Rona E. Cheifetz

Effects of positive resection margin and tumor distance from anus on rectal cancer treatment outcomes

PURPOSE Rectal cancer outcome depends on stage, technical aspects of surgical excision, and use of adjuvant chemoradiation. Here, we examine effects of positive resection margin and tumor distance from the anus in stage 2 and 3 cancers on 4-year disease-specific survival and recurrence. METHODS We reviewed all 495 rectal cancer patients registered in British Columbia in 1996. RESULTS There were 481 cases analyzed: 29 in situ, 134 stage 1, 107 stage 2, 100 stage 3, 83 stage 4, and 28 unknown stage. Survival was significantly affected by presence of positive resection margin in stage 2 and 3 cancers, P = 0.0001. Lower tumor distance from the anus for stage 2 and 3 cancers worsened survival, P = 0.0007, and overall recurrence, P =0.016, but not local recurrence, P = 0.11. Adjuvant postoperative combined radiation and chemotherapy in stage 2 and 3 cancers significantly improved survival, P = 0.070 and local recurrence, P = 0.018, but not overall recurrence, P = 0.19. CONCLUSIONS Presence of positive resection margin and tumor distance from the anus affect survival, local recurrence, and overall recurrence. Adjuvant postoperative combined radiation and chemotherapy improved our outcomes. Our local recurrence rates for rectal cancers are worse than currently reported standards of less than 10%. Improved surgical excision and use of adjuvant preoperative radiation and chemotherapy may improve outcome.

Effect of emergent presentation on outcome from rectal cancer management

BACKGROUND We have previously reported outcomes for all rectal cancers in BC in 1996. We found that our local recurrence rates and survival were suboptimal relative to current standards in recent literature. METHODS In this retrospective, population-based study, we report the influence of emergent presentation (obstruction, perforation, massive hemorrhage) on outcomes, types of surgical procedures and use of staging investigations, and use of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. RESULTS There were 452 invasive adenocarcinomas of the rectum of which 45 were emergent and 407 nonemergent. Disease-specific survival at 4 years for emergent and nonemergent stage II cancers were 66% versus 80%, respectively, and for stage III cancers, 60% versus 73%, respectively (P <0.04). Local recurrence rates at 4 years for emergent and nonemergent stage II cancers were 20% versus 15%, respectively, and for stage III cancers, 70% and 20%, respectively (P <0.05). Surgical resection more frequently involved a stoma for emergent (60%) than for nonemergent (35%) cases (P <0.01). Percent of patients having complete staging investigations were similar between emergent (42%) and nonemergent patients (39%). Adjuvant radiation was given in similar proportion to emergent (61%) and nonemergent (55%) patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to a slightly higher proportion of emergent patients (63%) than nonemergent patients (43%). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that outcome from rectal cancer management is worse for emergent than nonemergent presentation. Since there is no difference in use of staging investigations or adjuvant therapy, the difference in outcome is likely due to difference in surgical technique between emergent and nonemergent cases.