Ronald Schneeweiss

Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.

OBJECTIVES This study examined differences among obstetricians, family physicians, and certified nurse-midwives in the patterns of obstetric care provided to low-risk patients. METHODS For a random sample of Washington State obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians, and certified nurse-midwives, records of a random sample of their low-risk patients beginning care between September 1, 1988, and August 31, 1989, were abstracted. RESULTS Certified nurse-midwives were less likely to use continuous electronic fetal monitoring and had lower rates of labor induction or augmentation than physicians. Certified nurse-midwives also were less likely than physicians to use epidural anesthesia. The cesarean section rate for patients of certified nurse-midwives was 8.8% vs 13.6% for obstetricians and 15.1% for family physicians. Certified nurse-midwives used 12.2% fewer resources. There was little difference between the practice patterns of obstetricians and family physicians. CONCLUSIONS The low-risk patients of certified nurse-midwives in Washington State received fewer obstetrical interventions than similar patients cared for by obstetrician-gynecologists or family physicians. These differences are associated with lower cesarean section rates and less resource use.

Diagnosis Clusters: A New Tool for Analyzing the Content of Ambulatory Medical Care

A clustering method for the analysis of ambulatory morbidity data is presented. This approach reduces spurious variations resulting from idiosyncratic diagnosis labeling and coding habits of physicians and facilitates the analysis of the content of ambulatory medical care through the use of aggregate morbidity data. The clusters provide a tool that allows for the comparison of the content of practice based on different factors such as provider training, practice organization, and patient characteristics. Ninety-two diagnosis clusters were derived using the 1977 and 1978 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). These clusters incorporate 86 per cent of all ambulatory visits to office-based physicians in the contiguous United States. The clusters were constructed based on the consensus of a group of clinicians including both generalists, as well as selected subspecialists representing the spectrum of ambulatory medical practice. The diagnosis clusters presented are compatible with the International Classification of Diseases (ICDA-8 and ICD-9-CM) and the International Classifications of Health Problems in Primary Care (ICHPPC and ICHPPC-2). Several applications demonstrating the utility of the method are presented, and directions for future applications are suggested.

The content of ambulatory medical care in the United States. An interspecialty comparison.

Ambulatory care, accounting for over half a billion visits to physicians per year, is a major component of the health-care system and is the core of primary health care. This study uses data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to describe the most common problems seen in an ambulatory-care setting, to identify the medical specialties that provide the greater part of this care, and to characterize the major specialties in terms of the diagnoses in the patients who constitute their ambulatory practice. Fifteen diagnosis clusters account for 50 per cent of all ambulatory-care visits; only 8 of the 28 specialties account for a substantial amount (more than 25 per cent) of the ambulatory care rendered to patients with any of these 15 diagnoses. General and family physicians, general internists, and general pediatricians account for 65.9 per cent of all outpatient visits to physicians for the 15 most common problems; general and family physicians alone are responsible for more than half this total. The individual specialties differ markedly in the diagnostic and demographic variety of their outpatient workload. These differences have important implications for the training of physicians and the organization of their practices.

The Use of Medical Resources by Residency-trained Family Physicians and General Internists: Is There a Difference?

This study compared the use of medical resources by recently trained family physicians and general internists. Analyses are based on records of 3,737 adult office encounters with 132 family physicians and 2,250 adult office encounters with 102 general internists. General internists are twice as likely as family physicians to order blood tests, blood counts, chest x-rays, and electrocardiograms for their adult patients. Internists also spend more time with patients, and refer and hospitalize them at slightly higher rates. The different practice styles of general internists and family physicians were evident for adult patients of all ages and for patients with essential benign hypertension. The average per visit charge for diagnostic tests ordered during follow-up visits with hypertensive patients was estimated to be

Barriers, strategies, and lessons learned from complementary and alternative medicine curricular initiatives

11.97 for patients seen by general internists and

Head lice treatments and school policies in the US in an era of emerging resistance: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

5.67 for patients seen by family physicians. These findings persisted after controlling for a variety of patient, practice, and physician characteristics.

The Effect of Including Secondary Diagnoses on the Description of the Diagnostic Content of Family Practice

Fifteen U.S. academic programs were the recipients of a National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine R25 Education Grant Program to introduce curricular changes in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in their institutions. The authors describe the lessons learned during the implementation of these CAM education initiatives. Principal investigators identified these lessons along with discovered barriers and strategies, both those traditionally related to medical and nursing education and those unique to CAM education. Many lessons, barriers, and strategies were common across multiple institutions. Most significant among the barriers were issues such as the resistance by faculty; the curriculum being perceived as too full; presenting CAM content in an evidence-based and even-handed way; providing useful, reliable resources; and developing teaching and assessment tools. Strategies included integration into existing curriculum; creating increased visibility of the curriculum; placing efforts into faculty development; cultivating and nurturing leadership at all levels in the organization, including among students, faculty, and administration; providing access to CAM-related databases through libraries; and fostering efforts to maintain sustainability of newly established CAM curricular elements through institutionalization and embedment into overall educational activities. These lessons, along with some detail on barriers and strategies, are reported and summarized here with the goal that they will be of practical use to other institutions embarking on new CAM education initiatives.

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole-Induced Sepsis-like Syndrome in a Patient with AIDS

BackgroundHead lice are a common infection in school-age children worldwide. Several authorities in the US have recommended different treatments and school policies in order to control this disease. Recent concerns of emerging lice resistance worldwide raise the necessity to reassess the current recommendations.ObjectiveTo perform a cost-effectiveness analysis (from the US caregiver perspective) of three head lice treatments commonly used in the US, permethrin 1%, malathion 0.5% and the lice comb, in order to evaluate the cost effectiveness of different treatments in the current era, and to explore the effect of different factors in this analysis.MethodsWe used a decision-tree model to represent the costs and effectiveness of the different treatment strategies. A patient/caregiver perspective was applied, with a time horizon of 2 weeks. Probabilities of treatment success or failure of the three treatments were based on the literature. Effectiveness was measured as the successful eradication of head lice, and costs — including the costs of the treatment, the physician co-pay and the costs of days out of school — were calculated. One-way and multi-way analyses were performed using decision analysis software (Treeage Pro Healthcare 2008).ResultsCombing was dominated by permethrin 1%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of malathion 0.5% versus permethrin 1% was

How Family Physicians Choose An Office Computer System

US161.75 per cure. For caregivers whose willingness to pay is <

The Economic Impact of a Primary Care Clinic-Reply

US161.75 per cure, permethrin 1% is the most cost-effective option. For those with a willingness to pay of ≥