Ronald Byrd
Louisiana State University in Shreveport
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ronald Byrd.
Sports Biomechanics | 2003
Ronald Byrd; Kyle Pierce; Lee Rielly; Jenny Brady
Abstract Prestigious professional organisations have questioned the efficacy of resistive training by children or have often neglected to address weightlifting in their position papers on resistive training for children. The purpose of this paper was to address the deficit in data regarding the efficacy of training children for weightlifting and to report data regarding to safety in this population. Eleven subjects (3 female, 8 male) who had trained at the USA Weightlifting Development Centre in Shreveport Louisiana for a minimum of 22 months (mean = 28.8; SD ±4.4) served as subjects for this study. Means for the pool of subjects subjected to t‐test to compare data obtained at each subjects initial competition with that obtained at the individuals most recent competition revealed significant positive changes in body weight, snatch weight, clean and jerk weight, and total weight lifted. The latter three were significant both in absolute weight and in weight lifted per kg of body weight. Total weight lifted at competitions plotted separately for boys and for girls across time indicated an apparently steeper slope of improvement for boys. The latter were not tested for significance because of the small sample sizes. The lack of injury in training and in 534 competitive lifts was discussed. None required medical attention or loss of training time. It was concluded that there can be no doubt regarding the efficacy of weightlifting as carried out at the USA Weightlifting Development Centre. The importance of proper application of scientific theory of conditioning in a conservative manner for this population was emphasised.Prestigious professional organisations have questioned the efficacy of resistive training by children or have often neglected to address weightlifting in their position papers on resistive training for children. The purpose of this paper was to address the deficit in data regarding the efficacy of training children for weightlifting and to report data regarding to safety in this population. Eleven subjects (3 female, 8 male) who had trained at the USA Weightlifting Development Centre in Shreveport Louisiana for a minimum of 22 months (mean = 28.8; SD +/- 4.4) served as subjects for this study. Means for the pool of subjects subjected to t-test to compare data obtained at each subjects initial competition with that obtained at the individuals most recent competition revealed significant positive changes in body weight, snatch weight, clean and jerk weight, and total weight lifted. The latter three were significant both in absolute weight and in weight lifted per kg of body weight. Total weight lifted at competitions plotted separately for boys and for girls across time indicated an apparently steeper slope of improvement for boys. The latter were not tested for significance because of the small sample sizes. The lack of injury in training and in 534 competitive lifts was discussed. None required medical attention or loss of training time. It was concluded that there can be no doubt regarding the efficacy of weightlifting as carried out at the USA Weightlifting Development Centre. The importance of proper application of scientific theory of conditioning in a conservative manner for this population was emphasised.
Sports Biomechanics | 2007
Ronald Byrd; Kyle C. Pierce; Lee Rielly; Jenny Brady
Abstract Prestigious professional organisations have questioned the efficacy of resistive training by children or have often neglected to address weightlifting in their position papers on resistive training for children. The purpose of this paper was to address the deficit in data regarding the efficacy of training children for weightlifting and to report data regarding to safety in this population. Eleven subjects (3 female, 8 male) who had trained at the USA Weightlifting Development Centre in Shreveport Louisiana for a minimum of 22 months (mean = 28.8; SD ±4.4) served as subjects for this study. Means for the pool of subjects subjected to t‐test to compare data obtained at each subjects initial competition with that obtained at the individuals most recent competition revealed significant positive changes in body weight, snatch weight, clean and jerk weight, and total weight lifted. The latter three were significant both in absolute weight and in weight lifted per kg of body weight. Total weight lifted at competitions plotted separately for boys and for girls across time indicated an apparently steeper slope of improvement for boys. The latter were not tested for significance because of the small sample sizes. The lack of injury in training and in 534 competitive lifts was discussed. None required medical attention or loss of training time. It was concluded that there can be no doubt regarding the efficacy of weightlifting as carried out at the USA Weightlifting Development Centre. The importance of proper application of scientific theory of conditioning in a conservative manner for this population was emphasised.Prestigious professional organisations have questioned the efficacy of resistive training by children or have often neglected to address weightlifting in their position papers on resistive training for children. The purpose of this paper was to address the deficit in data regarding the efficacy of training children for weightlifting and to report data regarding to safety in this population. Eleven subjects (3 female, 8 male) who had trained at the USA Weightlifting Development Centre in Shreveport Louisiana for a minimum of 22 months (mean = 28.8; SD +/- 4.4) served as subjects for this study. Means for the pool of subjects subjected to t-test to compare data obtained at each subjects initial competition with that obtained at the individuals most recent competition revealed significant positive changes in body weight, snatch weight, clean and jerk weight, and total weight lifted. The latter three were significant both in absolute weight and in weight lifted per kg of body weight. Total weight lifted at competitions plotted separately for boys and for girls across time indicated an apparently steeper slope of improvement for boys. The latter were not tested for significance because of the small sample sizes. The lack of injury in training and in 534 competitive lifts was discussed. None required medical attention or loss of training time. It was concluded that there can be no doubt regarding the efficacy of weightlifting as carried out at the USA Weightlifting Development Centre. The importance of proper application of scientific theory of conditioning in a conservative manner for this population was emphasised.
Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation | 1991
Douglas Boatwright; Ronald Byrd; Michael Mangum
Twenty college‐age males participated in a weight‐training experiment, three sets of 10 repetitions at 70% one repetition maximum (1 RM) for the squat, to examine the time course relationship between prostaglandin (PG) formation, creatine kinase (CK) activity, and ratings of perceived soreness (RPS). Two groups of 10 each received aspirin (3 g/day) or placebo for 4 consecutive days, starting 1 day prior to workout. There was no significant difference between the groups for CK and RPS during the course of the experiment, but the PG values were significantly different (p < 0.05) between groups at all time points measured. Changes observed in biochemical parameters followed an exponential growth and decay during the period following exercise for all variables. The 24 hour PG level was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the pre‐ and postexercise and 72 hour levels, but not significantly different from the 48 hour level. Ratings of soreness were not significantly different at the 24 and 48 hour intervals, bu...
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | 1988
Harold S. O'bryant; Ronald Byrd; Michael H. Stone
Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness | 1980
Michael H. Stone; Ronald Byrd; Tew J; Wood M
Journal of The American Dietetic Association | 1982
Johnson Cc; Michael H. Stone; Lopez-S A; Hebert Ja; Kilgore Lt; Ronald Byrd
Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness | 1983
Johnson Cc; Michael H. Stone; Ronald Byrd; Lopez-S A
Sports Medicine | 1999
Ronald Byrd; T. Jeff Chandler; Michael S. Conley; Andrew C. Fry; G. Greg Haff; Alex Koch; Fred Hatfield; K. Brett Kirksey; Jeff McBride; Travis McBride; Harvey Newton; Harold S. O'bryant; Michael H. Stone; Kyle Pierce; Steven Scott Plisk; Margaret Ritchie-Stone; Dan Wathen
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | 1987
Danny Blessing; Michael H. Stone; Ronald Byrd; Dennis Wilson; Ralph Rozenek; Dhanarajan Pushparani; Harry Lipner
Perceptual and Motor Skills | 1990
Michael Sylva; Ronald Byrd; Michael Mangum