in the chemotherapy group and 26.7% for patients in the control group (Cox multivariate analysis: odds ratio for recurrence or death = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.96; P = .028). With regard to secondary outcome measures, a trend towards increased overall survival was observed but did not reach statistical significance (5-year overall survival: chemotherapy group, 51.1% v control group, 41.1%; odds ratio for death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.10; P = .13).nnnCONCLUSIONnDespite a suboptimal regimen, which was the standard at the beginning of the study, adjuvant intravenous systemic chemotherapy provided a significant disease-free survival benefit for patients with resected liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Cellular interactions of 5-fluorouracil and the camptothecin analogue CPT-11 (irinotecan) in a human colorectal carcinoma cell line☆

CPT-11 (irinotecan) is a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor active against metastatic colorectal carcinoma. We investigated, in a human colon carcinoma cell line, HT-29, the effects of CPT-11 and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) combinations. A strong synergism between CPT-11 and 5FU was observed after sequential exposure and only additivity or antagonism after simultaneous exposure. When cells were first exposed to 5FU, the product of cellular CPT-11 concentrations versus time (CxT) was 6895 +/- 1020 pmol x hr/10(6) cells, while it was 3875 +/- 121 pmol x hr/10(6) cells with CPT-11 alone (p < 0.01). The same phenomenon was observed with SN-38: 148.2 +/- 49.5 versus 83.4 +/- 23.6 pmol x hr/10(6) cells (p < 0.05). Consequently, the formation of protein-DNA complexes was 1.4 times greater with 5FU pretreatment than with CPT-11 alone (p = 0.03). Moreover, the incorporation of 5FU derivatives into DNA was multiplied by a factor of 1.5 24 hr after CPT-11 exposure. When cells were first incubated with CPT-11, the decrease in thymidylate synthase (TS) activity was identical to that obtained after 5FU exposure (1.09 to 0.023 pmol/min/mg protein), but this decrease persisted for 24 hr (0.014 pmol/min/mg protein) (p = 0.035). At the same time, a 1.8-fold increase in the incorporation of 5FU derivatives into DNA and a 2-fold increase in DNA-protein complex formation were evidenced. With the two sequential associations, we observed a persistent S-phase arrest, as compared with CPT-11 alone. These results suggest that CPT-11 and 5FU combinations are of clinical interest, and mechanisms of interaction between the two drugs seem to be multifactorial.

In vivo and in vitro antitumor activity of oxaliplatin in combination with cetuximab in human colorectal tumor cell lines expressing different level of EGFR

This study aimed to assess the effect of cetuximab (C225, Erbitux®, a chimeric anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody) in combination with oxaliplatin in vitro and in vivo on four colon cancer cell lines (HCT-8; HT-29, SW620, HCT-116) expressing different levels of EGFR. In vitro, cetuximab combined with oxaliplatin significantly decreased the IC50 values of oxaliplatin in HCT-8 (EGF-R moderate) and HT-29 (EGF-R weak) cell lines, while SW620 (EGF-R negative) and HCT-116 (EGFR strong) cell lines remained unresponsive. This combination was synergistic in HCT-8 and HT-29 cell lines while cetuximab induced no major modification of the IC50 of oxaliplatin in HCT-116 or SW620 cell lines. We then determined the effect of cetuximab on the EGF-induced EGFR phosphorylation and we highlight a correlation between the basal level of phospho-EGFR and the response to the combination. In vivo, the combination of cetuximab plus oxaliplatin significantly inhibited tumor growth of HCT-8 and HT-29 (tumor delay or Td = 21.6±2.9 and 18.0±2.9xa0days respectively, synergistic effect) compared to either oxaliplatin (Td=12.6±2.3 and 14.4±3.2xa0days respectively) or cetuximab (Td=13.4±2.9 and 14.5±2.4xa0days, respectively) alone in xenograft models. The combination had no effect on HCT-116 and SW-620 cell lines. The observed responses are strictly dependent on the cell type, and are not correlated with the level of EGFR expression but related to the basal level of phospho-EGFR. This study provides promising preclinical results for a possible clinical investigation of the combination of oxaliplatin plus cetuximab in chemorefractory colorectal tumors.

Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound etoposide.

Abstract A population pharmacokinetics study using the NONMEM program was undertaken to determine the effects of different covariates on the pharmacokinetic parameters of etoposide. A total of 1,044 plasma etoposide concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in 100 patients (pts; 75 men and 25 women aged 25–85 years) treated for various tumor types with i.v. (57 pts) or oral (43 pts) etoposide. For 67 pts, etoposide plasma protein binding was determined by equilibrium dialysis; the unbound fraction ranged from 4% to 24%. A linear two-compartment model with first-order absorption (for oral dosing) accurately described the concentration versus time data. The central and peripheral volumes of distribution were significantly correlated with the body surface area [Vc (L)u2009=u20095.5u2009×u2009BSA (m2) and Vpu2009= 4.1 ×u2009BSA], but even after BSA had been taken into account, the interindividual variability of the two volumes remained high (34% and 57%, respectively). The clearance (CL) was not correlated with the following covariates: age, BSA, sex, height, and levels of serum bilirubin and liver enzymes. The final regression model for CL was CL (ml/min)u2009=u200949.8u2009×u2009(1u2009−u20090.009u2009×u2009PRO)u2009× WT/Scru2009+u200933.8u2009×u2009(1u2009−u20090.29u2009×u2009META) × (1− (1u2009−u20090.012 × ALB), where ALB, PRO, WT,and Scr, respectively, were albuminemia, proteinemia (g/l), weight (kg), and serum creatinine (μMu200a) and METAu2009=u20091 if the patient had liver metastases (otherwise, METAu2009=u20090). The interindividual variability in CL (mean value 30u2009ml/min) decreased only from 32% to 26% when these covariates were taken into account. The mean oral bioavailability was 66%, showing an interindividual variability of 37%. The plasma clearance of the unbound fraction was strongly and negatively correlated with Scr but was not dependent on either PRO or ALB. These data show that modifications in PRO levels do not directly affect plasma exposure to unbound etoposide. This analysis makes possible the rational consideration of modifications of covariates such as Scr in etoposide dosing. This population data base will constitute the prerequisite for adaptative control with feedback dosing for continuous oral administration of etoposide.

High dose-intensity of irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in advanced cancer patients: a feasibility study.

PURPOSEnTo assess, on a multicenter basis, the feasibility of treating advanced cancer patients with high-dose irinotecan.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnThirty-five patients who met the usual phase I criteria (26 men and nine women) were included. Primary tumor sites were colon, head and neck, unknown primary, kidney, liver, and others. All had been previously treated. Irinotecan was given at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) (600 mg/m2) or the level below (500 mg/m2) as a 30-minute infusion once every 3 weeks.nnnRESULTSnEighteen patients were entered in the four participating centers at the MTD of 600 mg/m2. This dose level was clearly shown not to be feasible: 14 patients (78%) had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, with febrile episodes in 11 patients; grade 3 to 4 diarrhea was observed in nine patients; and one toxic death occurred. Subsequently, 17 not heavily pretreated patients were included at 500 mg/m2 and carefully monitored. The safety of this dose level was considered acceptable: 41% of patients had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, 24% experienced grade 3 to 4 diarrhea, and no febrile granulocytopenia or toxic death occurred. Six partial responses were documented in metastatic colorectal cancer, all in patients who had previously received conventional chemotherapy, four in patients who had exhibited progressive disease under fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy.nnnCONCLUSIONnWe plan to study the higher dose-intensity 500-mg/m2 level on good-risk and carefully monitored patients. This could enlarge the spectrum of tumors sensitive to irinotecan and improve the already good results observed in colorectal cancers.

Population pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin

The objective of this study was to explore correlations between a variety of covariates and oxaliplatin ultrafilterable and blood pharmacokinetic parameters. Data from 40 patients receiving oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and levofolinic acid as standard treatment for advanced colorectal cancer were analysed. Plasma ultrafilterable, blood, and urine platinum concentrations were determined by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Data were analysed according to a population pharmacokinetic method using the NONMEM program. The best fit for oxaliplatin plasma ultrafilterable clearance (CL) was given by the following equation, which considers four covariates: body surface area (BSA, in metres squared), age (in years), sex (0 if male, 1 if female), and serum creatinine (Scr, in micromoles per liter): CL (l/h)=5.49xBSA+4.55xBSAx(140–AGE)x(1–0.15xSEX)/Scr. By taking into account these covariates, the interindividual variability in CL decreased from 43% to 33%. Renal clearance represented 34% of the overall elimination. This value was obtained by recovering urine over only 5xa0h from the beginning of the infusion and modelling the data using NONMEM. We would recommend the use of this methodology for pharmacokinetic studies in oncology in which renal clearances of the drug are presently rarely explored. The oxaliplatin blood concentrations versus time observed during the three-cycle period were well-described by a three-compartment model with first-order elimination from the central compartment. No significant intrapatient pharmacokinetic variability was observed between cycles. The relationship we obtained using the population approach between oxaliplatin CL and covariates may allow rational reduction of oxaliplatin dose in cases of elevated serum creatinine levels.

Chronopharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in patients with breast cancer

SummaryThe chronopharmacokinetics of doxorubicin (DOX) has been studied in 18 patients suffering from breast cancer. They received combined chemotherapy, including DOX (50 mg/m2 as an iv bolus), given at two different times (09.00 h or 21.00 h). The two randomized courses of the protocol were given to each patient at a four week interval.The total body clearance (CL) of DOX was significantly decreased when the drug was administered at 21.00 h, resulting in a longer elimination half-life and an increase in AUC. The renal clearance of DOX did not differ at the different times of administration, and it appears that the decrease in CL was related to a change in hepatic blood flow. The volume of distribution of the drug was not changed.

Patient-reported outcomes as a component of the primary endpoint in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in advanced pancreatic cancer.

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing gemcitabine+tipifarnib (G+t) or gemcitabine+placebo (G+p) in patients with pancreatic cancer, the primary endpoint of time to deterioration (TTD) was based primarily on patient-reported outcomes. Deterioration was defined as death or worsening of disease-related symptoms, based on patient-reported outcomes of pain intensity and analgesic use in a daily diary, plus investigator-rated weekly performance status. Secondary endpoints included survival and safety. Two hundred and forty-four patients were treated for a total of 4780 weeks, during which the diary was completed daily. Overall, the completion of the diary was found to be feasible: patients completed approximately 95% of scheduled diary entries. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment arms. The primary endpoint of TTD was not significantly different between the G+t arm (69 days) and the G+p arm (91 days, P=0.40). Survival was not significantly different between the G+t arm (202 days) and the G+p arm (221 days, P=0.66). The combination of G+t had an acceptable toxicity profile, with primarily neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Methodologically, measurement of patient-reported outcomes is feasible and useful in assessing the effect of anti-cancer therapy in pancreatic cancer if comprehensive initial and ongoing training is provided to all people involved, including not only the patients but also the study personnel.

Phase-I study of a new schedule based on increasing days of topotecan administration associated with dose individualisation

Background: The most commonly prescribed schedule of topotecan administration is daily for five days, every 21xa0days. Both pre-clinical and clinical studies suggest that a more protracted schedule may increase its therapeutic index. The current study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated number of days with 30-minute i.v. infusion of topotecan daily at fixed area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) (i.e., 35xa0μg/L×h). Patients and methods: Topotecan was administered i.v. over 30xa0min. The planned levels of number of days of administration were: 7, 10, 13, 15 and 17. The dose was individualized according to the patient’s individual topotecan clearance observed after the first infusion of each cycle. Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled and received 71 cycles of therapy. The 13-day level was defined as the maximum number of days of administration. The main side effects were thrombocytopenia and anaemia, whereas neutropenia was infrequent. The mean (coefficient of variation) observed AUC was 34.6 (21%), and 33.4 (19%) μg/L×h, for the last day of cycle 1, and of cycle 2, respectively. Confirmed partial responses were observed in one patient with metastatic desmoplastic tumour and in two patients with small round metastatic endocrine carcinoma. Conclusion: The recommended number of topotecan administration is 10xa0days. Beyond the potential clinical interest of topotecan administered for a 10-day period, this is the first trial showing the feasibility of a phase-I study exploring a number of administrations of daily AUC rather than a total dose in mg/m².

Phase I/II Pharmacokinetic Study of Mitoxantrone by Continuous Venous Infusion in Patients with Solid Tumours and Lymphoproliferative Diseases

Phase I and pharmacokinetic studies were performed in order to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose and the efficiency of 120 h continuous venous infusion (CVI) of mitoxantrone. 25 patients suffering from either metastatic solid tumour or refractory lymphoproliferative disease were included in the study. The starting dose was 2 mg/m2 per day and was increased by a 0.2 mg/m2 per day step dose. The main toxicity observed was leukopenia which became limiting in more than 50% of the patients receiving 2.4 mg/m2 per day (12 mg/m2 over a 120 h period); this dose was defined as the maximal tolerated dose in these pretreated patients. One partial response and three stable diseases were observed. A plasma plateau concentration of mitoxantrone (2.13 [S.D. 0.54] micrograms/1 at 2 mg/m2 per day, 2.56 [1.32] micrograms/1 at 2.2 per day and 3.46 [1.32] micrograms/l at 2.4 mg/m2 per day) was reached within 24-48 h. It was linearly related to the administered dose. The mean plasma clearance of mitoxantrone was 27.8 [14.2] l/h/m2 and the volume of distribution of the beta phase averaged 2327 [2125] l/m2. An inverse relationship was established between the mitoxantrone clearance and the degree of hematologic toxicity. This 120 h CVI mitoxantrone schedule was safe and could be repeated every 3 weeks in an outpatient setting. The relationship between mitoxantrone clearance and the drug related haematotoxicity could be used for an individual dose adjustment.