Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ron Handels is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ron Handels.


Journal of Alzheimer's Disease | 2010

Biomarkers as Predictors for Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer-Type Dementia: Implications for Trial Design

Ineke A. van Rossum; Stephanie J.B. Vos; Ron Handels; Pieter Jelle Visser

Disease modifying drugs for Alzheimers disease (AD) are likely to be most effective when given in non-demented subjects. In this review we summarized biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood that can predict AD-type dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In addition, we investigated whether these markers could reduce sample size and costs if used to select subjects for trials on the prevention of AD in subjects with MCI. A meta-analysis of markers that had been investigated in multiple studies showed that the combination of amyloid-beta (Abeta1-42 and tau in CSF had the best predictive accuracy for AD (odds ratio (OR) 18.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.6-32.4). Abeta1-42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau in CSF also predicted conversion, but with lower accuracy (OR 7.5 to 8.1). Plasma levels of Abeta1-40, Abeta1-42, the ratio Abeta1-42/Abeta1-40 and homocysteine did not predict outcome. In a fictive trial design, the use of the combination of Abeta1-42 and tau in CSF in the selection of subjects could reduce sample size by 67% and trial costs by 60% compared to a trial in which unselected subjects with MCI would be enrolled. In conclusion, the combination of Abeta1-42 and tau in CSF is useful to select subjects for trials that aim to slow down the progression from MCI to AD-type dementia.


Neurobiology of Aging | 2012

Test sequence of CSF and MRI biomarkers for prediction of AD in subjects with MCI

Stephanie J.B. Vos; Ineke van Rossum; Leah Burns; Dirk L. Knol; Philip Scheltens; Hilkka Soininen; Lars-Olof Wahlund; Harald Hampel; Magda Tsolaki; Lennart Minthon; Ron Handels; Gilbert J. L'Italien; Wiesje M. van der Flier; Pauline Aalten; Charlotte E. Teunissen; Frederik Barkhof; Kaj Blennow; Robin Wolz; Daniel Rueckert; Frans R.J. Verhey; Pieter Jelle Visser

Our aim was to identify the best diagnostic test sequence for predicting Alzheimers disease (AD)-type dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers. We selected 153 subjects with mild cognitive impairment from a multicenter memory clinic-based cohort. We tested the CSF beta amyloid (Aβ)1-42/tau ratio using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and hippocampal volumes (HCVs) using the atlas-based learning embeddings for atlas propagation (LEAP) method. Outcome measure was progression to AD-type dementia in 2 years. At follow-up, 48 (31%) subjects converted to AD-type dementia. In multivariable analyses, CSF Aβ1-42/tau and HCV predicted AD-type dementia regardless of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype and cognitive scores. Test sequence analyses showed that CSF Aβ1-42/tau increased predictive accuracy in subjects with normal HCV (p < 0.001) and abnormal HCV (p = 0.025). HCV increased predictive accuracy only in subjects with normal CSF Aβ1-42/tau (p = 0.014). Slope analyses for annual cognitive decline yielded similar results. For selection of subjects for a prodromal AD trial, the best balance between sample size and number of subjects needed to screen was obtained with CSF markers. These results provide further support for the use of CSF and magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers to identify prodromal AD.


Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders | 2013

Determinants of care costs of patients with dementia or cognitive impairment

Ron Handels; Claire A. G. Wolfs; Pauline Aalten; Frans R.J. Verhey; Johan L. Severens

Introduction:Dementia causes a high burden on patients, caregivers, and societies. Decision analytic models to support allocation of resources are often developed making use of cost-of-illness (COI) studies. However, current COI study estimates are highly variable due to care setting and methodological issues. We aim to explore variables explaining the variation of (formal and informal) health care costs of cognitive disorders, using a broad spectrum of variables, including patient, caregiver, and social context variables. Methods:A bottom-up COI study design was used in which a societal viewpoint and a validated method to measure and value informal care was applied. Data were analyzed using univariate, multivariate, and forward regression analyses. Results:The average 1-year health care sector costs were &OV0556;26,140 (


Alzheimers & Dementia | 2017

Recommendations for CSF AD biomarkers in the diagnostic evaluation of dementia

Anja Hviid Simonsen; Sanna-Kaisa Herukka; Niels Andreasen; Inês Baldeiras; Maria Bjerke; Kaj Blennow; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Giovanni B. Frisoni; Tomasz Gabryelewicz; Samantha Galluzzi; Ron Handels; Milica G. Kramberger; Agnieszka Kulczyńska; José Luis Molinuevo; Barbara Mroczko; Agneta Nordberg; Catarina R. Oliveira; Markus Otto; Juha O. Rinne; Uros Rot; Esen Saka; Hilkka Soininen; Hanne Struyfs; Silvia Suardi; Pieter Jelle Visser; Bengt Winblad; Henrik Zetterberg; Gunhild Waldemar

34,505 or £17,775) and &OV0556;11,931 (


Alzheimers & Dementia | 2014

Diagnosing Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review of economic evaluations

Ron Handels; Claire A. G. Wolfs; Pauline Aalten; Manuela A. Joore; Frans R.J. Verhey; Johan L. Severens

15,749 or £8113) for patient and family. The analyses indicated that cognitive functioning, caregiver burden, patient sex, and instrumental activities of daily living were significantly associated with care costs independently. Conclusions:Cognitive functioning and instrumental activities of daily living are important variables to include in health care decision models. We recommend also including caregiver burden and patient sex in decision models for health policy decision makers to fully reflect the heterogeneity of the disease progression of cognitive disorders.


BMC Neurology | 2012

Diagnostic and economic evaluation of new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: the research protocol of a prospective cohort study

Ron Handels; Pauline Aalten; Claire A. G. Wolfs; Marcel Olde-Rikkert; Philip Scheltens; Pieter Jelle Visser; Manuela A. Joore; Johan L. Severens; Frans R.J. Verhey

This article presents recommendations, based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method, for the clinical application of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid‐β1–42, tau, and phosphorylated tau in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with dementia. The recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary working group based on the available evidence and consensus from focused discussions for (i) identification of Alzheimers disease (AD) as the cause of dementia, (ii) prediction of rate of decline, (iii) cost‐effectiveness, and (iv) interpretation of results. The working group found sufficient evidence to support a recommendation to use CSF AD biomarkers as a supplement to clinical evaluation, particularly in uncertain and atypical cases, to identify or exclude AD as the cause of dementia. Because of insufficient evidence, it was uncertain whether CSF AD biomarkers outperform imaging biomarkers. Operational recommendations for the interpretation of ambiguous CSF biomarker results were also provided.


World Journal of Biological Psychiatry | 2018

Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for neurodegenerative dementias: An update of the Consensus of the Task Force on Biological Markers in Psychiatry of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry

Piotr Lewczuk; Peter Riederer; Sid E. O'Bryant; Marcel M. Verbeek; Bruno Dubois; Pieter Jelle Visser; Kurt A. Jellinger; S. Engelborghs; Alfredo Ramirez; Lucilla Parnetti; C. R. Jack; Charlotte E. Teunissen; Harald Hampel; Alberto Lleó; Frank Jessen; Lidia Glodzik; M. J. de Leon; Anne M. Fagan; José-Luis Molinuevo; Willemijn J. Jansen; Bengt Winblad; Leslie M. Shaw; Ulf Andreasson; Markus Otto; Brit Mollenhauer; Jens Wiltfang; Martin Turner; Inga Zerr; Ron Handels; Alexander Thompson

The objective of this study is to systematically review the literature on economic evaluations of interventions for the early diagnosis of Alzheimers disease (AD) and related disorders and to describe their general and methodological characteristics. We focused on the diagnostic aspects of the decision models to assess the applicability of existing decision models for the evaluation of the recently revised diagnostic research criteria for AD.


Alzheimers & Dementia | 2017

Recommendations for cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in the diagnostic evaluation of mild cognitive impairment

Sanna Kaisa Herukka; Anja Hviid Simonsen; Niels Andreasen; Inês Baldeiras; Maria Bjerke; Kaj Blennow; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Giovanni B. Frisoni; Tomasz Gabryelewicz; Samantha Galluzzi; Ron Handels; Milica G. Kramberger; Agnieszka Kulczyńska; José Luis Molinuevo; Barbara Mroczko; Agneta Nordberg; Catarina R. Oliveira; Markus Otto; Juha O. Rinne; Uros Rot; Esen Saka; Hilkka Soininen; Hanne Struyfs; Silvia Suardi; Pieter Jelle Visser; Bengt Winblad; Henrik Zetterberg; Gunhild Waldemar

BackgroundNew research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have recently been developed to enable an early diagnosis of AD pathophysiology by relying on emerging biomarkers. To enable efficient allocation of health care resources, evidence is needed to support decision makers on the adoption of emerging biomarkers in clinical practice. The research goals are to 1) assess the diagnostic test accuracy of current clinical diagnostic work-up and emerging biomarkers in MRI, PET and CSF, 2) perform a cost-consequence analysis and 3) assess long-term cost-effectiveness by an economic model.Methods/designIn a cohort design 241 consecutive patients suspected of having a primary neurodegenerative disease are approached in four academic memory clinics and followed for two years. Clinical data and data on quality of life, costs and emerging biomarkers are gathered.Diagnostic test accuracy is determined by relating the clinical practice and new research criteria diagnoses to a reference diagnosis. The clinical practice diagnosis at baseline is reflected by a consensus procedure among experts using clinical information only (no biomarkers). The diagnosis based on the new research criteria is reflected by decision rules that combine clinical and biomarker information. The reference diagnosis is determined by a consensus procedure among experts based on clinical information on the course of symptoms over a two-year time period.A decision analytic model is built combining available evidence from different resources among which (accuracy) results from the study, literature and expert opinion to assess long-term cost-effectiveness of the emerging biomarkers.DiscussionSeveral other multi-centre trials study the relative value of new biomarkers for early evaluation of AD and related disorders. The uniqueness of this study is the assessment of resource utilization and quality of life to enable an economic evaluation. The study results are generalizable to a population of patients who are referred to a memory clinic due to their memory problems.Trial registrationNCT01450891


Alzheimers & Dementia | 2015

Early cost-utility analysis of general and cerebrospinal fluid-specific Alzheimer's disease biomarkers for hypothetical disease-modifying treatment decision in mild cognitive impairment.

Ron Handels; Manuela A. Joore; An Tran-Duy; Anders Wimo; Claire A. G. Wolfs; Frans R.J. Verhey; Johan L. Severens

Abstract In the 12 years since the publication of the first Consensus Paper of the WFSBP on biomarkers of neurodegenerative dementias, enormous advancement has taken place in the field, and the Task Force takes now the opportunity to extend and update the original paper. New concepts of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and the conceptual interactions between AD and dementia due to AD were developed, resulting in two sets for diagnostic/research criteria. Procedures for pre-analytical sample handling, biobanking, analyses and post-analytical interpretation of the results were intensively studied and optimised. A global quality control project was introduced to evaluate and monitor the inter-centre variability in measurements with the goal of harmonisation of results. Contexts of use and how to approach candidate biomarkers in biological specimens other than cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), e.g. blood, were precisely defined. Important development was achieved in neuroimaging techniques, including studies comparing amyloid-β positron emission tomography results to fluid-based modalities. Similarly, development in research laboratory technologies, such as ultra-sensitive methods, raises our hopes to further improve analytical and diagnostic accuracy of classic and novel candidate biomarkers. Synergistically, advancement in clinical trials of anti-dementia therapies energises and motivates the efforts to find and optimise the most reliable early diagnostic modalities. Finally, the first studies were published addressing the potential of cost-effectiveness of the biomarkers-based diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders.


Journal of Alzheimer's Disease | 2013

Natural Progression Model of Cognition and Physical Functioning among People with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

Ron Handels; Weili Xu; Debora Rizzuto; Barbara Caracciolo; Rui Wang; Bengt Winblad; Frans R.J. Verhey; Johan L. Severens; Laura Fratiglioni; Manuela A. Joore; Anders Wimo

This article presents recommendations, based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method, for the clinical application of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid‐β1–42, tau, and phosphorylated tau in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary working group and based on the available evidence and consensus from focused group discussions for 1) prediction of clinical progression to Alzheimers disease (AD) dementia, 2) cost‐effectiveness, 3) interpretation of results, and 4) patient counseling. The working group recommended using CSF AD biomarkers in the diagnostic workup of MCI patients, after prebiomarker counseling, as an add‐on to clinical evaluation to predict functional decline or conversion to AD dementia and to guide disease management. Because of insufficient evidence, it was uncertain whether CSF AD biomarkers outperform imaging biomarkers. Furthermore, the working group provided recommendations for interpretation of ambiguous CSF biomarker results and for pre‐ and post‐biomarker counseling.

Collaboration


Dive into the Ron Handels's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johan L. Severens

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maria Marques

Universidade Nova de Lisboa

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge