Ronald R. Salem
Yale University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ronald R. Salem.
Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2007
Muhammad Wasif Saif; Aymen Elfiky; Ronald R. Salem
Bevacizumab is the first U.S. Food and Drug Association-approved vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agent that greatly increases progression-free and overall survival in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Although bevacizumab is generally well tolerated, some serious adverse events have occurred in some patients in clinical trials, including arterial thromboembolism and gastrointestinal (GI) perforation. GI perforation was first observed in the pivotal phase 3 trial, in which six events occurred in bevacizumab group (1.5%), compared with no events in the control group. Since then, similar rates of GI perforation have been observed in other large trials. Typical presentation was abdominal pain associated with constipation and vomiting. Such events occurred throughout treatment and were not correlated with duration of exposure. No difference in rate of GI perforations was found in patients who did and did not have a baseline history of peptic ulcer disease, diverticulosis, and history of chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, the incidence of GI perforation seemed to be higher in patients with primary tumor intact, recent history of sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, or previous adjuvant radiotherapy, but it is necessary to confirm these preliminary findings by multivariate analyses. The mechanism responsible for causing GI perforation is not known and may be multifactorial. Bevacizumab should be permanently discontinued in patients who develop GI perforation. This article reviews the incidence, presentation, pathogenesis, risk factors, and management of GI perforation in patients with colorectal cancer who are treated with bevacizumab.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2004
Jeffrey H. Lee; Ronald R. Salem; Harry R. Aslanian; Chacho Ms; Mark Topazian
OBJECTIVES:The aim of this study was to assess the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in patients with unexplained common bile duct strictures after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and intraductal tissue sampling.METHODS:Records were reviewed for all subjects undergoing EUS for evaluation of unexplained bile duct strictures at our institution. 40 subjects had either a final histologic diagnosis (24) or no evidence of malignancy after at least 1 yr of follow-up (16).RESULTS:The finding of a pancreatic head mass and/or an irregular bile duct wall had sensitivity for malignancy of 88%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 84%. Bile duct wall thickness ≥3 mm had a sensitivity for malignancy of 79%, specificity of 79%, positive predictive value of 73%, and negative predictive value of 80%. Sensitivity of EUS FNA for malignancy was 47% with specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 50%.CONCLUSIONS:Sonographic features may be more sensitive than EUS FNA for diagnosis of unexplained bile duct strictures and include presence of a pancreatic mass, an irregular bile duct wall, or bile duct wall thickness > 3 mm. EUS FNA cytology is specific but insensitive for diagnosis. EUS improves the diagnosis of otherwise unexplained bile duct strictures.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1997
Bruce G. Haffty; Barbara Ward; Pradip Pathare; Ronald R. Salem; Charles McKhann; Malcolm Beinfield; Diana B. Fischer; Michael Reiss
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was (1) to review systemic therapy practice patterns to assess how information regarding nodal status currently influences systemic therapy decisions, and (2) to review long-term outcome of patients who do not undergo axillary dissection compared with patients who do. METHODS AND MATERIALS For the current practice patterns portion of the study, the records of 292 patients who presented in the past 3 years with invasive breast cancer and underwent conservative surgery were reviewed to determine systemic therapy administered with respect to patient age, primary tumor size, clinical nodal status, and presenting symptoms. For the long-term outcome portion of the study, the records of 955 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent conservative surgery and radiation therapy before December 1989 were reviewed. Patient characteristics and outcome of those patients who underwent axillary dissection (n = 565, 59%) were compared with a cohort of patients treated during the same era who did not undergo axillary dissection (n = 390, 41%). RESULTS For the current practice-patterns cohort, information regarding nodal status appeared to influence adjuvant systemic therapy for those patients less than 50 years of age and for those patients with palpable masses who were older than 50. Patients older than 50 with nonpalpable mammographically detected tumors have a low probability of nodal involvement and information regarding nodal status rarely changed therapy in this group of patients. In the long-term outcome study, there were no significant differences in the rates of distant metastasis, disease-free survival, or overall survival between those patients who underwent lymph node dissection and those who did not. CONCLUSION For selected patients, axillary lymph node dissection appears to have little influence on subsequent management and long-term outcome. These data suggest that it is time to reassess the role of axillary lymph node dissection in patients who undergo conservative surgery and radiation therapy.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2005
Harry Aslanian; Ronald R. Salem; Jeffrey K. Lee; Dana K. Andersen; Marie E. Robert; Mark Topazian
BACKGROUND:Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been compared to intraoperative surgical palpation for diagnosis of vascular invasion by pancreatic cancer. This study compares EUS with vascular resection and histologic evidence of vascular invasion in resected pancreatic masses.METHODS:All patients with solid pancreatic masses who underwent both preoperative EUS and surgery at 1 hospital over a 7 year period were identified. The relationship of pancreatic masses to adjacent vessels was prospectively assessed by EUS. EUS findings were compared to surgical and pathology gold standards. “Vascular adherence” was defined as tumor adherence requiring vascular resection during surgery, and “vascular invasion” as histologic invasion of vessel wall by tumor.RESULTS:30 of 68 patients were resectable. Among these 30, vascular adherence was present in 8, including 18% of patients with an intact echoplane between tumor and adjacent vessels at EUS, 29% of those with loss of echoplane alone, and 50% of those with additional EUS features of vascular involvement. Vascular invasion was present in 4, including 12% of patients with an intact echoplane, 0% of those with loss of echoplane alone, and 33% of those with additional EUS features. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of EUS were 63%, 64%, 43% and 80% for vascular adherence and 50% 58%, 28% and 82% for vascular invasion. NPV rose to 90% for vascular adherence if only the portal confluence vessels were considered.CONCLUSIONS:EUS has poor sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for diagnosis of venous involvement by pancreatic cancer.
Cancer | 2006
Gina G. Chung; Harry H. Yoon; Maciej P. Zerkowski; Sriparna Ghosh; Laurie Thomas; Malini Harigopal; Lori A. Charette; Ronald R. Salem; Robert L. Camp; David L. Rimm; Barbara A. Burtness
Measures of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in pancreatic cancer typically have been qualitative or semiquantitative. The objective of this study was to use a series of algorithms called AQUA that quantitatively assesses protein expression on tissue microarrays (TMAs) to compare in situ expression of VEGF and its primary receptors, VEGF receptor 1 (FLT‐1) and VEGF receptor 1 (FLK‐1), on a pancreatic cancer TMA.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2001
Lawrence Kleinberg; Jonathan Knisely; Richard F. Heitmiller; Marriana Zahurak; Ronald R. Salem; Barbara Burtness; Elizabeth Heath; Arlene A. Forastiere
PURPOSE To assess the long-term survival results after cisplatin, protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil, and concurrent radiotherapy (RT) followed by surgical resection of esophageal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ninety-two patients with esophageal cancer (65 with adenocarcinoma and 27 with squamous cell carcinoma) were treated in two sequential protocols of preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The patients had tumor confined to the esophagus and regional nodes, including celiac nodes for middle and distal lesions. In trial A (1989-1994), 50 patients were treated with 44 Gy RT (2 Gy/d) along with concurrent 5-fluorouracil 300 mg/m(2)/d given by protracted venous infusion on Days 1-30 and cisplatin 26 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5 and 26-30. In trial B (1995-1997, 42 patients), the chemotherapy dosages during RT were reduced to 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2)/d protracted venous infusion and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1-5 and 16-30; three cycles of paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2)and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) were given postoperatively. Surgery generally occurred 4-6 weeks after completion of the planned preoperative therapy. Transhiatal resection was performed whenever possible. RESULTS Of the 92 patients, 86 (93%) underwent surgery (1 refused, 2 died preoperatively, and 3 developed evidence of metastatic disease). Of the 92 patients, 80 (87%) had complete resections with negative margins (3 had positive margins and 3 had distant metastases discovered at surgery). The pathologic complete response rate was 33% (30 of 92). The median follow-up was 63.5 months. The median survival and disease-specific survival for all enrolled patients was 35 and 59 months, respectively. The 5-year survival and disease-specific survival rate was 40% and 49%, respectively. Patients with a pathologic complete response had a 67% survival rate at 5 years (median not reached), and the remainder of patients had a 5-year survival rate of 27% (median 21 months; p <0.001). For 21 patients alive after 5 years (60-121 months), 2 died of their disease and all others were disease free. Eight patients with pathologic Stage I tumor at the time of surgery had survival similar to those with a complete response to preoperative therapy. The median survival for patients with pathologic Stage IIA, IIB, III, and IV disease at the time of surgery was 22, 13.5, 18, and 4.9 months, respectively. The pattern of initial failure was local/regional alone in 6% (5 of 90), local/regional plus distant in 3% (3 of 90), and distant alone in 47% (42 of 90). No differences were noted in survival or response rate between those with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION The promising 5-year survival results and low rate of late cancer-related deaths suggest that these regimens of intensive neoadjuvant therapy may improve the overall cure rate. The pathologic stage after neoadjuvant therapy is an important predictor of survival and may be useful in selecting patients for novel adjuvant therapies. Isolated local failure is uncommon, indicating that efforts to improve the therapeutic outcome should focus on optimizing systemic therapy rather than intensifying the RT. Additional randomized data are needed to assess the benefits of this therapeutic approach fully.
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology | 2000
Sarah H. Poggi; Jennifer M. McNiff; Wen Jen Hwu; Sancar Bayar; Ronald R. Salem
Primary melanoma originating in the gastrointestinal tract is very rare and the majority of these tumors arise in the mucosa of the anus or rectum. A case of solitary colonic melanoma in a 79-year-old man is described with a review of pertinent literature. The surgically excised neoplasm was evaluated by routine histology and immunohistochemistry stains. Pathologic examination of the excised cecal mass revealed an 8 x 5-cm tan-pink mass with a central green-black necrotic area. Histologically, there were solid sheets of S100- and HMB-45-positive pigmented cells extending from the mucosal ulcerated surface through the bowel wall. The patient had no evidence of cutaneous or ocular primary melanoma. He remained free of recurrent disease 5 years after surgical resection of the colonic melanoma. The unique pathologic features and clinical outcome support the diagnosis of primary colonic melanoma in this patient.
Gastroenterology | 1995
Marian Haber; Adrian Reuben; Morton I. Burrell; Patrick Oliverio; Ronald R. Salem; A. Brian West
A case of multiple focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver occurring in a 22-year-old woman with musculoskeletal hemihypertrophy and anomalous vascular supply to the liver is described. The patient had Klippel-Trénaunay-Weber syndrome and abdominal pain and tender massive hepatomegaly. Visceral angiography showed marked dilatation of the celiac axis and both the main trunk and peripheral branches of the hepatic artery. Large abdominal veins drained from the dome of the liver into the hepatic veins. The vascular anomalies were evident on contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Multiple focal nodular hyperplasia was confirmed by laparoscopic liver biopsy. The findings in this patient support the concept that multiple focal nodular hyperplasia characteristically occurs in a syndromic form and is induced by an irregular arterial supply in the liver, with localized hyperfusion that leads to nodular areas of hepatocyte hyperproliferation.
British Journal of Cancer | 2016
Stacey Stein; Edward Samuel James; Yanhong Deng; Xiangyu Cong; Jeremy S. Kortmansky; Jia Li; Carol Staugaard; Doddamane Indukala; Ann Marie Boustani; Vatsal Patel; Charles Cha; Ronald R. Salem; B.W. Chang; Howard S. Hochster; Jill Lacy
Background:Modifications of FOLFIRINOX are widely used despite the absence of prospective data validating efficacy in metastatic disease (metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC)) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We conducted a multicentre phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer to assess the impact of dose attenuation in MPC and efficacy in LAPC.Methods:Patients with untreated MPC or LAPC received modified FOLFIRINOX (irinotecan and bolus 5-fluorouracil reduced by 25%). Adverse events (AEs) were compared with full-dose FOLFIRINOX. Response rate (RR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were determined.Results:In total, 31 and 44 patients with LAPC and MPC were enrolled, respectively. In MPC, efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX was comparable with FOLFIRINOX with RR 35.1%, OS 10.2 months (95% CI 7.65–14.32) and PFS 6.1 months (95% CI 5.19–8.31). In LAPC, efficacy was notable with RR 17.2%, resection rate 41.9%, PFS 17.8 months (95% CI 11.0–23.9) and OS 26.6 months (95% CI 16.7, NA). Neutropenia (P<0.0001), vomiting (P<0.001) and fatigue (P=0.01) were significantly decreased. [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging response did not correlate with PFS or OS.Conclusions:In this first prospective study of modified FOLFIRINOX in MPC and LAPC, we observed decreased AEs compared with historical control patients. In MPC, the efficacy appears comparable with FOLFIRINOX. In LAPC, PFS and OS were prolonged and support the continued use of FOLFIRINOX in this setting.
Annals of Surgery | 2016
Matthew T. McMillan; Sameer Soi; Horacio J. Asbun; Chad G. Ball; Claudio Bassi; Joal D. Beane; Stephen W. Behrman; Adam C. Berger; Mark Bloomston; Mark P. Callery; John D. Christein; Elijah Dixon; Jeffrey A. Drebin; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; William E. Fisher; Zhi Ven Fong; Michael G. House; Steven J. Hughes; Tara S. Kent; John W. Kunstman; Giuseppe Malleo; Benjamin C. Miller; Ronald R. Salem; Kevin C. Soares; Vicente Valero; Christopher L. Wolfgang; Charles M. Vollmer
Objective: To evaluate surgical performance in pancreatoduodenectomy using clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) occurrence as a quality indicator. Background: Accurate assessment of surgeon and institutional performance requires (1) standardized definitions for the outcome of interest and (2) a comprehensive risk-adjustment process to control for differences in patient risk. Methods: This multinational, retrospective study of 4301 pancreatoduodenectomies involved 55 surgeons at 15 institutions. Risk for CR-POPF was assessed using the previously validated Fistula Risk Score, and pancreatic fistulas were stratified by International Study Group criteria. CR-POPF variability was evaluated and hierarchical regression analysis assessed individual surgeon and institutional performance. Results: There was considerable variability in both CR-POPF risk and occurrence. Factors increasing the risk for CR-POPF development included increasing Fistula Risk Score (odds ratio 1.49 per point, P < 0.00001) and octreotide (odds ratio 3.30, P < 0.00001). When adjusting for risk, performance outliers were identified at the surgeon and institutional levels. Of the top 10 surgeons (≥15 cases) for nonrisk-adjusted performance, only 6 remained in this high-performing category following risk adjustment. Conclusions: This analysis of pancreatic fistulas following pancreatoduodenectomy demonstrates considerable variability in both the risk and occurrence of CR-POPF among surgeons and institutions. Disparities in patient risk between providers reinforce the need for comprehensive, risk-adjusted modeling when assessing performance based on procedure-specific complications. Furthermore, beyond inherent patient risk factors, surgical decision-making influences fistula outcomes.