Rosa Burgers
Boston Children's Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rosa Burgers.
The Journal of Urology | 2013
Rosa Burgers; Suzanne M. Mugie; Janet Chase; Christopher S. Cooper; Alexander von Gontard; Charlotte Siggaard Rittig; Yves Homsy; Stuart B. Bauer; Marc A. Benninga
PURPOSE We present a consensus view of members of the International Childrens Continence Society (ICCS) together with pediatric gastroenterologists, experts in the field of functional gastrointestinal disorders, on the management of functional constipation in children with lower urinary tract symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS Discussions were held by the board of the ICCS and a multidisciplinary core group of authors was appointed. The draft document review process was open to all ICCS members via the website. Feedback was considered by the core authors and, by agreement, amendments were made as necessary. RESULTS Guidelines on the assessment, and pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of functional constipation in children with lower urinary tract symptoms are outlined. CONCLUSIONS The final document is not a systematic literature review. It includes relevant research when available, as well as expert opinion on the current understanding of functional constipation in children with lower urinary tract symptoms. The document is intended to be clinically useful in primary, secondary and tertiary care settings.
The Journal of Urology | 2013
Rosa Burgers; Tom P.V.M. de Jong; Marloes Visser; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf; Marc A. Benninga
PURPOSE We assessed the prevalence of functional defecation disorders, such as functional constipation and functional nonretentive fecal incontinence, in children referred to a tertiary pediatric urology outpatient clinic for lower urinary tract symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the charts of 4 to 17-year-old patients evaluated due to lower urinary tract symptoms. All patients received a standardized bowel questionnaire and physical examination. We assessed the prevalence of pediatric functional defecation disorders according to Rome III criteria. Transabdominal ultrasound was performed to measure rectal diameter with a diameter of greater than 3 cm considered to indicate a rectal fecal mass. RESULTS We analyzed the records of 113 patients, including 50 boys, with a median age of 8 years (IQR 6-10) who had lower urinary tract symptoms. Of the patients 46 had dysfunctional voiding and 38 had urge incontinence/overactive bladder. Rome III criteria for functional constipation and functional nonretentive fecal incontinence were fulfilled by 47% and 11% of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms, respectively. Children with dysfunctional voiding were more likely to fulfill the criteria for functional constipation than those with urge incontinence and other urological disorders (63% vs 42% and 28%, respectively, p = 0.009). Children with urge incontinence more likely fulfilled the criteria for functional nonretentive fecal incontinence than those with dysfunctional voiding and other urological disorders (21% vs 2.2% and 10%, respectively, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS More than 50% of children with lower urinary tract symptoms evaluated at a tertiary referral center fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for functional defecation disorders. We recommend evaluating bowel habits as part of the initial assessment of a child who presents with urological symptoms. Future studies of the effect on urological symptoms of treating functional defecation disorders are justified.
The Journal of Urology | 2010
Rosa Burgers; Olivia Liem; Stephen Canon; Hayat Mousa; Marc A. Benninga; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Stephen A. Koff
PURPOSE We investigated the effect of rectal distention on lower urinary tract function. MATERIALS AND METHODS Children were assigned to a constipation and lower urinary tract symptoms group or to a lower urinary tract symptoms only group. The definition of constipation was based on pediatric Rome III criteria. Standard urodynamics were done initially and repeated during simultaneous barostat pressure controlled rectal balloon distention and after balloon deflation. We evaluated the effects of rectal balloon inflation and deflation on urodynamic parameters. Colonic transit time measurement, anorectal manometry and the Parenting Rating Scale of child behavior were also used. RESULTS We studied 7 boys and 13 girls with a median age of 7.5 years who had constipation and lower urinary tract symptoms, and 3 boys and 3 girls with a median age of 7.5 years who had lower urinary tract symptoms only. Urodynamic patterns of response to rectal distention were inhibitory in 6 children and stimulatory in 12, and did not change in 8. In 54% of the cases balloon deflation reversed balloon inflation changes while in 46% balloon inflation changes persisted or progressed. No significant differences were noted in children with vs without constipation and no clinical symptom or diagnostic study predicted the occurrence, direction or degree of bladder responses. CONCLUSIONS In almost 70% of children with lower urinary tract symptoms rectal distention significantly but unpredictably affected bladder capacity, sensation and overactivity regardless of whether the children had constipation, and independent of clinical features and baseline urodynamic findings. Urodynamics and management protocols for lower urinary tract symptoms that fail to recognize the effects of rectal distention may lead to unpredictable outcomes.
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2012
Rosa Burgers; Alon D. Levin; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf; Marc A. Benninga
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prevalence of pediatric functional defecation disorders (FDD) using the Rome III criteria and to compare these data with those obtained using Rome II criteria. STUDY DESIGN A chart review was performed in patients referred to a tertiary outpatient clinic with symptoms of constipation and/or fecal incontinence. All patients received a standardized bowel questionnaire and physical examination, including rectal examination. The prevalence of pediatric FDD according to both Rome criteria sets was assessed. RESULTS Patients with FDD (n = 336; 61% boys, mean age 6.3 ± 3.5 SD) were studied: 39% had a defecation frequency ≤ 2/wk, 75% had fecal incontinence, 75% displayed retentive posturing, 60% had pain during defecation, 49% passed large diameter stools, and 49% had a palpable rectal fecal mass. According to the Rome III criteria, 87% had functional constipation (FC) compared with only 34% fulfilling criteria for either FC or functional fecal retention based on the Rome II definitions (P < .001). Of the patients with a rectal fecal mass, 95% would also have been correctly identified as having FC without a rectal examination. Twenty-nine patients (11%) fulfilled the criteria for functional nonretentive fecal incontinence according to both the Rome II and Rome III criteria. CONCLUSION The pediatric Rome III criteria for FC are less restrictive than the Rome II criteria. The Rome III criteria are an important step forward in the definition and recognition of FDD in children.
The Journal of Urology | 2013
Rosa Burgers; Tom P.V.M. de Jong; Marc A. Benninga
PURPOSE We investigate 2 diagnostic tests to assess the rectal filling state. MATERIALS AND METHODS The rectal filling state was assessed with transabdominal ultrasound or with digital rectal examination by 2 independent investigators in children with urological problems before a scheduled diagnostic or surgical urological procedure. A dilated rectum filled with stool or large amounts of (usually) hard stool were both considered as a rectal fecal mass. All investigations were performed with the patient under general anesthesia. The kappa test was used to evaluate agreement between transabdominal ultrasound and digital rectal examination. RESULTS A total of 84 children (54 boys) with a median (p25-p75) age of 9.0 years (6.4-11) were eligible candidates. A rectal mass was found on transabdominal ultrasound and digital rectal examination in 32% and 41% of all children, respectively, with agreement between the 2 tests in 82.5%. Cohens kappa showed good agreement of 0.62 (95% CI 0.45-0.79) between transabdominal ultrasound and digital rectal examination. The median (IQR) diameter of the rectum was 3.3 cm (2.8-3.9) in children with a full rectum, and 2.5 cm (1.8-2.8) and 2.0 cm (1.5-2.2) in patients with a half filled and empty rectum, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Transabdominal ultrasound is a noninvasive and reliable alternative to assess the rectal filling state, and might replace digital rectal examination in the evaluation of children with constipation.
Neurogastroenterology and Motility | 2012
Olivia Liem; Rosa Burgers; F. L. Connor; Marc A. Benninga; S.N. Reddy; Hayat Mousa; C. Di Lorenzo
Background Solid‐state (SS) manometry catheters with portable data loggers offer many potential advantages over traditional water‐perfused (WP) systems, such as prolonged recordings in a more physiologic ambulatory setting and the lack of risk for water overload. The use of SS catheters has not been evaluated in comparison with perfused catheters in children. This study aims to compare data provided by SS and WP catheters in children undergoing colonic manometry studies.
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition | 2013
Suzanne M. Mugie; Maria E. Perez; Rosa Burgers; Elizabeth Hingsbergen; Jaya Punati; Hayat Mousa; Marc A. Benninga; Carlo Di Lorenzo
Objective: In adults, colonic manometry and colonic scintigraphy are both valuable studies in discriminating normal and abnormal colonic motility. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield and tolerability of colonic manometry and colonic scintigraphy in children with severe constipation. Methods: Twenty-six children (mean age 11.4 years, 77% boys) who had received colonic manometry and colonic scintigraphy as part of a colonic motility evaluation were included. Manometry was performed as per department protocol. After swallowing a methacrylate-coated capsule containing indium-111, images were taken at 4, 24, and 48 hours, and geometric centers were calculated. Results of both tests were categorized in 3 groups: normal, abnormal function in the distal part of the colon, and colonic inertia. Cohen &kgr; was used for the level of agreement. Patients and parents completed a questionnaire regarding their experience. Results: Colonic scintigraphy showed normal transit time in 20%, delay in the distal colon in 48%, and colonic inertia in 32% of patients. Colonic manometry was normal in 40%, abnormal in the distal colon in 40%, and colonic inertia was diagnosed in 20%. The &kgr; score was 0.34. All 5 patients with colonic inertia during manometry had a similar result by scintigraphy. Eighty-eight percent of patients preferred scintigraphy over manometry and 28% of parents preferred colonic manometry over scintigraphy. Conclusions: Colonic manometry and colonic scintigraphy have a fair agreement regarding the categorization of constipation. Scintigraphy is well tolerated in pediatric patients and may be a useful tool in the evaluation of children with severe constipation.
Acta Paediatrica | 2012
Rosa Burgers; Elvira Bonanno; Elisa Madarena; Francesca Graziano; Licia Pensabene; William Gardner; Hayat Mousa; Marc A. Benninga; Carlo Di Lorenzo
Aim: To investigate and compare the approach to childhood constipation by primary care physicians (PCP) in three Western countries to give insight into adherence to current guidelines and in actual care.
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition | 2009
Rosa Burgers; Marc A. Benninga
Fecal incontinence is defined as the passage of stools in an inappropriate place at least once per month, for a minimum period of 2 months. This frustrating symptom is a source of considerable distress and embarrassment for the child and the family. According to the Rome III criteria fecal incontinence can be subdivided into constipation-associated fecal incontinence and functional nonretentive fecal incontinence. This short review mainly addresses functional nonretentive fecal incontinence in children. Definition, prevalence, pathophysiology, and recent updates on treatment and long-term follow-up of fecal incontinence are discussed.
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition | 2014
Olivia Liem; Rosa Burgers; F. L. Connor; Marc A. Benninga; Hayat Mousa; C. Di Lorenzo
Objectives: Colonic manometry is a test used in the evaluation of children with defecation disorders unresponsive to conventional treatment. The most commonly reported protocol in pediatrics consists of a study that lasts approximately 4 hours. Given the wide physiological variations in colonic motility throughout the day, longer observation may detect clinically relevant information. The aim of the present study was to compare prolonged colonic manometry studies in children referred for colonic manometry with the more traditional short water-perfused technology. Methods: Colonic manometry studies of 19 children (8 boys, mean age 9.4 ± 0.9, range 3.9–16.3) with severe defecation disorders were analyzed. First, a “standard test” was performed with at least 1-hour fasting, 1-hour postprandial, and 1-hour postbisacodyl provocation recording. Afterwards, recordings continued until the next day. Results: In 2 of the 19 children, prolonged recording gave us extra information. In 1 patient with functional nonretentive fecal incontinence who demonstrated no abnormalities in the short recording, 2 long clusters of high-amplitude contractions were noted in the prolonged study, possibly contributing to the fecal incontinence. In another patient evaluated after failing use of antegrade enemas through a cecostomy, short recordings showed colonic activity only in the most proximal part of the colon, whereas the prolonged study showed normal motility over a larger portion of the colon. Conclusions: Prolonged colonic measurement provides more information regarding colonic motor function and allows detection of motor events missed by the standard shorter manometry study.