Ronald Lautner
University of Gothenburg
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ronald Lautner.
Lancet Neurology | 2016
Bob Olsson; Ronald Lautner; Ulf Andreasson; Annika Öhrfelt; Erik Portelius; Maria Bjerke; Mikko Hölttä; Christoff er Rosén; Caroline Olsson; Gabrielle Strobel; Elizabeth Wu; Kelly Dakin; Max Petzold; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg
BACKGROUND Alzheimers disease biomarkers are important for early diagnosis in routine clinical practice and research. Three core CSF biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimers disease (Aβ42, T-tau, and P-tau) have been assessed in numerous studies, and several other Alzheimers disease markers are emerging in the literature. However, there have been no comprehensive meta-analyses of their diagnostic performance. We systematically reviewed the literature for 15 biomarkers in both CSF and blood to assess which of these were most altered in Alzheimers disease. METHODS In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we screened PubMed and Web of Science for articles published between July 1, 1984, and June 30, 2014, about CSF and blood biomarkers reflecting neurodegeneration (T-tau, NFL, NSE, VLP-1, and HFABP), APP metabolism (Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ38, sAPPα, and sAPPβ), tangle pathology (P-tau), blood-brain-barrier function (albumin ratio), and glial activation (YKL-40, MCP-1, and GFAP). Data were taken from cross-sectional cohort studies as well as from baseline measurements in longitudinal studies with clinical follow-up. Articles were excluded if they did not contain a cohort with Alzheimers disease and a control cohort, or a cohort with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimers disease and a stable mild cognitive impairment cohort. Data were extracted by ten authors and checked by two for accuracy. For quality assessment, modified QUADAS criteria were used. Biomarker performance was rated by random-effects meta-analysis based on the ratio between biomarker concentration in patients with Alzheimers disease and controls (fold change) or the ratio between biomarker concentration in those with mild cognitive impariment due to Alzheimers disease and those with stable mild cognitive impairment who had a follow-up time of at least 2 years and no further cognitive decline. FINDINGS Of 4521 records identified from PubMed and 624 from Web of Science, 231 articles comprising 15 699 patients with Alzheimers disease and 13 018 controls were included in this analysis. The core biomarkers differentiated Alzheimers disease from controls with good performance: CSF T-tau (average ratio 2·54, 95% CI 2·44-2·64, p<0·0001), P-tau (1·88, 1·79-1·97, p<0·0001), and Aβ42 (0·56, 0·55-0·58, p<0·0001). Differentiation between cohorts with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimers disease and those with stable mild cognitive impairment was also strong (average ratio 0·67 for CSF Aβ42, 1·72 for P-tau, and 1·76 for T-tau). Furthermore, CSF NFL (2·35, 1·90-2·91, p<0·0001) and plasma T-tau (1·95, 1·12-3·38, p=0·02) had large effect sizes when differentiating between controls and patients with Alzheimers disease, whereas those of CSF NSE, VLP-1, HFABP, and YKL-40 were moderate (average ratios 1·28-1·47). Other assessed biomarkers had only marginal effect sizes or did not differentiate between control and patient samples. INTERPRETATION The core CSF biomarkers of neurodegeneration (T-tau, P-tau, and Aβ42), CSF NFL, and plasma T-tau were strongly associated with Alzheimers disease and the core biomarkers were strongly associated with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimers disease. Emerging CSF biomarkers NSE, VLP-1, HFABP, and YKL-40 were moderately associated with Alzheimers disease, whereas plasma Aβ42 and Aβ40 were not. Due to their consistency, T-tau, P-tau, Aβ42, and NFL in CSF should be used in clinical practice and clinical research. FUNDING Swedish Research Council, Swedish State Support for Clinical Research, Alzheimers Association, Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Torsten Söderberg Foundation, Alzheimer Foundation (Sweden), European Research Council, and Biomedical Research Forum.
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease | 2012
Bob Olsson; Ronald Lautner; Henrik Zetterberg; Katarina Nägga; Kina Höglund; Hans Basun; Peter Annas; Lars Lannfelt; Niels Andreasen; Lennart Minthon; Kaj Blennow; Oskar Hansson
Microglia manage immunosurveillance and mediate inflammation, both suggested to be important in Alzheimers disease (AD). The aim of this study was to investigate if microglial markers could differentiate, firstly between AD and controls, and secondly between stable mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and those progressing to AD and vascular dementia (VaD). Furthermore, we investigated if these markers were sufficiently stable to be used in clinical trials. We quantified YKL-40 and sCD14 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 96 AD patients, 65 healthy controls, and 170 patients with MCI from baseline and over 5.7 years. For the stability analysis, two CSF samples were collected from 52 AD patients with a six-month interval in between. YKL-40, but not sCD14, was significantly elevated in AD compared with healthy controls (p = 0.003). Furthermore, YKL-40 and sCD14 were increased in MCI patients who converted to VaD (p = 0.029 and p = 0.008), but not to AD according to NINCDS-ADRDA. However, when stratified according to CSF levels of tau and Aβ42, YKL-40 was elevated in those with an AD-indicative profile compared with stable MCI with a normal profile (p = 0.037). In addition, YKL-40 and sCD14 were very stable in AD patients with good correlation between time-points (r = 0.94, p = 3.4 × 10-25; r = 0.77, p = 2.0 × 10-11) and the cortical damage marker T-tau. Thus, microglial markers are stable and may be used as safety markers for monitoring CNS inflammation and microglia activation in clinical trials. Moreover, YKL-40 differentiates between AD and controls and between stable MCI to AD and those that convert to AD and VaD.
JAMA Psychiatry | 2014
Ronald Lautner; Sebastian Palmqvist; Niklas Mattsson; Ulf Andreasson; Anders Wallin; Erik Pålsson; Joel Jakobsson; Sanna-Kaisa Herukka; Rikard Owenius; Bob Olsson; Harald Hampel; Dan Rujescu; Michael Ewers; Mikael Landén; Lennart Minthon; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Oskar Hansson
IMPORTANCE Several studies suggest that the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele modulates cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of β-amyloid 42 (Aβ42). Whether this effect is secondary to the association of the APOE ε4 allele with cortical Aβ deposition or whether APOE ε4 directly influences CSF levels of Aβ42 independently of Aβ pathology remains unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the APOE genotype affects the diagnostic accuracy of CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer disease (AD), in particular Aβ42 levels, and whether the association of APOE ε4 with CSF biomarkers depends on cortical Aβ status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We collected data from 4 different centers in Sweden, Finland, and Germany. Cohort A consisted of 1345 individuals aged 23 to 99 years with baseline CSF samples, including 309 with AD, 287 with prodromal AD, 399 with stable mild cognitive impairment, 99 with dementias other than AD, and 251 controls. Cohort B included 105 nondemented younger individuals (aged 20-34 years) with CSF samples available. Cohort C included 118 patients aged 60 to 80 years with mild cognitive symptoms who underwent flutemetamol F 18 ([18F]flumetamol) positron emission tomography amyloid imaging and CSF tap. EXPOSURES Standard care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cerebrospinal fluid levels of Aβ42 and total and phosphorylated tau in relation to the APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 polymorphism in different diagnostic groups and in cases with or without cortical uptake of [18F]flutemetamol. RESULTS The CSF levels of Aβ42 but not total and phosphorylated tau were lower in APOE ε4 carriers compared with noncarriers irrespective of diagnostic group (cohort A). Despite this, CSF levels of Aβ42 differed between participants with AD when compared with controls and those with stable mild cognitive impairment, even when stratifying for APOE genotype (P < .001 to P = .006). Multiple binary logistic regression revealed that CSF levels of Aβ42 and APOE ε4 genotype were independent predictors of AD diagnosis. In cohort B, APOE ε4 carrier status did not influence CSF levels of Aβ42. Moreover, when stratifying for cortical uptake of [18F]flutemetamol in cohort C, APOE ε4 genotype did not influence CSF levels of Aβ42. This result was replicated in a cohort with individuals from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) using carbon 11-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B scanning. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Cerebrospinal fluid levels of Aβ42 are strongly associated with the diagnosis of AD and cortical Aβ accumulation independent of APOE genotype. The clinical cutoff for CSF levels of Aβ42 should be the same for all APOE genotypes.
Journal of Neural Transmission | 2012
Jonny Daborg; Ulf Andreasson; Marcela Pekna; Ronald Lautner; Eric Hanse; Lennart Minthon; Kaj Blennow; Oskar Hansson; Henrik Zetterberg
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is strongly associated with loss of synapses. The complement system has been shown to be involved in synaptic elimination. Several studies point to an association between AD and the complement system. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of complement components 3 and 4 (C3 and C4, respectively), and complement receptor 1 (CR1) with AD in 43 patients with AD plus dementia, 42 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who progressed to AD during follow-up (MCI-AD), 42 patients with stable MCI and 44 controls. Complement levels were also applied in a multivariate model to determine if they provided any added value to the core AD biomarkers Aβ42, T-tau and P-tau. We found elevated CSF levels of C3 and C4 in AD compared with MCI without progression to AD, and elevated CSF levels of CR1 in MCI-AD and AD when these groups were merged. These results provide support for aberrant complement regulation as a part in the AD process, but the changes are not diagnostically useful.
International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease | 2011
Ronald Lautner; Niklas Mattsson; Michael Schöll; Kristin Augutis; Kaj Blennow; Bob Olsson; Henrik Zetterberg
Intensive research over the last decades has provided increasing evidence for neuroinflammation as an integral part in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimers disease (AD). Inflammatory responses in the central nervous system (CNS) are initiated by activated microglia, representing the first line of the innate immune defence of the brain. Therefore, biochemical markers of microglial activation may help us understand the underlying mechanisms of neuroinflammation in AD as well as the double-sided qualities of microglia, namely, neuroprotection and neurotoxicity. In this paper we summarize candidate biomarkers of microglial activation in AD along with a survey of recent neuroimaging techniques.
Advances in Clinical Chemistry | 2014
Henrik Zetterberg; Ronald Lautner; Tobias Skillbäck; Christoffer Rosén; Pashtun Shahim; Niklas Mattsson; Kaj Blennow
Alzheimers disease (AD) is a progressive brain amyloidosis that injures brain regions involved in memory consolidation and other cognitive functions. Neuropathologically, the disease is characterized by accumulation of a 42-amino acid protein called amyloid beta, and N-terminally truncated fragments thereof, in extracellular senile plaques together with intraneuronal inclusions of hyperphosphorylated tau protein in neurofibrillary tangles, and neuronal and axonal degeneration and loss. Clinical chemistry tests for these pathologies have been developed for use on cerebrospinal fluid samples. Here, we review what these markers have taught us on the disease process in AD and how they can be implemented in routine clinical chemistry. We also provide an update on new marker development and ongoing analytical standardization effort.
Molecular Psychiatry | 2014
Ulf Andreasson; Ronald Lautner; Jonathan M. Schott; Niklas Mattsson; Oskar Hansson; Sanna-Kaisa Herukka; Seppo Helisalmi; Michael Ewers; Harald Hampel; Anders Wallin; Lennart Minthon; John Hardy; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg
New research and clinical criteria for Alzheimers disease (AD) have recently been proposed, which include biomarker information on Alzheimers plaque and tangle pathology, or AD-typical structural brain changes, as supporting or essential elements of an AD diagnosis.1, 2, 3 In a large group of patients with both genetic and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker data, we here show that biomarker-assisted diagnosis-making almost doubles the effect size of the association between the ɛ4 variant of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene and AD. We included clinically diagnosed patients with either AD dementia (n=309) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD (n=287), cognitively normal controls (n=251) and patients with MCI who remained stable over at least 2 years (n=399) or developed dementias other than AD (n=99) (Table 1, Supplementary Material). All had APOE ɛ2/ɛ3/ɛ4 genotypes and results on the CSF biomarkers total tau (T-tau), phosphorylated tau (P-tau) and the 42-amino-acid isoform of amyloid-β (Aβ42) determined. These CSF biomarkers reflect the core elements of Alzheimers pathology4 and are strongly associated with AD in cross-sectional as well as longitudinal follow-up studies (Supplementary Material).5, 6 AD dementia and MCI-AD patients were first pooled into one clinical AD group (n=596) and compared with all remaining categories that were designated non-AD (n=749). A positive APOE ɛ4 carrier status (one or two ɛ4 alleles) was overrepresented in the AD group and yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 4.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.52–5.62) for a clinical diagnosis of AD at inclusion or follow-up (Figure 1). This OR is similar to the AlzGene meta-analysis of APOE (3.68, 95% CI 3.30–4.11, www.alzgene.org/meta.asp?geneID=83, November 2012 freeze). Similarly, we tested the association of APOE ɛ4 with AD, comparing the 596 AD patients with the 251 cognitively normal controls, which resulted in an OR of 6.35 (95% CI 4.59–8.80). Figure 1 Odds ratios for a positive APOE ɛ4 carrier status based on (A) clinical diagnosis, comparing patients with clinical AD with dementia at inclusion or follow-up (n=596) versus all other diagnostic groups (n=749), (B) clinical diagnosis, comparing ... Disregarding the clinical diagnoses and subgrouping all subjects into amyloid-positive, defined as CSF Aβ42 <546 ng l−1 (n=779), and amyloid-negative, defined as CSF Aβ42 ⩾546 ng l−1 (n=563) (see Supplementary Material for details on cut-point determination), gave an OR for APOE ɛ4 as high as 6.27 (95% CI 4.93–7.98). Dichotomizing the material according to CSF T-tau or P-tau did not change the ORs as compared with clinical diagnosis only (Figure 1). Even though the OR for the ratio P-tau/Aβ42 (6.50 (95% CI 5.07–8.35)) was slightly higher than for Aβ42 alone, the difference was not statistically significant. We also compared patients, again disregarding the clinical diagnoses, who had a complete CSF biomarker signature indicative of AD, that is, low Aβ42 and both high T-tau and P-tau (n=438, see Supplementary Material for a detailed description of the signature), with subjects with a negative CSF biomarker pattern (n=414). The biomarker diagnosis strengthened the association to APOE ɛ4; the OR increased from 4.45 (95% CI 3.52–5.62) in pure clinical diagnosis to 7.66 (95% CI 5.65–10.39) in patients classified on the basis of biomarker data alone. Finally, ORs were calculated on subjects having both a clinical diagnosis and a concordant complete biomarker profile (n(AD)=324; n(control)=155). This approach resulted in an even stronger association of APOE ɛ4 with AD (OR 10.4, 95% CI 6.65–16.3). Similar effects were seen when comparing non-carriers with ɛ4 heterozygotes and homozygotes across the different diagnostic groups (Figure 1, Supplementary Material). These results have several important implications. First, APOE ɛ4 appears as strongly associated with amyloid pathology as clinical AD. Second, clinical criteria that incorporate biomarker information on Alzheimers pathology give a stronger association with APOE ɛ4 than clinical diagnosis alone. This is compatible with the presumed higher diagnostic accuracy of the revised clinical approach,1, 2, 3 and has also been seen in a series of neuropathologically verified AD cases and controls.7 Third, the approach of combining clinical with biomarker data may increase the power of genetic association studies, as well as the potential to provide insights into the mechanistic pathways through which genetic risk factors may exert their effects.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine | 2013
Karin Nagy; Ina Skagervik; Hayrettin Tumani; Axel Petzold; M. Wick; Hans-Jürgen Kühn; Manfred Uhr; Axel Regeniter; Johannes Brettschneider; Markus Otto; Jörg Kraus; Florian Deisenhammer; Ronald Lautner; Kaj Blennow; Leslie M. Shaw; Henrik Zetterberg; Niklas Mattsson
Abstract Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) has a high mortality and morbidity rate. Early SAH diagnosis allows the early treatment of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm, which improves the prognosis. Diagnostic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses may be performed after a negative computed tomography scan, but the precise analytical methods to be used have been debated. Here, we summarize the scientific evidence for different CSF methods for SAH diagnosis and describe their implementation in different countries. The principle literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus with the search items “cerebrospinal fluid”, “subarachnoid haemorrhage”, and “diagnosis”. CSF analyses for SAH include visual examination, red blood cell counts, spectrophotometry for oxyhaemoglobin or bilirubin determination, CSF cytology, and ferritin measurement. The methods vary in availability and performance. There is a consensus that spectrophotometry has the highest diagnostic performance, but both oxyhaemoglobin and bilirubin determinations are susceptible to important confounding factors. Visual inspection of CSF for xanthochromia is still frequently used for diagnosis of SAH, but it is advised against because spectrophotometry has a superior diagnostic accuracy. A positive finding of CSF bilirubin is a strong indicator of an intracranial bleeding, whereas a positive finding of CSF oxyhaemoglobin may indicate an intracranial bleeding or a traumatic tap. Where spectrophotometry is not available, the combination of CSF cytology for erythrophages or siderophages and ferritin is a promising alternative.
Brain Injury | 2016
Magnus Gren; Pashtun Shahim; Ronald Lautner; David H. Wilson; Ulf Andreasson; Niklas Norgren; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg
Abstract Objective: To determine whether transient hypoxia during breath-hold diving causes neuronal damage or dysfunction or alters amyloid metabolism as measured by certain blood biomarkers. Design: Sixteen divers competing in the national Swedish championship in breath-hold diving and five age-matched healthy control subjects were included. Blood samples were collected at baseline and over a course of 3 days where the divers competed in static apnea (STA), dynamic apnea without fins (DYN1) and dynamic apnea with fins (DYN2). Main outcomes: Biomarkers reflecting brain injury and amyloid metabolism were analysed in serum (S-100β, NFL) and plasma (T-tau, Aβ42) using immunochemical methods. Results: Compared to divers’ baseline, Aβ42 increased after the first event of static apnea (p = 0.0006). T-tau increased (p = 0.001) in STA vs baseline and decreased after one of the dynamic events, DYN2 (p = 0.03). Further, T-tau correlated with the length of the apneic time during STA (ρ = 0.7226, p = 0.004) and during DYN1 (ρ = 0.66, p = 0.01). Conclusion: The findings suggest that transient hypoxia may acutely increase the levels of Aβ42 and T-tau in plasma of healthy adults, further supporting that general hypoxia may cause mild neuronal dysfunction or damage and stimulate Aβ production.
Neurobiology of Aging | 2018
Niklas Mattsson; Oscar Eriksson; Olof Lindberg; Michael Schöll; Björn Lampinen; Markus Nilsson; Philip S. Insel; Ronald Lautner; Olof Strandberg; Danielle van Westen; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Sebastian Palmqvist; Erik Stomrud; Oskar Hansson
Apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 is a major genetic risk factor for Alzheimers disease (AD), but its importance for the clinical and biological heterogeneity in AD is unclear, particularly at the prodromal stage. We analyzed 151 prodromal AD patients (44 APOE ε4-negative and 107 APOE ε4-positive) from the BioFINDER study. We tested cognition, 18F-flutemetamol β-amyloid (Aβ) positron emission tomography, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Aβ, tau and neurodegeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging of white matter pathology and brain structure. Despite having similar cortical Aβ-load and baseline global cognition (mini mental state examination), APOE ε4-negative prodromal AD had more nonamnestic cognitive impairment, higher cerebrospinal fluid levels of Aβ-peptides and neuronal injury biomarkers, more white matter pathology, more cortical atrophy, and faster decline of mini mental state examination, compared to APOE ε4-positive prodromal AD. The absence of APOE ε4 is associated with an atypical phenotype of prodromal AD. This suggests that APOE ε4 may impact both the diagnostics of AD in early stages and potentially also effects of disease-modifying treatments.