Ronald L. Schwartz

Dissociation of sensory-attentional from motor-intentional neglect

OBJECTIVES Spatial neglect may result from disruption of sensory-attentional systems that spatially allocate perceptual resources and the motor-intentional systems that direct exploration and action. Previous studies have suggested that the line bisection task is more sensitive to sensory-attentional disorders and the cancellation task to motor-intentional disorders. A new technique was developed that allows the dissociation of sensory-attentional and motor-intentional deficits in both tasks and thereby allows comparison of these tasks. METHODS Ten patients with right hemispheric injury and hemispatial neglect performed line bisection and cancellation tasks while viewing stimuli on closed circuit TV. Direct view of the exploring hand and the target was precluded; the TV monitor guided performance. The direct condition made the direction of hand movement on the table (workspace) congruent with that on the monitor. Inverting the camera produced the indirect condition wherein the lateral movement in the workspace occurred in the opposite direction on the monitor. RESULTS On the cancellation task, five patients marked targets in the right workspace in the direct condition but the left workspace in the indirect condition, indicating sensory-attentional neglect. However, four other patients cancelled targets only in the right workspace in both conditions, failing to explore the left workspace, suggesting motor-intentional neglect. A patient who performed ambiguously may have elements of both types of neglect. Only two out of five patients designated as sensory-attentional in cancellation tasks showed sensory neglect on line bisection. The other three patients, as well as patients defined as motor-intentional by cancellation performance, exhibited motor-intentional neglect on line bisection. CONCLUSION The designation of sensory-attentional versus motor-intentional neglect therefore, in part, depends on task specific demands.

Crossed apraxia: implications for handedness.

Liepmann posited that right hand preference relates to left hemisphere dominance for learned skilled movements. Limb apraxia, impairment of skilled movement, typically occurs in individuals with left hemisphere (LH) lesions. The occurrence of apraxia in right-handed individuals following right-hemisphere lesions appears to refute Liepmanns hypothesis. We studied the apraxia of a right-handed man, RF, following a right frontal lesion to determine whether his apraxia paralleled the apraxia seen following LH lesions. Results of behavioral testing indicated that, like individuals with apraxia following left frontal lesions, RF was better at gesture recognition than gesture production which was significantly impaired across tasks. Kinematic motion analyses of movement linearity, planarity, and the coupling of temporospatial aspects of movements substantiated the parallel impairments in RF and patients with LH apraxia. The impairment seen in our patient with crossed apraxia provides evidence for the fractionation of systems underlying hand preference and skilled movement.

Spatial Bias Attentional and Intentional Influence in Normal Subjects

Normal subjects often demonstrate a spatial bias on line bisection (LB) and cancellation (CA) tasks.We wanted to learn if horizontal spatial bias found in normal subjects may be dissociable into sensory-attentional (ATT) and motor-intentional (INT) subgroups similar to those described in brain-injured patients with spatial neglect. We studied the influence of ATT and INT factors on the spatial bias observed in normal subjects using a new technique that uncouples the direction of action from the direction of attention. This technique also allowed us to test both LB and CA tasks on the same individuals. Our results show that ATT bias significantly influenced performance on an LB task, whereas performance on a CA task was influenced by biases in both the ATT and INT systems. In addition, the overall bias on these two tasks reflects an interaction between the biases induced by the ATT and INT systems that may be in the same or different directions. NEUROLOGY 1997;48: 234-242

Anosognosia : examining the disconnection hypothesis

OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that anosognosia for hemiparesis results from intrahemispheric disconnection. METHODS Using right carotid barbiturate injection as a model for anosognosia for hemiparesis, systematic attempts were made to modify deficit awareness by providing the left hemisphere with explicit information regarding left upper extremity function. RESULTS Experimental interventions failed to modify deficit awareness in 19 of 32 patients. In those patients who discovered their weakness, attempted movement of the weak limb seems more important than explicit observation of the extremity by the left hemisphere. CONCLUSIONS The results fail to support Geschwind’s disconnection hypothesis for anosognosia for hemiparesis.

Anosognosia for hemiplegia Test of the personal neglect hypothesis

Objective: To test the personal neglect hypothesis of anosognosia for hemiplegia (AHP) using selective anesthesia of the right hemisphere. Background: Although AHP most commonly follows right-hemisphere injury, the mechanism responsible for this hemispheric asymmetry has not been entirely elucidated. Because denial of ownership of parts on the contralesional side of ones body (personal neglect) also more commonly follows right-hemisphere damage, personal neglect might account for AHP. Design/Methods: AHP and personal neglect were assessed in 20 patients during right intracarotid barbiturate infusion. With vision restricted to the central field, patients were randomly presented with either their own hands or those of examiners matched for size, gender, and race. Patients were asked to read numbers placed on the hands to establish that hemianopia did not confound hand recognition. Results: All subjects correctly read the numbers on all trials. Only 4 of 20 subjects misidentified their hands and denied awareness of left hemiplegia. All errors occurred for the left hand, indicating personal neglect. However, the 16 subjects without personal neglect also demonstrated AHP. Conclusion: Because AHP and personal neglect are dissociable, personal neglect cannot completely account for AHP. NEUROLOGY 1995;45: 2195-2199

Mental object rotation in Parkinson's disease.

Deficits in visual-spatial ability can be associated with Parkinsons disease (PD), and there are several possible reasons for these deficits. Dysfunction in frontal-striatal and/or frontal-parietal systems, associated with dopamine deficiency, might disrupt cognitive processes either supporting (e.g., working memory) or subserving visual-spatial computations. The goal of this study was to assess visual-spatial orientation ability in individuals with PD using the Mental Rotations Test (MRT), along with other measures of cognitive function. Non-demented men with PD were significantly less accurate on this test than matched control men. In contrast, women with PD performed similarly to matched control women, but both groups of women did not perform much better than chance. Further, mental rotation accuracy in men correlated with their executive skills involving mental processing and psychomotor speed. In women with PD, however, mental rotation accuracy correlated negatively with verbal memory, indicating that higher mental rotation performance was associated with lower ability in verbal memory. These results indicate that PD is associated with visual-spatial orientation deficits in men. Women with PD and control women both performed poorly on the MRT, possibly reflecting a floor effect. Although men and women with PD appear to engage different cognitive processes in this task, the reason for the sex difference remains to be elucidated.

Testing memory for self-generated items in dementia: method makes a difference.

Objective: To learn how pAD (probable Alzheimer’s disease), PD+ (“Parkinson’s Plus” syndrome), and control subjects remember internally generated material under different conditions. Background: “Self-discovered,” or internally generated knowledge, prized by educators and therapists, can bring about considerable behavioral change. Both parietal-temporal-limbic (pAD) and frontal-subcortical dementia (e.g. PD+) cause dysmemory, but may cause different internal-external memory bias. pAD subjects, confusing internal and external information (confabulation) and reporting internal information during memory testing (intrusions), may be biased to remember internal material. PD+ subjects, impaired at generative tests, may be externally biased. Methods: Ten pAD, 5 PD+, and 10 control subjects generated words in a category without instruction to remember (INR), and took a list-learning test of incidental memory for internally and externally generated words. To test how INR influences memory, subjects then generated and attempted to recall four more words. Results: All three subject groups remembered more internally generated than externally provided words without INR. Recall versus recognition of internally generated words differed by group, with PD+ subjects showing greatest improvement with recognition. The pAD subjects performed worse with INR than without INR, had the most intrusion errors, and, rather than demonstrating a release from proactive inhibition, recalled fewer words outside the category. Groups differed in overall recall/recognition improvement (p = 0.015). Conclusions: Aged subjects preferentially retained internally generated material. However, among demented subjects, memory for internally generated words was influenced by the testing method used. PD+ subjects have poor internal recall, but excellent internal recognition. In pAD, memory for internally generated words may exceed external memory, but only when subjects are not explicitly trying to remember.

Caloric stimulation in neglect: Evaluation of response as a function of neglect type

Contralesional neglect may be induced by either unawareness of contralesional stimuli (attentional neglect, AN) or failure to act in contralesional space (intentional neglect, IN). We examined whether contralesional cold caloric stimulation differentially affects AN versus IN. Patients with left-sided neglect (n = 16) from right-hemisphere lesions performed target cancellation and line bisection tasks. Using a video-based apparatus that reverses the right and left side of stimuli, patients with abnormal cancellation performance were divided into those with AN and those with IN. The 5 subjects with normal cancellation performance but rightward bisection bias were also separated into 2 neglect groups. Subjects performed cancellation or bisection tasks before and immediately after irrigation of the left auditory canal with ice water. Caloric stimulation induced brisk rightward nystagmus in all subjects. Subjects with AN cancelled more left-sided targets after stimulation than those with IN (p = .02). Whereas caloric stimulation significantly shifted bisection error leftward for both IN and AN groups (p < .0001), AN patients exhibited a greater magnitude of shift than the IN patients. While the basis for differential performance remains undefined, the data indicate that caloric stimulation influences AN more than IN.

Emotional conversations in Parkinson’s disease

Objective: To learn how PD influences verbal description of emotional events. Background: Individuals with PD exhibit emotional processing deficits. Emotional experience likely involves several dimensions (e.g., valence, arousal, motor activation) subserved by a distributed modular network involving cortical, limbic, basal ganglia, diencephalic, and mesencephalic regions. Although the neurodegeneration in PD likely affects components in this network, little is known about how PD influences emotional processing. Because PD is associated with activation deficits, one could predict that the discourse of emotional experiences involving high activation would be reduced in patients with PD compared to control subjects. Alternatively, because patients with PD exhibit paradoxical sensitivity to externally evoked motor activation (kinesia paradoxica), it is possible that emotional stimuli may facilitate verbal emotional expression more so in patients with PD than in control subjects. Methods: The authors measured verbal descriptions of personal emotional experiences in subjects with PD and normal controls. Results: Compared with control subjects, individuals with PD showed a relative increase in the number of words spoken and in discourse duration when talking about emotional experiences that are usually associated with high levels of arousal and motor activation. Although the authors did not measure arousal or activation, prior research has shown that, when asked to recall an emotional experience, people will often re-experience the emotion previously experienced during that episode. Conclusions: Recalling emotional episodes induces verbal kinesia paradoxica in patients with PD. Although recall of these emotional episodes may have been associated with increased arousal and activation, the mechanism underlying emotional verbal kinesia paradoxica is unclear.

Conceptual apraxia in probable Alzheimer's disease as demonstrated by the Florida Action Recall Test.

Patients with probable Alzheimers disease (AD) often have difficulties associated with semantic knowledge. Therefore, conceptual apraxia, a defect of action semantics and mechanical knowledge, may be an early sign of this disease. The Florida Action Recall Test (FLART), developed to assess conceptual apraxia, consists of 45 line drawings of objects or scenes. The subject must imagine the proper tool to apply to each pictured object or scene and then pantomime its use. Twelve participants with Alzheimers disease (NINCDS-ADRDA criteria) and 21 age- and education-matched controls were tested. Nine Alzheimers disease participants scored below a 2-standard-deviation cutoff on conceptual accuracy, and the three who scored above the cutoff were beyond a 2-standard-deviation cutoff on completion time. The FLART appears to be a sensitive measure of conceptual apraxia in the early stages of Alzheimers disease.