Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ronald A. Sloto is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ronald A. Sloto.


Scientific Investigations Report | 2009

Evaluation of Water-Chemistry and Water-Level Data at the Henderson Road Superfund Site, Upper Merion Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, 1991-2008

Ronald A. Sloto

Several shutdown-rebound tests have been conducted at the Henderson Road Superfund Site, which has been on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s National Priorities List since 1984. For a given test, the extraction wells are turned off, and water samples are collected from selected monitor wells at regular intervals before and during cessation of pumping to monitor for changes in chemical concentrations. A long-term shutdown-rebound test began on July 17, 2006. In support of this test, the U.S. Geological Survey conducted this study to determine the effects of shutting down on-site extraction wells on concentrations of selected contaminants and water levels. Concentrations were compared to ARARs (applicable relevant and appropriate requirements), which were set as remediation goals in the Henderson Road Site Record of Decision. Water from 10 wells in and near the source area and to the north, northeast, and northwest of the source area sampled in 2008 exceeded the 5.52 μg/L (micrograms per liter) ARAR for benzene. The greatest changes in benzene concentration between pre-shutdown samples collected in July 2006 and samples collected in February and March 2008 (19 months after the shutdown) were for wells in and north of the source area; increases in benzene concentration ranged from 1.5 to 164 μg/L. Water from five wells in the source area and to the north and northwest of the source area sampled in 2008 exceeded the 60 μg/L ARAR for chlorobenzene. The greatest changes in chlorobenzene concentration between pre-shutdown samples collected in July 2006 and samples collected in February and March 2008 were for wells north of the source area; increases in chlorobenzene concentration ranged from 6.9 to 99 μg/L. The highest concentrations of chlorobenzene were near or outside the northern site boundary, indicating chlorobenzene may have moved north away from the source area; however, no monitor well clusters are on the northern side of the Pennsylvania Turnpike, which is about 190 feet north of the source area. A much larger area was affected by chlorobenzene than benzene. Chlorobenzene concentrations decreased in the source area and increased at and beyond the site boundary. Water from four wells in and northeast of the source area sampled in 2008 exceeded the 5.06 μg/L ARAR for 1,1-dichloroethane (1,1-DCA). Increases in 1,1-DCA concentration between pre-shutdown samples collected in July 2006 and samples collected in February 2008 ranged from 0.4 to 20 μg/L. Water from two wells in the source area sampled in 2008 exceeded the 175 μg/L ARAR for total xylene. The 1,1-DCA and xylene plumes appear to extend in an east-northeast direction from the source area. Large drawdowns in the Upper Merion Reservoir during droughts in 1998 and 2001 affected water levels in the Chester Valley and at the Henderson Road Site, except for well HR-17-170. After the drought of 2001, water levels in the Chester Valley showed a protracted recovery lasting from September 2001 until June 2005 (46 months). Water-level data were evaluated temporally for 1997– 2008 and spatially for (1) June 16, 2003, when the extraction wells were pumping at the full rate prior to the start of the June 2003 shutdown test; (2) July 10, 2006, during the period of reduced pumping after the June 2003 shutdown test; and (3) February 25–29, 2008, when the extraction wells were not pumping. Except for well HR-5-195, wells were categorized as shallow, intermediate-depth, and deep wells. The potentiometric surface for shallow wells did not appear to be affected by pumping of the extraction wells. The general direction of ground-water flow was to the north. The potentiometric surface for intermediate-depth wells showed a cone of depression when the extraction wells were pumping at the full rate but did not show a cone of depression when the extraction wells were pumping at the reduced rate. The ground-water-flow direction was toward the north and northeast, similar to that when the extraction wells were pumping. Water-level data were available for only four on-site deep wells when the extraction wells were pumping. The available water-level data showed a flat hydraulic gradient. When the wells were pumping at the full rate, the ground-water-flow direction was to the Henderson Road Site from the northwest; when the wells were pumping at the reduced rate, the groundwater-flow direction was reversed, and flow was away from Evaluation of Water-Chemistry and Water-Level Data at the Henderson Road Superfund Site, Upper Merion Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, 1991–2008 By Ronald A. Sloto 2 Evaluation of Water-Chemistry and Water-Level Data at the Henderson Road Superfund Site the Henderson Road Site to the northwest. When the extraction wells were not pumping, the ground-water-flow direction was away from the Henderson Road Site toward the north and northeast. Benzene concentrations measured in water samples from shallow wells in February and March 2008 were above the ARAR only in the source area. Benzene concentrations measured in water samples from intermediate-depth wells were above the ARAR in the source area and beyond the northern site boundary. Benzene concentrations measured in water samples from deep wells were above the ARAR in the source area and at and beyond the northern site boundary. Benzene appears to have moved to the north away from the source area in the intermediate and deep zones. Chlorobenzene concentrations measured in water samples from shallow wells collected in February and March 2008 were above the ARAR beyond the northern site boundary northwest of the source area. Chlorobenzene concentrations measured in water samples from intermediate-depth wells were above the ARAR in the source area and beyond the northern site boundary northwest of the source area. Chlorobenzene concentrations measured in water samples from deep wells collected in February and March 2008 were above the ARAR at and beyond the northern site boundary. Chlorobenzene appears to have moved to the north away from the source area in the shallow, intermediate, and deep zones. Off-site wells were drilled to monitor the possible movement of chemicals of concern from the Henderson Road Site. Concentrations of benzene and chlorobenzene above the ARARs were measured in water samples from well cluster HR-7 at the northern site boundary and well cluster HR-6 beyond the northern site boundary on the southern side of the Pennsylvania Turnpike. No off-site monitor wells are located directly north of these well clusters on the northern side of the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Potentiometric-surface maps indicate the direction of ground-water flow from these well clusters is to the north. Additional monitor well clusters north of well clusters HR-6 and HR-7 on the northern side of the Pennsylvania Turnpike could help determine how far benzene or chlorobenzene have moved offsite and could be used to better define ground-water-flow directions north of the site. Introduction The Henderson Road Superfund Site, herein referred to as the Henderson Road Site, occupies approximately 7 acres in Upper Merion Township, Montgomery County, Pa. (fig. 1). Between December 1974 and March 1977, an on-site well (the injection well) was used to dispose of liquid industrial waste containing organic contaminants. In addition, an on-site landfill received industrial and municipal wastes. The site was listed on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) National Priorities List on September 21, 1984. A ground-water treatment plant was constructed and began operation in September 1991. The treatment plant utilized bioremediation to reduce organic contaminant levels and carbon adsorption to remove residual contaminants before the treated water was discharged to an adjacent intermittent stream. Initially, five ground-water extraction wells pumped contaminated ground water to the treatment plant. Several shutdown-rebound tests were conducted on the site. The objective of a shutdown-rebound test is to determine whether chemical concentrations would increase or be stable in the absence of pumping. For a given test, the extraction wells are turned off, and water samples are collected from selected monitor wells at regular intervals before and during cessation of pumping to monitor for changes in chemical concentrations. A long-term shutdown-rebound test began on July 17, 2006. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) conducted this study for the USEPA in support of this extended shutdownrebound test to determine the effects of shutting down the extraction wells on the concentrations of selected contaminants and on water levels. All chemical and most water-level data used for this study were collected and furnished by RT Environmental Services, Inc., a contractor for the responsible parties at the Henderson Road Site. RT Environmental Services, Inc. has worked at the site since 1989. They designed and implemented the site-remediation system and operate the treatment plant. Shutdown-Rebound Tests In September 1991, the ground-water treatment plant began operation. Initially, five ground-water extraction wells (B-1, IW, HR-3-255, HR-3-295, and RE-205) pumped contaminated ground water to the treatment plant. Wells HR-24-476 and HR-26-457 were later added as extraction wells, and wells B-1 and HR-24-476 were discontinued as extraction wells. Several shutdown-rebound tests were conducted to evaluate the effect of shutting down the extraction wells on chemical concentrations. Short tests (1 to 3 weeks in duration) were conducted in June 1995, April 1997, and April 1999. A longer, 5.5-month test was conducted from June 30 to December 12, 2003; this test is referred to as the 2003 shutdown test in this report. Following this test, the pumping rate for the extraction wells was reduced. A second, long-term shutdownrebound test was started on July 17, 2006; this test is called the 2006–08 shutdown test in this report. The time lin


Water-Resources Investigations Report | 1996

HYSEP: A Computer Program for Streamflow Hydrograph Separation and Analysis

Ronald A. Sloto; Michele Y. Crouse


Scientific Investigations Report | 2006

Arsenic, Boron, and Fluoride Concentrations in Ground Water in and Near Diabase Intrusions, Newark Basin, Southeastern Pennsylvania

Lisa A. Senior; Ronald A. Sloto


Scientific Investigations Report | 2013

Baseline groundwater quality from 20 domestic wells in Sullivan County, Pennsylvania, 2012

Ronald A. Sloto


Water-Resources Investigations Report | 1998

Radon in the ground water of Chester County, Pennsylvania

Ronald A. Sloto; Lisa A. Senior


Water-Resources Investigations Report | 1980

Development of a digital model of ground-water flow in deeply weathered crystalline rock, Chester County, Pennsylvania

Laurence J. McGreevy; Ronald A. Sloto


Water-Resources Investigations Report | 1998

Results of borehole geophysical logging and hydraulic tests conducted in Area D supply wells, former U.S. Naval Air Warfare Center, Warminster, Pennsylvania

Ronald A. Sloto; Kevin E. Grazul


Water-Resources Investigations Report | 1997

Hydrogeology and water quality of the West Valley Creek Basin, Chester County, Pennsylvania

Lisa A. Senior; Ronald A. Sloto; Andrew G. Reif


Scientific Investigations Report | 2011

Distribution of trace metals at Hopewell Furnace National Historic Site, Berks and Chester Counties, Pennsylvania

Ronald A. Sloto; Andrew G. Reif


Scientific Investigations Report | 2010

Changes in Groundwater Flow and Volatile Organic Compound Concentrations at the Fischer and Porter Superfund Site, Warminster Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, 1993-2009

Ronald A. Sloto

Collaboration


Dive into the Ronald A. Sloto's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa A. Senior

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel J. Goode

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Randall W. Conger

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew G. Reif

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles A. Cravotta

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge