Rolf Terlinden
Grünenthal GmbH
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rolf Terlinden.
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics | 2007
Rolf Terlinden; Joachim Ossig; Frank Fliegert; Claudia Lange; Karin Göhler
SummaryTapentadol is a novel, centrally acting oral analgesic with a dual mode of action that has demonstrated efficacy in preclinical and clinical models of pain relief. The present study investigated and characterized the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of tapentadol in humans. Four healthy male subjects received a single 100-mg oral dose of 3-[14C]-labeled tapentadol HCl for evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of the drug and the excretion balance of radiocarbon. The concentration-time profiles of radiocarbon in whole blood and serum and radiocarbon excretion in the urine and feces, and the expired C02 were determined. The serum pharmacokinetics and excretion kinetics of tapentadol and its conjugates were assessed, as was its tolerability. Absorption was rapid (with a mean maximum serum concentration [Cmax], 2.45 μg-eq/m]; a time to Cmax, 1.25–1.5 h), and the drug was present primarily in the form of conjugated metabolites (conjugated:unconjugated metabolites = 24∶1). Excretion of radiocarbon was rapid and complete (>95% within 24 h; 99.9% within 5 days) and almost exclusively renal (99%∶69% conjugates; 27% other metabolites; 3% in unchanged form). No severe adverse events or clinically relevant changes in vital signs, laboratory measurements, electrocardiogram recording, or physical examination findings were reported. In our study group, it was found that a single oral dose of tapentadol was rapidly absorbed, then excreted into the urine, primarily in the form of conjugated metabolites, and was well tolerated.
Drug Metabolism Letters | 2008
Christa Kneip; Rolf Terlinden; Horst Beier; Genfu Chen
The new analgesic tapentadol was evaluated for induction and inhibition of several cytochrome P450 enzymes in vitro, and protein binding was assessed. It was concluded that no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions are likely to occur through either mechanism.
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia | 2014
Babette Kögel; Rolf Terlinden; Johannes Schneider
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the analgesic potential of the centrally acting analgesics tramadol, morphine and the novel analgesic tapentadol in a pre-clinical research model of acute nociceptive pain, the tail-flick model in dogs. STUDY DESIGN Prospective part-randomized pre-clinical research trial. ANIMALS Fifteen male Beagle dogs (HsdCpb:DOBE), aged 12-15 months. METHODS On different occasions separated by at least 1 week, dogs received intravenous (IV) administrations of tramadol (6.81, 10.0 mg kg(-1) ), tapentadol (2.15, 4.64, 6.81 mg kg(-1) ) or morphine (0.464, 0.681, 1.0 mg kg(-1) ) with subsequent measurement of tail withdrawal latencies from a thermal stimulus (for each treatment n = 5). Blood samples were collected immediately after the pharmacodynamic measurements of tramadol to determine pharmacokinetics and the active metabolite O-demethyltramadol (M1). RESULTS Tapentadol and morphine induced dose-dependent antinociception with ED50-values of 4.3 mg kg(-1) and 0.71 mg kg(-1) , respectively. In contrast, tramadol did not induce antinociception at any dose tested. Measurements of the serum levels of tramadol and the M1 metabolite revealed only marginal amounts of the M1 metabolite, which explains the absence of the antinociceptive effect of tramadol in this experimental pain model in dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Different breeds of dogs might not or only poorly respond to treatment with tramadol due to low metabolism of the drug. Tapentadol and morphine which act directly on μ-opioid receptors without the need for metabolic activation are demonstrated to induce potent antinociception in the experimental model used and should also provide a reliable pain management in the clinical situation. The non-opioid mechanisms of tramadol do not provide antinociception in this experimental setting. This contrasts to many clinical situations described in the literature, where tramadol appears to provide useful analgesia in dogs for post-operative pain relief and in more chronically pain states.
Pharmacotherapy | 2010
Johan W. Smit; C. Oh; Jens Rengelshausen; Rolf Terlinden; Paulien G. M. Ravenstijn; Shean‐Sheng Wang; David Upmalis; Bernhard Mangold
Study Objective. To evaluate the effects of acetaminophen, naproxen, and acetylsalicylic acid on the pharmacokinetics of the centrally acting analgesic tapentadol in healthy subjects.
Clinical Pharmacokinectics | 2010
Xu Steven Xu; Johan W. Smit; Rachel Lin; Kim Stuyckens; Rolf Terlinden; Partha Nandy
BackgroundTapentadol is a new, centrally active analgesic agent with two modes of action — ώ, opioid receptor agonism and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition — and the immediate-release (IR) formulation is approved in the US for the relief of moderate to severe acute pain. The aims of this analysis were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to facilitate the understanding of the pharmacokinetics of tapentadol IR in healthy subjects and patients following single and multiple dosing, and to identify covariates that might explain variability in exposure following oral administration.MethodsThe analysis included pooled data from 11 385 serum pharmacokinetic samples from 1827 healthy subjects and patients with moderate to severe pain. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was conducted using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM®) software to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters and the influence of the subjects’ demographic characteristics, clinical laboratory chemistry values and disease status on these parameters. Simulations were performed to assess the clinical relevance of the covariate effects on tapentadol exposure.ResultsA two-compartment model with zero-order release followed by first-order absorption and first-order elimination best described the pharmacokinetics of tapentadol IR following oral administration. The interindividual variability (coefficient of variation) in apparent oral clearance (CL/F) and the apparent central volume of distribution after oral administration were 30% and 29%, respectively. An additive error model was used to describe the residual variability in the log-transformed data, and the standard deviation values were 0.308 and 0.314 for intensively and sparsely sampled data, respectively. Covariate analysis showed that sex, age, bodyweight, race, body fat, hepatic function (using total bilirubin and total protein as surrogate markers), health status and creatinine clearance were statistically significant factors influencing the pharmacokinetics of tapentadol. Total bilirubin was a particularly important factor that influenced CL/F, which decreased by more than 60% in subjects with total bilirubin greater than 50 ώmol/L.ConclusionsThe population pharmacokinetic model for tapentadol IR identified the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and a wide range of covariates. The simulations of tapentadol exposure with identified, statistically significant covariates demonstrated that only hepatic function (as characterized by total bilirubin and total protein) may be considered a clinically relevant factor that warrants dose adjustment. None of the other covariates are of clinical relevance, nor do they necessitate dose adjustment.
principles and practice of constraint programming | 2013
Karin Göhler; Martin Brett; Johan W. Smit; Jens Rengelshausen; Rolf Terlinden
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of orally administered tapentadol immediate release (IR) compared with tapentadol prolonged release (PR). METHODS Three randomized, open-label, crossover studies were conducted in subjects under fasted conditions. Studies 1 and 2 determined the absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of oral tapentadol IR 86 mg and tapentadol PR 86 mg, respectively, relative to a 34-mg intravenous (IV) dose of tapentadol. Study 3 determined the relative bioavailability of tapentadol PR 86 mg vs. tapentadol IR 86 mg. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis and relative bioavailability using dose-adjusted, log-transformed analysis of variance models for maximum concentration (Cmax) and areas under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC0-t and AUC). Adverse events (AEs), vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), and laboratory parameters were assessed. RESULTS Absolute bioavailability was estimated to be 32% (95% confidence interval (CI), 29.4 - 34.8%; n = 24) for tapentadol IR 86 mg and 32% (95% CI, 28.0 - 35.9%; n = 18) for tapentadol PR 86 mg. Based on AUC, the relative bioavailability of tapentadol PR vs. tapentadol IR was 96% (90% CI, 87.8 - 104.4%; n = 16). Following IV administration, tapentadol had an elimination half-life of about 4 hours; in Studies 1 and 2, respectively, mean tapentadol volumes of distribution were 540 and 471 l, and mean clearance was 1,531 and 1,603 ml/min. Compared to tapentadol IR 86 mg, the prolonged-release characteristics of tapentadol PR 86 mg were evident with a lower Cmax (22.5 ng/ml vs. 64.2 ng/ml), a longer time to Cmax (5.0 h vs. 1.5 h), a higher half-value duration (HVD: 12.5 h vs. 3.6 h), and a longer mean residence time (MRT: 10.6 h vs. 6.0 h). The most common AEs reported were dizziness, headache, fatigue, nausea, somnolence, and dry mouth; most AEs were mild. No clinically relevant changes in vital signs, ECG parameters, or laboratory values were observed. CONCLUSIONS Absolute bioavailability for both tapentadol IR and tapentadol PR was ~ 32% under fasted conditions. Extent of exposure (AUC) for tapentadol PR was very similar to tapentadol IR, whereas Cmax was lower and HVD/MRT longer for the prolonged-release formulation. Overall, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of tapentadol PR enable a twice-daily dosing regimen to be used; such a regimen is expected to improve patient compliance during chronic use.
Journal of Chromatography B | 2015
Vera Hillewaert; Klaus Pusecker; Luc Sips; Tom Verhaeghe; Ronald de Vries; Manfred Langhans; Rolf Terlinden; Philip Timmerman
Tapentadol is a novel, centrally acting analgesic with 2 mechanisms of action, MOR agonism and noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibition in a single molecule. It is the first member of a new therapeutic class, MOR-NRI. A high throughput liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) assay was developed and validated for the quantitative analysis of tapentadol and its O-glucuronide metabolite in human serum. Simultaneous quantification was deemed to be challenging because of the large difference in concentrations between tapentadol and its O-glucuronide metabolite in clinical samples. Therefore, a method was established using a common processed sample, but with different injection volumes and chromatographic conditions for each analyte. Tapentadol and tapentadol-O-glucuronide were determined by protein precipitation of 0.100ml of the samples with acetonitrile. The internal standards used are D₆-tapentadol and D₆-tapentadol-O-glucuronide. The validated concentration range was 0.200-200 ng/ml (tapentadol) and 10.0-10,000 ng/ml (tapentadol-O-glucuronide). Chromatographic separation was achieved by gradient elution on a Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18 (1.7 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm) column, with mobile phase consisting of 0.01 M ammonium formate (adjusted to pH 4 using formic acid) (A) and methanol (B). A separate injection was done for measurement of each analyte, with a different gradient and run time. The analytes were detected by using an electrospray ion source on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operating in positive ionization mode. The run time was 1.6 min for tapentadol and 1.5 min for tapentadol-O-glucuronide. The high sensitivity and acceptable performance of the assay allowed its application to the analysis of serum samples in clinical trials. The validated method was used for analysis of tapentadol in over 17,000 samples.
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy | 2012
Robert B. Raffa; Helmut Buschmann; Thomas Christoph; Gary Eichenbaum; Werner Englberger; Christopher M. Flores; Torsten Hertrampf; Babette Kögel; Klaus Schiene; Wolfgang Werner Al Strasburger; Rolf Terlinden; Thomas M. Tzschentke
Drug Research | 2011
Wolfgang Lintz; Reinhard Becker; Joachim Gerloff; Rolf Terlinden
Contraception | 2006
Rolf Terlinden; Heinz Uragg; Karin Göhler; Christa Kneip