Rosalia Emma
University of Catania
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rosalia Emma.
Internal and Emergency Medicine | 2018
Massimo Caruso; Jaymin B. Morjaria; Rosalia Emma; Maria Domenica Amaradio; Riccardo Polosa
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory multifactorial disorder of the airways characterized by the involvement of immune cells and mediators in its onset and maintenance. Traditional therapeutic strategies have been unsatisfactory in controlling the underlying pathology, especially in the more severe states. Hence in the last couple of decades, new biological approaches targeting molecular mediators have been developed. In this narrative review we examine biological agents currently available for the management of severe asthma, focusing our attention on their clinical application, pros and cons, and in particular on gaps regarding the use of these agents. The most well-known and used biologic agent in clinical practice is omalizumab, though there is emerging evidence for mepolizumab too. The future of these biological therapies is to broaden our knowledge of their practical use and ascertain predictive biomarkers, or define an algorithm, useful in the optimal application of these ‘biological weapons’.
International Immunopharmacology | 2018
Massimo Caruso; Fabio Cibella; Rosalia Emma; Davide Campagna; Giovanni Tringali; Maria Domenica Amaradio; Riccardo Polosa
ABSTRACT Prevalence of allergic diseases is increasing worldwide. Allergen‐specific immunotherapy (ASIT) is potentially the only curative treatment for allergy, but there is a lack of reliable methods to monitor the immune responses to ASIT and to predict clinical efficacy. Recently, the definition of allergen sensitivity threshold (CD‐Sens) by Basophil Activation Tests has been suggested as potential method in this context. The aim of this study was to compare trends of CD‐Sens, measured by the markers CD63 and CD203c, and clinical symptoms in subjects with allergic rhinitis receiving Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT). 26 rhinitis patients allergic to Parietaria were selected and matched into two groups; a SLIT treated group (SG) and a reference group (RG) treated by traditional anti‐allergic medications. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for the four cardinal symptoms of rhinitis and peripheral blood was collected before the first dose of SLIT (T0) and after 12months (T12) to define the severity of the symptoms and the sensitivity of basophils to Parietaria. The comparison between T0 and T12 in SG patients showed a significant decrease of symptom severity (VAS score) and an increased tolerability of basophils to Parietaria (CD‐Sens) both by CD63 and CD203c. But, only CD203c seems to be correlated with the clinical symptoms. These data corroborate the hypothesis that SLIT could change the immunological course of allergic sensitization already in the first year, and that an immunological parameter as CD‐Sens measured by CD63 and CD203c expression on stimulated basophils could be useful to monitor the changes in the immune system. HIGHLIGHTSThere is a lack of methods to predict the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy.The basophils threshold sensitivity by CD63/CD203c could be useful to this purpose.The marker CD203c seems to better related to clinical outcomes in allergic rhinitis.Allergen immunotherapy reduces the basophils sensitivity already in the first year.
American Journal of Physiology-lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology | 2016
Rosalia Emma; Massimo Caruso; Riccardo Polosa
to the editor: We read with great interest the article by Martin et al. ([3][1]) about potential effects of e-vapor exposure on gene expression and we have some observations. It is important to draw attention to the definitions and selection criteria of participants in the three study groups,
Trials | 2014
Riccardo Polosa; Salvatore Bellinvia; Massimo Caruso; Rosalia Emma; Angela Alamo; Marek L. Kowalski; Christian Domingo
BackgroundPatients with chronic severe asthma (CSA) have a crippling disease and current available treatments are not satisfactory. Thus, management of CSA remains a major unmet need. Although the evidence from existing randomized controlled trials fails to support a definite role for immunomodulatory drugs in these patients due to major methodologic drawbacks, findings with low-dose methotrexate (MTX) are encouraging. However, larger and well-designed clinical trials are required to establish the beneficial role of MTX in CSA, and for the detection of the key characteristics of those who are going to respond to this drug.Methods/designPatients will be recruited from the accessible asthmatic patients lists of tertiary referral centers. All patients will meet the stringent diagnostic criteria for CSA, including the requirement for the regular use of Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention Step 5 medications (oral prednisone and/or omalizumab). The experimental design of the proposed study will take the form of a double-blind parallel-randomized placebo-controlled trial consisting of a total of eight visits, including run-in and run-out periods. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either MTX or a matched placebo once a week as an add-on therapy to their existing medication after run-in. Physiological, laboratory and clinical assessments will be measured regularly throughout the study and compared with baseline assessments.DiscussionWe expect that MTX will reduce Step 5 medications dosage in patients with CSA without compromising the overall disease control. Improvement in several indicators of asthma severity and control will be also investigated.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02124226 (assigned 25 April 2014).
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports | 2018
Jaymin B. Morjaria; Massimo Caruso; Rosalia Emma; Cristina Russo; Riccardo Polosa
Purpose of ReviewTo evaluate the impact of allergic rhinitis (AR) on the development of asthma and to update readers on recent literature suggesting that early treatment of allergic subjects with immunotherapy may prevent asthma onset.Recent FindingsAR is frequently associated with asthma, leading to the concept that these two conditions are different aspects of the same disease. There is increasing evidence that AR precedes the onset of asthmatic symptoms and current treatment strategies are beneficial in symptom control with no impact prevention. There is limited knowledge about the risk factors responsible for the progression of AR to asthma, though recent data supports the notion that it is possible to prevent asthma onset by allergen immunotherapy.SummaryDespite significant advances in specific immunotherapy (SIT) therapy strengthening its efficacy in AR and possible prevention of progression to asthma, the adoption of this therapeutic strategy is still restricted in comparison to therapies directed towards treatment of AR symptoms. Unlike corticosteroids and other symptomatic therapies, the benefit of SIT treatment in allergic individuals has been shown to prevent the development of allergic conditions. Hence, large well-conducted randomized clinical trials with long-term efficacy of SIT are required to confirm or refute the concept that SIT may abrogate the progression of AR to asthma in patients.
Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease | 2018
Rosalia Emma; Jaymin B. Morjaria; Virginia Fuochi; Riccardo Polosa; Massimo Caruso
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition involving the airways with varying pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical symptoms and outcomes, generally controlled by conventional therapies including inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists. However, these therapies are unable to successfully control symptoms in about 5–10% of severe asthma patients. Atopic asthma, characterized by high immunoglobulin (Ig)E or eosinophilia, represents about 50% of asthmatic patients. Interleukin (IL)-5 is the main cytokine responsible of activation of eosinophils, hence therapeutic strategies have been investigated and developed for clinical use. Biologics targeting IL-5 and its receptor (first mepolizumab and subsequently, reslizumab and benralizumab), have been recently approved and used as add-on therapy for severe eosinophilic asthma resulting in a reduction in the circulating eosinophil count, improvement in lung function and exacerbation reduction in asthma patients. Despite these biologics having been approved for stratified severe asthma patients that remain uncontrolled with high doses of conventional therapy, a number of patients may be eligible for more than one biologic. Presently, the lack of head-to-head studies comparing the biological agents among themselves and with conventional therapy make the choice of optimal therapy for each patient a challenge for clinicians. Moreover, discontinuation of these treatments, implications for efficacy or adverse events, in particular in long-term treatment, and needs for useful biomarkers are still matters of debate. In this review we evaluate to date, the evidence on mepolizumab that seems to demonstrate it is a well-tolerated and efficacious regimen for use in severe eosinophilic asthma, though more studies are still required.
PLOS ONE | 2018
Rosalia Emma; Aruna T. Bansal; Johan Kolmert; Craig E. Wheelock; Swen-Erik Dahlen; Matthew J. Loza; Bertrand De Meulder; Diane Lefaudeux; Charles Auffray; Barbro Dahlén; Per Bakke; Pascal Chanez; Stephen J. Fowler; Ildiko Horvath; Paolo Montuschi; Norbert Krug; Marek Sanak; Thomas Sandström; Dominick Shaw; Louise Fleming; Ratko Djukanovic; Peter H. Howarth; Florian Singer; Ana R. Sousa; Peter J. Sterk; Julie Corfield; Ioannis Pandis; Kian Fan Chung; Ian M. Adcock; Rene Lutter
Oxidative stress is believed to be a major driver of inflammation in smoking asthmatics. The U-BIOPRED project recruited a cohort of Severe Asthma smokers/ex-smokers (SAs/ex) and non-smokers (SAn) with extensive clinical and biomarker information enabling characterization of these subjects. We investigated oxidative stress in severe asthma subjects by analysing urinary 8-iso-PGF2α and the mRNA-expression of the main pro-oxidant (NOX2; NOSs) and anti-oxidant (SODs; CAT; GPX1) enzymes in the airways of SAs/ex and SAn. All the severe asthma U-BIOPRED subjects were further divided into current smokers with severe asthma (CSA), ex-smokers with severe asthma (ESA) and non-smokers with severe asthma (NSA) to deepen the effect of active smoking. Clinical data, urine and sputum were obtained from severe asthma subjects. A bronchoscopy to obtain bronchial biopsy and brushing was performed in a subset of subjects. The main clinical data were analysed for each subset of subjects (urine-8-iso-PGF2α; IS-transcriptomics; BB-transcriptomics; BBr-transcriptomics). Urinary 8-iso-PGF2α was quantified using mass spectrometry. Sputum, bronchial biopsy and bronchial brushing were processed for mRNA expression microarray analysis. Urinary 8-iso-PGF2α was increased in SAs/ex, median (IQR) = 31.7 (24.5–44.7) ng/mmol creatinine, compared to SAn, median (IQR) = 26.6 (19.6–36.6) ng/mmol creatinine (p< 0.001), and in CSA, median (IQR) = 34.25 (24.4–47.7), vs. ESA, median (IQR) = 29.4 (22.3–40.5), and NSA, median (IQR) = 26.5 (19.6–16.6) ng/mmol creatinine (p = 0.004). Sputum mRNA expression of NOX2 was increased in SAs/ex compared to SAn (probe sets 203922_PM_s_at fold-change = 1.05 p = 0.006; 203923_PM_s_at fold-change = 1.06, p = 0.003; 233538_PM_s_at fold-change = 1.06, p = 0.014). The mRNA expression of antioxidant enzymes were similar between the two severe asthma cohorts in all airway samples. NOS2 mRNA expression was decreased in bronchial brushing of SAs/ex compared to SAn (fold-change = -1.10; p = 0.029). NOS2 mRNA expression in bronchial brushing correlated with FeNO (Kendal’s Tau = 0.535; p< 0.001). From clinical and inflammatory analysis, FeNO was lower in CSA than in ESA in all the analysed subject subsets (p< 0.01) indicating an effect of active smoking. Results about FeNO suggest its clinical limitation, as inflammation biomarker, in severe asthma active smokers. These data provide evidence of greater systemic oxidative stress in severe asthma smokers as reflected by a significant changes of NOX2 mRNA expression in the airways, together with elevated urinary 8-iso-PGF2α in the smokers/ex-smokers group. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov—Identifier: NCT01976767
Frontiers in Physiology | 2018
Massimo Caruso; Giovanni Li Volti; Pio Maria Furneri; Virginia Fuochi; Rosalia Emma; Riccardo Polosa
Citation: Caruso M, Li Volti G, Furneri PM, Fuochi V, Emma R and Polosa R (2018) Commentary: Inflammatory and Oxidative Responses Induced by Exposure to Commonly Used e-Cigarette Flavoring Chemicals and Flavored e-Liquids without Nicotine. Front. Physiol. 9:1240. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01240 Commentary: Inflammatory and Oxidative Responses Induced by Exposure to Commonly Used e-Cigarette Flavoring Chemicals and Flavored e-Liquids without Nicotine
European Respiratory Journal | 2018
Massimo Caruso; Rosalia Emma; Virginia Fuochi; Pio Maria Furneri; Riccardo Polosa
We read with great interest the research article by Miyashita et al. [1], in which the authors showed that e-cigarette aerosol emissions increase platelet-activating factor receptor (PAFR) expression and, consequently, Streptococcus pneumoniae adhesion to human airway epithelial cells. These findings led authors to conclude that e-cigarette use has the potential to increase susceptibility to pneumococcal infection. Unfortunately, the evidence presented in the paper is inadequate to provide much confidence in this conclusion. E-cigarette vapour enhances pneumococcal adherence to airway epithelial cells under “abnormal” conditions of exposure http://ow.ly/O9J030keaYe
European Respiratory Journal | 2017
Massimo Caruso; Rosalia Emma; Paul Brinkman; Peter J. Sterk; Aruna T. Bansal; Bertrand De Meulder; Diane Lefaudeux; Charles Auffray; Stephen J. Fowler; Nicholas J. W. Rattray; Giorgio Pennazza; Per Bakke; Pascal Chanez; Ildikò Horvàrth; Norbert Krug; Paolo Montuschi; Marek Sanak; Thomas Sandström; Dominick Shaw; Kian Fan Chung; Ratko Djukanovic; Florian Singer; Ana R. Sousa; Sven Erik Dahlén; Johan Kolmert; Hans Weda; Teunis Johannes Vink; Hugo Knobel