Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ronald H. Shapiro is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ronald H. Shapiro.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009

A Dose–Volume Analysis of Radiation Pneumonitis in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

R. Bryan Barriger; Jeffrey A. Forquer; Jeffrey G. Brabham; David L. Andolino; Ronald H. Shapiro; Mark A. Henderson; Peter A.S. Johnstone; Achilles J. Fakiris

PURPOSE To examine the rates and risk factors of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Dosimetry records for 251 patients with lymph node-negative Stage I-IIB NSCLC and no prior chest radiation therapy (RT) treated with SBRT were reviewed. Patients were coded on the basis of the presence of at least Grade (G) 2 RP using the Common Toxicity Criteria version 2 criteria. Radiation doses, V5, V10, V20, and mean lung dose (MLD) data points were extracted from the dose-volume histogram (DVH). RESULTS Median PTV volume was 48 cc. Median prescribed radiation dose was 60 Gy delivered in three fractions to the 80% isodose line. Median age at treatment was 74 years. Median follow-up was 17 months. RP was reported after treatment of 42 lesions: G1 in 19 (8%), G2 in 17 (7%), G3 in 5 (2%), and G4 in 1 (0.4%). Total lung DVHs were available for 143 patients. For evaluable patients, median MLD, V5, V10, and V20 were 4.1 Gy, 20%, 12%, and 4%, respectively. Median MLDs were 4 Gy and 5 Gy for G0-1 and G2-4 groups, respectively (p = 0.14); median V5 was 20% for G0-1 and 24% for G2-4 (p = 0.70); median V10 was 12% in G0-1 and 16% in G2-4 (p = 0.08), and median V20 was 4% in G0-1 and 6.6% in G2-4 (p = 0.05). G2-4 RP was noted in 4.3% of patients with MLD ≤4 Gy compared with 17.6% of patients with MLD >4 Gy (p = 0.02), and in 4.3% of patients with V20 ≤4% compared with 16.4% of patients with V20 >4% (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Overall rate of G2-4 RP in our population treated with SBRT was 9.4%. Development of symptomatic RP in this series correlated with MLD and V20.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011

Chest Wall Toxicity After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Malignant Lesions of the Lung and Liver

David L. Andolino; Jeffrey A. Forquer; Mark A. Henderson; R.B. Barriger; Ronald H. Shapiro; Jeffrey G. Brabham; Peter A.S. Johnstone; Higinia R. Cardenes; Achilles J. Fakiris

PURPOSE To quantify the frequency of rib fracture and chest wall (CW) pain and identify the dose-volume parameters that predict CW toxicity after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS The records of patients treated with SBRT between 2000 and 2008 were reviewed, and toxicity was scored according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 for pain and rib fracture. Dosimetric data for CW and rib were analyzed and related to the frequency of toxicity. The risks of CW toxicity were then further characterized according to the median effective concentration (EC(50)) dose-response model. RESULTS A total of 347 lesions were treated with a median follow-up of 19 months. Frequency of Grade I and higher CW pain and/or fracture for CW vs. non-CW lesions was 21% vs. 4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). A dose of 50 Gy was the cutoff for maximum dose (Dmax) to CW and rib above which there was a significant increase in the frequency of any grade pain and fracture (p = 0.03 and p = 0.025, respectively). Volume of CW receiving 15 Gy - 40 Gy was highly predictive of toxicity (R(2) > 0.9). According to the EC(50) model, 5 cc and 15 cc of CW receiving 40 Gy predict a 10% and 30% risk of CW toxicity, respectively. CONCLUSION Adequate tumor coverage remains the primary objective when treating lung or liver lesions with SBRT. To minimize toxicity when treating lesions in close proximity to the CW, Dmax of the CW and/or ribs should remain <50 Gy, and <5 cc of CW should receive ≥ 40 Gy.


Free Radical Biology and Medicine | 2011

Inhibition of NF-κB and DNA double-strand break repair by DMAPT sensitizes non-small-cell lung cancers to X-rays.

Neil C. Estabrook; Helen Chin-Sinex; Anthony J. Borgmann; Ryan Dhaemers; Ronald H. Shapiro; David Gilley; Nazmul Huda; Peter A. Crooks; Christopher Sweeney; Marc S. Mendonca

We investigated the efficacy and mechanism of dimethylaminoparthenolide (DMAPT), an NF-κB inhibitor, to sensitize human lung cancer cells to X-ray killing in vitro and in vivo. We tested whether DMAPT increased the effectiveness of single and fractionated X-ray treatment through inhibition of NF-κB and/or DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Treatment with DMAPT decreased plating efficiency, inhibited constitutive and radiation-induced NF-κB binding activity, and enhanced radiation-induced cell killing by dose modification factors of 1.8 and 1.4 in vitro. X-ray fractionation demonstrated that DMAPT inhibited split-dose recovery/repair, and neutral DNA comet assays confirmed that DMAPT altered the fast and slow components of X-ray-induced DNA DSB repair. Knockdown of the NF-κB family member p65 by siRNA increased radiation sensitivity and completely inhibited split-dose recovery in a manner very similar to DMAPT treatment. The data suggest a link between inhibition of NF-κB and inhibition of DSB repair by DMAPT that leads to enhancement of X-ray-induced cell killing in vitro in non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Studies of A549 tumor xenografts in nude mice demonstrated that DMAPT enhanced X-ray-induced tumor growth delay in vivo.


Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2014

ACR appropriateness Criteria® pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma

Stephanie A. Terezakis; Monika L. Metzger; David C. Hodgson; Cindy L. Schwartz; Ranjana H. Advani; Christopher R. Flowers; Andrea K. Ng; Kenneth B. Roberts; Ronald H. Shapiro; Richard B. Wilder; Michael J. Yunes; Louis S. Constine

Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma is a highly curable malignancy and potential long‐term effects of therapy need to be considered in optimizing clinical care. An expert panel was convened to reach consensus on the most appropriate approach to evaluation and treatment of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence‐based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well‐established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. Four clinical variants were developed to assess common clinical scenarios and render recommendations for evaluation and treatment approaches to pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. We provide a summary of the literature as well as numerical ratings with commentary. By combining available data in published literature and expert medical opinion, we present a consensus to the approach for management of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:1305–1312.


Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2011

Urgent radiotherapy is effective in the treatment of metastatic medulloblastoma causing symptomatic brainstem edema

Ronald H. Shapiro; Andrew L. Chang

A 3‐year‐old male who presented with hydrocephalus symptoms was found to have metastatic medulloblastoma with diffuse spinal disease. Thirteen days following surgical resection of his primary tumor, he clinically deteriorated due to worsening brainstem edema. Following intubation, stress‐dose steroids, and mannitol, urgent radiotherapy was initiated to the whole brain and cervical cord. The patient improved clinically with a repeat MRI showing decreased leptomeningeal enhancement in the radiation fields. In the literature, there are no reports of successful urgent radiotherapy in medulloblastoma, but in this instance, it proved to be a viable option. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011; 57: 1077–1080.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2014

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Follow-up of Hodgkin Lymphoma

C Ha; David C. Hodgson; Ranjana H. Advani; Bouthaina S. Dabaja; Sughosh Dhakal; Christopher R. Flowers; Nancy P. Mendenhall; Monika L. Metzger; John P. Plastaras; Kenneth B. Roberts; Ronald H. Shapiro; Sonali M. Smith; Stephanie A. Terezakis; Karen M. Winkfield; Anas Younes; Louis S. Constine

The main objectives of follow-up studies after completion of treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma are detection of recurrence for salvage therapy and monitoring for sequelae of treatment. The focus of the follow-up shifts, with time after treatment, from detection of recurrence to long-term sequelae. A majority of recurrence is detected by history and physical examination. The yield for routine imaging studies and blood tests is low. Although routine surveillance CT scan can detect recurrence not detected by history and physical examination, its benefit in ultimate survival and cost-effectiveness is not well defined. Although PET scan is a useful tool in assessing response to treatment, its routine use for follow-up is not recommended. Long-term sequelae of treatment include secondary malignancy, cardiovascular disease, pneumonitis, reproductive dysfunction, and hypothyroidism. Follow-up strategies for these sequelae need to be individualized, as their risks in general depend on the dose and volume of radiation to these organs, chemotherapy, age at treatment, and predisposing factors for each sequela. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is either lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015

ACR appropriateness Criteria® diffuse large b-cell lymphoma

Bouthaina S. Dabaja; Ranjana H. Advani; David C. Hodgson; Sughosh Dhakal; Christopher R. Flowers; C Ha; Bradford S. Hoppe; Nancy P. Mendenhall; Monika L Metzger; John P. Plastaras; Kenneth B. Roberts; Ronald H. Shapiro; Sonali M. Smith; Stephanie A. Terezakis; Karen M. Winkfield; Anas Younes; Louis S. Constine

The management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma depends on the initial diagnosis including molecular and immunophenotypic characteristics, Ann Arbor staging, and International Prognostic Index (IPI score). Treatment approaches with different chemotherapy regimens used is discussed in detail. The role of radiation as a consolidation is discussed including: (1) the prerituximab randomized trials that challenged the role of radiation, (2) recent prospective studies (UNFOLDER/RICOVER-60), and (3) retrospective studies; the last 2 showed a potential benefit of radiation both for early and advanced stage. The document also discusses the role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography for predicting outcome and potentially guiding therapy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


International Journal of Radiation Biology | 2016

Irradiated human endothelial progenitor cells induce bystander killing in human non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancer cells

William T. Turchan; Ronald H. Shapiro; Garrett V. Sevigny; Helen Chin-Sinex; Benjamin Pruden; Marc S. Mendonca

Abstract Purpose To investigate whether irradiated human endothelial progenitor cells (hEPC) could induce bystander killing in the A549 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells and help explain the improved radiation-induced tumor cures observed in A549 tumor xenografts co-injected with hEPC. Materials and methods We investigated whether co-injection of CBM3 hEPC with A549 NSCLC cells would alter tumor xenograft growth rate or tumor cure after a single dose of 0 or 5 Gy of X-rays. We then utilized dual chamber Transwell dishes, to test whether medium from irradiated CBM3 and CBM4 hEPC would induce bystander cell killing in A549 cells, and as an additional control, in human pancreatic cancer MIA PaCa-2 cells. The CBM3 and CBM4 hEPC were plated into the upper Transwell chamber and the A549 or MIA PaCa-2 cells were plated in the lower Transwell chamber. The top inserts with the CBM3 or CBM4 hEPC cells were subsequently removed, irradiated, and then placed back into the Transwell dish for 3 h to allow for diffusion of any potential bystander factors from the irradiated hEPC in the upper chamber through the permeable membrane to the unirradiated cancer cells in the lower chamber. After the 3 h incubation, the cancer cells were re-plated for clonogenic survival. Results We found that co-injection of CBM3 hEPC with A549 NSCLC cells significantly increased the tumor growth rate compared to A549 cells alone, but paradoxically also increased A549 tumor cure after a single dose of 5 Gy of X-rays (p < 0.05). We hypothesized that irradiated hEPC may be inducing bystander killing in the A549 NSCLC cells in tumor xenografts, thus improving tumor cure. Bystander studies clearly showed that exposure to the medium from irradiated CBM3 and CBM4 hEPC induced significant bystander killing and decreased the surviving fraction of A549 and MIA PaCa-2 cells to 0.46 (46%) ± 0.22 and 0.74 ± 0.07 (74%) respectively (p < 0.005, p < 0.0001). In addition, antibody depletion studies demonstrated that the bystander killing induced in both A549 and MIA PaCa-2 cells was mediated by the cytokines TNF-α and TGF-β (p < 0.05). Conclusions These data provide evidence that irradiated hEPC can induce strong bystander killing in A549 and MIA PaCa-2 human cancer cells and that this bystander killing is mediated by the cytokines TNF-α and TGF-β.


American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hodgkin Lymphoma-Favorable Prognosis Stage I and II

Sughosh Dhakal; Ranjana H. Advani; Leslie Ballas; Bouthaina S. Dabaja; Christopher R. Flowers; Chul S. Ha; Nancy P. Mendenhall; Monika L. Metzger; John P. Plastaras; Kenneth B. Roberts; Ronald H. Shapiro; Sonali M. Smith; Stephanie A. Terezakis; Karen M. Winkfield; Anas Younes; Louis S. Constine

This topic addresses the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with favorable prognosis stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma. In most cases, combined modality therapy (chemotherapy followed by involved site radiation therapy) constitutes the current standard of care. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. By combining the most recent medical literature and expert opinion, this revised guideline can aid clinicians in the appropriate use of combined modality therapy for favorable prognosis stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma. Increasing information about the late effects of treatment has led to attempts to decrease toxicity by using less chemotherapy (decreased duration and/or intensity or different agents) and less radiation therapy (reduced volume and/or dose) while maintaining excellent efficacy.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2018

Histology, Tumor Volume, and Radiation Dose Predict Outcomes in NSCLC Patients After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

K. Shiue; A. Cerra-Franco; Ronald H. Shapiro; Neil C. Estabrook; Edward M. Mannina; Christopher R. Deig; Sandra Althouse; Sheng Liu; Jun Wan; Yong Zang; Namita Agrawal; Pericles Ioannides; Yongmei Liu; Chen Zhang; Colleen DesRosiers; G. Bartlett; Marvene M. Ewing; Mark Langer; Gordon A. Watson; Richard C. Zellars; F.M. Kong; Tim Lautenschlaeger

Introduction: It remains unclear if histology should be independently considered when choosing stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy dose prescriptions for NSCLC. Methods: The study population included 508 patients with 561 lesions between 2000 and 2016, of which 442 patients with 482 lesions had complete dosimetric information. Eligible patients had histologically or clinically diagnosed early‐stage NSCLC and were treated with 3 to 5 fractions. The primary endpoint was in‐field tumor control censored by either death or progression. Involved lobe control was also assessed. Results: At 6.7 years median follow‐up, 3‐year in‐field control, involved lobe control, overall survival, and progression‐free survival rates were 88.1%, 80.0%, 49.4%, and 37.2%, respectively. Gross tumor volume (GTV) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01 per mL, p = 0.0044) and histology (p = 0.0225) were independently associated with involved lobe failure. GTV (HR = 1.013, p = 0.001) and GTV dose (cutoff of 110 Gy, biologically effective dose with &agr;/&bgr; = 10 [BED10], HR = 2.380, p = 0.0084) were independently associated with in‐field failure. For squamous cell carcinomas, lower prescription doses were associated with worse in‐field control (12 Gy × 4 or 10 Gy × 5 versus 18 Gy or 20 Gy × 3: HR = 3.530, p = 0.0447, confirmed by propensity score matching) and was independent of GTV (HR = 1.014 per mL, 95% confidence interval: 1.005–1.022, p = 0.0012). For adenocarcinomas, there were no differences in in‐field control observed using the above dose groupings (p = 0.12 and p = 0.31, respectively). Conclusions: In the absence of level I data, GTV and histology should be considered to personalize radiation dose for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy. We suggest lower prescription doses (i.e., 12 Gy × 4 or 10 G × 5) should be avoided for squamous cell carcinomas if normal tissue tolerances are met.

Collaboration


Dive into the Ronald H. Shapiro's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge