Rondel Albarado

Admission rapid thrombelastography can replace conventional coagulation tests in the emergency department: experience with 1974 consecutive trauma patients.

Objective:Injury and shock lead to alterations in conventional coagulation tests (CCTs). Recently, rapid thrombelastography (r-TEG) has become recognized as a comprehensive assessment of coagulation abnormalities. We have previously shown that admission r-TEG results are available faster than CCTs and predict pulmonary embolism. We hypothesized that r-TEGs more reliably predict blood component transfusion than CCTs. Methods:Consecutive patients admitted between September 2009 and February 2011 who met the highest-level trauma activations were included. All had admission r-TEG and CCTs. We correlated r-TEG values [activated clotting time (ACT), r, k, &agr;, maximal amplitude (MA), LY30] with their corresponding CCTs [prothrombin time (PT)/activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), international normalized ratio (INR), platelet count and fibrinogen] for transfusion requirements. Charges were calculated for each test. Demographics, vital signs, and injury severity were recorded. Results:We studied 1974 major trauma activations. The median injury severity score was 17 [interquartile range 9–26]; 25% were in shock; 28% were transfused; and 6% died within 24 hours. Overall, r-TEG correlated with CCTs. When controlling for age, injury mechanism, weighted-Revised Trauma Score, base excess and hemoglobin, ACT-predicted red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and the &agr;-angle predicted massive RBC transfusion better than PT/aPTT or INR (P < 0.001). The &agr;-angle was superior to fibrinogen for predicting plasma transfusion (P < 0.001); MA was superior to platelet count for predicting platelet transfusion (P < 0.001); and LY-30 (rate of amplitude reduction 30 minutes after the MA is reached) documented fibrinolysis. These correlations improved for transfused, shocked or head injured patients. The charge for r-TEG (

A Clinical Series of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Hemorrhage Control and Resuscitation

317) was similar to the 5 CCTs (

Unique pattern of complications in elderly trauma patients at a Level I trauma center.

286). Conclusions:The r-TEG data was clinically superior to results from 5 CCTs. In addition, r-TEG identified patients with an increased risk of early RBC, plasma and platelet transfusions, and fibrinolysis. Admission CCTs can be replaced with r-TEG.

Damage-control resuscitation increases successful nonoperative management rates and survival after severe blunt liver injury.

BACKGROUND A requirement for improved methods of hemorrhage control and resuscitation along with the translation of endovascular specialty skills has resulted in reappraisal of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for end-stage shock. The objective of this report was to describe implementation of REBOA in civilian trauma centers. METHODS Descriptive case series of REBOA (December 2012 to March 2013) used in scenarios of end-stage hemorrhagic shock at the University of Maryland, R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, and Herman Memorial Hospital, The Texas Trauma Institute, Houston, Texas. RESULTS REBOA was performed by trauma and acute care surgeons for blunt (n = 4) and penetrating (n = 2) mechanisms. Three cases were REBOA in the descending thoracic aorta (Zone I) and three in the infrarenal aorta (Zone III). Mean (SD) systolic blood pressure at the time of REBOA was 59 (27) mm Hg, and mean (SD) base deficit was 13 (5). Arterial access was accomplished using both direct cutdown (n = 3) and percutaneous (n = 3) access to the common femoral artery. REBOA resulted in a mean (SD) increase in blood pressure of 55 (20) mm Hg, and the mean (SD) aortic occlusion time was 18 (34) minutes. There were no REBOA-related complications, and there was no hemorrhage-related mortality. CONCLUSION REBOA is a feasible and effective means of proactive aortic control for patients in end-stage shock from blunt and penetrating mechanisms. With available technology, this method of resuscitation can be performed by trauma and acute care surgeons who have benefited from instruction on a limited endovascular skill set. Future work should be aimed at devices that allow easy, fluoroscopy-free access and studies to define patients most likely to benefit from this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level V.

Technical and financial feasibility of an inferior vena cava filter retrieval program at a level one trauma center.

Background: Trauma centers are caring for increased proportions of elderly patients. Although age and Injury Severity Score are independently associated with mortality, trauma centers were originally designed to care for seriously injured patients without age-specific guidelines. We hypothesized that elderly patients would have different complication patterns than their younger counterparts. Methods: The trauma registry of an American College of Surgeons -verified Level I trauma center was queried for all patients older than 14 years admitted between January 2005 and December 2008. Mechanism, mortality, and complications were evaluated after dividing patients into eight age groups. Results: Of the 15,223 patients, 13% were elderly (≥65), and 86% were injured via a blunt mechanism. Increasing age correlated with fatality (all Injury Severity Scores), end-organ failure, and thromboembolic complications (deep venous thrombosis and coagulopathy). Analysis revealed a significant breakpoint at 45 years of age for mortality, decubitus ulcer, and renal failure (all p values <0.05). Infectious complications (sepsis, wound infection, and abscess) all peaked between 45 years and 65 years and then declined with increasing age. Conclusions: We document that elderly trauma patients suffer the same complications as their younger counterparts, albeit at a different rate. More importantly, we identified a “breakpoint” of increased risk of complications and mortality at greater than 45 years. Although the mechanisms behind these observations remain unknown, understanding their unique patterns may allow appropriate allocation of resources and focus research efforts on interventions that should improve outcomes. Level of Evidence: II.

Management of Cholecystitis in High-Risk Patients

BACKGROUND Nonoperative multidisciplinary management for severe (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Grades IV and V) liver injury has been used for two decades. We have previously shown that Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR) using low-volume, balanced resuscitation improves survival of severely injured trauma patients; however, little attention has been paid to organ-specific outcomes. We wanted to determine if implementation of DCR has improved survival and successful nonoperative management after severe blunt liver injury. METHODS A retrospective study was performed on all adult trauma patients with severe blunt liver injury who were admitted from 2005 to 2011. Patients were divided into pre-DCR (2005–2008) and DCR (2009–2011) groups. Patients who died before leaving the emergency department (ED) were excluded. Outcomes (resuscitation products used, survival, and length of stay) were then compared by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2011, 29,801 adult trauma patients were admitted, and 1,412 (4.7%) experienced blunt liver injury. Of these, 244 (17%) sustained Grade IV and V injuries, with 206 patients surviving to leave the ED. The pre-DCR group (2005–2008) was composed of 108 patients, and the DCR group (2009–2011) had 98 patients. The groups were not different in demographics as well as prehospital and ED vital signs or Injury Severity Score (ISS). No change in operative or interventional radiology techniques occurred in this time frame. The DCR cohort had an increase in successful nonoperative management (from 54% to 74%, p < 0.01) as well as a reduction in initial 24-hour packed red blood cell (median, from 13 U to 6.5 U; p < 0.01), plasma (median, from 13 U to 8 U; p < 0.01), and crystalloid (median, from 5,800 mL to 4,100 mL; p < 0.01) administration. The DCR treatment was associated with improved survival, from 73% to 94% (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION In patients with severe blunt liver injury, DCR was associated with less crystalloid and blood product use, a higher successful nonoperative management rate, and improved survival. Resuscitation technique may improve outcomes after severe liver injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, level III.

The Open Abdomen

BACKGROUND Considering new guidelines for retrievable inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs), we examine our initial experience after establishing a comprehensive filter removal program in our level 1 trauma center. We evaluated the technical and financial feasibility of this program and barriers to IVCF retrieval, including insurance status and costs, in trauma patients. METHODS Trauma patients receiving IVCFs from May 2011 to 2013 were consented and prospectively enrolled in the study program. Retrieval rates were assessed for the years before study initiation. Primary outcome was IVCF retrieval. Hospital financial data for retrieval were examined and univariate analysis performed. Hospital cost-to-charge and payment-to-charge ratios were assessed. RESULTS Before study initiation from April 2009 to 2011, 66 IVCFs were placed in trauma patients with only 2 retrievals in 2 years. During the study period, 247 trauma patients had IVCF placement of which 111 (45%) were enrolled. The main reason for nonenrollment was lack of referral by the implanting team. Retrieval was attempted in 100 outpatients with success in 85 (85%). Patients enrolled in the program were more likely to have their filters removed (73% vs. 18%; odds ratio, 12.6; 95% confidence interval, 6.6-24.3; P < 0.001). Mean time from placement to attempt was 6.2 ± 4.0 months (range, 0.5-31.8). Of the total attempts, 29% were nonresource patients, 11% had Medicaid, and 60% had commercial insurance including Medicare patients. Chances of successful retrieval were higher if performed later during the study (P = 0.03). Successful retrieval was not related to insurance status (P = not significant). The mean total hospital charges related to retrieval were

8: SIMPLE, RELIABLE SEPSIS SCREENING TOOL IMPROVES MORTALITY IN TRAUMA PATIENTS

4,493 (range,

The effect of damage control laparotomy on major abdominal complications: A matched analysis

2,510-

Acute cholecystitis in the sick patient

9,106). Successful retrieval contributed to lower total charges (P < 0.01). Factors contributing to higher total charges were retrieval attempt later in study period (P = 0.01) and commercial insurance status (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The rate of IVCF placement in trauma patients increased 4-fold over 4 years. The rate of IVCF retrieval increased more than 14-fold during the same period after establishment of the retrieval program. Elective outpatient retrieval of IVCFs in all eligible trauma patients is financially feasible without loss to the health care system even in regions with high rates of uninsured. A major barrier to successful filter retrieval was lack of patient referral into the program by implanting physicians. Hospital administration and physician outreach are important determinants of successful IVCF retrieval in trauma patients.