Ron Carere

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Impact on Clinical and Valve-Related Outcomes

Background— Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an alternative to open heart surgery in patients with aortic stenosis. However, long-term data on a programmatic approach to aortic valve implantation remain sparse. Methods and Results— Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed in 168 patients (median age, 84 years) in the setting of severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk. Access was transarterial (n=113) or, in the presence of small iliofemoral artery diameter, transapical (n=55). The overall success rate was 94.1% in this early experience. Intraprocedural mortality was 1.2%. Operative (30-day) mortality was 11.3%, lower in the transarterial group than the transapical group (8.0% versus 18.2%; P=0.07). Overall mortality fell from 14.3% in the initial half to 8.3% in the second half of the experience, from 12.3% to 3.6% (P=0.16) in transarterial patients and from 25% to 11.1% (P=0.30) in transapical patients. Functional class improved over the 1-year postprocedure period (P<0.001). Survival at 1 year was 74%. The bulk of late readmission and mortality was not procedure or valve related but rather was due to comorbidities. Paravalvular regurgitation was common but generally mild and remained stable at late follow-up. At a maximum of >3 years and a median of 221 days, structural valve failure was not observed. Conclusions— Transcatheter aortic valve implantation can result in early and sustained functional improvement in high-risk aortic stenosis patients. Late outcome is determined primarily by comorbidities unrelated to aortic valve disease.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Durability of Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes Beyond 3 Years in a Large Patient Cohort

Background— Although short- and medium-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation are encouraging, long-term data on valve function and clinical outcomes are limited. Methods and Results— Consecutive high-risk patients who had been declined as surgical candidates because of comorbidities but who underwent successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve between January 2005 and December 2006 and survived past 30 days were assessed. Clinical, echocardiographic, and computed tomographic follow-up examinations were performed. Seventy patients who underwent successful procedures and survived longer than 30 days were evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 3 years. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years (interquartile range 3.4 to 4.3 years), survival was 57%. Survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 81%, 74%, and 61%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation was 98.5% (1 patient with endocarditis). During this early procedural experience, 11 patients died within 30 days, and 8 procedures were unsuccessful. When these patients were included, overall survival was 51%. Transaortic pressure gradients increased from 10.0 mm Hg (interquartile range 8.0 to 12.0 mm Hg) immediately after the procedure to 12.1 mm Hg (interquartile range 8.6 to 16.0 mm Hg) after 3 years (P=0.03). Bioprosthetic valve area decreased from a mean of 1.7±0.4 cm2 after the procedure to 1.4±0.3 cm2 after 3 years (P<0.01). Aortic incompetence after implantation was trivial or mild in 84% of cases and remained unchanged or improved over time. There were no cases of structural valvular deterioration, stent fracture, deformation, or valve migration. Conclusions— Transcatheter aortic valve implantation demonstrates good medium- to long-term durability and preserved hemodynamic function, with no evidence of structural failure. The procedure appears to offer an adequate and lasting resolution of aortic stenosis in selected patients.

Plasma Protein Biosignatures for Detection of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

BACKGROUND Coronary angiography remains the most widely used tool for routine screening and diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), a major pathologic process that develops in 50% of cardiac transplant recipients beyond the first year after transplant. Given the invasiveness, expense, discomfort, and risk of complications associated with angiography, a minimally invasive alternative that is sensitive and specific would be highly desirable for monitoring CAV in patients. METHODS Plasma proteomic analysis using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation-matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization double time-of-flight mass spectrometry was carried out on samples from 40 cardiac transplant patients (10 CAV, 9 non-significant CAV, 21 possible CAV). Presence of CAV was defined as left anterior descending artery diameter stenosis ≥ 40% by digital angiography and quantitatively measured by blinded expert appraisal. Moderated t-test robust-linear models for microarray data were used to identify biomarkers that are significantly differentially expressed between patient samples with CAV and with non-significant CAV. A proteomic panel for diagnosis of CAV was generated using the Elastic Net classification method. RESULTS We identified an 18-plasma protein biomarker classifier panel that was able to classify and differentiate patients with angiographically significant CAV from those without significant CAV, with an 80% sensitivity and 89% specificity, while providing insight into the possible underlying immune and non-alloimmune contributory mechanisms of CAV. CONCLUSION Our results support of the potential utility of proteomic biomarker panels as a minimally invasive means to identify patients with significant, angiographically detectable coronary artery stenosis in the cardiac allograft, in the context of post-cardiac transplantation monitoring and screening for CAV. The potential biologic significance of the biomarkers identified may also help improve our understanding of CAV pathophysiology.

Percutaneous aortic valve implantation: A case report

The present case demonstrates the percutaneous implantation of a bioprosthetic valve in a patient with severe aortic stenosis. An 85-year-old man with significant comorbidities was determined to be at unacceptable risk with traditional surgical valve replacement. Percutaneous aortic valve implantation was performed, was successful and uncomplicated, with significant clinical and hemodynamic improvement. Currently, this procedure is an option only for symptomatic patients who are not appropriate candidates for surgical valve replacement.