Ronald H. M. A. Bartels

Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: Part 1.

OBJECTIVE:The main objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of participants treated by simple decompression (SD) of the ulnar nerve versus anterior subcutaneous transposition (AST). METHODS:A prospective randomized controlled study was performed. Three hundred forty participants were referred to our institution between March 1999 and July 2002. One hundred fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized into two surgical groups: 75 were assigned to SD, and 77 were assigned to AST. Participants were followed for 1 year after surgery. The main outcome measure was clinical outcome 1 year after surgery. RESULTS:An excellent or good result was obtained in 49 of 75 participants who underwent SD and in 54 of 77 participants undergoing AST. The difference was not statistically significant. However, the complication rate was statistically lower in the SD group (9.6%) compared with the AST group (31.1%) (risk ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.14–0.69). Duration of symptoms, (sub)luxation of the ulnar nerve, and severity of the complaints did not influence outcome. CONCLUSION:Surgery for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is effective. The outcomes of SD and AST are equivalent, except for the complication rate. Because the intervention is simpler and associated with fewer complications, SD is advised, even in the presence of (sub)luxation.

Spinal extradural metastasis: review of current treatment options.

Bone metastases, especially to the spine, are frequently encountered during the course of a malignancy. Due to a worldwide increase of cancer incidence and to a longer life expectancy of patients with cancer, a rise in incidence of bone metastases is observed. A brief historical overview is the base of a review of current treatment options. Despite new developments in the surgical and radiotherapeutic fields, as well as in medical oncology, external beam radiotherapy is the cornerstone of the treatment of spinal metastases. In selected cases, surgical treatment is a proven option. Vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty can also be considered. Supportive medical care does not differ from that given for symptomatic lesions to the skeletal system elsewhere in the body. After discussing the treatment options, an algorithm is given.

Tubular Diskectomy vs Conventional Microdiskectomy for Sciatica: A Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT Conventional microdiskectomy is the most frequently performed surgery for patients with sciatica due to lumbar disk herniation. Transmuscular tubular diskectomy has been introduced to increase the rate of recovery, although evidence is lacking of its efficacy. OBJECTIVE To determine outcomes and time to recovery in patients treated with tubular diskectomy compared with conventional microdiskectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS The Sciatica Micro-Endoscopic Diskectomy randomized controlled trial was conducted among 328 patients aged 18 to 70 years who had persistent leg pain (>8 weeks) due to lumbar disk herniations at 7 general hospitals in The Netherlands from January 2005 to October 2006. Patients and observers were blinded during the follow-up, which ended 1 year after final enrollment. INTERVENTIONS Tubular diskectomy (n = 167) vs conventional microdiskectomy (n = 161). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was functional assessment on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) for sciatica (score range: 0-23, with higher scores indicating worse functional status) at 8 weeks and 1 year after randomization. Secondary outcomes were scores on the visual analog scale for leg pain and back pain (score range: 0-100 mm) and patients self-report of recovery (measured on a Likert 7-point scale). RESULTS Based on intention-to-treat analysis, the mean RDQ score during the first year after surgery was 6.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6 to 6.8) for tubular diskectomy and 5.4 (95% CI, 4.6 to 6.2) for conventional microdiskectomy (between-group mean difference, 0.8; 95% CI, -0.2 to 1.7). At 8 weeks after surgery, the RDQ mean (SE) score was 5.8 (0.4) for tubular diskectomy and 4.9 (0.5) for conventional microdiskectomy (between-group mean difference, 0.8; 95% CI, -0.4 to 2.1). At 1 year, the RDQ mean (SE) score was 4.7 (0.5) for tubular diskectomy and 3.4 (0.5) for conventional microdiskectomy (between-group mean difference, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.03 to 2.6) in favor of conventional microdiskectomy. On the visual analog scale, the 1-year between-group mean difference in improvement was 4.2 mm (95% CI, 0.9 to 7.5 mm) for leg pain and 3.5 mm (95% CI, 0.1 to 6.9 mm) for back pain in favor of conventional microdiskectomy. At 1 year, 107 of 156 patients (69%) assigned to tubular diskectomy reported a good recovery vs 120 of 151 patients (79%) assigned to conventional microdiskectomy (odds ratio, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.99]; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS Use of tubular diskectomy compared with conventional microdiskectomy did not result in a statistically significant improvement in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score. Tubular diskectomy resulted in less favorable results for patient self-reported leg pain, back pain, and recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN51857546.

Subsidence of stand-alone cervical carbon fiber cages.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the number of subsidences of inserted cervical carbon fiber cages and to define predictive factors for subsidence. METHODS: All patients treated for a cervical herniated disc and fusion with a cervical carbon fiber cage between January 2002 and December 2003 were retrospectively identified. The radiological examinations were reviewed, and, especially, the presence of subsidence was noted. Possible predictive factors for subsidence were determined before the investigation. RESULTS: In 69 patients, there were 96 cages inserted, of which 29.2% subsided. Of all factors investigated, only smoking seemed to be predictive for subsidence, whereas insertion at C6 to C7 clearly had a higher risk at subsidence. Subsidence was not related to outcome or fusion. CONCLUSION: Although the high number of subsidence of cages has never been described before, clinical outcome and fusion rate is comparable with the literature.

Stem Cell–Based Therapies for Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract Summary: Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in loss of nervous tissue and consequently loss of motor and sensory function. There is no treatment available that restores the injury-induced loss of function to a degree that an independent life can be guaranteed. Transplantation of stem cells or progenitors may support spinal cord repair. Stem cells are characterized by self-renewal and their ability to become any cell in an organism. Promising results have been obtained in experimental models of SCI. Stem cells can be directed to differentiate into neurons or glia in vitro, which can be used for replacement of neural cells lost after SCI. Neuroprotective and axon regeneration-promoting effects have also been credited to transplanted stem cells. There are still issues related to stem cell transplantation that need to be resolved, including ethical concerns. This paper reviews the current status of stem cell application for spinal cord repair.

Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review of the literature

The study design includes a systematic literature review. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of transforaminal endoscopic surgery and to compare this with open microdiscectomy in patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniations. Transforaminal endoscopic techniques for patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniations have become increasingly popular. The literature has not yet been systematically reviewed. A comprehensive systematic literature search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed up to May 2008. Two reviewers independently checked all retrieved titles and abstracts and relevant full text articles for inclusion criteria. Included articles were assessed for quality and outcomes were extracted by the two reviewers independently. One randomized controlled trial, 7 non-randomized controlled trials and 31 observational studies were identified. Studies were heterogeneous regarding patient selection, indications, operation techniques, follow-up period and outcome measures and the methodological quality of these studies was poor. The eight trials did not find any statistically significant differences in leg pain reduction between the transforaminal endoscopic surgery group (89%) and the open microdiscectomy group (87%); overall improvement (84 vs. 78%), re-operation rate (6.8 vs. 4.7%) and complication rate (1.5 vs. 1%), respectively. In conclusion, current evidence on the effectiveness of transforaminal endoscopic surgery is poor and does not provide valid information to either support or refute using this type of surgery in patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniations. High-quality randomized controlled trials with sufficiently large sample sizes are direly needed to evaluate if transforaminal endoscopic surgery is more effective than open microdiscectomy.

Use of a novel absorbable hydrogel for augmentation of dural repair: results of a preliminary clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and performance of a synthetic dural sealant as an adjunct to standard surgical dural repair techniques to prevent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. METHODS: This study was designed as a prospective, nonrandomized, single-center clinical trial. The dural sealant is a synthetic absorbable hydrogel. Consecutive series of patients scheduled for elective cranial and intradural spinal surgery were included until a total of 50 applications were achieved. It was used primarily as an adjunct to ensure watertight dural closure. The end point was defined as no leak with the Valsalva maneuver after dural sealant application. The patients were followed up for 3 months after surgery to check for CSF leakage, standard laboratory and neurological examinations, and possible adverse advents. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients, 46 were included and treated with the dural sealant because of spontaneous leak (n = 34; 69%) or leak after the Valsalva maneuver (n = 12; 25%). There was no leak in the other patients (n = 3; 6%). After application of the dural sealant, there was no leak in all 46 patients (100%). Of the 46 patients included, there was one case of overt CSF leak. One patient had a pseudomeningocele. There were no adverse events other than those related to the disease or to the surgical procedure itself. CONCLUSION: The dural sealant, a synthetic absorbable hydrogel, is a useful adjunct to achieve watertight dural closure. Application resulted in 100% closure of intraoperative CSF leaks. There are no evident adverse effects.

Endoscope-assisted Supraorbital Craniotomy for Lesions of the Interpeduncular Fossa

OBJECTIVE The supraorbital approach is well accepted for lesions in the anterior fossa, the sellar region, and the anterior circle of Willis. However, the usefulness of this approach has not yet been elucidated for lesions in the interpeduncular fossa. The technique of an endoscope-assisted, ipsi- and contralateral supraorbital approach to lesions within the interpeduncular fossa is described, and the initial results are reported. METHODS A small supraorbital craniotomy, using an eyebrow incision, was performed in each of seven patients who were operated on for different types of lesions in the interpeduncular fossa, including a neuromuscular choristoma of the oculomotor nerve, a retrosellar epidermoid tumor, and five aneurysms (two of the basilar artery tip, two at the offspring of the superior cerebellar artery, and one fusiform arterial widening of the basilar artery apex). The surgical approach, its indications and limitations, and the additional value of an endoscope are outlined. RESULTS All lesions could be easily reached and well visualized through this approach by using an endoscope as an adjunct to the operating microscope. The saccular aneurysms all could be clipped successfully, the fusiform widening was wrapped, the epidermoid tumor was removed completely, and the choristoma was removed only partially because of brain stem invasion. The patient with the neuromuscular choristoma had persistent diabetes insipidus postoperatively, most probably caused by stretching the pituitary stalk with the endoscope. The patient with the epidermoid tumor showed a postoperative transient partial oculomotor nerve paresis at the side of the approach. The cosmetic results of the eyebrow incisions for this approach were excellent in all patients. CONCLUSION Lesions in the interpeduncular fossa can be effectively treated using a supraorbital approach, which can be ipsi- or contralateral to the side of the lesion, depending on the exact location of the lesion. The use of an endoscope is essential to visualize these lesions that lie in the shadow of the sellar and parasellar anatomic structures. The major advantage over other approaches are a nearly perpendicular surgical route (although the distance is longer, which is, on the other hand, not a disadvantage), a minimized amount of dissection and brain retraction by using an endoscope through anatomic gateways, and a small surgical incision with excellent cosmetic results.

Risk factors for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow: a case control study.

SummaryBackground. Ulnar nerve compression at the elbow is frequently encountered as the second most common compression neuropathy in the arm. As dexterity may be severely affected, the disease entity can seriously interfere with daily life and work. However, epidemiological research considering the risk factors is rarely performed.This study intended to investigate whether potential risk factors based on historical belief contribute to the development of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. Method. A hospital based case control study was performed of patients that underwent surgical treatment for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow at the neurosurgical department from June 2004 until June 2005. Controls were those patients treated for a cervical or lumbar herniated disc.The main outcome measure was the presence of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow proven clinically, and electrodiagnostically. Results. 110 patients with ulnar nerve lesions and 192 controls were identified. Smoking, education level and related working experience were identified as risk factors. Conversely, gender, BMI, alcohol consumption, trauma to the elbow, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension are not risk factors for the development of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. Conclusion. Risk factors are clearly defined. In the past many factors have been described, but mostly in surgical series. This study concludes that gender, previous fracture of the elbow and BMI are not predictive factors for ulnar entrapment neuropathy. However, education and working experience are closely correlated with this entity.

History of the surgical treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.

OBJECTIVESurgery to achieve ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow has been performed for nearly 2 centuries. Several methods have been developed, some of which have been abandoned. Historical insight improves understanding of current techniques and provides the basis for the development of new methods. Which treatment method is best is the topic of ongoing debate. METHODSThe literature was reviewed using the MEDLINE database. Standard textbooks and retrieved articles were checked for missing references. For older articles, the bibliographies of books and theses were consulted. When I was unsuccessful in finding information in standard biographies of authors of milestone publications, I contacted the hospitals or institutions in which these individuals worked or are currently working. RESULTSA systematic chronological overview of the surgical treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow is presented, with special attention to people who described a treatment method for the first time. CONCLUSIONThis article is the first in the literature to provide information about and photographs of nearly all of the people who were important in the development of the surgical treatment of compression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow.