Ronald L. Drengler

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of paclitaxel in combination with biricodar, a novel agent that reverses multidrug resistance conferred by overexpression of both MDR1 and MRP.

PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of administering biricodar (VX-710; Incel, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, MA), an agent that modulates multidrug resistance (MDR) conferred by overexpression of both the multidrug resistance gene product (MDR1) P-glycoprotein and the MDR-associated protein (MRP) in vitro, in combination with paclitaxel. The study also sought to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel that could be administered with biologically relevant concentrations of VX-710 and characterize the toxicologic and pharmacologic profiles of the VX-710/ paclitaxel regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with solid malignancies were initially treated with VX-710 as a 24-hour infusion at doses that ranged from 10 to 120 mg/m2 per hour. After a 2-day washout period, patients were re-treated with VX-710 on an identical dose schedule followed 8 hours later by paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion at doses that ranged from 20 to 80 mg/m2. The pharmacokinetics of both VX-710 and paclitaxel were studied during treatment with VX-710 alone and VX-710 and paclitaxel. Thereafter, patients received VX-710 and paclitaxel every 3 weeks. RESULTS VX-710 alone produced minimal toxicity. The toxicologic profile of the VX-710/paclitaxel regimen was similar to that reported with paclitaxel alone; neutropenia that was noncumulative was the principal dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The MTD levels of VX-710/ paclitaxel were 120 mg/m2 per hour and 60 mg/m2, respectively, in heavily pretreated patients and 120/60 to 80 mg/m2 per hour in less heavily pretreated patients. At these dose levels, VX-710 steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) ranged from 2.68 to 4.89 microg/mL, which exceeded optimal VX-710 concentrations required for MDR reversal in vitro. The pharmacokinetics of VX-710 were dose independent and not influenced by paclitaxel. In contrast, VX-710 reduced paclitaxel clearance. At the two highest dose levels, which consisted of VX-710 120 mg/m2 per hour and paclitaxel 60 and 80 mg/m2, pertinent pharacokinetic determinants of paclitaxel effect were similar to those achieved with paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion at doses of 135 and 175 mg/m2, respectively. CONCLUSION VX-710 alone is associated with minimal toxicity. In combination with paclitaxel, biologically relevant VX-710 plasma concentrations are achieved and sustained for 24 hours, which simulates optimal pharmacologic conditions required for MDR reversal in vitro. The acceptable toxicity profile of the VX-710/ paclitaxel combination and the demonstration that optimal pharmacologic conditions for MDR reversal are achievable support a rationale for further trials of VX710/paclitaxel in patients with malignancies that are associated with de novo or acquired resistance to paclitaxel caused by overexpression of MDR1 and/or MRP.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Trial of Oral Irinotecan Administered Daily for 5 Days Every 3 Weeks in Patients With Solid Tumors

PURPOSE We conducted a phase I dose-escalation trial of orally administered irinotecan (CPT-11) to characterize the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor effects in patients with refractory malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS CPT-11 solution for intravenous (IV) use was mixed with CranGrape juice (Ocean Spray, Lakeville-Middleboro, MA) and administered orally once per day for 5 days every 3 weeks to 28 patients. Starting dosages ranged from 20 to 100 mg/m2/d. RESULTS Grade 4 delayed diarrhea was the DLT at the 80 mg/m2/d dosage in patients younger than 65 years of age and at the 66 mg/m2/d dosage in patients 65 or older. The other most clinically significant toxicity of oral CPT-11 was neutropenia. A linear relationship was found between dose, peak plasma concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for both CPT-11 and SN-38 lactone, implying no saturation in the conversion of irinotecan to SN-38. The mean metabolic ratio ([AUC(SN-38 total) + AUC(SN-38G total)]/AUC(CPT-11 total)) was 0.7 to 0.8, which suggests that oral dosing results in presystemic conversion of CPT-11 to SN-38. An average of 72% of SN-38 was maintained in the lactone form during the first 24 hours after drug administration. One patient with previously treated colorectal cancer and liver metastases who received oral CPT-11 at the 80 mg/m2/d dosage achieved a confirmed partial response. CONCLUSION The MTD and recommended phase II dosage for oral CPT-11 is 66 mg/m2/d in patients younger than 65 years of age and 50 mg/m2/d in patients 65 or older, administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. The DLT of diarrhea is similar to that observed with IV administration of CPT-11. The biologic activity and favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics make oral administration of CPT-11 an attractive option for further clinical development.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Oral Fluoropyrimidine Capecitabine in Combination With Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies

PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of administering the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in combination with paclitaxel, to characterize the principal toxicities of the combination, to recommend doses for subsequent disease-directed studies, and to determine whether significant pharmacokinetic interactions occur between these agents when combined. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-six courses of capecitabine and paclitaxel were administered to 17 patients in a two-stage dose-escalation study. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks, and capecitabine was administered continuously as two divided daily doses. During stage I, capecitabine was escalated to a target dose of 1,657 mg/m(2)/d, whereas the paclitaxel dose was fixed at 135 mg/m(2). In stage II, paclitaxel was increased to a target dose of 175 mg/m(2), and the capecitabine dose was the maximum established in stage I. Pharmacokinetics were characterized for each drug when given alone and concurrently. RESULTS Myelosuppression, predominately neutropenia, was the principal dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Other toxicities included hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, hyperbilirubinemia, skin rash, myalgia, and arthralgia. Two patients treated with capecitabine 1,657 mg/m(2)/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) developed DLTs, whereas none of six patients treated with capecitabine 1,331 mg/m(2)/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) developed DLTs during course 1. Pharmacokinetic studies indicated that capecitabine and paclitaxel did not affect the pharmacokinetic behavior of each other. No major antitumor responses were noted. CONCLUSION Recommended combination doses of continuous capecitabine and paclitaxel are capecitabine 1,331 mg/m(2)/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)/d IV every 3 weeks. Favorable preclinical mechanistic interactions between capecitabine and paclitaxel, as well as an acceptable toxicity profile without clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions, support the performance of disease-directed evaluations of this combination.

Phase I and Pharmacologic Study of the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor SU101 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical feasibility and pharmacologic behavior of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU101, administered on a prolonged, intermittent dosing schedule to patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-six patients were treated with SU101 doses ranging from 15 to 443 mg/m(2) as a 24-hour continuous intravenous (IV) infusion weekly for 4 weeks, repeated every 6 weeks. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed to characterize the disposition of SU101 and its major active metabolite, SU0020. Immunohistochemical staining of PDGF-alpha and -beta receptors was performed on malignant tumor specimens obtained at diagnosis. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were treated with 52 courses (187 infusions) of SU101. The most common toxicities were mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, and fever. Two patients experienced one episode each of grade 3 neutropenia at the 333 and 443 mg/m(2) dose levels. Dose escalation of SU101 above 443 mg/m(2)/wk was precluded by the total volume of infusate required, 2.5 to 3.0 L. Individual plasma SU101 and SU0020 concentrations were described by a one-compartment model that incorporates both first-order formation and elimination of SU0020. SU101 was rapidly converted to SU0020, which exhibited a long elimination half-life averaging 19 +/- 12 days. At the 443 mg/m(2)/wk dose level, trough plasma SU0020 concentrations during weeks 2 and 4 ranged from 54 to 522 micromol/L. Immunohistochemical studies revealed PDGF-alpha and -beta receptor staining in the majority (15 of 19) of malignant neoplasms. CONCLUSION SU101 was well tolerated as a 24-hour continuous IV infusion at doses of up to 443 mg/m(2)/wk for 4 consecutive weeks every 6 weeks. Although further dose escalation was precluded by infusate volume constraints, this SU101 dose schedule resulted in the achievement and maintenance of substantial plasma concentrations of the major metabolite, SU0020, for the entire treatment period.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Irofulven, a Novel Mushroom-Derived Cytotoxin, Administered for Five Consecutive Days Every Four Weeks in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies

PURPOSE To evaluate the toxicity and pharmacologic behavior of the novel mushroom-derived cytotoxin irofulven administered as a 5-minute intravenous (IV) infusion daily for 5 days every 4 weeks to patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase I trial, 46 patients were treated with irofulven doses ranging from 1.0 to 17.69 mg/m(2) as a 5-minute IV infusion (two patients received a 1-hour infusion) daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. The modified continual reassessment method was used for dose escalation. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on days 1 and 5 to characterize the plasma disposition of irofulven. RESULTS Forty-six patients were treated with 92 courses of irofulven. The dose-limiting toxicities on this schedule were myelosuppression and renal dysfunction. At the 14.15-mg/m(2) dose level, renal dysfunction resembling renal tubular acidosis occurred in four of 10 patients and was ameliorated by prophylactic IV hydration. The 17.69-mg/m(2) dose level was not tolerated because of grade 4 neutropenia and renal toxicity, whereas the 14.15-mg/m(2) dose level was not tolerable with repetitive dosing because of persistent thrombocytopenia. Other common toxicities included mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, facial erythema, and fatigue. One partial response occurred in a patient with advanced, refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer lasting 7 months. Pharmacokinetic studies of irofulven revealed dose-proportional increases in both maximum plasma concentrations and area under the concentration-time curve, while the agent exhibited a rapid elimination half-life of 2 to 10 minutes. CONCLUSION Given the results of this study, the recommended dose of irofulven is 10.64 mg/m(2) as a 5-minute IV infusion daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. The preliminary antitumor activity documented in a patient with advanced pancreatic cancer and the striking preclinical antitumor effects of irofulven observed on intermittent dosing schedules support further disease-directed evaluations of this agent on the schedule evaluated in this study.

DX-8951f, a Hexacyclic Camptothecin Analog, on a Daily-Times-Five Schedule: A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies

PURPOSE To assess the feasibility of administering DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate), a water-soluble, camptothecin analog, as a 30-minute intravenous infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks, determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of DX-8951f, and seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of DX-8951f. After three patients were treated at the first dose level, doses were to be escalated in increments of 100%, using a single patient at each dose level unless moderate toxicity was observed. The MTD, defined as the highest dose level at which the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity did not exceed 20%, was calculated separately for minimally pretreated (MP) and heavily pretreated (HP) patients. The PK and excretory profiles of DX-8951, the anhydrous form of DX-8951f, were also characterized. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were treated with 130 courses of DX-8951f at six dose levels ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 mg/m(2)/d. Brief, noncumulative neutropenia was the most common toxicity observed. Severe myelosuppression (neutropenia that was protracted and/or associated with fever and/or severe thrombocytopenia) was consistently experienced by HP and MP patients at doses exceeding 0.3 and 0.5 mg/m(2)/d, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea) were also observed, but these effects were rarely severe. Objective antitumor activity included partial responses in one patient each with platinum-resistant extrapulmonary small-cell and fluoropyrimidine- and irinotecan-resistant colorectal carcinoma, and minor responses in patients with prostate, hepatocellular, thymic, primary peritoneal, and irinotecan-resistant colorectal carcinomas. The PKs of total DX-8951 were linear and well fit by a three-compartment model. CONCLUSION The recommended doses for phase II studies of DX-8951f as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks are 0.5 and 0.3 mg/m(2)/d for MP and HP patients, respectively. The characteristics of the myelosuppressive effects of DX-8951f, paucity of severe nonhematologic toxicities, and antitumor activity against a wide range of malignancies warrant broad disease-directed evaluations of DX-8951f on this schedule.

A Randomized Phase I and Pharmacological Trial of Sequences of 1,3-bis(2-Chloroethyl)-1-Nitrosourea and Temozolomide in Patients with Advanced Solid Neoplasms

Purpose: O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGAT) is modulated by methylating agents, which, in turn, abrogates nitrosourea resistance in preclinical studies. The feasibility of administering various sequences of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) and temozolomide (TEM) in patients with advanced solid neoplasms was evaluated in this Phase I and pharmacological study to assess this premise in the clinical setting. The study also sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) levels of BCNU and TEM as a function of Seq, to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of TEM administered both before and after BCNU, assess AGAT fluctuations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity. Experimental Design: Sixty-three patients were randomized to receive treatment with oral TEM daily on days 1–5 and BCNU administered i.v., either on day 1 before TEM [Sequence (Seq) B→T] or day 5 after TEM (Seq T→B). Treatment was repeated every 6 weeks. Blood sampling for PK studies was performed on both days 1 and 5 of course one. PBMCs were sampled to evaluate major sequence-dependent effects on AGAT levels. Results: Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the principal dose-limiting toxicities of the BCNU/TEM regimen. These effects were more prominent in patients receiving Seq T→B, resulting in a much lower MTD of 80/100 mg/m2/day compared with 150/110 mg/m2/day for Seq B→T. Notable antitumor activity was observed in patients with glioblastoma multiforme, sarcoma, and ovarian carcinoma. No sequence-dependent PK effects were noted to account for sequence-dependent toxicological effects. At the MTD level, AGAT activity in PBMCs decreased 3-fold, on average, and AGAT fluctuations did not appear to be sequence-dependent. Conclusions: The principal toxicities of the BCNU/TEM regimen were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, which were consistent and predictable, albeit sequence-dependent. Seq T→B was substantially more myelosuppressive, resulting in disparate MTDs and dose levels recommended for subsequent disease-directed evaluations (150/110 and 80/100 mg/m2/day for Seq B→T and T→B, respectively). Sequence-dependent differences in TEM PK do not account for this clinically relevant magnitude of sequence-dependent toxicity. The characteristics of the myelosuppressive effects of BCNU/TEM, the paucity of severe nonhematological toxicities, and antitumor activity at tolerable doses warrant disease-directed evaluations on this schedule.

Phase I and Pharmacologic Study of PN401 and Fluorouracil in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies

PURPOSE To assess the feasibility of administering PN401, an oral uridine prodrug, as a rescue agent for the toxic effects of fluorouracil (5-FU), and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of 5-FU when given with PN401, with an 8-hour treatment interval between these agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of 5-FU, given as a rapid intravenous infusion weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. PN401 was administered orally 8 hours after 5-FU administration, to achieve sustained plasma uridine concentrations of at least 50 micromol/L. Initially, patients received 6 g of PN401 orally every 8 hours for eight doses (schedule 1). When dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was consistently noted, patients then received 6 g of PN401 every 2 hours for three doses and every 6 hours thereafter for 15 doses (schedule 2). RESULTS Twenty-three patients received 50 courses of 5-FU and PN401. Among patients on schedule 1, DLT (grade 4 neutropenia complicated by fever and diarrhea) occurred in those receiving 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk. Among patients on schedule 2, 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk was well tolerated, but grade 4, protracted (> 5 days) neutropenia was consistently noted in those treated with higher doses of the drugs. Nonhematologic effects were uncommon and rarely severe. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU, assessed in 12 patients on schedule 2, were nonlinear, with the mean area under the time-versus-concentration curve (AUC) increasing from 298 +/- 44 to 962 +/- 23 micromol/L and mean clearance decreasing from 34 +/- 4 to 15.6 +/- 0.38 L/h/m(2) as the dose of 5-FU was increased from 1,250 to 1,950 mg/m(2)/wk. 5-FU AUCs achieved with 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk for 6 weeks along with the intensified PN401 dose schedule were approximately five-fold higher than those achieved with 5-FU alone. Plasma uridine concentrations increased with each of the three PN401 doses given every 2 hours, and uridine steady-state concentrations were greater than 50 micromol/L. CONCLUSION Treatment with oral PN401 beginning 8 hours after 5-FU administration is well tolerated and results in sustained plasma uridine concentrations above therapeutic-relevant levels. The recommended 5-FU dosage for phase II evaluations is 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks with the intensified PN401 dose schedule (schedule 2). At this dose, systemic exposure to 5-FU as measured by AUC was five-fold higher than that observed after administration of a conventional 5-FU bolus.

Abstract P3-03-05: Establishment and evaluation of ER+ breast cancer models using an optimized methodology for exogenous hormone delivery

Preclinical in vivo models of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer rely on exogenous supplementation of hormones for growth. This requirement leads to animal toxicity and mortality over time, limiting development and drug testing in these types of models. Efficacy of test agents, particularly endocrine therapies, may also be altered in these models due to excessive hormone exposure, highlighting the need to improve methods for the establishment and testing of ER+ breast models. We have developed an alternative method of hormone supplementation in ER+ breast cancer models and optimized this method for testing of endocrine therapies. Using two cell-based breast models, we demonstrated improved breast tumor take and time to tumor volume endpoint while reducing animal toxicity and mortality associated with standard hormone supplementation. Subsequent studies identified the lowest effective dose (LED) of supplement for hormone dependent model growth with a preclinically relevant time to tumor volume endpoint. Activity of endocrine therapies including tamoxifen, letrozole, fulvestrant and exemestane were compared at the standard and LED hormone concentrations. In these studies tamoxifen treatment resulted in tumor regressions which was not appreciably improved using the LED dose of supplement. However letrozole activity was improved in the LED study suggesting hormone supplementation can impact activity of some agents. Using this process we also generated a panel of ER+ patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, including two novel hormone therapy responsive models from chemo-naive or hormone therapy pretreated patients, designated ST986 and ST2177, respectively. This improved method of hormone supplementation diminishes the adverse effects of standard hormone supplementation and provides utility for development of anticancer therapies in ER+ breast models. Citation Format: Wick MJ, Vaught T, Meade J, Gamez L, Farley M, Tolcher AW, Rasco D, Patnaik A, Drengler RL, Rosenthal A, Papadopoulos KP. Establishment and evaluation of ER+ breast cancer models using an optimized methodology for exogenous hormone delivery. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-05.

Abstract C10: Establishment and characterization of melanoma patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model sets: correlation with clinical response and progression using serial biopsy sampling.

Background: Recent FDA approval of B-Raf and Mek inhibitors has improved treatment outcomes for patients with BRAFV600E/K metastatic melanoma. However, most patients receiving these agents progress within a year and are left with limited treatment options. Few validated screening tools exist to evaluate potentially beneficial therapies for these resistant/refractory patients. To address this deficiency we have established patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model sets by collecting serial samples at timepoints when patients demonstrated sensitivity and resistance to B-Raf and Mek inhibitors and characterized each by mutation, receptor and ligand density and drug sensitivity. Methods: Paired, sensitive/insensitive PDX melanoma models from three patients were established in athymic nude mice from primary or metastatic patient tissue. Baseline samples for each paired model were collected from patients who subsequently reported clinical response to a therapy and again once the patient progressed on that therapy. Established models were confirmed by histologic comparative analysis and linked with patient treatment and outcome data. For each model DNA was extracted and subjected to exon sequencing of 207 known oncogenes; growth factor receptor and ligand densities were interrogated using immunohistochemistry and quantitative RNA in situ hybridization. Drug sensitivity studies were performed evaluating and comparing each model following treatment with oral vemurafenib, trametinib or dabrafenib. Study endpoints included tumor volume and time from treatment initiation, with tumor growth inhibition, delay and regression reported at study completion. Results: The B-RafV600E models ST052, ST052B, ST052C and ST052D reported sensitivity or resistance to vemurafenib correlative with clinical response and progression. Trametinib but not vemurafenib was active towards the ST361 B-RafV600R model while the ST361B model was found insensitive to both agents. Trametinib sensitivity to the ST697 and ST697B H-RasQ61K models was correlative with clinical response and progression. Dabrafenib sensitivity was similar to vemurafenib in evaluated models. Expression of HER3, a mechanism of possible adaptive resistance to targeted therapies, but not EGFR or HER2 was reported in all models and was relatively unchanged in serial models sets; heregulin expression was also determined in each model. Conclusion: We have established patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model sets with sensitivity and resistance to B-Raf and Mek inhibitors correlative with clinical response and progression. Receptor and ligand expression was identified and maintained in serial models. Based on these results this panel can serve as a valuable screening tool to evaluate potentially beneficial therapies for patients resistant/refractory to B-Raf and Mek inhibitors. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):C10. Citation Format: Michael J. Wick, Justin Meade, Jennifer Brown, Teresa L. Vaught, Anthony W. Tolcher, Lizette Gamez, Drew Rasco, Amita Patnaik, Ronald Drengler, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos. Establishment and characterization of melanoma patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model sets: correlation with clinical response and progression using serial biopsy sampling. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C10.